1
|
Knopp-Sihota JA, MacGregor T, Nuspl M, Reeves J, Kennedy M. Healthcare aide-focused interventions to improve pain management in long-term care homes: A systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2023; 104:104808. [PMID: 36137462 DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pain is common in long-term care residents. We examined the effectiveness of interventions involving healthcare aides that aim to manage pain for these residents. DESIGN A systematic review which follows PRISMA reporting guidelines. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS We examined controlled trials and intervention studies that included long-term care residents aged ≥60 years who received interventions to reduce chronic pain. Interventions were either delivered by healthcare aides at the resident level or were directed at healthcare aides to improve their pain management practices for residents. METHODS We searched 7 databases to identify relevant studies. After screening 400 articles, we reviewed 131 full-text articles and included them if they reported a pain management intervention and measured pain with a standardized pain scale. Data were synthesized narratively. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool. RESULTS In total, 9 studies were examined in the narrative review. Six studies described pain interventions involving education, new pain protocols and/or new assessment tools delivered to healthcare aides. Three studies described pain interventions delivered by healthcare aides to residents, which included a new incontinence care routine, light touch massage, and a bathing intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Interventions involving healthcare aides may be beneficial to pain management for long-term care residents as they have the potential to reduce residents' pain and improve both pain assessment and reporting practices. Further research is warranted on specific elements that contribute to an improvement in residents' pain and to the overall role of healthcare aides care of residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Knopp-Sihota
- Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) Program, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, 1 University Drive, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | - Tara MacGregor
- Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) Program, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Megan Nuspl
- Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) Program, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer Reeves
- Research in Elder Care (TREC) Program, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Megan Kennedy
- Public Services Librarian, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Doupe M, Brunkert T, Wagg A, Ginsburg L, Norton P, Berta W, Knopp-Sihota J, Estabrooks C. SCOPE: safer care for older persons (in residential) environments-a pilot study to enhance care aide-led quality improvement in nursing homes. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:26. [PMID: 35115053 PMCID: PMC8812152 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-00975-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nursing home residents require daily support. While care aides provide most of this support they are rarely empowered to lead quality improvement (QI) initiatives. Researchers have shown that care aide-led teams can successfully participate in a QI intervention called Safer Care for Older Persons in Residential Care Environments (SCOPE). In preparation for a large-scale study, we conducted a 1-year pilot to evaluate how well coaching strategies helped teams to enact this intervention. Secondarily, we measured if improvements in team cohesion and communication, and resident quality of care, occurred. Methods This study was conducted using a prospective single-arm study design, on 7 nursing homes in Winnipeg Manitoba belonging to the Translating Research in Elder Care research program. One QI team was selected per site, led by care aides who partnered with other front-line staff. Each team received facilitated coaching to enact SCOPE during three learning sessions, and additional support from quality advisors between these sessions. Researchers developed a rubric to evaluate how well teams enacted their interventions (i.e., created actionable aim statements, implemented interventions using plan-do-study-act cycles, and used measurement to guide decision-making). Team cohesion and communication were measured using surveys, and changes in unit-level quality indicators were measured using Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set data. Results Most teams successfully enacted their interventions. Five of 7 teams created adequate-to-excellent aim statements. While 6 of 7 teams successfully implemented plan-do-study-act cycles, only 2 reported spreading their change ideas to other residents and staff on their unit. Three of 7 teams explicitly stated how measurement was used to guide intervention decisions. Teams scored high in cohesion and communication at baseline, and hence improved minimally. Indicators of resident quality care improved in 4 nursing home units; teams at 3 of these sites were scored as ‘excellent’ in two or more enactment areas, versus 1 of the 3 remaining teams. Conclusions Our coaching strategies helped most care aide-led teams to enact SCOPE. Coaching modifications are needed to help teams more effectively use measurement. Refinements to our evaluation rubric are also recommended. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-022-00975-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm Doupe
- Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
| | - Thekla Brunkert
- University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, Basel, Switzerland.,Nursing Science (INS), Department Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Wagg
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Liane Ginsburg
- School of Health Policy & Management, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter Norton
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Whitney Berta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Carole Estabrooks
