Topical Review: Effects of Contact Lens Wear on Corneal, Conjunctival, and Lid Margin Sensitivity

Functional Changes of the Ocular Surface Sensory Nerves Due to Contact Lens Use in Young Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Users

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in corneal sensory nerve functionality in young asymptomatic (CL-A) and symptomatic (CL-S) contact lens (CL) users.

Methods

CL wearers (23.8 ± 1.0 years, n = 31) were classified as CL-S with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) ≥ 13 (n = 14) or CL-A. Users of eye glasses (EG; 24.5 ± 0.8 years, n = 29) with OSDI < 13 participated as controls. The sensations evoked by mechanical, chemical (gas esthesiometer), and cold (4°C saline drops) stimuli were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VASs). Moreover, tear volume, tear break up time (TBUT), blinking frequency (BF), and ocular surface temperature (OST; IR thermography) were also measured.

Results

Mechanical and chemical stimuli produced similar scores in the CL-A and EG participants, although the CL-A subjects referred to stronger irritation (p < 0.05). Likewise, the VAS intensity in response to cold stimuli did not differ between CL-A and EG subjects, while the ability to detect cold was significantly worse in CL-S users (p < 0.05). CL-A users had a similar tear volume, a higher BF (p < 0.01) and shorter TBUT (p < 0.001) to EG wearers, and blinking and TBUT were also altered significantly in CL-S users (p < 0.01). Interestingly, the OST was significantly lower in CL-A users (p < 0.05) than in EG wearers, but not in CL-S users.

Conclusions

Using CLs modifies corneal sensitivity, blinking and tearing in young volunteers. Even if they have yet to develop clinical signs of inflammation, they display changes in corneal sensitivity consistent with the sensitization of corneal nociceptors and the inhibition cold thermoreceptors, phenomena that occur under inflammatory conditions. The differences in corneal sensitivity and OST between CL-A and CL-S users could reflect the extent of nerve damage and inflammation at the ocular surface.

CLEAR - Anatomy and physiology of the anterior eye

A key element of contact lens practice involves clinical evaluation of anterior eye health, including the cornea and limbus, conjunctiva and sclera, eyelids and eyelashes, lacrimal system and tear film. This report reviews the fundamental anatomy and physiology of these structures, including the vascular supply, venous drainage, lymphatic drainage, sensory innervation, physiology and function. This is the foundation for considering the potential interactions with, and effects of, contact lens wear on the anterior eye. This information is not consistently published as academic research and this report provides a synthesis from all available sources. With respect to terminology, the report aims to promote the consistent use of nomenclature in the field, and generally adopts anatomical terms recommended by the Federative Committee for Anatomical Terminology. Techniques for the examination of the ocular surface are also discussed.

CLEAR - Effect of contact lens materials and designs on the anatomy and physiology of the eye

This paper outlines changes to the ocular surface caused by contact lenses and their degree of clinical significance. Substantial research and development to improve oxygen permeability of rigid and soft contact lenses has meant that in many countries the issues caused by hypoxia to the ocular surface have largely been negated. The ability of contact lenses to change the axial growth characteristics of the globe is being utilised to help reduce the myopia pandemic and several studies and meta-analyses have shown that wearing orthokeratology lenses or soft multifocal contact lenses can reduce axial length growth (and hence myopia). However, effects on blinking, ptosis, the function of Meibomian glands, fluorescein and lissamine green staining of the conjunctiva and cornea, production of lid-parallel conjunctival folds and lid wiper epitheliopathy have received less research attention. Contact lens wear produces a subclinical inflammatory response manifested by increases in the number of dendritiform cells in the conjunctiva, cornea and limbus. Papillary conjunctivitis is also a complication of all types of contact lenses. Changes to wear schedule (daily disposable from overnight wear) or lens materials (hydrogel from SiHy) can reduce papillary conjunctivitis, but the effect of such changes on dendritic cell migration needs further study. These changes may be associated with decreased comfort but confirmatory studies are needed. Contact lenses can affect the sensitivity of the ocular surface to mechanical stimulation, but whether these changes affect comfort requires further investigation. In conclusion, there have been changes to lens materials, design and wear schedules over the past 20+ years that have improved their safety and seen the development of lenses that can reduce the myopia development. However, several changes to the ocular surface still occur and warrant further research effort in order to optimise the lens wearing experience.

The impact of hybrid contact lenses on keratoconus progression after accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of hybrid contact lenses (HCLs) on keratoconus (KCN) progression after accelerated transepithelial cross-linking (A-TE CXL).

METHODS

Thirty-five eyes of 26 patients who preferred Ultrahealth HCLs for an optical correction after A-TE CXL formed the study group, and 45 eyes of 34 patients who preferred spectacle correction were age- and sex-matched to form the control group. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), maximum keratometry, mean keratometry, apical posterior keratometry, cylindrical power, minimum corneal thickness, keratoconus vertex indices and curvature asymmetry indices obtained by Scheimpflug corneal topography were compared before, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. Anterior segment optic coherence tomography (AS-OCT) was performed to measure the apical corneal clearance of HCL-wearing patients.

RESULTS

The median pre-CXL CDVA value of the patients in the HCL group was logMAR 0.30 (0.20-1.0), and it was logMAR 0.30 (0.10-1.0) in the spectacle-corrected group. There was a significant increase in CDVA 6 and 12 months after CXL procedure in both groups (p < 0.001, 0.003, respectively). The median front curve asymmetry index (FCAsym) significantly improved after A-TE CXL in the HCL group. The pre-CXL and 12th-month topographic comparisons of the spectacle-corrected group revealed no significant difference. In addition, no significant difference was observed between topographic alterations of two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The CDVA significantly improved, and KCN progression was halted in patients wearing HCL 12 months after A-TE CXL. Besides, FCAsym indices can be considered for follow-up of the HCL-wearing patients as an assistive parameter to AS-OCT measurements.