Hypersensitivity to Cold Stimuli in Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers

The roles of neural adaptation and sensitization in contact lens discomfort

PURPOSE

To investigate the roles of neural adaptation and sensitization in contact lens discomfort (CLD).

METHODS

Cooling stimuli (20 °C) were applied to the cornea in a group comprising 24 symptomatic and 25 asymptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers as well as 15 non-CL wearing controls, using a computerized Belmonte esthesiometer. The adaptation paradigm consisted of 20 repetitive stimuli at threshold, sub- and supra-threshold levels. The sensitization paradigm involved five levels of suprathreshold stimuli ranging between 1x to 2x threshold. Following each stimulus, participants rated the sensation magnitude regarding intensity, coolness and irritation. Measurements were taken with habitual CL (BL_CL), after 2 weeks of no-CL (No_CL) and after restarting habitual CL wear (ReSt_CL).

RESULTS

The symptomatic subjects exhibited a lower threshold but reported enhanced sensations during the adaptation and sensitization paradigm, compared to the asymptomatic and control groups (all p ≤ 0.021). At the BL_CL and ReSt_CL visits, they showed increased ratings to repeated subthreshold stimuli (p = 0.025) and greater irritation during the sensitization paradigm (p ≤ 0.032). Ratings in asymptomatic and control groups were relatively unchanged over time (p ≥ 0.181). Logistic regression revealed a link between the augmented sensory responses and increased likelihood with CLD.

CONCLUSION

The maladaptive sensory responses seen in CLD subjects, with reduced adaptation and heightened sensitization to ocular surface stimulation, suggest an imbalance between sensitization and adaptation in CLD. As CLD may represent a reversible subcategory of dry eye, it can serve as a human dry eye model for studying the neurosensory effect of ocular surface stimulation.

Functional Changes of the Ocular Surface Sensory Nerves Due to Contact Lens Use in Young Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Users

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in corneal sensory nerve functionality in young asymptomatic (CL-A) and symptomatic (CL-S) contact lens (CL) users.

Methods

CL wearers (23.8 ± 1.0 years, n = 31) were classified as CL-S with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) ≥ 13 (n = 14) or CL-A. Users of eye glasses (EG; 24.5 ± 0.8 years, n = 29) with OSDI < 13 participated as controls. The sensations evoked by mechanical, chemical (gas esthesiometer), and cold (4°C saline drops) stimuli were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VASs). Moreover, tear volume, tear break up time (TBUT), blinking frequency (BF), and ocular surface temperature (OST; IR thermography) were also measured.

Results

Mechanical and chemical stimuli produced similar scores in the CL-A and EG participants, although the CL-A subjects referred to stronger irritation (p < 0.05). Likewise, the VAS intensity in response to cold stimuli did not differ between CL-A and EG subjects, while the ability to detect cold was significantly worse in CL-S users (p < 0.05). CL-A users had a similar tear volume, a higher BF (p < 0.01) and shorter TBUT (p < 0.001) to EG wearers, and blinking and TBUT were also altered significantly in CL-S users (p < 0.01). Interestingly, the OST was significantly lower in CL-A users (p < 0.05) than in EG wearers, but not in CL-S users.

Conclusions

Using CLs modifies corneal sensitivity, blinking and tearing in young volunteers. Even if they have yet to develop clinical signs of inflammation, they display changes in corneal sensitivity consistent with the sensitization of corneal nociceptors and the inhibition cold thermoreceptors, phenomena that occur under inflammatory conditions. The differences in corneal sensitivity and OST between CL-A and CL-S users could reflect the extent of nerve damage and inflammation at the ocular surface.

TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of contact lenses on the ocular surface

Several lifestyle choices made by contact lens wearers can have adverse consequences on ocular health. These include being non-adherent to contact lens care, sleeping in lenses, ill-advised purchasing options, not seeing an eyecare professional for regular aftercare visits, wearing lenses when feeling unwell, wearing lenses too soon after various forms of ophthalmic surgery, and wearing lenses when engaged in risky behaviors (e.g., when using tobacco, alcohol or recreational drugs). Those with a pre-existing compromised ocular surface may find that contact lens wear exacerbates ocular disease morbidity. Conversely, contact lenses may have various therapeutic benefits. The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impinged upon the lifestyle of contact lens wearers, introducing challenges such as mask-associated dry eye, contact lens discomfort with increased use of digital devices, inadvertent exposure to hand sanitizers, and reduced use of lenses. Wearing contact lenses in challenging environments, such as in the presence of dust and noxious chemicals, or where there is the possibility of ocular trauma (e.g., sport or working with tools) can be problematic, although in some instances lenses can be protective. Contact lenses can be worn for sport, theatre, at high altitude, driving at night, in the military and in space, and special considerations are required when prescribing in such situations to ensure successful outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis, incorporated within the review, identified that the influence of lifestyle factors on soft contact lens dropout remains poorly understood, and is an area in need of further research. Overall, this report investigated lifestyle-related choices made by clinicians and contact lens wearers and discovered that when appropriate lifestyle choices are made, contact lens wear can enhance the quality of life of wearers.

