The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Lymphedema Life Impact Scale in Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Rasch validation and refinement of the Lymphedema Life Impact Scale version 2 in an Italian cohort with secondary lymphedema

PURPOSE

To produce and validate an Italian version of the Lymphedema Life Impact Scale version 2 (LLISv2-It), a tool measuring the impact of lymphedema on health-related quality of life, and investigate its main psychometric characteristics.

METHODS

After translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the LLISv2, we administered it to 156 subjects with secondary lymphedema (upper or lower limb), together with (depending on the limb involved) either the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) or the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). We analyzed the performance of LLISv2-It using Classical Test Theory and Rasch methods.

RESULTS

Cronbach alpha was 0.89. Item fit statistics indicated that item #12 was underfitting (Infit MnSQ = 1.56; Outfit MnSq = 1.75). Test-retest reliability of the 17-item version (without item #18, not scored, according to the original authors) and of a 16-item version (without #12 and #18-a unidimensional item set) were both excellent (ICC2.1 = 0.93; 95%). The minimum detectable change was 8.9 points. The correlation of LLISv2-It with DASH and LEFS was r = 0.81 and -0.57, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian version of the LLISv2 is reliable and valid. To make the tool more psychometrically sound, we recommend to not calculate items #12 and #18 in the total score.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Lymphedema Life Impact Scale (LLISv2) is particularly useful as a validated condition-specific health-related quality of life measure for patients with chronic edema/lymphedema. We have validated its Italian version (LLISv2-It).We also examined the psychometric properties of the LLISv2 in individuals with secondary lymphedema of either upper or lower limb, using both classical test theory and Rasch techniques, to provide insights for further refinement of the questionnaire.Based on our results, we recommend not to count item #12 in the total score (besides #18, as already suggested by the original authors). Moreover, we determined that the minimum detectable change of the LLISv2 was 9 points. This information is helpful in clinical practice to understand if the change in score is not due to chance (measurement error).Although further research is warranted, the present validation study of the LLISv2 increases the confidence in the metric quality and clinical utility of the scale to assess lymphedema-specific health-related quality of life in individuals with secondary lymphedema of either upper or lower limb.

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the pregnancy exercise self-efficacy scale

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to adapt the Pregnancy Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (P-ESES) into Turkish, investigate its reliability and validity in Turkish pregnant women, and obtain a validated tool in order to assess the exercise self-efficacy during pregnancy.

METHODS

A total of 138 pregnant women participated in the present study. For the translation of the P-ESES into Turkish (P-ESES-T), a six-phase process was followed. The psychometric properties of the P-ESES-T were analyzed in respect of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and criterion validity. To assess the validity of the P-ESES-T, the associations between the P-SES-T and the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ), the Sensewear Pro3 Armband (n = 31), and the Exercise Barries/Benefits Scale (EBBS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability for the P-ESES-T total score was found to be very strong (ICCs: 0.986, p < 0.001). Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.899. There were strong correlations between the total scores of the P-ESES-T and PPAQ, and EBBS (r = 0.780, r = 0.874; p < 0.001). However, no significant correlations were found between the total number of steps and energy expenditure obtained from the physical activity monitor and the P-ESES-T (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The P-ESES-T is a reliable and valid tool that can be used to evaluate exercise self-efficacy, which is an important factor that affects exercise participation during pregnancy.

Psychometric Properties of Quality of Life Questionnaires for Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review

Backgrounds: Assessing quality of life (QoL) using a well-developed and validated questionnaire is an essential part of a breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) treatment. However, a QoL questionnaire with the best psychometric properties is so far unknown. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the questionnaires measuring the QoL of patients with BCRL. Methods: A thorough search was performed to identify published studies in electronic databases such as Medline (via Ovid), EBSCOhost, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, on 8 February 2022, by using search terms as follows: ‘quality of life’; ‘breast cancer’; ‘upper limb’; ‘lymphedema’; ‘questionnaire’; and ‘measurement properties.’ Two reviewers conducted article selection, data extraction, and quality assessment independently. The third reviewer helped solve any possible disagreements between the two reviewers. The COSMIN checklist and manual were used to assess the quality of included studies. Results: A total of nineteen articles with nine questionnaires were included and assessed using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Most studies only assessed content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity. Lymph-ICF-UL showed the most ‘sufficient’ and ‘high’ quality of evidence ratings for its measurement properties. Conclusion: The most appropriate questionnaire for use based on our assessment is Lymph-ICF-UL.

An important tool in lymphedema management: validation of Turkish version of the lymphedema breast cancer questionnaire

PURPOSE

This study aimed to perform the psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version of the Lymphedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire (LBCQ).

METHODS

Patients with BCRL (n = 50) received a Turkish version of the following measurement tools: Lymphedema Functioning, Disability, and Health Questionnaire (Lymph-ICF), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (Quick DASH), LBCQ and Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI-20). Patients without BCRL (n = 50) completed only the Turkish LBCQ. Psychometric properties were analyzed with internal consistency, test-retest reliability, ROC analysis, criterion, and discriminant validity.

