Rates of Nursing Errors and Handoffs-Related Errors in a Medical Unit Following Implementation of a Standardized Nursing Handoff Form

Designing and Validating an Evidence-Based, Shift-to-Shift Handover Bundle for Nurses and Physicians

This article reports a study aimed at developing and validating an evidence-based, shift-to-shift handover bundle for nurses and physicians to be used at shift changes in intensive care and emergency units. Deficient or absent clinical handovers, or failures to transfer information, responsibility, and accountability can have unwanted consequences for hospitalized patients, particularly those at critical areas. Clinical handovers are practiced every day, in many ways, in all institutional health care settings. Despite increasing demand for structured processes to guide clinical handovers, standardized handover bundles for nurses and physicians are limited in the emergency and intensive care unit. As a result of this study, a shift-to-shift handover bundle was created, which was an evidence-based research design. This bundle is expected to be helpful for proper patient transfers between these critical areas, ensuring patient safety and efficient quality management.

Educational interventions for improving nursing shift handovers: A systematic review

AIM

This study analyzed the components of educational interventions for handovers among nursing students and nurses.

BACKGROUND

A handover is a communication process that occurs when patient care responsibilities and rights are transferred from one nurse to another. This process is important in nursing to ensure the continuity of nursing care and patient safety.

DESIGN

A systematic literature review of Korean and international studies was conducted to identify the components of handover educational programs for nursing students and nurses and analyze their effects, thereby providing a basis for the further development of these programs.

METHODS

Studies published in English or Korean no later than June 30, 2022, were found via an electronic database search using the MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases. Three reviewers independently evaluated all the studies. These studies focused on educational interventions for nursing students and nurses regarding covering shift-to-shift nursing handovers. After reviewing 1971 extracted articles, 18 satisfied the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Nine articles involved nursing students and nine involved nurses. Four articles covered bedside handovers as educational topics. Educational methods included lectures and active practice. Active practice comprised demonstrations, role-play, and feedback. The main content areas of the educational programs were an introduction to handovers; training regarding how to extract important information for handovers; and strategies using informatic and thematic structures, such as mnemonics, and concept mapping. The patient cases for role-play were provided in forms of written scenarios, virtual electronic charts, videos, scenario-based simulated situations, and actual patient cases assigned in clinical practice. The effects of the educational interventions were evaluated regarding knowledge, performance, and self-efficacy. Performance and self-efficacy were significantly higher in a study in which the intervention group was provided additional individual feedback compared to the control group and in a study in which the intervention group received multiple additional practice opportunities.

CONCLUSIONS

Handover education for nursing students and nurses should include individual feedback, demonstrations, and opportunities to practice to improve their performance and self-efficacy. Feedback methods should be further developed to increase the effectiveness of educational programs. Sample cases involving patients should be devised to increase these opportunities, and methods for improving educator efficiency should be identified.

Systematic Review of Quality Improvement Projects Related to Intershift Nursing Handover

BACKGROUND

Nursing handover is a real-time process in which patient-specific information is passed between nurses to ensure the continuity and safety of patient care.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of quality improvement (QI) projects in improving the intershift nursing handover process.

METHODS

A computerized search was performed of electronic databases for articles published during 2009-2019 in English or Korean for which the full texts were available. The included studies involved QI projects, handover between nurses, and intershift handover. The QI-MQCS (Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set) was used to appraise the quality of QI strategies.

RESULTS

The handover methods used in the 22 QI projects could be broadly divided into 2 types: (1) using a standardized communication tool; and (2) involving patient-participation bedside handover.

CONCLUSIONS

The published research on intershift handover-related QI projects employed standardized communication tools and the patient-participation bedside handover method to reduce adverse events and handover times and increase the satisfaction of patients and nurses. Future studies should measure the changes in patient safety-related outcomes.

Handover in Nursing: A Concept Analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The broad use of the term handover to describe any activity involving the transfer of professional responsibility from one person to another has led to an ambiguous understanding. Recently, handover has become a process central to the delivery of high-quality and safe patient care. The aim of this analysis was to clarify the concept of handover within the context of nursing practice.

METHODS

Rodgers's evolutionary approach was used as the analysis method along with some aspects of the dimensional analysis guided by Caron and Bowers, to understand the perspectives of senders and receivers.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed four attributes of handover: transfer of information, interaction for disambiguation, process, and strategy. Handover is defined as a process for transferring responsibility from sender to receiver through communication through the transfer of information, the interaction for disambiguation, and the context-sensitive strategy for accomplishing the continuity and safety of patient care. The salient dimension of handover was process, and the sub-dimensions were transfer of information, interaction for disambiguation, and strategy. From the sender's perspectives, it is the process of transferring information organized by the sender, and from the receiver's perspective, handover is the process establishing care plan through interactive strategy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The definition and identified attributes serve as a heuristic for designing strategies and further developing the construct of handover in nursing.

Improving Patient Throughput With an Electronic Nursing Handoff Process in an Academic Medical Center: A Rapid Improvement Event Approach

OBJECTIVE

Rush University Medical Center nursing leadership undertook a process improvement project to revamp nursing handoff during unit transfer with the goal of improving patient throughput. The aim was to decrease assign-to-occupy time, the duration from bed assignment to bed occupancy.

BACKGROUND

There was a lengthy lag time in admitting/transferring patients, leading to delays in patient throughput and potential threats to patient safety. In fiscal year 2016, assign-to-occupy time averaged 97 minutes. The goal was to decrease that time to 60 minutes or less.

