Primary Family Caregivers' Reasons for Disclosing Versus Not Disclosing a Cancer Diagnosis in India

Development of a question prompt list for Indian cancer patients receiving radiation therapy treatment and their primary family caregivers

AIM

We aimed to develop two question prompt lists (QPLs), one for Indian cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy and the second for their primary family caregivers.

METHODS

The study comprised three phases: (1) qualitative interviews with patients (n = 65) and PFCs (n = 39) to identify their information needs, queries and concerns regarding RT; (2) development of draft QPLs using conventional content analysis and translation into Hindi and Marathi using European Organisation Research and Treatment of Cancer guidelines; and, (3) A readability analysis, and acceptability study with patients (n = 22), PFCs (n = 26) and Radiation Oncology (RO) staff (n = 20) exploring barriers to QPL implementation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Analysis in Phase I identified questions patients and PFCs asked or wanted to ask their physician. A list of 125 and 136 questions were generated for patients and PFCs, respectively. After five iterations, the draft QPLs were finalised, translated, and back-translated from English into Hindi and Marathi (Phase II). In Phase III, most patients and PFCs reported the QPLs were easy to read, they did not find it difficult to ask the questions, and the questions were not emotionally upsetting. Conversely, RO staff reported concerns that patients may find it difficult to discuss the questions with their physician.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the need to empower patients and PFCs to ask questions and for staff to feel comfortable answering them. Implementing physician-endorsed QPLs could achieve these aims.

Experiences of prognosis disclosure versus nondisclosure among family caregivers of persons with advanced cancer

Caregiving in the South Asian context is often assumed by family automatically for the person with cancer (PWC). In this paper, we applied the disclosure decision-making model (DD-MM) to understand the motives behind cancer prognosis disclosure (or not) by caregivers to the PWC. Fifty caregivers participated in semi-structured interviews; and data were analyzed using Framework Approach. For the disclosing caregivers, some of the themes that emerged were consistent with the DD-MM framework while others were not. In particular, the theme "recipient assessment" was part of the DD-MM framework, while others such as unmet communication needs, caregiver self-reflection, and family support were outside of the framework. In contrast, for the non-disclosing caregivers, the reasons for nondisclosure fit very concisely into the DD-MM framework, particularly with information assessment, recipient assessment, and (non) disclosure efficacy. This study has significant implications for development of communication skills trainings around holding family meetings in India.

Empowering families to take on a palliative caregiver role for patients with cancer in India: Persistent challenges and promising strategies

BACKGROUND

The population of patients with cancer requiring palliative care (PC) is on the rise in India. Family caregivers will be essential members of the care team in the provision of PC.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to characterize provider perspectives of the challenges that Indian families face in taking on a palliative caregiving role.

METHOD

Data for this analysis came from an evaluation of the PC-PAICE project, a series of quality improvement interventions for PC in India. We conducted 44 in-depth semi-structured interviews with organizational leaders and clinical team members at seven geographically and structurally diverse settings. Through thematic content analysis, themes relating to the caregivers' role were identified using a combination of deductive and inductive approaches.

RESULT

Contextual challenges to taking up the PC caregiving role included family members' limited knowledge about PC and cancer, the necessity of training for caregiving responsibilities, and cultural preferences for pursuing curative treatments over palliative ones. Some logistical challenges include financial, time, and mental health limitations that family caregivers may encounter when navigating the expectations of taking on the caregiving role. Strategies to facilitate family buy-in for PC provision include adopting a family care model, connecting them to services provided by Non-Governmental Organizations, leveraging volunteers and social workers to foster PC awareness and training, and responding specifically to family's requests.

CONCLUSION

Understanding and addressing the various challenges that families face in adopting the caregiver role are essential steps in the provision and expansion of PC in India. Locally initiated quality improvement projects can be a way to address these challenges based on the context.

Treatment-related communication experiences and expectations among Indian cancer patients receiving radiation therapy and their family members: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To explore Indian cancer patients' and their primary family caregivers' (PFC) experiences and expectations of treatment-related communication with their physician while undergoing radiation therapy.

METHODS

Participants, comprising patient-PFC dyads (n = 32), patients only (n = 33) and PFC only (n = 7), were recruited from one hospital in Mumbai, India. Semi-structured interviews explored participants' perceived role in cancer-related decision-making, diagnosis and prognosis communication experiences with the physician, communication expectations of their treating physician, and information needs. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using the framework approach.

RESULTS

Main themes included: (i) patients' passive role in treatment communication, (ii) family as an integral part of the medical consultation, and (iii) dyads' expectations and beliefs about the role of the physician.

