Umbilical Cord Prolapse: A Review of the Literature

Risk factors analysis and multidisciplinary team first-aid simulation training for umbilical cord prolapse can improve neonatal outcomes

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we sought to identify risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse (UCP) and adapt the multidisciplinary team (MDT) first-aid simulation training for UCP patients. We evaluated the usefulness of the MDT first-aid simulation by comparing delivery outcomes for UCP patients before and after its implementation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on 149 UCP cases (48 overt and 101 occult) and 298 control deliveries that occurred at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 1998 to December 2022. Patient data were compared between the groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for means comparison, and the chi-square test was used for categorical data. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors significantly associated with UCP.

RESULTS

Overt UCP was strongly associated with all adverse delivery outcomes. Both univariate and multivariate analyses identified multiparity, breech presentation, polyhydramnios, and low birth weight as independent risk factors for overt UCP (all odds ratios [OR] > 1; all p < 0.05). Preterm labor and abnormal placental cord insertion were identified as independent risk factors for occult UCP (all OR > 1; all p < 0.05). After 2014, when obstetrical staff received MDT first-aid simulation training, patients with overt UCP experienced shorter decision-to-delivery intervals due to more timely cesarean sections. They also had higher Apgar scores at 1, 5, and 10 min, and lower admission rates to the neonatal intensive care unit compared to patients before 2014 (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MDT first-aid simulation training for overt UCP can improve neonatal outcomes. However, medical simulation training efforts should initially focus on the early identification of risk factors for both overt and occult UCP.

Impact of velamentous cord insertion on perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Velamentous cord insertion may be identified prenatally, but the clinical implications of this diagnosis remain controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively summarize current data on the association of velamentous cord insertion and adverse perinatal outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception until May 22, 2022 to identify eligible studies.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Observational studies including singleton pregnancies with velamentous cord insertion, either prenatally or postnatally identified, and comparing them with those with central/eccentric cord insertion were considered eligible.

METHODS

The quality of the studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the risk of bias with the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. The main outcome was small-for-gestational-age neonates. Heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using a Q test and an I² index. Analyses were performed using a random-effects model, with outcome data reported as relative risk or mean difference with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

In total, 9 cohort and 2 case-control studies, of which 4 had prenatal and 7 had postnatal velamentous cord insertion diagnosis, were included. The overall prevalence of velamentous cord insertion was estimated to be 1.4% among singleton pregnancies. Compared with the central/eccentric cord insertion control group, pregnancies with velamentous cord insertion were at higher risk of several adverse perinatal outcomes, namely small-for-gestational-age neonates (relative risk, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-2.41), preeclampsia (relative risk, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.39), pregnancy-induced hypertension (relative risk, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-1.70), stillbirth (relative risk, 4.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-8.87), placental abruption (relative risk, 2.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-5.03), preterm delivery (relative risk, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-2.65), emergency cesarean delivery (relative risk, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-3.38), 1-minute Apgar score <7 (relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.05), 5-minute Apgar score <7 (relative risk, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-2.71), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (relative risk, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.02). In a subgroup analysis, prenatally diagnosed velamentous cord insertion was associated with small-for-gestational-age neonates (relative risk, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.32), stillbirth (relative risk, 4.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-16.08), and preterm delivery (relative risk, 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.01-3.60). In a sensitivity analysis of studies excluding cases with vasa previa, velamentous cord insertion was associated with an increased risk of small-for-gestational-age neonates (relative risk, 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-4.17), pregnancy-induced hypertension (relative risk, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.01), and stillbirth (relative risk, 9.42; 95% confidence interval, 3.19-27.76), but not preterm delivery (relative risk, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-4.54).

CONCLUSION

Velamentous cord insertion is associated with several adverse perinatal outcomes, including stillbirth, and these associations persist when only prenatally diagnosed cases are considered and when vasa previa cases are excluded. According to these findings, the exact pathophysiology should be further investigated and an effective prenatal monitoring plan should be developed.

Umbilical Cord Prolapse-Interesting CTG Traces

Umbilical cord prolapse can be a life-threatening obstetrical event involving the fetus due to sudden oxygenated blood flow obstruction. These types of events most often happen in labor and are associated with obstetric maneuvers. Rarely, a clinical examination can diagnose the condition, but the situation is usually detected secondary to an abnormal cardiotocography trace. We present several clinical cases where a CTG trace was used to infer umbilical cord prolapse.

Umbilical cord prolapse: revisiting its definition and management

Umbilical cord prolapse is an unpredictable obstetrical emergency with an incidence ranging from 1 to 6 per 1000 pregnancies. It is associated with high perinatal mortality, ranging from 23% to 27% in low-income countries to 6% to 10% in high-income countries. In this review, we specifically addressed 3 issues. First, its definition is not consistent in the current literature, and "occult cord prolapse" is a misnomer because the cord is still above the cervix. We proposed that cord prolapse, cord presentation, and compound cord presentation should be classified according to the positional relationship among the cord, the fetal presenting part, and the cervix. All of them may occur with either ruptured or intact membranes. The fetal risk is highest in cord prolapse, followed by cord presentation, and lastly by compound cord presentation, which replaces the misnomer "occult cord prolapse." Second, the mainstay of treatment of cord prolapse is urgent delivery, which means cesarean delivery in most cases, unless vaginal delivery is imminent. The urgency depends on the fetal heart rate pattern, which can be bradycardia, recurrent decelerations, or normal. It is most urgent in cases with bradycardia, because a recent study showed that cord arterial pH declines significantly with the bradycardia-to-delivery interval at a rate of 0.009 per minute (95% confident interval, 0.0003-0.0180), and this may indicate an irreversible pathology such as vasospasm or persistent cord compression. However, cord arterial pH does not correlate with either deceleration-to-delivery interval or decision-to-delivery interval, indicating that intermittent cord compression causing decelerations is reversible and less risk. Third, while cesarean delivery is being arranged, different maneuvers should be adopted to relieve cord compression by elevating the fetal presenting part and to prevent further cord prolapse beyond the vagina. A recent study showed that the knee-chest position provides the greatest elevation effect, followed by filling of the maternal urinary bladder with 500 mL of fluid, and then the Trendelenburg position (15°) and other maneuvers. However, each maneuver has its own advantages and limitations; thus, they should be applied wisely and with great caution, depending on the actual clinical situation. Therefore, we have proposed an algorithm to guide this acute management.

Umbilical Cord Prolapse in the Prehospital Setting: A Case Report

Umbilical cord prolapse is an acute obstetric emergency associated with high fetal morbidity and mortality. To avoid poor outcomes, rapid diagnosis with immediate intervention is required, especially in the prehospital setting where resources are limited. In this case report, we describe a 38-year-old woman with umbilical cord prolapse, with a review of appropriate prehospital maneuvers and treatment.