Nurses' Perception of Shared Decision-Making Processes: Quantifying a Shared Governance Culture

The functionality of unit practice councils and its relationship with nurses' accountability: A cross-sectional study

AIM

This study aimed to examine the relationship between perceived unit practice councils' functionality and nurses' accountability in Saudi Arabia.

DESIGN

A descriptive, correlational and cross-sectional design was used.

METHODS

Convenience sampling of 160 nurses working in multiple sites of a large, tertiary medical centre in Saudi Arabia was performed. Structured self-administered questionnaires were used to measure perceived unit practice council functionality and levels of nurse accountability.

RESULTS

Nurses perceived that unit practice councils had moderate levels of functionality; however, nurses had high levels of accountability. Also, perceived unit practice councils' functionality had a significant positive relationship with nurses' accountability (r = 0.49, p < 0.001). More studies are needed to investigate the impact of different shared governance models on nurses' work environments.

Shared governance council to engage advanced practice registered nurses in a hospital setting

BACKGROUND

Health care organizations use advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) to expand patient access and support high-quality care. However, turnover, often exacerbated by inadequate engagement, has steep financial and experiential costs.

LOCAL PROBLEM

The project site, a large urban academic institution with quaternary care capabilities, employs more than 300 APRNs to provide patient care. Due to variations in hiring entity, leadership structure, and organizational visibility, efforts to maintain APRN engagement were complex. In addition, inconsistencies in standardization of clinical, credentialing, and privileging procedures created organizational risk.

METHODS

Quality improvement principles informed the implementation of a shared governance council for APRNs that included nurse practitioners and certified registered nurse anesthetists. Data were collected pre and postintervention using validated engagement questions.

INTERVENTION

Implementation of a shared governance council to support the organizational engagement of APRNs through decisional involvement in professional practice issues.

RESULTS

Analysis included the percentage of change in aggregate scores and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to obtain p values of the 2 independent samples. There was an 8.9% increase in aggregate postintervention scores and statistical improvement in measures of quality improvement involvement.

CONCLUSION

Participation in the shared governance council increased APRN engagement through enhanced opportunities to communicate professional and clinical practice issues, decisional involvement, and collaboration. Statistically significant improvements in quality improvement involvement values potentially affirm the council's role in facilitating work environment improvements. Potential long-term gains include improved job satisfaction, retention, and organizational cost savings.

The Role of Participation in and Effectiveness of Shared Governance Councils in the Nurses' Perception of a Professional Practice Work Environment

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to identify the differences in nurses' perceptions of their professional practice work environment (PPWE) related to their participation in shared governance (SG) councils and to examine the perception of effectiveness of SG councils among nurses who participate in them.

BACKGROUND

Research suggests that adopting SG in nursing can lead to significant, positive outcomes, such as patient and nurse satisfaction and enhanced nurse empowerment, engagement, and a PPWE.

METHODS

The study used a cross-sectional design in a Magnet®-designated urban Jordanian cancer care hospital. A convenience sample of 580 direct care nurses was used. The data were collected using self-administered questionnaires, the Council Health (CH) instrument, and the Professional Practice Work Environment Inventory (PPWEI).

RESULTS

Results demonstrated a significant difference in the total score of PPWE between the SG council members (4.85) and nonmembers (4.68) (t = 2.906, P = 0.004). The results also indicated small to strong correlations of the total overall council health mean and all domain means of council effectiveness with total overall PPWEI mean and all domain means of PPWE (P < 0.05) among nurses who participated in SG councils.

CONCLUSION

Findings support involving more staff in SG councils and that enhancing the SG councils' effectiveness positively affects the PPWE.

An Exploration of Factors Associated With Nurses' Perceptions of Decisional Involvement

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate nurses' perceptions of decisional involvement (DI).

BACKGROUND

Decisional involvement is a measure or gauge of nurses' perceived shared leadership. There has been limited research examining factors associated with actual and preferred DI.

METHODS

A descriptive, observational study design was used. A total of 189 RNs completed the Decisional Involvement Scale and Evidence-Based Practice Implementation Scale. Nurses' preferred DI (DI-P) and actual DI (DI-A) were analyzed, and DI total and subscale scores were compared based on nurses' demographic and clinical practice characteristics.