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pringle J, Mellado ASAV, Haraldsdottir E, Kelly F, Hockley J. Pain assessment and management in care homes: understanding the context through a scoping review. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:431. [PMID: 34275442 PMCID: PMC8286436 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02333-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Internationally, 2–5% of people live in residential or nursing homes, many with multi-morbidities, including severe cognitive impairment. Pain is frequently considered an expected part of old age and morbidity, and may often be either under-reported by care home residents, or go unrecognized by care staff. We conducted a systematic scoping review to explore the complexity of pain recognition, assessment and treatment for residents living in care homes, and to understand the contexts that might influence its management. Methods Scoping review using the methodological framework of Levac and colleagues. Articles were included if they examined pain assessment and/or management, for care or nursing home residents. We searched Medline, CINAHL, ASSIA, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar; reference lists were also screened, and website searches carried out of key organisations. Conversations with 16 local care home managers were included to gain an understanding of their perspective. Results Inclusion criteria were met by 109 studies. Three overarching themes were identified: Staff factors and beliefs - in relation to pain assessment and management (e.g. experience, qualifications) and beliefs and perceptions relating to pain. Pain assessment – including use of pain assessment tools and assessment/management for residents with cognitive impairment. Interventions - including efficacy/effects (pharmaceutical/non pharmaceutical), and pain training interventions and their outcomes. Overall findings from the review indicated a lack of training and staff confidence in relation to pain assessment and management. This was particularly the case for residents with dementia. Conclusions Further training and detailed guidelines for the appropriate assessment and treatment of pain are required by care home staff. Professionals external to the care home environment need to be aware of the issues facing care homes staff and residents in order to target their input in the most appropriate way. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02333-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Pringle
- Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | | | | | - Fiona Kelly
- School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, East Lothian, UK
| | - Jo Hockley
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Joy JA, Novosel LM, Ren D, Engberg S. Effect of a QI Intervention on Nursing Assistants' Pain Knowledge and Reporting Behavior. Pain Manag Nurs 2020; 22:150-157. [PMID: 32747173 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain among long-term care residents is often underdiagnosed and inadequately treated. We examined the effect of a multimodal intervention on certified nursing assistants' pain recognition knowledge and verbal reporting behavior. Secondarily, we examined pain documentation in a newly established pain log compared with pain verbally reported to nurses and documented in the electronic health record (EHR). DESIGN Quality improvement project using a pretest-posttest design. SETTING A skilled nursing and rehabilitation facility in Southwestern Pennsylvania including two long-term care units and one transitional rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS Fifty-six nursing assistants. METHODS The intervention was a face-to-face educational session with a training video and introduction of a new pain log used to document residents' pain. Pain knowledge was measured before and after the educational intervention. Multiple measures were used to examine nursing assistants' pain reporting. RESULTS Nursing assistants' pain knowledge improved (p < .001). There was no change in verbal pain reporting behaviors. The percent of pain episodes documented in the electronic health record that were reported to nurses varied by unit type (45% on the long-term care units vs. 100% on the rehabilitation unit) but remained unchanged postintervention. Pain logs were used more often on the rehabilitation than the long-term care units; use was low overall. Nursing assistant reports that nurses provided feedback on their reports of resident pain increased from 45% in week 1 to 75% in week 4. CONCLUSIONS Although the multimodal intervention improved nursing assistants' pain knowledge and their perceptions of the feedback they received from nurses when they reported pain, it had no effect on certified nursing assistants reporting of pain to nurses (per nurse report).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dianxu Ren
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sandra Engberg
- Health Promotion and Development, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Omissions of Care in Nursing Home Settings: A Narrative Review. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21:604-614.e6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
6
|
Effect of an Educational and Organizational Intervention on Pain in Nursing Home Residents: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2019; 19:1118-1123.e2. [PMID: 30471802 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether an intervention based on education and professional support to nursing home (NH) staff would decrease the number of residents with a pain complaint, and to determine whether the intervention would improve pain management. DESIGN Nonrandomized controlled trial. NHs were nonrandomly allocated either to a strong intervention group consisting in audit, feedback, and collaborative work on quality indicators with a hospital geriatrician, or to a light intervention group (LIG) consisting in audit and feedback only. SETTING One hundred fifty-nine NHs located in France. PARTICIPANTS A subgroup of 3722 residents. MEASURES Information on pain complaint and pain-related covariates at the resident-related and at the NH level were recorded by NH staff at baseline and 18 months later. These covariates were included in a mixed-effects logistic regression on resident's pain complaint. Pain management was compared between intervention groups by chi-square tests. RESULTS A greater reduction of residents with a pain complaint after the strong intervention (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.53, 0.90) and a better pain management (47.6% gold standard, vs 30.6% in the LIG, P < .001) than controls. CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS Combining educational and organizational measures, evaluating pain as a patient-reported outcome and as a process endpoint, and implementing a broad-spectrum intervention were original approaches to improve quality of care in NHs. Our results support nonspecific, collaborative, educational, and organizational interventions in NHs to decrease residents' pain complaint and improve pain management.