A 12-month Prospective Study of Tear Osmolarity in Contact Lens Wearers Refitted with Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses

Machine learning-based prediction of tear osmolarity for contact lens practice

PURPOSE

This study addressed the utilisation of machine learning techniques to estimate tear osmolarity, a clinically significant yet challenging parameter to measure accurately. Elevated tear osmolarity has been observed in contact lens wearers and is associated with contact lens-induced dry eye, a common cause of discomfort leading to discontinuation of lens wear.

METHODS

The study explored machine learning, regression and classification techniques to predict tear osmolarity using routine clinical parameters. The data set consisted of 175 participants, primarily healthy subjects eligible for soft contact lens wear. Various clinical assessments were performed, including symptom assessment with the Ocular Surface Disease Index and 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5), tear meniscus height (TMH), tear osmolarity, non-invasive keratometric tear film break-up time (NIKBUT), ocular redness, corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining and Meibomian glands loss.

RESULTS

The results revealed that simple linear regression was insufficient for accurate osmolarity prediction. Instead, more advanced regression models achieved a moderate level of predictive power, explaining approximately 32% of the osmolarity variability. Notably, key predictors for osmolarity included NIKBUT, TMH, ocular redness, Meibomian gland coverage and the DEQ-5 questionnaire. In classification tasks, distinguishing between low (<299 mOsmol/L), medium (300-307 mOsmol/L) and high osmolarity (>308 mOsmol/L) levels yielded an accuracy of approximately 80%. Key parameters for classification were similar to those in regression models, emphasising the importance of NIKBUT, TMH, ocular redness, Meibomian glands coverage and the DEQ-5 questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the potential benefits of integrating machine learning into contact lens research and practice. It suggests the clinical utility of assessing Meibomian glands and NIKBUT in contact lens fitting and follow-up visits. Machine learning models can optimise contact lens prescriptions and aid in early detection of conditions like dry eye, ultimately enhancing ocular health and the contact lens wearing experience.

Comfort After Refitting Symptomatic Habitual Reusable Toric Lens Wearers with a New Daily Disposable Contact Lens for Astigmatism

Purpose

To subjectively evaluate comfort with a daily disposable (delefilcon A for astigmatism) contact lens compared to other common weekly/monthly soft toric contact lenses in symptomatic wearers.

Methods

This open-label, single arm study enrolled current reusable soft toric lens wearers with minimum score of 12 on the contact lens dry eye (CLDEQ-8) questionnaire. Subjects were also administered the CLDEQ-8 after 1 replacement schedule of their optimized habitual toric lenses (2 to 4 weeks), and after 2 weeks of wear with delefilcon A toric daily disposable lenses (Dailies Total1 for Astigmatism; Alcon Vision LLC, Fort Worth, Texas).

Results

A total of 85 subjects completed the study. Mean total CLDEQ-8 score was 16.8 ± 8.1 for subjects refit with their optimized habitual toric lenses and 12.4 ± 7.5 for subjects refit with delefilcon A toric lenses, a difference of 4.3 ± 10.4 (p < 0.001). With delefilcon A toric lenses, 78.9% of subjects reported little to no intensity of eye discomfort, compared to 51.7% for the habitual toric lenses (p = 0.005). In addition, 77.7% of subjects reported little to no intensity of dryness for delefilcon A toric lenses, compared to 50.6% for the habitual toric lenses (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The subjective comfort in symptomatic habitual reusable toric contact lens wearers was improved by refitting with delefilcon A toric lenses.

Silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel soft contact lenses for differences in patient-reported eye comfort and safety

