Atopic dermatitis in pregnancy: current status and challenges

Atopic dermatitis in women: special considerations in the childbearing years

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common inflammatory dermatoses in adults. Women are disproportionately impacted by AD and report significant impacts on quality of life compared to men.

Objective

Given the absence of formal guidelines for the treatment of AD in women of childbearing age, we will review special considerations for treating women of childbearing age with AD to ensure consistent care and optimal outcomes for these patients.

Methods

PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant articles from database inception through May of 2023.

Results

There are several treatments including topical therapies, systemic therapies, and phototherapy that are considered safe during preconception, pregnancy and breastfeeding. Given the negative consequences of uncontrolled AD for both the mother and the unborn baby, the risks and benefits of potential therapies should be reviewed with all women of childbearing age suffering from AD.

Limitations

The gold standard in recommending therapies is randomized controlled trials; however, pregnant and lactating women are often excluded from these trials.

Conclusion

Through shared decision-making between the dermatologist, obstetrician, and patient, the risks and benefits of any therapy should be thoroughly discussed and considered with all women of childbearing age, to optimize care and outcomes for this unique population.

Gender differences in adult atopic dermatitis and clinical implication: Results from a nationwide multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease that affects both children and adults. However, limited research has been conducted on gender differences in AD.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess gender differences in adult AD patients, focusing on demographic and clinical features, comorbidities and treatment approaches.

METHODS

In this multicentre, observational, cross-sectional study, we enrolled 686 adult patients with AD (357 males and 329 females). For each patient, we collected demographic data (age and sex), anthropometric measurements (weight, height, hip circumference, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio), clinical information (onset age, disease duration, severity, itching intensity, impact on quality of life) and noted comorbidities (metabolic, atopic and other). We recorded past and current topical and systemic treatments. We analysed all collected data using statistical techniques appropriate for both quantitative and qualitative variables. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was employed to evaluate the relationships among all clinical characteristics of the patients.

RESULTS

We found no differences in age at onset, disease duration, severity and quality of life impact between males and females. Males exhibited higher rates of hypertriglyceridaemia and hypertension. No significant gender differences were observed in atopic or other comorbidities. Treatment approaches were overlapping, except for greater methotrexate use in males. MCA revealed distinct patterns based on gender, disease severity, age of onset, treatment and quality of life. Adult males with AD had severe disease, extensive treatments and poorer quality of life, while adult females had milder disease, fewer treatments and moderate quality of life impact.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals that gender differences in adult AD patients are largely due to inherent population variations rather than disease-related disparities. However, it highlights potential undertreatment of females with moderate AD and quality of life impact, emphasizing the need for equitable AD treatment. JAK inhibitors may offer a solution for gender-based therapeutic parity.

Atopic Dermatitis: Fertility, Pregnancy, and Treatment Perspectives

Hormonal and immunologic changes during pregnancy can contribute to the development of different dermatoses, the most common of which is atopic eruption of pregnancy (AEP). Of atopic dermatitis (AD) cases during pregnancy, 80% are new-onset presentations, while 20% represent recurrences or exacerbations of preexisting disease. Evidence on the effects of previous AD on fertility is limited. Different factors influence women's desire to conceive in this setting, and it has been hypothesized that barrier defects and systemic inflammation could contribute to biologic infertility, although more data are needed. Clinical practice suggests a tendency toward undertreatment in pregnant woman due to concerns about potential effects on obstetric and fetal outcomes. However, pregnant women should be offered adequate and safe treatments, preferably on an individual basis. The aim of this review was to summarize the evidence on disease course in pregnant women with AD and the challenges associated with its diagnosis and management. We also review the current evidence on the use of conventional and novel systemic therapies for AD in this population.

In vitro tests to evaluate embryotoxicity and irritation of Chinese herbal medicine (Pentaherbs formulation) for atopic dermatitis

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disorder and its prevalence is increasing in the last few decades. No treatment can cure the condition. Pregnancy often worsens the clinical manifestation. There are considerable interests in Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM) as an alternative treatment for AD. A well tolerated CHM formula (Pentaherbs formulation, PHF) has been proven efficacious in improving life quality and reducing topical corticosteroid use in children with moderate-to-severe AD. However, safety data of PHF are not available.