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ginsburg L, Easterbrook A, Berta W, Norton P, Doupe M, Knopp-Sihota J, Anderson RA, Wagg A. Implementing Frontline Worker-Led Quality Improvement in Nursing Homes: Getting to "How". Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2018; 44:526-535. [PMID: 30166036 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite emerging frameworks for quality improvement (QI) implementation, little is known about how the implementation process works, particularly in nursing home settings. A study was conducted to describe "how"' a complex frontline worker-led QI program was implemented in nursing homes. METHODS Six focus groups were conducted in February 2017 with participants of a year-long, multicomponent, unit-level QI intervention in seven nursing homes in the Canadian province of Manitoba. Constant comparative analysis was used to examine perspectives of different groups of QI program participants-35 health care aides, health professionals, and managers. RESULTS Five themes important to the implementation process were identified: (1) "supportive elements of the QI program structure," (2) "navigating the workplace," (3) "negotiating relationships," (4) "developing individual skills," and (5) "observable program impact." Data on theme integration suggest that "supportive elements of the QI program structure" (Theme 1), "developing individual skills" (Theme 4), and "observable program impact" (on residents, health care aides, and leaders; Theme 5) operated as part of a reinforcing feedback loop that boosted team members' ability to navigate the workplace, negotiate relationships, and implement the QI program. CONCLUSION Health care aide-led QI teams are feasible. However, a leadership paradox exists whereby worker-led QI programs also must incorporate concrete mechanisms to promote strong leadership and sponsor support to teams. The findings also point to the underexplored impact of interpersonal relationships between health care aides and professional staff on QI implementation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Krein SL, Harrod M, Collier S, Davis KK, Rolle AJ, Fowler KE, Mody L. A national collaborative approach to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections in nursing homes: A qualitative assessment. Am J Infect Control 2017; 45:1342-1348. [PMID: 28807424 PMCID: PMC5828510 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Revised: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing health care-associated infections (HAIs), such as catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), is a critical performance improvement target in nursing homes. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Long-term Care: Health Care-Associated Infections/Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection, a national performance improvement program, was designed to promote implementation of a CAUTI prevention program through state-based or regional collaboratives in more than 500 nursing homes across the United States. METHODS Qualitative interviews were conducted with 8 purposefully selected organizational leads (who led implementation activities for a group of facilities) and 8 facility leads (who led implementation activities at a given facility) to understand implementation successes and challenges and experiences of participants involved in the program. Key themes were identified using a rapid analysis approach. RESULTS Key themes related to general perceptions, changes due to program participation, and factors influencing program implementation were identified. In general, the program was viewed positively by organizational and facility leads with changes in catheter care practices, staff empowerment, and improvements in knowledge identified as benefits. Implementation challenges included the time required for program start-up as well as issues with staff and physician support, logistic barriers, and staffing turnover. CONCLUSIONS Despite some challenges, the observed program success and positive views of those participating suggest that collaboratives are an important strategy for providing nursing homes with enhanced expertise and support to prevent HAIs and ensure resident safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Krein
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI; Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Molly Harrod
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Sue Collier
- Health Research and Educational Trust, American Hospital Association, Chicago, IL
| | - Kristina K Davis
- Health Research and Educational Trust, American Hospital Association, Chicago, IL
| | - Andrew J Rolle
- Health Research and Educational Trust, American Hospital Association, Chicago, IL
| | - Karen E Fowler
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Lona Mody
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI; Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Quasdorf T, Bartholomeyczik S. Influence of leadership on implementing Dementia Care Mapping: A multiple case study. DEMENTIA 2017; 18:1976-1993. [PMID: 28984156 DOI: 10.1177/1471301217734477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Dementia Care Mapping is an internationally applied method for enhancing person-centred care for people with dementia in nursing homes. Recent studies indicate that leadership is crucial for the successful implementation of Dementia Care Mapping; however, research on this topic is rare. This case study aimed to explore the influence of leadership on Dementia Care Mapping implementation in four nursing homes. Twenty-eight interviews with project coordinators, head nurses and staff nurses were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Nursing homes that failed to implement Dementia Care Mapping were characterised by a lack of leadership. The leaders of successful nursing homes promoted person-centred care and were actively involved in implementation. While overall leadership performance was positive in one of the successful nursing homes, conflicts related to leadership style occurred in the other successful nursing homes. Thus, it is important that leaders promote person-centred care in general and Dementia Care Mapping in particular. Furthermore, different types of leadership can promote successful implementation. Trial registration of the primary study: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN43916381.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Quasdorf
- Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen e.V. (DZNE), Germany; Department für Pflegewissenschaft, Universität Witen/Herdecke, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|