Effect of Number of Zones on Subjective Vision in Concentric Bifocal Optics

Subjective Evaluation of Defocus and Astigmatism Combinations Using Image Simulation in Presbyopes

SIGNIFICANCE

Image simulation is a useful and efficient tool to explore the impact of defocus and astigmatism combinations on visual acuity and image quality score when accommodation is taken into account.

PURPOSE

The goal of this experiment was to determine if a simulation is able to predict visual acuity and image quality score (IQS) with defocus and astigmatism combinations in presbyopes.

METHODS

We measured visual acuity and IQS in five defocus and astigmatism combinations in either real or simulated conditions. In real conditions, the subjects viewed a stimulus through an ophthalmic lens or a deformable mirror. In simulated conditions, subjects viewed images of the same stimulus with simulated blur. The amounts of defocus and astigmatism combinations of a progressive addition lens in near vision were generated through a static correction of the subject's aberrations. We simulated three levels of accommodation: subject could not accommodate (FOC0), subject could accommodate to the less hyperopic focal point (FOC1), or subject could accommodate to the circle of least confusion (FOC2).

RESULTS

Visual acuity or IQS did not differ between mirror and progressive addition lens conditions. Visual acuity measured in real blur conditions differed significantly from that in FOC0 simulated blur condition but were similar to that in FOC1 and FOC2 simulated blur conditions. Image quality score obtained in real conditions were between scores measured with the FOC0 and FOC1 simulated conditions, suggesting that the subjects were able to produce a low level of accommodation.

CONCLUSIONS

Accommodation may play a role when comparing optical and simulated defocus and astigmatism combinations. Presbyopic subjects are able to produce a low level of accommodation that may counterbalance a part of the deleterious effect of the astigmatism on image quality. Simulation remains a useful tool if the correct accommodation state is taken into account.

Optical and imaging properties of a novel multi-segment spectacle lens designed to slow myopia progression

PURPOSE

High sampling density optical metrology combined with pupil- and image-plane numerical analyses were applied to evaluate a novel spectacle lens containing multiple small zones designed to slow myopia progression.

METHODS

High-resolution aberrometry (ClearWave, www.lumetrics.com) was used to sample wavefront slopes of a novel spectacle lens, Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) (www.hoya.com), incorporating many small, positive-powered lenslets in its periphery. Using wavefront slope and error maps, custom MATLAB software ('Indiana Wavefront Analyzer') was used to compute image-plane point-spread functions (PSF), modulation transfer functions (MTF), simulated images and power distributions created by the dual-focus optic for different pupil sizes and target vergences.

RESULTS

Outside of a central 10 mm zone containing single distance optical power, a hexagonal array of small 1 mm lenslets with nearest-neighbour separations of 0.5 mm were distributed over the lens periphery. Sagittal and curvature-based measures of optical power imperfectly captured the consistent +3.50 D add produced by the lenslets. Image plane simulations revealed multiple PSFs and poor image quality at the lenslet focal plane. Blur at the distance optic focal plane was consistent with a combination of diffraction blur from the distance optic and the approximately +3.50 D of defocus from the 1 mm diameter near optic zones.

CONCLUSION

Converging the defocused beams generated by the multiple small (1 mm diameter) lenslets to a blurred image at the distance focal plane produced a blur magnitude determined by the small lenslet diameter and not the overall pupil diameter. The distance optic located in between the near-add lenslets determines the limits of the optical quality achievable by the lens. When compared to the optics of a traditional concentric-zone dual-focus contact lens, the optics of the DIMS lens generates higher-contrast images at low spatial frequencies (<7 cycles per degree), but lower-contrast at high spatial frequencies.

Effect of Simulated and Real Spherical and Astigmatism Defocus on Visual Acuity and Image Quality Score

SIGNIFICANCE

Image simulation is a useful and efficient tool to explore the impact of spherical and astigmatic blur on visual acuity (VA) and image gradation. It could help to design new optical corrections more efficiently and rapidly.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of simulated (convolution by an artificial eye) and real spherical and astigmatic defocus on VA and image gradation.

METHODS

Experiments were performed under highly controlled conditions: dynamic correction of the subjects' aberrations at 1 Hz and application of an artificial pupil. In experiment 1, Landolt C VA was measured in various conditions of spherical and astigmatism defocus. The amounts of spherical or positive astigmatic defocus oriented at 45° that gives a Landolt C VA of 0.0, 0.2, and 0.5 logMAR were measured in experiment 2. In experiment 3, the subjects scored the quality of the perceived image (three high-contrast 0.4 logMAR letters) with a five-item continuous grading scale.

RESULTS

Simulated blur was always more detrimental than optical blur. We measured a difference of 0.08 ± 0.03 and 0.11 ± 0.05 logMAR between both conditions, respectively, in presence of spherical and astigmatism defocus. An average ± standard deviation difference of 0.16 ± 0.06 D (i.e., spherical defocus) and 0.24 ± 0.15 D (i.e., astigmatism defocus) was observed between simulated and real optics blur to provide a given VA. The differences of image quality score between both conditions were, respectively, 15.13 ± 9.63 and 13.33 ± 4.83 for spherical and astigmatism defocus. Most of the differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a difference of about 20 and 35% between simulated and real optics blur, respectively, in presence of spherical and astigmatism blur. However, the difference between both methods remains equal to or below the clinically significant difference.

Testing vision with angular and radial multifocal designs using Adaptive Optics

Multifocal vision corrections are increasingly used solutions for presbyopia. In the current study we have evaluated, optically and psychophysically, the quality provided by multizone radial and angular segmented phase designs. Optical and relative visual quality were evaluated using 8 subjects, testing 6 phase designs. Optical quality was evaluated by means of Visual Strehl-based-metrics (VS). The relative visual quality across designs was obtained through a psychophysical paradigm in which images viewed through 210 pairs of phase patterns were perceptually judged. A custom-developed Adaptive Optics (AO) system, including a Hartmann-Shack sensor and an electromagnetic deformable mirror, to measure and correct the eye's aberrations, and a phase-only reflective Spatial Light Modulator, to simulate the phase designs, was developed for this study. The multizone segmented phase designs had 2-4 zones of progressive power (0 to +3D) in either radial or angular distributions. The response of an "ideal observer" purely responding on optical grounds to the same psychophysical test performed on subjects was calculated from the VS curves, and compared with the relative visual quality results. Optical and psychophysical pattern-comparison tests showed that while 2-zone segmented designs (angular & radial) provided better performance for far and near vision, 3- and 4-zone segmented angular designs performed better for intermediate vision. AO-correction of natural aberrations of the subjects modified the response for the different subjects but general trends remained. The differences in perceived quality across the different multifocal patterns are, in a large extent, explained by optical factors. AO is an excellent tool to simulate multifocal refractions before they are manufactured or delivered to the patient, and to assess the effects of the native optics to their performance.