Adaptation Mechanisms, Eccentricity Profiles, and Clinical Implementation of Red-on-White Perimetry

Age-related change in flicker thresholds with rod- and cone-enhanced stimuli

PURPOSE

Rod and cone photoreceptor-specific tests can be time-consuming. A new non-invasive test is described. The test is based on the measurement of flicker modulation thresholds with rod- and cone-enhanced visual stimuli, which requires only minimum adaptation time. Here, we investigated how the rod-and cone-mediated flicker thresholds vary with age.

METHODS

Monocular thresholds with rod and cone-enhanced stimuli were measured in 140 healthy adults, (age range: 18-75 years), foveally (0°) and at four parafoveal locations, at an eccentricity of 5° in each of the four quadrants using five, adaptive, interleaved staircases. Temporal frequencies, stimulus sizes, background luminance and spectral composition, were adjusted appropriately to achieve approximately 1 log unit separation in sensitivity between the rod- and cone-enhanced stimuli. Spectrally calibrated, 'neutral density' filters were used to enable adequate control of display luminance for rod enhanced stimuli.

RESULTS

The magnitude of central and parafoveal rod thresholds was significantly higher than the central and parafoveal cone thresholds, respectively (p < 0.001) in both the age groups. However, the rate of increase in central rod thresholds (y = 0.45x-12.79; linear regression equation) was not significantly steeper than the rate of increase in central (y = 0.29x-8.53) cone thresholds (p = 0.15). Centrally, cone thresholds showed a better correlation with rod central thresholds for the age > 45 years (Spearman correlation, ρ = 0.74, p < 0.001) compared to age ≤ 45 years (ρ = 0.41, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Thresholds with rod- and cone-enhanced stimuli are largely invariant below 45 years of age and increase rapidly above this age. This age-wise normative database can be used as an effective functional-marker to assess photoreceptor sensitivities in retinal diseases.

Selective Automated Perimetry Under Photopic, Mesopic, and Scotopic Conditions: Detection Mechanisms and Testing Strategies

PURPOSE

Automated scotopic, mesopic, and photopic perimetry are likely to be important paradigms in the assessment of emerging treatments of retinal diseases, yet our knowledge of the photoreceptor mechanisms detecting targets under these conditions remains largely dependent on simian data. We therefore aimed to establish the photoreceptor/postreceptoral mechanisms detecting perimetric targets in humans under photopic, mesopic, and scotopic conditions and to make recommendations for suitable clinical testing strategies for selective perimetry.

METHODS

Perimetric sensitivities within 30° of fixation were determined for eight wavelengths (410, 440, 480, 520, 560, 600, 640, and 680 nm) under scotopic, mesopic (1.3 cd.m^-2) and photopic (10 cd.m^-2) conditions. Data were fitted with vector combinations of rod, S-cone, nonopponent M+L-cone mechanism, and opponent M- versus L-cone mechanism templates.

RESULTS

Scotopicperimetric sensitivity was determined by rods peripherally and by a combination of rods and cones at, and immediately around, fixation. Mesopic perimetric sensitivity was mediated by M+L-cones and S-cones centrally and by M+L-cones and rods more peripherally. Photopic perimetric sensitivity was determined by an opponent M- versus L-cone, a nonopponent M+L-cone, and an S-cone mechanism centrally and by a combination of an S-cone and an M+L-cone mechanism peripherally.

CONCLUSIONS

Under scotopic conditions, a 480-nm stimulus provides adequate isolation (≥28 dB) of the rod mechanism. Several mechanisms contribute to mesopic sensitivity: this redundancy in detection may cause both insensitivity to broadband white targets and ambiguity in determining which mechanism is being probed with short-wavelength stimuli. M- and L-cone-derived mechanisms are well isolated at 10 cd.m^-2: these may be selectively probed by a stimulus at 640 nm (≥ 20 dB isolation).

TRANSLATION RELEVANCE

In human observers, multiple mechanisms contribute to the detection of Goldmann size III and size V perimetric targets under scotopic, mesopic, and photopic conditions. The relative contribution of these mechanisms appears to differ from those found previously for macaques. Our results furthermore suggest that caution must be exercised when using microperimetric techniques, which are typically conducted under mesopic conditions and which are likely to be important in the assessment of emerging treatments for retinal disease. This is because mesopic background conditions maximize the redundancy of target detection. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that spectral manipulation of the stimulus alone cannot be used to reliably separate rod from cone responses under these conditions.

