Patient, Provider, and System Factors Contributing to Patient Safety Events During Medical and Surgical Hospitalizations for Persons With Serious Mental Illness

Evaluation of Warfarin Use in Patients With Mental Health Conditions in a Rural Community Health Center System

Background: Mental health conditions (MHCs) may affect a patient's ability to comply with requirements necessary for safe warfarin use. Objective: To describe warfarin control, defined as time in therapeutic range (TTR), for patients with and without MHCs receiving care through a pharmacist-driven anticoagulation service within a rural community health center system. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients on warfarin between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017. The primary study endpoint was TTR. Secondary endpoints were the number of international normalized ratios (INRs) per 30 days, percentage of INRs within, above, and below target range, and warfarin-related adverse events. Results: A total of 79 patients were included-37 with and 42 without MHCs. Patients were mostly male (n = 47; 59.5%) and prescribed warfarin for atrial fibrillation (n = 45; 57.0%). There were no differences in overall TTR between those with (59.6%; interquartile range = 41.8-73.4) versus without (63.4%; interquartile range = 46.7-73.6) MHCs (P = .542). Secondary outcomes showed no differences in the frequency or percentage of INRs in, above, or below target range (all P > .05). However, there were about twice as many hemorrhagic complications in the group with MHCs (27% vs 11.9%; P = .149). Conclusion: Patients with MHCs experienced no difference in overall TTR as compared to patients without MHCs. However, there was a non-statistically significant reduction in TTR, which would be consistent with limited existing data and demonstrates possible reproducibility to a rural, underserved patient population. Future research is needed to validate these outcomes.

Patient-related factors associated with an increased risk of being a reported case of preventable harm in first-line health care: a case-control study

Background

Patient safety issues in primary health care and in emergency departments have not been as thoroughly explored as patient safety issues in the hospital setting. Knowledge is particularly sparse regarding which patients have a higher risk of harm in these settings. The objective was to evaluate which patient-related factors were associated with risk of harm in patients with reports of safety incidents.

Methods

A case–control study performed in primary health care and emergency departments in Sweden. In total, 4536 patients (cases) and 44,949 controls were included in this study. Cases included patients with reported preventable harm in primary health care and emergency departments from January 1st, 2011 until December 31st, 2016.

Results

Psychiatric disease, including all psychiatric diagnoses regardless of severity, nearly doubled the risk of being a reported case of preventable harm (odds ratio, 1.96; p < 0.001). Adjusted for income and education there was still an increased risk (odds ratio, 1.69; p < 0.001). The preventable harm in this group was to 46% diagnostic errors of somatic disease.

Conclusion

Patients with psychiatric illness are at higher risk of preventable harm in primary care and the emergency department. Therefore, this group needs extra attention to prevent harm.

The Patient's Role in Patient Safety

Keeping patients safe while they receive medical care is essential. Yet current systems designed to ensure patient safety are not enough, because medical error is the third leading cause of preventable deaths in the United States. Clinicians can partner with the patient to enhance patient safety. Pulse Center for Patient Safety proposes patient- and family-driven processes designed to improve a patient's chances of avoiding harm. This article discusses highlights of the role of patient safety through a grassroots lens, summarizes the factors that influence the patient's role in patient safety and reviews recommendations on how clinicians can partner with patients.

Adolescent testicular microlithiasis: A case-based, multinational survey of clinical management practices

INTRODUCTION

Testicular microlithiasis (TM) is a condition characterized by calcium deposits within the testis, usually detected incidentally during ultrasonography of the scrotum. TM has been associated with the presence of, and possibly the development of, testicular malignancy. Our aim was to document international clinical management practices for TM and to analyze what factors and perception of risk influence conservative versus active management and follow-up.

METHODS

European Society for Paediatric Urology (ESPU) and Society for Pediatric Urology (SPU) members were invited to complete an online case-based survey of clinical management practices of TM. Eight cases had a single variable changed each time (classic versus limited TM, unilateral versus bilateral, prior cryptorchidism versus no cryptorchidism) to ascertain the provider's perception of risk. The respondents completed multiple choice questions on initial management, follow-up plan, length and interval of follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with decisions on management and follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 265 respondents to the survey from 35 countries (Table). Median time in practice was 13 years. Factors that were significantly associated with more aggressive initial management (more than counseling on self-examination) included: not yet in independent practice, low volume TM cases per year, those practicing pediatric and adult urology, classic appearance of TM and cryptorchidism. Factors that were significantly associated with urologist follow-up and active investigation included: European practitioners, low TM case volume per year, those practicing both pediatric urology and pediatric surgery, classic TM appearance and a case history of cryptorchidism. Interval and length of follow-up was wide-ranging, with most respondents favoring annual follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Management of TM varies and a mix of surgeon and case factors significantly influences management strategies. This baseline understanding of the lack of systematic management suggests the need for the development of consensus guidelines and prospective study.