Comparison of Topical Cyclosporine and Diquafosol Treatment in Dry Eye

Diquafosol Improves Corneal Wound Healing by Inducing NGF Expression in an Experimental Dry Eye Model

Dry eye disease (DED) is caused by inflammation and damage to the corneal surface due to tear film instability and hyperosmolarity. Various eye drops are used to treat this condition. Each eye drop has different properties and mechanisms of action, so the appropriate drug should be used according to clinical phenotypes. This study aims to compare the therapeutic mechanisms of cyclosporine A (CsA) and diquafosol tetrasodium (DQS). An experimental in vivo/in vitro model of DED using hyperosmolarity showed decreased cell viability, inhibited wound healing, and corneal damage compared to controls. Treatment with cyclosporine or diquafosol restored cell viability and wound healing and reduced corneal damage by hyperosmolarity. The expression of the inflammation-related genes il-1β, il-1α, and il-6 was reduced by cyclosporine and diquafosol, and the expression of Tnf-α, c1q, and il-17a was reduced by cyclosporine. Increased apoptosis in the DED model was confirmed by increased Bax and decreased Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl expression, but treatment with cyclosporine or diquafosol resulted in decreased apoptosis. Diquafosol increased NGF expression and translocation into the extracellular space. DED has different damage patterns depending on the progression of the lesion. Thus, depending on the type of lesion, eye drops should be selected according to the therapeutic target, focusing on repairing cellular damage when cellular repair is needed or reducing inflammation when inflammation is high and cellular damage is severe.

Comparison of matrix metallopeptidase-9 expression following cyclosporine and diquafosol treatment in dry eye

PURPOSE

We sought to evaluate the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in dry eyes treated with 0.05% cyclosporin A and 3.0% diquafosol tetrasodium.

METHODS

One-hundred ninety-five eyes of 195 patients with dry eye were divided into three groups as follows: group 1, cyclosporin group (n = 69); group 2, diquafosol group (n = 59); and group 3, artificial tears eyes (n = 67). All eyes were treated and followed up for three months. Schirmer I Test, corneal staining, tear-film break-up time (TBUT), and tear-film MMP-9 content were measured at three months and compared between groups. The expression of MMP-9 was confirmed using a point-of-care test device (InflammaDry®; RPS Diagnostics, Sarasota, FL, USA) and graded as zero to four points.

RESULTS

At the third month, MMP-9 expression was lower in group 1 as compared with in groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.020 and 0.006, respectively). The mean MMP-9 grade according to point-of-care testing was also lower in group 1 than in groups 2 or 3 (p = 0.002 and 0.038, respectively). MMP-9 showed a correlation with corneal staining in both groups 1 and 2 (all p < 0.001) and with Schirmer I Test and TBUT in group 1 (p = 0.018 and 0.015, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

MMP-9 expression and grade were lower after treatment with cyclosporin than after treatment with diquafosol in the dry eye disease. Anti-inflammatory treatment can decrease ocular MMP-9 levels in dry eye disease.

Effectiveness of Topical Cyclosporin A 0.1%, Diquafosol Tetrasodium 3%, and Their Combination, in Dry Eye Disease

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of the topical use of cyclosporin A (CsA) 0.1%, diquafosol (DQS) tetrasodium 3% ophthalmic solution, and their combination in treating dry eye disease in a general health care setting. Methods: This prospective, nonrandomized, observational study analyzed 279 patients. Patients instilled topical CsA 0.1% (Ikervis^®; Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Japan) once daily and/or DQS tetrasodium 3% (Diquas-S^®; Santen) six times a day for 12 weeks. Objective signs [tear break-up time (TBUT), National Eye Institute (NEI) corneal and conjunctival staining scores] and symptoms [Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) and Dry Eye-related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS) questionnaires] were evaluated at baseline, week 4, and week 12. Results: Patients (n = 279) were mainly female (85.0%) with a mean (SD) age of 50.1 (14.8) years, and received CsA (n = 93), DQS (n = 99), or CsA/DQS (n = 87). Both monotherapies and CsA/DQS combination therapy significantly improved TBUT, NEI corneal and conjunctival staining scores, and SANDE and DEQS scores from baseline to week 12 (all P < 0.0001). The mean change in TBUT between baseline and week 12 was significantly higher in CsA/DQS combination therapy (2.13 ± 2.41 s) than in CsA monotherapy (1.07 ± 1.71 s; P = 0.0011). Conclusions: Monotherapy with CsA or DQS and CsA/DQS combination therapy all significantly improved the objective signs and symptoms of dry eyes during 12 weeks of treatment. CsA/DQS combination therapy provides an additional benefit in terms of TBUT compared with CsA alone; however, a randomized controlled trial still needs to be performed to confirm this result.

