NNP education in neonatal end-of-life care: a needs assessment

Describing Nurses' Work and Educational Needs in Providing Neonatal Palliative Care: A Narrative Review

Nurses in NICUs report insufficient education as a persistent barrier to providing quality neonatal palliative care (NPC). Since existing literature on educational interventions in NPC is limited, this review aimed to identify and narratively synthesize literature both about nurses' attitudes toward NPC and the NPC education received by nurses. We conducted a nonsystematic narrative literature review. Four themes were identified from the 28 articles included in this review. These were as follows: (a) nursing work in NPC, (b) NICU nurses' experiences and perceptions of NPC, (c) facilitators and barriers to nursing work in NPC, and (d) educational interventions in NPC. This literature review identified studies about NICU nurses' experiences and education in providing NPC. NICU nurses both desired and lacked education in NPC. This literature review identifies the importance of developing and evaluating NPC education for nurses.

Caring for Dying Infants: A Systematic Review of Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives of Neonatal Palliative Care

Objectives:

The palliative and hospice care movement has expanded significantly in the United States since the 1960s. Neonatal end of life care, in particular, is a developing area of practice requiring healthcare providers to support terminally ill newborns and their families, to minimize suffering at the end of the neonate’s life. This paper seeks to systematically summarize healthcare providers’ perspectives related to end of life, in order to identify needs and inform future directions.

Methods:

Informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we systematically reviewed the literature discussing healthcare provider perspectives of neonatal end of life care ranging from year 2009 to 2020. To be included in the review, articles had to explicitly focus on perspectives of healthcare providers toward neonatal end of life care, be published in academic peer-reviewed sources, and focus on care in the United States.

Results:

Thirty-three articles were identified meeting all inclusion criteria. The literature covers, broadly, provider personal attitudes, experiences delivering care, practice approaches and barriers, and education and training needs. The experiences of physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses are highlighted, while less is discussed of other providers involved with this work (e.g., social work, physical therapy).

Conclusion:

Future research should focus on developing and testing interventions aimed at training and supporting healthcare providers working with neonates at end of life, as well as addressing barriers to the development and implementation of neonatal palliative teams and guidelines across institutions.

A simulation based difficult conversations intervention for neonatal intensive care unit nurse practitioners: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Neonatal nurse practitioners are often the front line providers in discussing unexpected news with parents. This study seeks to evaluate whether a simulation based Difficult Conversations Workshop for neonatal nurse practitioners leads to improved skills in conducting difficult conversations.

Methods

We performed a randomized controlled study of a simulation based Difficult Conversations Workshop for neonatal nurse practitioners (n = 13) in a regional level IV neonatal intensive care unit to test the hypothesis that this intervention would improve communication skills. A simulated test conversation was performed after the workshop by the intervention group and before the workshop by the control group. Two independent blinded content experts scored each conversation using a quantitative communication skills performance checklist and by assigning an empathy score. Standard statistical analysis was performed.

Results

Randomization occurred as follows: n = 5 to the intervention group, n = 7 to the control group. All participants were analyzed in each group. Participation in the simulation based Difficult Conversations Workshop increases participants’ empathy score (p = 0.015) and the use of communication skills (p = 0.013) in a simulated clinical encounter.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that a lecture and simulation based Difficult Conversations Workshop for neonatal nurse practitioners improves objective communication skills and empathy in conducting difficult conversations.