AIM OF THE STUDY

Our study aimed to evaluate the safety of PHF and its 5 individual herbal extracts, including embryotoxicity by Embryonic Stem Cell Test (EST) and irritation by Skin Irritation Test (SIT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Quality of 5 herbal extracts of PHF was confirmed by chromatography. In EST, mouse embryonic stem cell line (D3) and mouse fibroblast cell line (3T3) were used to study potential embryotoxicity. Three endpoints were assessed by concentration-response curves after 10 days' culture: 50% inhibition of D3 differentiation into beating cardiomyocytes (ID₅₀D3), 50% cytotoxic effects on D3 (IC₅₀D3) and on fibroblasts (IC₅₀3T3). A biostatistically based prediction model (PM) was applied to predict the embryotoxic potentials of each CHM. In SIT, epidermis equivalent commercially available kits (EpiDerm™) were used, and concentration-viability curves were obtained by MTT assay to detect skin irritations of each CHM.

RESULTS

Chemical authentication confirmed that 5 test herbal extracts contained their main active compounds. EST results indicated that the formula PHF and its individual CHMs were non-embryotoxic, except one CHM, Amur Corktree Bark (Huang Bai, Phellodendron chinense C.K.Schneid), was weakly embryotoxic. SIT results showed that cell viability was above 50% after treatment with different concentrations of all tested CHMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our in vitro tests provided preliminary evidence for safety of the formula PHF in embryonic stem cell test and skin irritation model, but PHF shall be cautiously used in pregnant women with AD. Further studies are needed to support its clinical application as an alternative treatment for AD, especially to the patients who plan for pregnancy or at lactation stages.

Pruritus in Pregnancy

Pruritus in pregnancy is a common and burdensome symptom that may be a first sign of a pregnancy-specific pruritic disease (atopic eruption of pregnancy, polymorphic eruption of pregnancy, pemphigoid gestationis, and intrahepatic cholestasis in pregnancy) or a dermatosis coinciding with pregnancy by chance. Despite its high prevalence, pruritus is often underrated by physicians, and data regarding the safety profiles of drugs for pruritus are very limited. In this review, we illustrate the epidemiology, possible pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, and diagnostic workup of various pregnancy-related diseases and discuss antipruritic treatments. The prevalence of pruritus in pregnancy demonstrates the importance of symptom recognition and the need for an holistic approach, taking into account both the potential benefits for the patient and the potential risks to the fetus.

The use of dupilumab in severe atopic dermatitis during pregnancy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis is a common chronic skin disease that can occur in pregnancy. Current treatments include topical and systemic glucocorticoids and cyclosporine. Presently, the only biologic approved for atopic dermatitis is dupilumab with limited data available regarding its safety profile in pregnancy.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of severe atopic dermatitis treated safely with dupilumab with no adverse maternal or fetal outcomes and resolution of atopic dermatitis postpartum in the absence of maintenance dupilumab therapy.

CONCLUSION

Here we demonstrate the safe use of dupilumab in pregnancy. Further research is needed to elucidate the role of dupilumab in the management of atopic dermatitis during pregnancy.

Atopic skin lesions in pregnant women: how to help patients

Many pregnant women experience skin symptoms caused by immunological, metabolic or other changes that occur in their body during pregnancy. One of the most common complaints of pregnant women is itchy skin. In about 20% of cases, itching in pregnant women is associated with atopic skin lesions. Histologically, these lesions are indistinguishable from atopic dermatitis, which also tends to worsen during pregnancy. It is believed that these lesions are due to increased production of Th2 cytokines (interleukin-4 and -10) in the body of a pregnant woman. Topical glucocorticosteroids and skin care products are best treatments for atopic skin lesions of pregnant women and exacerbation of atopic dermatitis. In cases of limited rashes or mild dermatitis, only care products with a strong moisturizing effect can be used. Using moisturizers can help minimize itching and skin discomfort. One of these agents that we use in practice is XeraCalm A.D Lipid-Replenishing cream, the unique formula of which not only has a regenerating and antipruritic effect, but also enhances the natural immunity of the skin.

