Practice and Quality Improvement Leaders Survey of Expectations of DNP Graduates' Quality Improvement Expertise

Leveraging Doctor of Nursing Practice Scholarship to Meet Organizational Leaders' Expectations

Background: The Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree prepares nurses for engagement in practice scholarship to improve health outcomes at multiple system levels. Organizational leaders' and employers' perceptions and expectations of DNP-prepared nurses require further study. Objective: To explore the perception of organizational leaders regarding expectations and engagement of DNP-prepared nurses in practice scholarship activities. Methods: Guided by the Actualized DNP Model, a cross-sectional design was used to survey organizational leaders (N = 87) regarding DNP-prepared nurses' engagement in practice scholarship. Results: Findings indicate that 92% (n = 80) of participants believed practice scholarship should be an expectation of DNP-prepared nurses serving in a variety of roles. Of the 77 respondents to the scholarship engagement questions, 97.4% (n = 75) reported that DNP-prepared nurses engaged in one or more practice scholarship activities over the past year. Conclusions: Aligning DNP practice scholarship competencies, as outlined in the American Association of Colleges of Nursing 2021 Essentials, with organizational needs, expectations, and provision of sufficient time to support these scholarship activities is needed. Implications for Nursing: Opportunities exist for DNP-prepared nurses to articulate and demonstrate their value by conducting practice scholarship through innovative advanced nursing roles to realize organizational goals. Organizational support is necessary for practice scholarship activities to transform DNP education.

Survey of Nursing Faculty Preparation for Guiding DNP Quality Improvement Projects

BACKGROUND

Quality improvement (QI) projects comprise the majority of University of Maryland School of Nursing (UMSON) Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) projects.

METHODS

An online survey was completed by 51% (n = 38) of faculty, who teach or mentor DNP students, and was analyzed using quantitative and descriptive methods.

RESULTS

Faculty were somewhat or not familiar with developing a QI charter 68.4%, human error theory and error proofing 63.2%, driver diagrams 60.5%, characteristics of high-reliability organizations 60.5%, and Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines 55.3%. The faculty were most interested in learning more about (n = 97 responses) were human error theory and error proofing (28.9%), SQUIRE guidelines (26.3%), statistical process control (21.1%), and implementation strategies and tactics (21.1%). The most commonly identified challenges included identifying QI projects (24%), project time constraints (16%), keeping up-to-date on QI concepts, methods, and tools (12%), and balancing professional workload (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gaps in self-reported QI knowledge indicate there is a need for further development of DNP and PhD prepared faculty at the UMSON.