Comparisons of Two Microperimeters: The Clinical Value of an Extended Stimulus Range

Bearing fixing: A new computer algorithm method for subjective determination of astigmatism

PURPOSE

This article aims to illustrate the principles of bearing fixing, a new computer-controlled procedure for subjective determination of astigmatism, and to compare it with conventional clinician-controlled Jackson crossed-cylinder refraction.

METHODS

The principles and method for bearing fixing are described. Astigmatism was measured using bearing fixing and Jackson cross-cylinder twice on 20 visually normal participants aged between 18 and 34 years. After final sphere adjustment, acuity measurements were made with each refraction estimate.

RESULTS

Bearing fixing results could be obtained for all participants. Mean bearing fixing cylinder magnitude was slightly higher than Jackson cross-cylinder measures of cylinder magnitude, by 0.05D. Using vector analysis to take into account cylinder power and axis, mean bearing fixing astigmatism was not significantly different from cross-cylinder astigmatism, but did have higher test-retest variability (p < 0.05). Acuity with bearing fixing and cross-cylinder corrections did not significantly differ in average value or repeatability.

CONCLUSIONS

Bearing fixing is a feasible method for subjective determination of astigmatism, and there are a number of potential improvements to the method which could make it faster and more precise.

Clinical Perspectives and Trends: Microperimetry as a trial endpoint in retinal disease

Endpoint development trials are underway across the spectrum of retinal disease. New validated endpoints are urgently required for the assessment of emerging gene therapies and in preparation for the arrival of novel therapeutics targeting early stages of common sight-threatening conditions such as age-related macular degeneration. Visual function measures are likely to be key candidates in this search. Over the last two decades, microperimetry has been used extensively to characterize functional vision in a wide range of retinal conditions, detecting subtle defects in retinal sensitivity that precede visual acuity loss and tracking disease progression over relatively short periods. Given these appealing features, microperimetry has already been adopted as an endpoint in interventional studies, including multicenter trials, on a modest scale. A review of its use to date shows a concurrent lack of consensus in test strategy and a wealth of innovative disease and treatment-specific metrics which may show promise as clinical trial endpoints. There are practical issues to consider, but these have not held back its popularity and it remains a widely used psychophysical test in research. Endpoint development trials will undoubtedly be key in understanding the validity of microperimetry as a clinical trial endpoint, but existing signs are promising.

A Review of the Use of Confidence Intervals for Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement in Optometry and Vision Science

SIGNIFICANCE

Confidence intervals are still seldom reported for Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement. When they are reported, 50% of articles use approximate methods and 50% use exact methods.

PURPOSE

Bland-Altman limits of agreement can be unreliable estimates, especially for small sample sizes. However, authors seldom use confidence intervals for limits of agreement. This article reviews their use in Optometry and Vision Science.

METHODS

A keyword search for "Bland," "Altman," "Bland-Altman," "LoA," and "limits of agreement" was conducted on the Optometry and Vision Science website within a time range from January 2016 to December 2018.

RESULTS

Fifty articles were reported or were judged to use Bland-Altman analysis; sample sizes ranged from 3 to 2072. Eight of these article reported confidence limits for limits of agreement, four of which used exact methods and four used Bland and Altman's approximate method.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of confidence intervals for limits of agreement has increased in Optometry and Vision Science but is far from universal. To assist researchers in calculating exact confidence limits for Bland-Altman limits of agreement, spreadsheets are included for performing the calculations and generating Bland-Altman plots with the confidence intervals included.