METHODS

Process improvement leaders held a rapid improvement event to determine viable solutions. A team then standardized handoff workflow; created an electronic tool, virtually eliminating verbal report; and implemented a new handoff process.

RESULTS

Assign-to-occupy time at 1 year after go-live averaged 55 minutes, and it has been staying less than 60 minutes since the implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Key success strategies included engaging stakeholders during the rapid improvement event, imploring frontline nurses to create and promote the revised process to facilitate staff engagement, and leveraging electronic health records.

A systematic review on the structured handover interventions between nurses in improving patient safety outcomes

AIM

This review aimed to elucidate the effectiveness of structured handovers in improving patient outcomes in the wards.

BACKGROUND

Studies have reported that the lack of quality handovers is one of the main causes of adverse effects.

EVALUATION

A search over six electronic databases: MEDLINE; CINAHL; Web of Science; EMBASE; Scopus; and CENTRAL via Ovid concluded nine studies and synthesized by two independent reviewers based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was used to guide the undertaking of this review and meta-analysis. All studies published up to February 2019 were considered in this review.

KEY ISSUES

This review has demonstrated that structured handovers reduced the incidences of patient complications, medication errors and general adverse events. However, the results were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Current structured handover formats were effective in reducing problematic handovers such as omission of information, inaccurate information and documentation errors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT

Although there is limited high-quality and rigorous research conducted to gain a clearer understanding of the impacts on patient-related outcomes in nursing care, structured handovers remained effective in reducing the number of mistakes in information transfer.

Improving Throughput for Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department: Implementation of a Standardized Report Process

BACKGROUND

Inefficient emergency department to inpatient handoff processes can contribute to delayed care.

LOCAL PROBLEM

The average emergency department length of stay for admitted patients and admission wait times at this institution were well above national averages, and a standard handoff process was lacking.

METHODS

Lean methodology was used to evaluate flow and identify opportunities for improvement.

INTERVENTIONS

Two tools were developed to standardize handoff.

RESULTS

Emergency department length of stay and admission wait times were not significantly improved following intervention implementation. However, patient transfer time decreased significantly (P < .01, F = 29.02) from 30.5 minutes (SD = 18.2) to 21.7 minutes (SD = 7.4). The length of time to give/receive report also decreased significantly (P = .04, F = 2.2) from 3.8 (SD = 1.6) minutes to 2.8 (SD = 1.2) minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although length of stay and admission wait times did not decline significantly, implementation of standard work and tools can potentially improve patient flow.

An Evidence-Based, Nursing Handover Standard for a Multisite Public Hospital in Switzerland: Web-Based, Modified Delphi Study

BACKGROUND

Ineffective communication procedures create openings for errors when health care professionals fail to transfer complete, consistent information. Deficient or absent clinical handovers, or failures to transfer information, responsibility, and accountability, can have severe consequences for hospitalized patients. Clinical handovers are practiced every day, in many ways, in all institutional health care settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to design an evidence-based, nursing handover standard for inpatients for use at shift changes or internal transfers between hospital wards.

METHODS

We carried out a modified, multiround, web-based, Delphi data collection survey of an anonymized panel sample of 264 nurse experts working at a multisite public hospital in Switzerland. Each survey round was built on responses from the previous one. The surveys ended with a focus group discussion consisting of a randomly selected panel of participants to explain why items for the evidence-based clinical nursing handover standard were selected or not selected. Items had to achieve a consensus of ≥70% for selection and inclusion.

RESULTS

The study presents the items selected by consensus for an evidence-based nursing handover standard for inpatients for use at shift changes or internal transfers. It also presents the reasons why survey items were or were not included.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified Delphi survey method enabled us to develop a consensus- and evidence-based nursing handover standard now being trialed at shift changes and the internal transfers of inpatients at our multisite public hospital in Switzerland.

Patient Handoff Processes: Implementation and Effects of Bedside Handoffs, the Teach-Back Method, and Discharge Bundles on an Inpatient Oncology Unit

BACKGROUND

Bedside handoffs, the teach-back method, and discharge bundles have been shown to contribute to empowering patients to actively engage in their treatment.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to identify patient activation scores, patient readmission rates, and nursing staff satisfaction before and after implementing bedside handoffs, the teach-back method, and discharge bundles on an inpatient oncology unit at a large military treatment facility.

METHODS

A series of three cycles using the Plan-Do-Study-Act framework guided implementation of the multifaceted approach. Patient activation scores, readmission rates, staff satisfaction, and anecdotal feedback from patients and nursing staff were collected prior to and following implementation.

FINDINGS

The sample of patients with cancer had high patient activation scores. After implementation of the multifaceted approach, readmission rates decreased from 32% to 25%, and staff satisfaction improved.

Using Kotter's Change Framework to Implement and Sustain Multiple Complementary ICU Initiatives

This article describes the planning, implementation, and outcomes of 2 complementary quality initiatives, bedside handoff and nurse-initiated interdisciplinary bedside rounds, in a 24-bed medical/surgical intensive care unit. Systematic approaches such as Kotter's change model and unit-based champions were used to redesign care processes and standardize daily communication and workflows. Active partnership with the patient and the family during these changes promoted a strong intensive care unit culture of patient- and family-centered care.

Standardizing Handoff Communication: Content Analysis of 27 Handoff Mnemonics

This study synthesizes information contained in 27 mnemonics to identify what information should be communicated during a handoff. Clustering and content analysis resulted in 12 primary information clusters that should be communicated. Given the large amount of information identified, it would be beneficial to use a structured handoff communication tool developed using a participatory approach. In addition, we recommend local standardization of information communicated during handoffs with variation across settings.