Clinical effectiveness of diquafosol ophthalmic solution 3% in Korean patients with dry eye disease: a multicenter prospective observational study

AIM

To investigate the effectiveness of diquafosol ophthalmic solution 3% administered in Korean patients with dry eye disease in real-world clinical settings.

METHODS

Diquafosol was administered for 8wk to 3 patient groups who received diquafosol as add-on therapy to existing medication (Add group, n=150); received diquafosol only (Monotherapy group, n=196); or discontinued part of their existing medication in favor of diquafosol (Switch group, n=11). Tear break-up time (TBUT), cornea and conjunctival staining based on National Eye Institute/Industry scoring scheme, subjective symptoms using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, and meibum quality and expressibility were evaluated at baseline, week 4, and week 8.

RESULTS

The mean TBUT increased (from 3.46, 3.92, and 5.84s, respectively, to 5.15, 5.53, and 8.59s, respectively) and corneal staining score decreased (from 2.23, 2.24, and 3.09, respectively, to 0.85, 0.97, and 1.64, respectively) in a time-dependent manner from baseline to week 8 in all three groups. Conjunctival staining score, OSDI questionnaire, and meibum quality and expressibility improved over time from baseline to week 8 in the Add and Monotherapy groups, but differences were not statistically significant in the Switch group.

CONCLUSION

Diquafosol improves subjective symptoms and objective signs in patients treated with existing medicines combined with diquafosol and treated solely with diquafosol. Diquafosol can be used as an effective therapeutic agent for dry eye disease or additionally applied in patients who have insufficient response to existing medicines.

Anti-inflammatory effects of glycine thymosin β4 eye drops in experimental dry eye

The aim of the present study was to investigate the anti-inflammatory effects of glycine thymosin β4 (Gly-Tβ4) eye drops, and to compare the efficacy of topical Gly-Tβ4 with Cyclosporine A (CsA) in a mouse model of experimental dry eye (EDE). Eye drops consisting of balanced salt solution (BSS), 0.1% Gly-Tβ4 or 0.05% CsA were used for treatment of EDE. Tear volume, tear film break-up time and corneal staining scores were measured after 7 and 14 days. Periodic acid-Schiff staining for conjunctival gobleT cells, TUNEL assay for corneal apoptotic positive cells, multiplex immunobead assay for interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ levels, and flow cytometry for CD4⁺/CCR5⁺ T cells were performed after 14 days. All clinical parameters showed improvement in the Gly-Tβ4 and CsA groups (all P<0.05). Significantly increased conjunctival gobleT cells and decreased corneal TUNEL positive cells were observed in the Gly-Tβ4 and CsA groups. The Gly-Tβ4 and CsA treated groups showed significantly reduced inflammatory cytokine levels and T cells in the conjunctiva compared with the EDE and BSS groups (all P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences observed in the inflammatory and clinical parameters between the Gly-Tβ4 and CsA treatment groups. Topical application of 0.1% Gly-Tβ4 significantly reduced inflammation on the ocular surface, as well as clinical parameters of EDE, with a similar efficacy to that of 0.05% CsA emulsions, suggesting that Gly-Tβ4 eye drops may be used as a therapeutic agent for treatment of dry eye disease.

Changes in Human Tear Proteome Following Topical Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: Cyclosporine A Versus Diquafosol Tetrasodium

Purpose

To compare the changes in human tear proteome and clinical effects following topical cyclosporine A (CsA) 0.05% or diquafosol tetrasodium (DQS) 3% treatment of dry eye disease (DED), and to identify biomarkers for determining disease severity and treatment effectiveness in DED.

Methods

A total of 18 patients were diagnosed with non-Sjögren DED. Nine patients in each group were treated with topical CsA 0.05% or DQS 3% for 4 weeks. Tear samples were collected after evaluation of tear breakup time, corneal and conjunctival erosion staining, and results of Schirmer's test 1 before and after treatment. Proteomes were characterized using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, and proteins exhibiting a fold change >1.5 or <0.67 (P < 0.05) were considered differentially expressed (DEP).

Results

A total of 794 proteins were identified, with no significant difference observed between pretreatment and posttreatment conditions. Proteomic analysis identified 54 and 106 DEPs between treatment groups (CsA and DQS, respectively), with gene ontology analysis indicating that both treatments enhanced innate and adaptive immune responses and cellular detoxification. Protein-network analysis showed that inflammation associated with the immune response was primarily responsible for the therapeutic process in both groups.

Conclusions

These results provide insight into the broad scope of changes at the ocular surface in DED and indicated that although both drugs improved the clinical parameters, the activated tear-specific biomarkers differed significantly between treatments. Our findings suggest that the DEPs identified here and those correlated with the clinical parameters might represent candidate biomarkers for DED.