Evaluation of Ocular Surface Characteristics in Dry Eye Disease With and Without Soft Contact Lens Wear: A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate ocular surface alterations and in vivo confocal microscopic characteristics of the cornea in dry eye disease (DED) with contact lens wear (CLW).

METHODS

Sixty participants were divided into three groups: DED with CLW (n=20), DED without CLW (n=20), and normal control (n=20). Ocular surface parameters were evaluated. Basal tears and in vivo confocal microscopy images of the cornea were collected. Multiplex bead analysis was used to assess interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, nerve growth factor (NGF), and substance P (SP) in tears. Nerve morphology and dendritic cell density in corneal subbasal nerve images were calculated.

RESULTS

The DED with CLW group showed significantly higher ocular surface staining scores (P=0.022) and higher levels of IL-1β, NGF, and SP in tears (P=0.014, P=0.004 and P=0.025) than the DED without CLW group. Corneal dendritic cell density in the DED with CLW group was significantly higher than that in the normal controls (P=0.001) and DED without CLW group (P=0.043). Tear cytokine levels of IL-1β, NGF, and SP were correlated with ocular surface parameters in the DED with CLW group. Moreover, the years of CLW were positively correlated with corneal dendritic cell density (r=0.527, P=0.017) and negatively correlated with corneal nerve density (r=-0.511, P=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with DED with CLW showed greater epithelial damage, elevated inflammatory cytokines and neuromediators in tears, and higher corneal dendritic cell density than patients with DED without CLW. The immune and nervous systems may be involved in contact lens-related DED.

The impact of contact lenses on meibomian gland morphology

Despite years of experience with contact lenses, controversy remains as to whether contact lenses adversely impact the meibomian glands (MG). This review summarizes the present body of evidence, showing that contact lens wear is associated with alterations in MG morphology (up to 80% higher gland atrophy compared to non-wearers) and qualitative changes in MG secretion. Key factors such as duration of contact lens wear, contact lens type (e.g., soft vs. rigid), edge design, and material modulus of elasticity are discussed in relation to the extent of MG morphological changes, the quality of MG secretion and other ocular surface parameters. Longitudinal studies of sufficient statistical power are needed to better understand how contact lens wear affects the MG, risk factors, and the clinical sequelae of these changes.

CLEAR - Anatomy and physiology of the anterior eye

A key element of contact lens practice involves clinical evaluation of anterior eye health, including the cornea and limbus, conjunctiva and sclera, eyelids and eyelashes, lacrimal system and tear film. This report reviews the fundamental anatomy and physiology of these structures, including the vascular supply, venous drainage, lymphatic drainage, sensory innervation, physiology and function. This is the foundation for considering the potential interactions with, and effects of, contact lens wear on the anterior eye. This information is not consistently published as academic research and this report provides a synthesis from all available sources. With respect to terminology, the report aims to promote the consistent use of nomenclature in the field, and generally adopts anatomical terms recommended by the Federative Committee for Anatomical Terminology. Techniques for the examination of the ocular surface are also discussed.

Detectability and Bias Indices of Pneumatic Corneal Stimuli Using Signal Detection Theory

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility of using signal detection theory (SDT) in estimating criterion and detectability indices for corneal pneumatic stimuli and test corneal psychophysical data against linking hypotheses from nonprimate physiology using Bayesian analysis.

Methods

Corneal pneumatic stimuli were delivered using the Waterloo Belmonte esthesiometer. Corneal thresholds were estimated in 30 asymptomatic participants and 1.5× threshold stimuli were used as signals (with 0.4 probability). There were 100-trial mechanical and cold stimulus experiments and 50-trial chemical experiments. Trials were demarcated auditorily and “yes” or “no” recorded after each trial. Cold stimulus experiments were conducted with 0.6 signal probability. Criterion (c), likelihood ratio (lnβ), and d′ were calculated from the yes-no responses.