RESULTS

The internal consistency of the Turkish LBCQ was strong (Cronbach's α coefficient >0.60). Test-retest reliability was also very strong (intraclass correlation coefficients from 0.79 to 1; p < 0.001). Criterion validity was supported by a moderate correlation of LBCQ with volumetric measurement, skinfold thickness, and questionnaires (Lymph-ICF, UEFI, and Quick DASH) (p < 0.05) via the ROC analysis, the cut-off point was found as "6" in distinguishing individuals with lymphedema and those without. There were significant differences in LBCQ total and subscale scores between participants with and without BCRL (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study clinically confirmed the validity, reliability, and applicability of the Turkish LBCQ in the Turkish population. LBCQ will enable the early detection of lymphedema and will save the country financially with early diagnosis.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe LBCQ was successfully translated, adapted, and validated into the Turkish language.Turkish version of the LBCQ was found to be reliable and valid to evaluate the signs and symptoms of lymphedema in Turkish women with breast cancer.By using LBCQ, rehabilitation professionals can detect lymphedema at an early stage, reduce the cost of lymphedema treatment and prevent the development of advanced lymphedema in their clinics.

Upper limb sensory evaluations and ultrasonographic skin measurements in breast cancer-related lymphedema receiving complex decongestive physiotherapy

Purpose

The aims of this study were to investigate if/how the presence of lymphedema affects the sensation of the upper limb and to assess whether complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP) has a favorable impact on sensory testing.

Methods

A total of 27 patients with unilateral stage 2 breast cancer–related lymphedema (BCRL) were included in the study. Bilateral circumferential measurements were taken with a tape measure at different levels. Based on these measurements, limb volumes were determined by summing segment volumes derived from the truncated cone formula. Circumferential measurements and ultrasonographic evaluations (epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous fat thicknesses) were performed at 10 cm distal to the elbow crease. The Semmes–Weinstein monofilament (SWM), static and moving two-point discrimination, pressure pain threshold (PPT), and tactile localization tests were also applied at the same site. After an initial evaluation, all patients underwent CDP phase 1 program. All the evaluations were repeated at the end of the treatment period.

Results

Before CDP, affected sides had significantly higher values than the unaffected sides in terms of SWM (p < 0.001), static (p = 0.002) and moving (p = 0.011) two-point discrimination, PPT (p = 0.001), and tactile localization (p < 0.001) values. After CDP, SWM (p = 0.002), static (p = 0.009) and moving (p = 0.024) two-point discrimination, PPT (p = 0.014), and tactile localization (p < 0.001) values decreased significantly on the affected sides.

Conclusion

BCRL seems to reduce light touch, static and moving two-point discrimination, PPT, and tactile localization sensations, whereas CDP seems to improve these sensory perceptions in women with BCRL. Ultrasonographic measurements also appear to be promising for prompt and convenient follow-up in the management of BCRL.

Trial registration

Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04296929 (date of registration: March 5, 2020)

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and COSMIN Analysis

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema is a chronic and debilitating condition that affects many cancer survivors. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can give valuable insight into the impact of lymphedema on a patient's quality of life and can play an essential role in treatment decisions. This study aims to (1) identify PROMs used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with lymphedema; and (2) assess the quality of the lymphedema-specific PROMs.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search to identify articles on lymphedema, quality of life, and PROMs. An overview was created of all PROMs used to assess HRQoL in patients with lymphedema. The methodological quality of the lymphedema-specific PROMs was assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 235 articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 200 described studies using one or more PROMs as an outcome measure in patients with lymphedema. The other 35 studies described the development and/or validation of a lymphedema-specific PROM. The COSMIN assessment demonstrated that none of these PROMs met all quality standards for development.

CONCLUSION

The use of PROMs in lymphedema is increasing; however, based on our findings, we cannot fully support the use of any of the existing instruments. A well-developed lymphedema-specific PROM, based on patient input, is needed to gain better insight into the impact of this condition, and can be used to measure the effect of possible medical and surgical treatments.

Self-reported questionnaires for lymphoedema: a systematic review of measurement properties using COSMIN framework

INTRODUCTION

Lymphoedema may develop as a result of numerous genetic and traumatic causes; however, treatment for cancer is the most common cause of its development in more economically developed nations. This systematic review critically appraised, compared and summarised the measurement properties of lymphoedema-specific self-reported questionnaires (SRQs) measuring various patient-reported outcomes including quality of life (QOL), function, morbidity, and symptoms.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched to identify studies of the measurement properties of SRQs. Two review teams independently evaluated the quality of the individual studies using the risk of bias tool from the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). Measurement properties of the SRQs presented in the studies were then rated. Study level ratings were summarised for an SRQ if they were reported in multiple studies, and their overall quality of the evidence were then graded.

RESULTS

Forty articles, reporting on 19 SRQs were identified from 8615 records. The focus of the 19 SRQs included eight on QOL, four on symptoms, two on function, and two on impairment. The other three SRQs were on illness perception, self-efficacy, and patient-relevant treatment benefit, respectively. Eight and three SRQs were upper limb and lower limb-specific, respectively, whereas seven questionnaires were for both upper and lower limb lymphoedema. One SRQ was developed for head and neck lymphoedema. According to the COSMIN framework, none of the SRQs reviewed had sufficient evidence to support all nine measurement properties. In lower limb questionnaires, the LYMQOL-leg has sufficient content, structural, and construct validity as well as internal consistency and reliability. For upper limb lymphoedema questionnaires, the Lymph-ICF-UL had sufficient content and construct validity as well as reliability.

CONCLUSION

LYMQOL-leg SRQ is recommended with confidence for evaluation of QOL of people with lower limb lymphoedema while the Lymph-ICF-UL is recommended for evaluation of the QOL of the breast cancer-related lymphoedema with some confidence. In view of the high level of the indeterminate ratings of the measurement properties of the existing SRQs, further research is desirable.