Atopic Dermatitis Treated Safely with Dupilumab during Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Dupilumab is currently the only biologic treatment approved for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Though limited, available clinical data describing dupilumab use in pregnancy have not identified a drug-associated risk of major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. Systemic treatment in pregnant women with atopic dermatitis is currently restricted to corticosteroids, cyclosporine A, and azathioprine. Atopic dermatitis often has a deleterious course in pregnancy which can cause substantial distress and significantly impact on global health and quality of life. We report a case of severe atopic dermatitis treated safely with dupilumab during pregnancy with no adverse maternal or fetal outcomes observed. Our case highlights that dupilumab use in pregnancy has its place but should always be preceded by careful assessment of the risks and benefits. Clinicians are encouraged to enroll their patients in relevant pregnancy registry studies to monitor outcomes in women exposed to dupilumab during pregnancy and lactation.

Immunosuppressive and Immunomodulating Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis in Pregnancy: An Appraisal of the Literature

The aim of this appraisal of the literature is to elucidate the effects of immunosuppressive and immunomodulating agents used to treat atopic dermatitis (AD) on risk factors for fertility, pregnancy, and breastfeeding. Negative side effects of the psychological and physical stresses associated to AD flairs and uncontrolled AD are discussed, in order to evaluate the consequences of abstaining from treatment. Research on pregnancies in Danish women suggests a tendency towards an increased use of topical steroids and ultraviolet light therapy during pregnancy, compared to before conception, confirming the need for these patients to receive treatment, as well as decreased use of systemic treatments, suggesting a tendency towards undertreatment in this patient population. It is important that effective treatment be provided to pregnant women with AD. Here we present an appraisal of current knowledge on treatments for AD and the risks of exposure for the fetus and breastfed infant. Since little is known about the association between AD, pregnancy, and systemic treatment, we generalize conclusions based on studies on treatments of pregnant women who have undergone organ transplantation and who have inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatic disease, and autoimmune disease. The majority of recommendations are therefore based on a low or very low quality of evidence according to the GRADE system. The selected studies reflect the authors’ assessment regarding originality and importance in the context of this appraisal. It is always the treating doctor’s responsibility to stay updated on current literature when treating patients, especially pregnant patients.

The Influence of Pregnancy on the Clinical Evolution and Prognosis of Pre-Existing Inflammatory and Autoimmune Skin Disorders and Their Management

BACKGROUND

Although the possible occurrence of typical dermatoses during pregnancy is well recognized, little is known about the influence of pregnancy on the clinical evolution and prognosis of different pre-existing chronic dermatological disorders.

SUMMARY

In this study a comprehensive search of the available literature and reviews has been undertaken in order to collect and analyze articles reporting pre-existing chronic skin disorders in pregnant women and report current knowledge on their particular clinical and therapeutic aspects.

Assessment of prurigo of pregnancy in patients without atopic background

Background

Prurigo of pregnancy (PP), a specific pregnancy dermatosis, has been associated with atopic background in the patient and/or the patient's family. However, this association was not validated in some studies, and cases without atopic background have been reported.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features of PP not related to atopic background and search for comorbid conditions in medical and obstetric records.

Methods

In this case series, patients with typical PP presentation (i.e., pruritic, discrete papulonodules on the extensor surfaces of the extremities) diagnosed at the dermatology clinics of tertiary referral hospitals were evaluated. The exclusion criteria included missing historical data, inadequate follow-up, laboratory test results suggestive of other pruritic conditions, history of atopic disease, and family history of atopy. Clinical and laboratory data including course, response to treatment, serum total immunoglobulin E level, and comorbidities in the medical and obstetric history were collected.

Results

Twenty patients developed PP predominantly during the late second or early third trimester. Nine patients reported that itching developed first, versus 10 patients who reported that lesions started first (one patient was uncertain about onset). There was no recurrence postpartum (mean postpartum follow-up, 17 months). Serum total immunoglobulin E level was elevated in 3 of 14 patients tested (21.4%). Obstetric history (n = 12) included polymorphic eruption of pregnancy (16.6%), PP (16.6%), and gestational pruritus (8.3%). Two of 20 patients (10%) had a history of pruritic skin condition (prurigo nodularis and pruritus of unclear etiology) while not pregnant. Medical history (n = 20) included psychiatric disease (20%) (obsessive compulsive disorder and anxiety), hypothyroidism (10%), and obesity (10%).