CONCLUSION

Indian cancer patients played a passive role in treatment decision-making while physicians were seen as primary medical decision-makers. Further, PFCs provided the final consent for the treatment plan and acted as a mediator/moderator between the patient-physician.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These findings suggest the need for (i) interventions such as question prompt lists that may improve patient activation and caregiver preparedness, and (ii) triadic communication training interventions for optimal communication between the three stakeholders (i.e., patient, physician and PFC).

Experiences of barriers to self-monitoring and medication-management among Indian patients with type 2 diabetes, their primary family-members and physicians

OBJECTIVES

This study explored the subjective accounts of the main barriers to self-monitoring of blood-glucose (SMBG) and medication-management among Indian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), their primary family-members (PFMs) and physicians.

METHODS

Using convenience sampling, patients with T2DM, their PFMs, and physicians, residing in a South Indian capital city, were recruited for semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (female = 14; mean age = 42.5 years) and their PFMs (female = 38; mean age = 39 years), and 25 physicians (female = 4; mean age = 49.8 years) were recruited. Three superordinate themes were identified: (i) complex medication-regimen: confusion, forgetting and reduced motivation, (ii) family recommendations of alternative therapies due to the social pressures of avoiding stigma, intrusiveness and being misrepresented for injecting insulin, and (iii) an expensive illness: choosing to spend money on only medication.

DISCUSSION

Implications of the findings highlight the need to (i) train physicians in communication and empathy skills, (ii) empower patients to communicate their barriers to physicians through triadic communication models and question-prompt lists, (iii) educate communities on the benefits of insulin for managing T2DM to reduce stigma, and (iv) equip communities with information about health insurance to address the financial toll of T2DM management.

Understanding and Supporting Informal Cancer Caregivers

Informal caregivers invest a significant amount of time and effort to provide cancer patients with physical, psychological, information, and social support. These challenging tasks can harm their own health and well-being, while a series of social-ecological factors may also influence the outcomes of cancer caregiving. Several instruments have been developed to help clinicians and researchers understand the multi-dimensional needs and concerns of caregivers. A growing body of evidence indicates that supportive interventions including psychoeducation, skills training, and therapeutic counseling can help improve the burden, information needs, coping strategies, physical functioning, psychological well-being, and quality of life of caregivers. However, there is difficulty in translating research evidence into practice. For instance, some supportive interventions tested in clinical trial settings are regarded as inconsistent with the actual needs of caregivers. Other significant considerations are the lack of well-trained interdisciplinary teams for supportive care provision and insufficient funding. Future research should include indicators that can attract decision-makers and funders, such as improving the efficient utilization of health care services and satisfaction of caregivers. It is also important for researchers to work closely with key stakeholders, to facilitate evidence dissemination and implementation, to benefit caregivers and the patient.

End of life of the cancer patient: patient, family and physician perceptions

Chronic diseases such as cancer have imposed challenges on health systems. Colombia has worked on the construction and implementation of a legal framework for palliative care, but a comprehensive approach to the care provided to cancer patients at the end of their lives is still lacking. Such an approach should be based on understanding of the perceptions of its different actors in order to allow for adequate decision-making and improved support during this stage. Currently, the infrastructure to provide adequate oncological support is insufficient, the administrative procedures that patients and families have to go through to get authorization for treatments and medications for symptom relief are overwhelming and, many times, costs must be paid out of pocket. On the other hand, it is important to train healthcare personnel to develop communication skills to approach patients from a place of compassion, personal development and reflection, creating spaces in which patients can speak openly about their wishes, fears and worries, even if they come together with the desire to accelerate the end of life. In addition, healthcare staff should support and initiate conversations about life and the end of life between patients and their families if this communication is complicated, given its importance for healthcare, quality of life and death. This article seeks to reflect on the end of life of the cancer patient from the perceptions of the actors involved, namely, patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals.

Prognostic disclosure in cancer care: a systematic literature review

Background:

Collusion in cancer care is the diplomatic concealment of information between a triad of the health care professional (HCP), patient, and caregiver. Free and expressive communication is determined by multiple factors, which establishes a healthy balance between ‘patient-centric’ and ‘family-centric’ decision making. The lack of a universal approach to prognostic disclosure techniques emphasizes the need for a systematic review of contemporary practice.

Methods:

A systematic review of the literature was conducted till June 2020 using themes based on cancer, communication, prognostic disclosure, and collusion by using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results:

Fifty-three studies involving 10,569 subjects were studied for their utility on prognostic disclosure using different communication methods and interfaces. Twenty-three studies used a face-to-face interview with subjects while in-person telephonic interviews were conducted in two studies, 16 studies implicated semi-structured questionnaires, and 6 studies mentioned the development of a new technique/tool for disclosure. The duration of a session for prognosis-disclosure ranged from 22 min to 1 h. The involvement of palliative care specialists and mental health professionals was limited during the disclosure of the prognosis.

