Fitting of Orthokeratology in the United States: A Survey of the Current State of Orthokeratology

Benefits and risks of orthokeratology treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis reviews the evidence for the risks and benefits associated with orthokeratology (OK) treatment compared with other methods of myopia control in children and adults.

METHODS

A systematic search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Pubmed, Embase and Ovid was conducted from database inception to 22nd August 2021. Studies that reported on risks, visual and ocular biometric effects of OK in patients > 5 years of age with myopia (- 0.75 to - 6.00D) were included. Main outcomes are change in axial length and any adverse event.

RESULTS

Fourty-five papers were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The quality of data was variable and of moderate certainty, and selection bias likely skewed the results towards a relative benefit for OK. The rate of axial elongation in children was lower for OK treatment compared to other treatment modalities at one year (MD - 0.16 mm, 95% CI - 0.25 to - 0.07). Rate of change in axial length in children rebounded after OK discontinuation compared to participants who continued treatment (MD 0.10 mm, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.14). Adults and children wearing OK were up to 3.79 times more likely to experience an adverse event when compared with conventional contact lenses (OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.24 to ll.), though this evidence base is underdeveloped and requires additional well-designed studies for substantial conclusions to be drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

OK arrests myopia progression while in use, however, there remain unanswered questions about the optimal duration of treatment, discontinuation effects and long-term risk for adverse events.

Two Cases of Bilateral Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment During Orthokeratology Treatment

Orthokeratology may be effective in slowing myopic progression. However, whether orthokeratology is beneficial enough to prevent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment formation remains unclear. Two cases of bilateral rhegmatogenous retinal detachment were seen during orthokeratology treatment and corrected with scleral buckling and cryopexy under general anesthesia. This is the first report of bilateral retinal detachment found during orthokeratology treatment. Although orthokeratology is effective for myopic correction and prevents axial length elongation, patients still have a risk of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Careful follow-up not only of the anterior segment but also of the peripheral retina is necessary.

A Survey of Myopia Correction Pattern of Children and Parent's Attitudes in China

SIGNIFICANCE

This survey provides information about Chinese children's myopia correction status and parents' attitudes toward myopia correction.

PURPOSE

Under the background of a guideline of appropriate techniques for the prevention and control of children's myopia, this study aimed to investigate the current myopia correction pattern of children and parents' attitudes.

METHODS

Two self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 684 children with myopia corrections and 450 parents (384 mothers and 66 fathers) to explore children's myopia correction patterns and parental attitudes. The questionnaire investigated the pattern of children's myopia correction, prescribing of children's myopia correction, the incidence of high myopia, parental attitudes toward various myopia corrections methods, and preferred initial age for contact lens usage.

RESULTS

Single-vision spectacles (n = 600; 88.2 ± 7.4%) are widely used in China because of their comfort and affordability. More than 80% of children use single-vision spectacles prescribed by ophthalmologists and opticians. Children who used single-vision spectacles at an earlier age had more incidence of high myopia (18.4 ± 4.2%) than those who used single-vision spectacles at a later age (0.7 ± 0.9%). Effective myopia control was the primary reason parents preferred to choose different optical corrections, followed by safety, convenience, clarity, affordability, comfort, and other reasons. The survey indicated that 52.4% of parents whose children used orthokeratology lenses would have preferred safe and convenient options if available. In addition, 50% of the parents preferred delaying their children's use of orthokeratology lenses and other contact lenses to an older age.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-vision spectacles are still a popular option to correct myopia in children. There was a demonstrated increase in myopia in children who used single spectacles at an earlier age. Parents' attitudes were important factors for selecting myopia corrections in children.