RESULTS

The DI-A and DI-P total scores were significantly different, including subscales for DI-A compared with DI-P score. Dissonance scores by subscale were highest for recruitment, governance, and support. Unit-based council (UBC) participants had significantly higher actual DI, compared with non-UBC participants. Nurses' perceptions of implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) was not significantly different by low versus high EBP implementation; nor were the scores significantly correlated with their DI-A or DI-P scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate nurses' perceptions of DI-A and DI-P. This study provided further examination of the differences and interrelationships between DI and nurses' demographic and clinical practice characteristics. Dissonance DI scores provide opportunities for targeting interventions to engage nurses in shared leadership.

Research on hospital-based shared governance: a scoping review

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to review research on hospital-based shared governance (SG), focussing on its core elements.

Design/methodology/approach

A scoping review was conducted by searching the Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Medic, ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest) and SveMed+ databases using SG and related concepts in hospital settings as search terms (May 1998–February 2019). Only original research articles examining SG were included. The reference lists of the selected articles were reviewed. Data were extracted from the selected articles by charting and then subjected to a thematic analysis.

Findings

The review included 13 original research articles that examined SG in hospital settings. The studied organizations had implemented SG in different ways, and many struggled to obtain satisfactory results. SG was executed within individual professions or multiple professions and was typically implemented at both unit- and organization-levels. The thematic analysis revealed six core elements of SG as follows: professionalism, shared decision-making, evidence-based practice, continuous quality improvement, collaboration and empowerment.

Practical implications

An SG framework for hospital settings was developed based on the core elements of SG, the participants and the organizational levels involved. Hospitals considering SG should prepare for a time-consuming process that requires belief in the core elements of SG. The SG framework can be used as a tool to implement and strengthen SG in organizations.

Originality/value

The review resumes the tradition of systematically reviewing SG literature, which had not been done in the 21st century. General tendencies of the research scene and research gaps are pointed out.

Nursing shared governance at hospitals - it's Finnish future?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to describe council structure, its benefits, supportive and obstructive factors and developmental needs as a part of shared governance in a university hospital.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

This is a descriptive study, where semi-structured interviews with 12 nurses was conducted in 2014 and documents from 75 council meetings from 2009 to 2014 were gathered and analyzed. Qualitative content analysis method was used on the data.

FINDINGS

The study hospital has been developing nursing shared governance with unique structure and processes of councils. Professors and university researchers act as chair and members are voluntary nursing staff. The factors supporting the councils are nurse managers' support, enthusiastic personnel and neighboring university. The factors obstructing the councils are lack of time, understanding and skills. The work of the councils benefits the organization by improving patient care, harmonizing nursing practices and informing decision-making. The council's developmental needs were more visibility, concentration into everyday problems and interprofessionality.

RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS

Applying nursing shared governance structures into an organization improves the professional practice environment of nursing personnel.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The study hospital has its own, unique council structure. It did not cover the whole hospital or all of the nursing personnel, but it is already producing promising results. It should be given an official status and more support from nurse managers, and it should be developed into an inter-professional discussion. The results presented here indicate that shared governance, even, in its early stage, contributes positively to the quality of care, harmonizes nursing practices and informs decision-making. Applying shared governance structures into an organization improves the professional practice environment of nursing personnel. The study showed concrete supporting and obstructing factors that should be notified in nursing leadership.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE

Despite the extensive empirical studies on nursing shared governance, there is very little research on councils in the Scandinavian countries.

Staff Nurse Decisional Involvement in the United States and Turkey

The purpose of this descriptive comparative study is to compare the levels of decisional involvement of staff nurses between one Midwestern health care system in the United States with a nongovernmental University hospital in Turkey. The Decisional Involvement Scale was used for data collection. U.S. ( n = 163) and Turkey ( n = 50) staff nurses were included in the study. Both samples preferred more decisional involvement than they currently experienced. However, Turkish nurses experienced and preferred lower levels of decisional involvement than the U.S. sample. Shared governance structures may be a strategy used to enhance staff nurse decisional involvement.