Conclusion:

The findings of the review indicate that patients in cancer care are aware of their diagnosis and to a certain extent of prognosis despite nondisclosure by their family members and treating teams. This review emphasizes the assessment of ‘disclosure wishes’ among patients and caregivers in separate interviews rather than simply relying on one specific method of interviewing. The nonconfrontational approach and training among HCPs are of utmost importance to build therapeutic resilience among the treating team involved in cancer care. Since many factors such as family wishes, cultural dissonance, medical model, and patient perception could become barriers to prognostic disclosure, there is a need to develop a universal approach to prognostic disclosure and handling associated collusion.

Demonstrating the importance of cultural considerations at end of life utilizing the perspective of Indian patients with cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to understand Indian cancer patients' hopes and beliefs about the end of life, particularly focusing on how this informed their preferences regarding end-of-life treatment. In India, individuals' lives are mainly guided by culturally driven practices of doing right by one's family and believing death is predetermined.

METHODS

Indian patients (25) diagnosed with advanced incurable cancer and aware of their prognosis participated in semi-structured interviews exploring their hopes as they approached the end of life. The interview also sought to understand patients' views and beliefs about do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and euthanasia. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.

RESULTS

Two major themes were identified: (i) a desire for living or dying comprising sub-themes of perceptions of current responsibilities, and having a fighting spirit versus feelings of despair, and (ii) God was the ultimate decision-maker of life and death. Furthermore, patients understood that a do-not-resuscitate order meant euthanasia and responded accordingly. Some patients reported hoping for death due to the pain and resultant suffering. However, patients did not talk about euthanasia openly, instead choosing to describe it within a larger framework of life and death.

CONCLUSIONS

Indian patients reaching the end of life valued their family responsibilities which determined their desire to live or die. However, all patients believed that God decided on their life and death. It is important to consider cultural perspectives on DNR or euthanasia and to address patients' pain management needs towards the end of life.

Oncologists' experience with discussing cancer prognosis with patients and families: perspectives from India

Nondisclosure of prognosis of advanced cancer is commonly practiced in some Asian cultures including India; but research is limited. To describe experiences of Indian oncologists in discussing cancer prognosis with people with cancer and their caregivers, with a focus on barriers and facilitators of prognostic discussions. Thirty oncologists practicing in South India, Hyderabad participated in semi-structured interviews; and analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Barriers included system-level, patient-level, and physician-level challenges as obstructions to open and honest interactions around cancer prognosis. Most of the barriers focused on communication-related challenges. Lack of communication skills training for providers coupled with over-reliance on use of euphemisms, hesitation in communicating with "weak" patient, and struggles to establish healthcare proxy described communication-related barriers. The study also described factors including family involvement in cancer care and empathic communication as facilitators of honest and open communication about prognosis. In particular, rapport building and getting to know the patient, use of empathic communication, engaging in gradual and individualized disclosure, and balancing hope with honesty were communication-related facilitators that aid open communication with patients with cancer and their caregivers about prognosis and plan of care. Results provide implications for development of communication skills trainings for oncology physicians in India. Adapting, delivering, and evaluating existing communication skills training programs, particularly around discussions of prognosis and goals of care is a requisite step for providing patient-centered and supportive care to patients with cancer and their caregiving families.

Indian patient use of cancer euphemisms: Association with psychological outcomes and health behaviours

OBJECTIVE

Euphemisms may be used to reduce the threat associated with the word "cancer." Cancer may be particularly threatening in Indian culture due to the myths surrounding its cause and prognosis. This study explored the prevalence of euphemism use by Indian patients and the relationship among euphemism use and illness cognitions, affect, health behaviour, and spontaneous self-affirmation (a behaviour associated with dealing with threat).

METHODS

In total, 350 cancer patients in India were recruited to take part in a study exploring patients' experiences of, and thoughts about, having an illness. They responded to a questionnaire measuring illness perceptions, coping strategies, anxiety, depression, health behaviours, and spontaneous self-affirmation. Patients were asked what words they used to describe their illness; euphemism users were those who used a euphemism (ie, non-medical term) as a first word.

RESULTS

About 51% of patients used a euphemism as a first word. Those with less education, unskilled employment, a lower income, and more children were more likely to be euphemism users. Euphemism users reported (a) weaker illness perceptions (less personal control, greater reporting of symptoms, and less understanding of their condition), (b) less use of 3 of 14 coping strategies, (c) less likelihood of spontaneously self-affirming, and (d) fewer healthy eating days.

CONCLUSIONS

Euphemism use in patients was not related to distress but was related to negative illness perceptions and use of fewer coping strategies, suggesting that we need further study about the extent to which euphemisms signal issues in psychological adaptation to cancer diagnosis.