Conclusion

PP can develop in patients without an atopic background. This finding should be considered when classifying specific pregnancy dermatoses. A thorough medical and family history with a focus on atopy should be obtained from every patient with a gestational eruption, and patients should be counseled accordingly.

Subcorneal pustular dermatosis: Comprehensive review and report of a case presenting during pregnancy

Subcorneal pustular dermatosis (SPD), also known as Sneddon-Wilkinson disease, is a rare, relapsing, sterile pustular eruption of unknown etiology that develops most commonly in middle-aged or mature women. This article reviews the presentation, associations, and management of the condition and highlights advances in pathophysiology. Onset of SPD during pregnancy has not been reported. Herein, we report a case of SPD that developed during pregnancy. The patient was treated with dapsone without complications for her or the fetus. An association between T helper (Th) 17 and Th2 environments in the development of SPD has been advocated. Pregnancy is characterized by a predominance of Th2 responses and increased interleukin-17 levels and thus may favor the development of the condition.

Correlation of nipple eczema in pregnancy with atopic dermatitis in Northern India: a study of 100 cases

BACKGROUND

Nipple eczema is a less common presentation of atopic dermatitis. No studies in the literature have correlated nipple eczema in pregnancy as a manifestation of atopic dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether nipple eczema presenting in pregnancy is a manifestation of atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study including 100 women who presented with nipple eczema for the first time during pregnancy. The exclusion criteria were any patient with previous history of nipple eczema, those already on oral or topical treatment for atopic dermatitis or nipple eczema, and other disorders mimicking eczema. Patients were divided into two groups ‒ nipple eczema with atopic dermatitis and without atopic dermatitis. Demographic data, clinical features, total leukocyte count, differential leukocyte count, absolute eosinophil counts, and serum IgE levels were compared between the two groups to detect association between nipple eczema in pregnancy and atopic dermatitis.

RESULTS

Out of 100 patients, 39 were diagnosed with atopic dermatitis, whereas 61 were ruled out to have any features suggestive of atopic dermatitis. There were no statistically significant differences in mean age, mean duration of symptoms, and serum IgE levels. In patients with atopic dermatitis, bilateral symptoms were noted more commonly than in patients without the disease, but this was statistically insignificant.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

Lack of long term follow-up and no large studies in literature to compare results.

CONCLUSION

Nipple eczema in pregnancy follows a similar pattern as in other age groups. The clinical profile of patients is similar in cases with and without atopic dermatitis.

European task force on atopic dermatitis position paper: treatment of parental atopic dermatitis during preconception, pregnancy and lactation period

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease that affects both children and adults, including a large number of adults of reproductive age. Several guidelines for the treatment of AD exist, yet specific recommendations for the treatment of pregnant or lactating women and for adults planning to have a child are often lacking. This position paper from the European Task force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD) is based on up-to-date scientific literature on treating pregnant and lactating women as wells as adults with AD planning to have a child. It is based on the expert opinions of members of the ETFAD and on existing safety data on the proposed treatments, many of which are derived from patients with other inflammatory diseases or from transplantation medicine. For treating future parents, as well as pregnant and lactating women with AD, the use of topical treatments including moisturizers, topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus, antiseptics such as chlorhexidine, octenidine, potassium permanganate and sodium hypochlorite (bleach) is deemed to be safe. Ultraviolet (UV) therapy may also be used. Systemic treatment should be prescribed only after careful consideration. According to the opinion of the ETFAD, treatment should be restricted to systemic corticosteroids and cyclosporine A, and, in selected cases, azathioprine.