Nanomolar Potency Aminophenyltriazine CFTR Activator Reverses Corneal Epithelial Injury in a Mouse Model of Dry Eye

Purpose: Dry eye disorders are a major health care burden. We previously reported the identification of N-methyl-N-phenyl-6-(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine [cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)_act-K267], which activated human wild-type CFTR chloride conductance with EC₅₀ ∼ 30 nM. Here, we report in vivo evidence for CFTR_act-K267 efficacy in an experimental mouse model of dry eye using a human compatible ophthalmic vehicle. Methods: CFTR activation in mice in vivo was demonstrated by ocular surface potential difference (OSPD) measurements. Ocular surface pharmacodynamics was measured in tear fluid samples obtained at different times after topical administration of CFTR_act-K267. Dry eye was produced by lacrimal duct cautery (LDC) and corneal epithelial injury and was assessed by Lissamine green (LG) staining. Results: OSPD measurements demonstrated a hyperpolarization of -8.6 ± 3 mV (standard error of the mean, 5 mice) in response to CFTR_act-K267 exposure in low chloride solution that was reversed by a CFTR inhibitor. Following single-dose topical administration of 2 nmol CFTR_act-K267, tear fluid CFTR_act-K267 concentration was >500 nM for more than 6 h. Following LDC, corneal surface epithelial injury, as assessed by LG staining, was substantially reversed in 10 of 12 eyes receiving 2 nmol CFTR_act-K267 3 times daily starting on day 2, when marked epithelial injury had already occurred. Improvement was seen in 3 of 12 vehicle-treated eyes. Conclusion: These studies provide in vivo evidence in mice for the efficacy of a topical, human use compatible CFTR_act-K267 formulation in stimulating chloride secretion and reversing corneal epithelial injury in dry eye.

Comparison of 0.05% cyclosporine and 3% diquafosol solution for dry eye patients: a randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical trial

Background

This study is aim to compare the clinical effectiveness between the two most prominent dry eye disease (DED)-specific eye drops, 0.05% cyclosporine (CN) and 3% diquafosol (DQ).

Methods

This is a multi-centered, randomized, masked, prospective clinical study. A total of 153 DED patients were randomly allocated to use CN twice per day or DQ six times daily. Cornea and conjunctival staining scores (NEI scale), tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test scores, and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score were measured at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks after treatment.

Results

At 12 weeks after treatment, NEI scaled scores were significantly reduced from the baseline by − 6.60 for CN and − 6.63 for DQ group (all P < 0.0001, P = 0.9739 between groups). TBUT and Schirmer values for CN were significantly improved from the baseline at 4 and 12 weeks (P = 0.0034, P < 0.0001 for TBUT, P = 0.0418, P = 0.0031 for Schirmer test). However, for DQ, TBUT showed significant improvement at 12 weeks only (P = 0.0281). Mean OSDI score differences from the baseline to 12 weeks were improved by − 13.03 ± 19.63 for CN and − 16.11 ± 20.87 for DQ, respectively (all P < 0.0001, P = 0.854 between groups). Regarding drug compliance, the mean instillation frequency of CN was less than that of DQ (P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in safety evaluation.

Conclusions

The level of improvement regarding NEI, TBUT, and OSDI scores were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. However, with regards to the early improvement of TBUT and patient compliance, patients using CN improved faster and with greater adherence to drug usage than did those treated with DQ.

Trial registration

KCT0002180, retrospectively registered on 23 December 2016.

The impact of dry eye disease treatment on patient satisfaction and quality of life: A review

Several aspects of the quality of life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction of patients with dry eye disease (DED) may be underestimated. Ocular symptoms, which are assessed by validated patient-reported questionnaires and may include stinging, burning, itchiness, grittiness, dryness and discomfort, reduce QoL by affecting daily activities and work productivity. Self-reported symptoms do not always correlate with post-treatment improvements in clinical measures such as tear film break-up time, inflammation and osmolarity. Thus, treatments may improve clinical ocular features without improving symptoms that affect daily life. This review explores 1500 abstracts from congress presentations and peer-reviewed journals for QoL and treatment satisfaction data on the use of active lubricants, osmoprotectants, secretagogues, and immunomodulators present in topical formulations for DED treatment, and validated symptom questionnaires. Patient-reported symptoms of DED are generally improved after treatment with topical formulations for tear replacement, tear stimulation or anti-inflammatory therapy compared with baseline or a control treatment. However, more data are required to compare the performance of active ingredients. It is fundamental to diagnose patients with DED accurately, recognising the major cause behind their dry eyes. Studies are also necessary to identify how patient satisfaction and QoL may be improved through long-term use of topical preparations. We conclude that careful and thorough consideration of patient-reported symptoms should be integrated into DED management to help tailor treatment to patient needs.