Results

Average d′ was 0.59 ± 0.1, 1.65 ± 0.37, and 1.14 ± 0.3 units for cold, mechanical, and chemical stimuli, respectively. Bayes factors obtained using Bayesian analysis of variance mildly favored (BF₁₀ = 1.55) differences between d′s of the stimulus types, with no support for differences in criteria between stimulus types. Multiple comparisons of d′ supported linking hypotheses based on nociception and nerve conductance theories.

Conclusions

Our experiments are the first to demonstrate the feasibility of estimating SDT indices and test different hypotheses. The conservative strategy (reporting “no” more often) chosen by participants was anticipated due to relatively large proportion of catch trials.

Translational Relevance

SDT when using pneumatic esthesiometry is vital to evaluate bias in responses of participants. Considering the varied forms of inherent noise in the corneal sensory system, SDT is critical to understand the sensory and decisional characteristics.

Role of diurnal variation of corneal sensory processing in contact lens discomfort

PURPOSE

To examine the diurnal variation of corneal threshold and suprathreshold sensory processing, symptoms, and tear secretion in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers and controls.

METHODS

26 symptomatic and 25 asymptomatic CL wearers and 15 asymptomatic non-CL wearing controls participated. Cooling thresholds, symptoms and tear meniscus height (TMH) were measured on each of 3 measurement days (random order) on the following schedules; Day-1 within 1 h of awakening (Baseline) and 3, 6 and 9 h later, Day-2 baseline and 9 h later (CLs worn in CL group) and Day-3 baseline and 9 h later. Magnitudes estimates for threshold-scaled suprathreshold stimuli were also estimated on Day-3. Data were analyzed using mixed models and repeated measures ANOVA.

RESULTS

Cooling thresholds for the symptomatic group were lower and decreased over Day-1 (p < 0.008) and after 8 h of CL wear on Day-2 (p < 0.001) and were paralleled by increased symptoms (all p < 0.001), whereas minimal variations were found in the asymptomatic and control groups. Magnitude estimates for suprathreshold stimuli were higher (p ≤ 0.002) in the symptomatic group but did not differ significantly over the day. TMH varied little over time and was lower in the symptomatic group, but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Corneal sensitivity and symptoms, but not TMH, increased diurnally irrespective of CL wear in symptomatic CL wearers. These results reveal the essential role of neurosensory abnormalities in CL discomfort and suggest involvement of a central mechanism in the diurnally increased symptoms of these patients.

Conjunctival Neuropathic and Inflammatory Pain-Related Gene Expression with Contact Lens Wear and Discomfort

Purpose: To identify alterations in neuropathic and inflammatory pain gene expression associated with contact lens (CL) wear and CL discomfort (CLD).Methods: Eight non-wearers, eight asymptomatic CL wearers (CLWs) and eight symptomatic CLWs were included. Conjunctival cells were collected by impression cytology and the mRNA expression levels of 85 genes were analyzed. Differentially expressed genes between non-wearers and CLWs and between asymptomatic and symptomatic CLWs were analyzed. An enrichment analysis was also performed.Results: Twelve genes were upregulated (including IL10, PDYN and PENK) and 28 downregulated (CCL2, IL1A, IL1B, IL2 and NGF) in CLWs (p ≤ 0.050). Eleven genes were upregulated (CCL2, IL1A, IL1B, IL2 and NGF) and nine downregulated (PDYN and PENK) in symptomatic CLWs (p ≤ 0.035). Enriched overrepresented terms were related to pain, neuronal transmission and inflammation.Conclusion: Contact lens wear might produce a desensitization-like mechanism responsible for comfortable CL wear. A malfunction of this mechanism might contribute to CLD.

Changes in Corneal Detection Thresholds After Repeated Tear Film Instability

Purpose

To use a human-based model to study the effects of repeated tear film instability on corneal detection thresholds to cold, mechanical, and chemical stimuli.

Methods

Twenty-five subjects participated in three study visits. A computer-controlled Belmonte esthesiometer was used to estimate corneal detection thresholds to cold, mechanical, and chemical stimuli before, after, and 30 minutes following 10 consecutive sustained tear exposure (STARE) trials. Subjects turned a pain knob (0–10) to indicate discomfort during STARE trials. The area of tear breakup and thinning in each trial was analyzed. Symptoms were evaluated by the Current Symptom Questionnaire (CSQ).