A Color Perimetric Test to Evaluate Macular Pigment Density in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

PURPOSE

To evaluate differences in measurements of macular pigment optical density (MPOD) in patients with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and a group of healthy patients (control group). Short-term repeatability of MPOD measures was also assessed in the control group.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 31 eyes from 31 patients with bilateral dry AMD, 21 eyes from 21 cases with dry AMD in the study eye and exudative AMD in the fellow eye. The control group included 17 eyes from 17 healthy patients of similar age and sex. The MPOD values were measured using a commercially available color perimetry technique (CP). Short-term repeatability of MPOD measurements by the CP technique was assessed in 20 eyes of 20 healthy subjects who were measured 3 times on 3 consecutive days.

RESULTS

The mean values for MPOD were 5.59 ± 2.06 dB in cases in which both eyes had dry AMD, 5.25 ± 2.72 dB in cases in which one eye had wet AMD and the studied eye had dry AMD, and 5.97 ± 2.14 dB in the eyes of the healthy control group. The mean value was lower in cases in which the fellow eye had wet AMD; however, no significant difference in MPOD was found between the three groups (p = 0.659) or between the group with dry AMD in both eyes and the healthy control group (p = 0.977). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value was 0.664 between day 1 and day 2, and 0.822 between day 2 and day 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not show a direct relation between MPOD and dry AMD. Color perimetry does not provide acceptable short-term repeatability for measuring MPOD. Learning effects may contribute to the measured test-retest variability. Other studies are needed to determine if CP is suitable for repeated measurements during the long term follow-up with the same patient.

Topography of cone dark adaptation deficits in age-related maculopathy

PURPOSE

Despite widespread agreement that dark adaptation is abnormal in age-related maculopathy (ARM), the optimal retinal location for detection of this deficit is unclear. We quantified the diagnostic potential of cone dark adaptation as a function of retinal eccentricity and compared this with the diagnostic potential of the time to the rod-cone-break (RCB).

METHODS

Cone dark adaptation was monitored after an 80% cone photopigment bleach in 10 subjects with ARM and 10 age-matched controls, using four achromatic annuli (0.5, 2, 7, and 12° radius) centered on the fovea. Threshold recovery data were modeled and the time constant of cone recovery (τ), final cone threshold, and time to RCB were determined. Diagnostic potential was evaluated by constructing receiver operating characteristic curves for these parameters.

RESULTS

Cone τ was significantly longer for the ARM group at 2, 7, and 12°. The greatest difference between groups was observed at 12° from fixation. At this location, the mean τ was 3.49 (±2.02) min and 0.64 (±0.38) min for ARM and control subjects, respectively (p = 0.002), and time to RCB was 17.68 (±5.37) min and 9.05 (±2.11) min for ARM and control subjects, respectively (p = 0.001). Correspondingly, receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the diagnostic potential of dark adaptometry is greatest for stimuli presented 12° from fixation; for cone τ, the area under the curve = 0.99 ± 0.02 and for time to RCB, area under the curve = 0.96 ± 0.04.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown cone-mediated dark adaptation to be significantly impaired in ARM. Our results provide compelling evidence in support of the diagnostic potential of cone dark adaptation and the use of annular stimuli at 12°. The observation that cone τ is highly diagnostic at this eccentricity is significant clinically because this parameter may be quantified within a few minutes.

The Glenn A. Fry award lecture 2010: Ophthalmic markers of diabetic neuropathy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a debilitating condition that affects about 50% of diabetic patients. The symptoms of DPN include numbness, tingling, or pain in the arms and legs. Patients with numbness may be unaware of foot trauma, which could develop into a foot ulcer. If left untreated, this may ultimately require amputation. Currently, the only method of directly examining peripheral nerves is to conduct skin punch or sural/peroneal nerve biopsies, which are uncomfortable and invasive. Indirect methods include quantitative sensory testing (assessing responses to heat, cold, and vibration) and nerve electrophysiology. Here, I describe research undertaken in my laboratory, investigating the possibility of using a range of ophthalmic markers to assess DPN. Corneal nerve structure and function can be assessed using corneal confocal microscopy and non-contact corneal esthesiometry, respectively. Retinal nerve structure and visual function can be evaluated using optical coherence tomography and perimetry, respectively. These techniques have been used to demonstrate that DPN is associated with morphological degradation of corneal nerves, reduced corneal sensitivity, retinal nerve fiber layer thinning, and peripheral visual field loss. With further validation, these ophthalmic markers could become established as rapid, painless, non-invasive, sensitive, reiterative, cost-effective, and clinically accessible means of screening for early detection, diagnosis, staging severity, and monitoring progression of DPN, as well as assessing the effectiveness of possible therapeutic interventions. Looking to the future, this research may pave the way for an expanded role for the ophthalmic professions in diabetes management.

