General Psychiatric Management for Suicidal Patients, With Remarks on Chronicity: Contending With the Angel of Death

Liability and Patient Suicide

Suicide is one of the leading causes of liability against a psychiatrist treating adult patients. Reducing the risk of liability entails understanding the phenomenology of suicide, approaching suicide risk assessment from a clinical perspective, conceptualizing how malpractice cases unfold, examining the issues of foreseeability and proper risk assessment, and developing a risk management approach to mitigate against the potential for a bad outcome. The use of various suicide screening risk assessments in certain clinical contexts is a potentially useful first step in identifying the need for further risk assessment. In conducting a more detailed review of a patient's risk, nonsuicidal self-injury is typically distinguished from suicidal intent and action, although morbidity and mortality can also be associated with any deliberate self-injury. Understanding the concepts of means reduction and risk management planning are essential elements to assist in helping reduce risk. Special attention to risk reduction related to firearms has received increased attention in recent years. Proper assessment, and documentation thereof in clinical records can assist in reducing liability. This article reviews these basic elements for the general practitioner of adult psychiatry related to suicide risk, assessment, and liability surrounding patient suicide.

Decision-making in crisis resolution and home treatment teams: The AWARE framework

Aims and methodThe aim of the study is to improve patient safety by identifying factors influencing gatekeeping decisions by crisis resolution and home treatment teams. A theoretical sampling method was used to recruit clinicians. Semi-structured interviews to elicit various aspects of clinical decision-making were carried out. The transcripts were thematically analysed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Patient needs (safety and treatment) was the primary driver behind decisions. The research also revealed that information gathered was processed using heuristics. We identified five key themes (anxiety, weighting, agenda, resource and experience), which were constructed into an acronym 'AWARE'.Clinical implicationsAWARE provides a framework to make explicit drivers for decision-making that are often implicit. Incorporating these drivers into reflective practice will help staff be more mindful of undue influences and result in improved clinical decisions.Declaration of interestNone.