Corneal Health during Three Months of Scleral Lens Wear

Evaluation of corneal dendritic cell density and subbasal nerve density in contact lens wearers using IVCM: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the subclinical changes in corneal dendritic cell density (CDCD) and corneal subbasal nerve density (CSND) in asymptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers.

Methods

Databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for trials and studies reporting the changes of corneal CDCD and CSND in contact lens wearers published until 25 June 2022. PRISMA guidelines as well as recommended meta-analysis practices were followed. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan V.5.3 software.

Results

After the screening, 10 studies with 587 eyes of 459 participants were included. Seven studies reported the data of CDCD. Compared with the control group, CDCD in the CL wearers was higher (18.19, 95% CI 18.8–27.57, p = 0.0001). Type of in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), wear duration, and frequency of lens change were sources of heterogeneity. The difference in CSND between CL wearers and the control group was insignificant, and subgroup analysis did not reveal a source of heterogeneity.

Conclusion

Overall, CDCD increased in CL wears, while CSND did not show significant differences. IVCM is a feasible tool to assess subclinical changes in CL wearers.

How Can We Best Measure the Performance of Scleral Lenses? Current Insights

Scleral lenses (SLs) present several unique advantageous characteristics for patients. As these lenses are mainly fitted in severely diseased eyes, a thorough evaluation of the ocular surface before and after SL fitting and the on-eye SL fitting evaluation are essential and help minimize potential physiological complications. This review will explore the current and emerging techniques and instrumentation to best measure SL performance ensuring optimal lens fitting, visual quality, comfort and physiological responses, highlighting some potential complications and follow-up recommendations. A single physician could perform the great majority of evaluations. Still, the authors consider that the assessment of SL fitting should be a collaborative and multidisciplinary job, involving contact lens practitioners, ophthalmologists and the industry. This publication has reviewed the most up-to-date work and listed the most used techniques; however, the authors encourage the development of more evidence-based recommendations for SL clinical practice.