Specific dermatoses of pregnancy other than pemphigoid gestationis

Specific dermatoses of pregnancy are skin disorders that occur specifically during or immediately after pregnancy and cannot be found in non-pregnant patients. According to the current consensus, they include atopic eruption of pregnancy (AEP), polymorphic eruption of pregnancy (PEP), pemphigoid gestationis (PG), and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). The diagnosis of specific dermatoses of pregnancy can be challenging due to their variation in clinical presentation; moreover, the tests currently available do not always provide the clue for the diagnosis. However, some distinctive features may be helpful to differentiate between such entities. Accordingly, the knowledge of specific dermatoses of pregnancy and of their management is critical, since their early recognition may allow to provide care for the mother and prevent potential increased fetal risk. In fact, while AEP and PEP do not affect maternal and fetal prognosis, PG and, mainly, ICP are associated to maternal complications as well as the risk of fetal loss. In this paper, the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features as well as management of AEP and PEP are reviewed in detail, while PG is described in another article of this issue. Moreover, the main features of ICP, which cannot be considered a primarily skin disease but may be managed first by dermatologists, are reported.

Dermatoses of pregnancy: Nomenclature, misnomers, and myths

The most recent reclassification of dermatoses of pregnancy includes polymorphic eruption of pregnancy, atopic eruption of pregnancy, and pemphigoid gestationis; intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, strictly not a dermatosis, was included in specific dermatoses of pregnancy for working purposes. Another dermatosis, pustular psoriasis of pregnancy, could be included for similar reasons. The nomenclature of these pregnancy-specific eruptions has been revised several times, generating potential confusion among practitioners. Clouding the picture further are misnomers that have been used to describe dermatoses of pregnancy. In addition, several cutaneous conditions that are associated with, but not specific to, pregnancy, have been misunderstood, which has resulted in certain myths among patients and physicians. In this contribution, we describe how the nomenclature of each dermatosis of pregnancy has evolved to fit the current classification scheme. We then identify several misnomers that have generated confusion within the scheme. Finally, we debunk several myths that have developed around cutaneous conditions outside of this scheme, in both mother and newborn.

Mast cell-mediated and associated disorders in pregnancy: a risky game with an uncertain outcome?

During pregnancy, the maternal organism is under the influence of tremendous endocrine as well as immunological changes as an adaptation to the implanted and developing fetus. In most cases, the maternal adaptations to pregnancy ensure both, the protection against harmful pathogens and the tolerance toward the growing semi-allogeneic fetus. However, under certain circumstances the unique hormonal milieu during pregnancy is causative of a shift into an unfavorable direction. Of particular importance are cellular disorders previous to pregnancy that involve cell types known for their susceptibility to hormones. One interesting cell type is the mast cell (MC), one of the key figures in allergic disorders. While physiological numbers of MCs were shown to positively influence pregnancy outcome, at least in mouse models, uncontrolled augmentations in quantity, and/or activation can lead to pregnancy complications. Women that have the desire of getting pregnant and been diagnosed with MC mediated disorders such as urticaria and mastocytosis or chronic inflammatory diseases in which MCs are involved, including atopic dermatitis, asthma, or psoriasis, may benefit from specialized medical assistance to ensure a positive pregnancy outcome. In the present review, we address the course of pregnancy in women affected by MC mediated or associated disorders.

Specific dermatoses of pregnancy and their treatment

The specific dermatoses of pregnancy represent a diverse group of intensely pruritic dermatoses, occurring only in the puerperal state. The relative rarity of these conditions, the often variable clinical appearance, and the lack of definitive diagnostic tests have led to confusion regarding the appropriate diagnosis and management of the specific dermatoses of pregnancy. Herein we review the clinical characteristics, diagnosis and treatment of five dermatoses occurring during pregnancy: pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy, atopic eruption of pregnancy, pemphigoid gestationis, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, and pustular psoriasis of pregnancy.

Treatment of atopic dermatitis in pregnancy

Atopic dermatitis (AD), also referred to as eczema, is one of the most frequently observed skin diseases in pregnant patients. The presentation and histopathology of this condition during pregnancy is identical to that of the non-pregnant individual. AD is a T-helper 2 dominant disease and may worsen during pregnancy, which favors this population of T-lymphocytes. AD management during pregnancy requires special precautions to avoid harming the fetus. Herein is an exploration of the different options available for the treatment of the pregnant patient with AD. The management of concomitant bacterial and viral infections is also discussed.