Mild systemic hypoxia and photopic visual field sensitivity

PURPOSE

Flickering stimuli increase the metabolic demand of the retina, making it a sensitive perimetric stimulus to the early onset of retinal disease. We determine whether flickering stimuli are a sensitive indicator of vision deficits resulting from acute, mild systemic hypoxia when compared to standard static perimetry.

METHODS

Static and flicker visual perimetry were performed in 14 healthy young participants while breathing 12% oxygen (hypoxia) under photopic illumination. The hypoxia visual field data were compared with the field data measured during normoxia. Absolute sensitivities (in dB) were analysed in seven concentric rings at 1°, 3°, 6°, 10°, 15°, 22° and 30° eccentricities as well as mean defect (MD) and pattern defect (PD) were calculated. Preliminary data are reported for mesopic light levels.

RESULTS

Under photopic illumination, flicker and static visual field sensitivities at all eccentricities were not significantly different between hypoxia and normoxia conditions. The mean defect and pattern defect were not significantly different for either test between the two oxygenation conditions.

CONCLUSION

Although flicker stimulation increases cellular metabolism, flicker photopic visual field impairment is not detected during mild hypoxia. These findings contrast with electrophysiological flicker tests in young participants that show impairment at photopic illumination during the same levels of mild hypoxia. Potential mechanisms contributing to the difference between the visual fields and electrophysiological flicker tests including variability in perimetric data, neuronal adaptation and vascular autoregulation are considered. The data have implications for the use of visual perimetry in the detection of ischaemic/hypoxic retinal disorders under photopic and mesopic light levels.

Persons with age-related maculopathy risk genotypes and clinically normal eyes have reduced mesopic vision

PURPOSE

To determine whether participants with normal visual acuity, no ophthalmoscopically signs of age-related maculopathy (ARM) in both eyes, and who are carriers of the CFH, LOC387715, and HRTA1 high-risk genotypes (gene-positive) have impaired rod- and cone-mediated mesopic visual function compared with persons who do not carry the risk genotypes (gene-negative).

METHODS

Fifty-three Caucasian study participants (mean 55.8 ± 6.1) were genotyped for CFH, LOC387715/ARMS2, and HRTA1 polymorphisms. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped in the CFH (rs380390), LOC387715/ARMS2 (rs10490924), and HTRA1 (rs11200638) genes using optimized gene-expression assays. The critical fusion frequency (CFF) mediated by cones alone (long-, middle-, and short-wavelength sensitive cones, LMS) and by the combined activities of cones and rods (LMSR) were determined. The stimuli were generated using a four-primary photostimulator that provides independent control of the photoreceptor excitation under mesopic light levels. Visual function was further assessed using standard clinical tests, flicker perimetry, and microperimetry.

RESULTS

The mesopic CFF mediated by rods and cones (LMSR) was significantly reduced in gene-positive compared to gene-negative participants after correction for age (P = 0.03). Cone-mediated CFF (LMS) was not significantly different between gene-positive and -negative participants. There were no significant associations between flicker perimetry and microperimetry and genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to relate ARM risk genotypes with mesopic visual function in clinically normal persons. These preliminary results could become of clinical importance because mesopic vision may be used as a biomarker to document subclinical retinal changes in persons with risk genotypes and to determine whether those persons progress into manifest disease.

Exploring retinal and functional markers of diabetic neuropathy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most debilitating complications of diabetes. DPN is a major cause of foot ulceration and lower limb amputation. Early diagnosis and management are key factors in reducing morbidity and mortality. Current techniques for clinical assessment of DPN are relatively insensitive for detecting early disease or involve invasive procedures such as skin biopsies. There is a need for less painful, non-invasive, safe evaluation methods. Eye-care professionals already play an important role in the management of diabetic retinopathy but recent studies have indicated that the eye may also be an important site for the diagnosis and monitoring of neuropathy. Corneal nerve morphology is a promising marker of diabetic neuropathy occurring elsewhere in the body. Emerging evidence tentatively suggests that retinal anatomical markers and a range of functional visual indicators could similarly provide useful information regarding neural damage in diabetes, although this line of research is less well established. This review outlines the growing body of evidence supporting a potential diagnostic role for retinal structure and visual functional markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of peripheral neuropathy in diabetes.