BACKGROUND

Ocular discomfort is the leading cause of permanent discontinuation of soft contact lens (SCL) wear. Silicone hydrogel and hydrogel materials are the two major categories of SCLs, with silicone hydrogel materials being newer and more breathable than hydrogel materials. Whether comfort is associated with SCL material is controversial despite numerous studies. Similarly, the difference between these materials in terms of safety outcomes (e.g. frequency of microbial keratitis) is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of silicone hydrogel compared with hydrogel SCLs on self-reported comfort, dry eye test results, and adverse events in SCL-wearing adults 18 years of age or older.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Eyes and Vision Information Specialist searched the electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There were no restrictions on language or date of publication. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, including the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2022, Issue 6), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase.com, PubMed, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database), ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We also searched the reference lists of identified studies, review articles, and guidelines for information about relevant studies that may not have been identified by our search strategy. Furthermore, we contacted investigators regarding ongoing trials. The most recent database search was conducted on 24 June 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Our search selection criteria included RCTs, quasi-RCTs, and cross-over RCTs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We applied standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven parallel-group RCTs conducted in the USA, the UK, Australia, Germany, India, and Turkey. A total of 1371 participants were randomized. The duration of SCL wear ranged from one to 52 weeks. Study characteristics and risk of bias The median number of participants per trial was 120 (interquartile range: 51 to 314), and the average age ranged from 20.7 to 33.0 years. Women represented the majority of participants (range 55% to 74.9%; 5 RCTs). Collectively, the included trials compared eight different silicone hydrogel SCLs with three different hydrogel SCLs. Five trials compared daily disposable SCLs, and two compared extended wear SCLs (worn for seven days and six nights). New SCL wearers were enrolled in three trials. Two trials included both new and established SCL wearers, and two trials did not report participants' history of SCL use. Five trials were sponsored by industry. We judged the overall risk of bias to be 'high' or 'some concerns' for the safety and efficacy outcomes. Findings One trial reported Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) results, with the evidence being very uncertain about the effects of SCL material on OSDI scores (mean difference -1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.49 to 8.09; 1 RCT, 47 participants; very low certainty evidence). Three trials reported visual analog scale comfort score results, with no clear difference in comfort between materials, but the evidence was of very low certainty; trial results could not be combined because the three trials reported results at different time points. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of SCL material on discontinuation of contact lens wear (risk ratio [RR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.74; 1 RCT, 248 participants). None of the included trials reported Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) or Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) scores. There was no evidence of a clinically meaningful difference (> 0.5 unit) between daily disposable silicone hydrogel and hydrogel SCLs in corneal staining, conjunctival staining, or conjunctival redness (very low certainty evidence). Adverse events Very low certainty evidence from two trials comparing daily disposable SCLs suggested no evidence of a difference between lens materials in the risk of vision-threatening adverse events at one to four weeks (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.08 to 5.51; 2 RCTs, 368 participants). Two trials comparing extended wear SCLs indicated that hydrogel SCLs may have a 2.03 times lower risk of adverse events at 52 weeks compared with silicone hydrogel SCLs (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.99; 815 participants), but the certainty of evidence was very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The overall evidence for a difference between all included silicone hydrogel and hydrogel SCLs was of very low certainty, with most trials at high overall risk of bias. The majority of studies did not assess comfort using a validated instrument. There was insufficient evidence to support recommending one SCL material over the other. For extended wear, hydrogel SCL may have a lower risk of adverse events at 52 weeks compared to silicon hydrogel. Future well-designed trials are needed to generate high certainty evidence to further clarify differences in SCL material comfort and safety.

The impact of contact lenses on meibomian gland morphology

Despite years of experience with contact lenses, controversy remains as to whether contact lenses adversely impact the meibomian glands (MG). This review summarizes the present body of evidence, showing that contact lens wear is associated with alterations in MG morphology (up to 80% higher gland atrophy compared to non-wearers) and qualitative changes in MG secretion. Key factors such as duration of contact lens wear, contact lens type (e.g., soft vs. rigid), edge design, and material modulus of elasticity are discussed in relation to the extent of MG morphological changes, the quality of MG secretion and other ocular surface parameters. Longitudinal studies of sufficient statistical power are needed to better understand how contact lens wear affects the MG, risk factors, and the clinical sequelae of these changes.

Tear Film Surface Quality in Modern Daily Disposable Contact Lens Wear

OBJECTIVES

As reported previously, tear film surface quality (TFSQ) should be considered in contact lens (CL) fitting. This study followed noninvasive keratograph tear film break-up time (NIKBUT) in CL wearers for 12 months to validate its clinical utility in predicting CL performance.

METHODS

Fifty-five subjects (M/F=17/38) aged 26±4 years were prescribed silicone hydrogel or hydrogel CLs. The study included baseline measurements without CLs; 2 visits for CL fitting and control; follow-up after 3, 6, and 12 months of CL wear; and postwear visit without CLs. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), 8-Item Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8), first and mean NIKBUT (F/M-NIKBUT), fluorescein tear film break-up time (FBUT), and ocular surface staining were evaluated.

RESULTS

Post hoc analysis of each pair of visits showed differences between baseline and all CL visits for F-NIKBUT, M-NIKBUT, FBUT, and corneal staining. No difference was reported in symptoms. In addition, differences between baseline and postwear visits were noted in OSDI, M-NIKBUT, FBUT, and corneal staining, with three of the latter parameters showing a downward trend.

CONCLUSIONS

No changes in TFSQ and symptoms were reported over 12 months. Introducing NIKBUT as part of routine CL fitting is advised to improve CL fit and predict success.

Dry Eye Symptoms in Individuals With Keratoconus Wearing Contact Lenses

OBJECTIVES

To assess dry eye symptoms associated with different contact lens modalities in patients with keratoconus using a dry eye questionnaire.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed by the National Keratoconus Foundation. The survey asked participants to report demographic characteristics, current optical correction, age at the time of diagnosis of keratoconus, and contact lens history. The 12-item Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was also completed. Data from participants wearing the same contact lens modality bilaterally were analyzed.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 197 individuals wearing the same contact lens modality bilaterally. The average age of participants at the time of the survey was 47.2±14.8 years (range: 15-87 years), and the average age at which keratoconus was diagnosed was 26.1±9.9 years (range: 8-55 years). The mean overall OSDI score of all participants was 40.2±22.8 (range: 0-100). There was no difference in the mean OSDI scores based on current contact lens modality type (F=1.79; n=187; P=0.13). Based on an OSDI score of 33 or higher, 90% of participants reported symptoms indicative of dry eye disease. Scleral lens wearers reported less discomfort on the individual items related to windy and low-humidity conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with keratoconus, irrespective of contact lens modality, report a high incidence of dry eye symptoms.