Results

There was a significant time effect on CSQ symptoms during both visits (Friedman test, P < 0.001), with immediately after repeated STARE and 30 minutes later significantly differing from before STARE (Wilcoxon, P < 0.017). Tear breakup occurred in every trial, ranging from 25% to 88% of the exposed corneal area and all subjects indicated discomfort during trials. There was a significant time effect on mechanical thresholds between before STARE mechanical thresholds and 30 minutes later (repeated measures analysis of variance [ANOVA] P < 0.001), but not cold (P = 0.057) or chemical (P = 0. 565) thresholds.

Conclusions

In this study, tear breakup during STARE trials was associated with discomfort, which when repeated, resulted in increased symptoms of ocular discomfort and alterations of mechanical sensory thresholds after 30 minutes. These results suggest that tear film instability, which is thought to occur repeatedly during normal blinking among dry eye patients over the day, can produce neurosensory alterations.

A Method to Calibrate the Carbon Dioxide (Chemical) Stimuli of Pneumatic Esthesiometer Externally

Purpose

To determine the feasibility of using a portable carbon dioxide (CO₂) sensor to calibrate a pneumatic esthesiometer and then to calibrate the chemical stimuli.

Methods

The chemical stimuli in ocular surface experiments are combinations of medical air and added CO₂ (%CO₂). These stimuli were calibrated using a portable CO₂ sensor (COZIR CM-0041) and data logger, delivered for 100 seconds by using the Waterloo Belmonte esthesiometer. The distances between the sensor and esthesiometer tip were 0 (to measure feasibility), 3, 5, and 10 mm. In experiment I, 100% CO₂ was tested using four different flow rates (50, 100, 150, and 200 mL/min) at three working distances. In experiment II, flow rates of 20 to 100 mL/min and concentrations of 20% to 100% CO₂ were tested in 20 steps at 3 working distances.

Results

The CO₂ sensor correctly reported the esthesiometer extremes of 0% and 100% CO₂ when placed at the esthesiometer tip. There were progressive, systematic increases in concentrations reaching/reported by the sensor with increasing flow rates and nominal concentrations and progressive decreases in measurements with increases in working distance.

Conclusions

CO₂ concentrations in pneumatic esthesiometers can be calibrated and, as expected, vary with flow rate and distance, highlighting the importance of calibration and standardization of CO₂ stimuli in these instruments.

Translational Relevance

Calibrated CO₂, a chemical sensory stimulus in humans, may be used in testing the surface of the eye as well as other membranes within which the CO₂ can be dissolved (e.g., mucous) to produce an acidic stimulus.

Effects of Tear Film Instability on Sensory Responses to Corneal Cold, Mechanical, and Chemical Stimuli

Purpose

To investigate the effects of tear film instability (TFI) induced by sustained tear exposure (STARE) on sensory responses to corneal cold, mechanical, and chemical stimuli.

Methods

Fifteen normal subjects were enrolled. TFI was induced during 10 repeated trials of STARE. Pneumatic cold, mechanical, and chemical stimuli were delivered using a computer-controlled Belmonte esthesiometer on three separate visits. The magnitude of the sensory responses to threshold and suprathreshold (1.25 and 1.50 times threshold levels) stimuli were assessed for intensity, coolness or warmness, irritation and pain, using a 0 (none) to 100 (very strong) scale, before and after STARE trials. Symptoms of ocular discomfort were evaluated using the Current Symptom Questionnaire (CSQ). Repeated measures ANOVA was used for data analysis.

Results

Following STARE trials, the intensity and coolness ratings to cooling stimuli decreased (P = 0.043 and 0.044 for intensity and coolness, respectively), while rated irritation to mechanical stimuli was increased (P = 0.024). The CSQ scores also increased regardless of visits (all P < 0.001). Intensity ratings, coolness to room temperature stimuli and irritation to mechanical and chemical stimuli increased for all suprathreshold stimuli with increasing stimulus levels (P ≤ 0.005).

Conclusions

Repeated TFI induced by STARE affects neurosensory function of the ocular surface. The decrease in reports of cooling and increase in irritation after repeated TFI suggest a complex interaction of neural mechanisms (particularly nonnociceptive cold and nociceptive mechanical) giving rise to ocular surface sensation in humans.