Patient and physician perspectives on the use of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for the management of chronic dry eye

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface and is one of the most common reasons for patients to visit an eye care provider. Cyclosporine A (CsA) is an immune modulating drug that was approved in the US for topical use in the treatment of DED in 2003, which led to a paradigm change in our understanding and treatment of DED, turning attention to control of inflammation for treatment. This review summarizes the literature to date regarding the impact of CsA on the treatment of DED. A special focus is given to the patient and physician perspectives of CsA, including dry eye symptom improvement, medication side effects, and overall patient satisfaction. Studies evaluating CsA in DED have considerable heterogeneity making generalized conclusions about the effect of CsA difficult. However, most studies have demonstrated improvement in at least some symptoms of dry eye in CsA-treated patients. Side effects, most commonly ocular burning on administration of CsA, are common. The literature is sparse regarding long-term follow-up of patients treated with CsA, optimal duration of treatment, and identifying which patients may receive the most benefit from CsA.

Effect of diquafosol tetrasodium 3% on the conjunctival surface and clinical findings after cataract surgery in patients with dry eye

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of diquafosol tetrasodium (DT) 3% on conjunctival impression cytologic findings in addition to clinical symptoms and signs after cataract surgery in patients with preexisting dry eye disease (DED).

METHODS

Ninety-four eyes of 94 patients with DED who underwent uneventful cataract surgery were included. In total, 50 patients were treated with DT 3% (group A), while 44 patients were treated with sodium hyaluronate 0.1% (group B) postoperatively, along with topical antibiotics and steroids. Conjunctival impression cytology was performed at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks after surgery. Visual acuity, ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear film breakup time (TBUT), keratoepitheliopathy score, Schirmer's test, and tear clearance rate were measured at baseline and at 1, 4, and 12 weeks, and corneal aberration was analyzed at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The grade of conjunctival squamous metaplasia was lower at 12 weeks, and goblet cell density was higher at 4 and 12 weeks in group A than in group B (P < 0.05). Compared with group B, group A showed significantly lower OSDI scores at 4 and 12 weeks, longer TBUT at 1, 4, and 12 weeks, lower keratoepitheliopathy scores at 1 and 12 weeks, and lower total root-mean-square score and spherical aberrations at 4 weeks after surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DT 3% eye drops application after cataract surgery was effective in improving conjunctival epithelial morphology and goblet cell density as well as clinical findings in patients with DED.

The Efficacy of Diquafosol Ophthalmic Solution in Non-Sjögren and Sjögren Syndrome Dry Eye Patients Unresponsive to Artificial Tear

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the efficacy of 3% diquafosol tetrasodium ophthalmic solution in Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and non-SS dry eye patients unresponsive to conventional artificial tear.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 38 dry eye patients (11 with SS and 27 with non-SS) who were treated with 3% diquafosol due to lack of response to artificial tear treatment for more than 3 months. Signs such as tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer-I test, and total ocular staining score (OSS), which consisted of corneal OSS and conjunctival OSS, were evaluated at baseline and the first visit after treatment. Symptoms were quantified using visual analog scale (VAS) and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores. Changes of parameters after treatment in all the patients and differences of changes in SS and non-SS were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total population, total OSS and corneal OSS improved average 6 weeks after diquafosol treatment (all P < 0.05, paired t-test), although conjunctival OSS had no improvement. TBUT increased after treatment (P = 0.036), while Schirmer-I test, OSDI, and VAS showed no improvement. With respect to comparisons, total and corneal OSS improved in non-SS patients and TBUT improved in SS patients (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Three percent diquafosol tetrasodium treatment could be considered as an additive or substitute treatment when artificial tear treatment is insufficient, as it improved OSS and TBUT. This study also demonstrated that diquafosol treatment is beneficial for TBUT improvement in SS, while it is beneficial for OSS improvement in non-SS dry eye patients.

Is the main lacrimal gland indispensable? Contributions of the corneal and conjunctival epithelia

The ocular surface system is responsible for ensuring that the precorneal tear film is sufficient in both quality and quantity to preserve optimal vision. Tear secretion is a complex, multifactorial process, and dysfunction of any component of the ocular surface system can result in tear film instability and hyperosmolarity with resultant dry eye disease. The tear film is primarily composed of lipids, aqueous, and mucins, with aqueous accounting for most of its thickness. The aqueous is produced by the main lacrimal gland, accessory lacrimal glands, and corneal and conjunctival epithelia. Although the main lacrimal gland has long been considered an indispensable source of the aqueous component of tears, there is evidence that adequate tear secretion can exist in the absence of the main lacrimal gland. We review and discuss the basics of tear secretion, the tear secretory capacity of the ocular surface, and emerging treatments for dry eye disease.