Agreement between the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) stereometric parameters estimated using HRT-I and HRT-II

Comparison of neuroretinal rim area measurements made by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I and the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II

PURPOSE

To investigate the agreement between neuroretinal rim area (RA) measurements using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph I (HRT Classic) and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (HRT II). To compare apparent RA changes in follow-up series of HRT II topographies when using either an HRT Classic or HRT II mean topography as baseline.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study and "no-change," short time series study.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-three ocular hypertensive and 31 primary open angle glaucoma subjects.

METHODS

Five HRT Classic and 5 HRT II examinations were acquired from 1 eye of each subject, across 2 visits within 6 weeks. For the cross-sectional study, follow-up RA measurements from HRT Classic and HRT II were compared, using the same HRT Classic mean topography as the baseline. The linear rates of RA change were compared in 2 short time series with either an HRT Classic or an HRT II mean topography as baseline, and 4 follow-up HRT II mean topographies. Intervals between topographies were arbitrarily set at 1 year for meaningful comparisons of rates. Rates of RA change over time were calculated by linear regression. Separate analyses were performed using 3 available reference planes (RP).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Global and sectoral RA measurements in HRT Classic and HRT II mean topographies; linear rates of RA change.

RESULTS

HRT Classic minus HRT II mean differences (95% limits of agreement) were 0.09 (-0.17, 0.35) mm, 0.09 (-0.13, 0.32) mm, and 0.11 (-0.24, 0.46) mm for the Moorfields, 320 µm, and standard RPs, respectively (P<0.001 for all RPs, Wilcoxon rank sum test). In the time series, the mean differences (95% limits of agreement) of RA rates of change (HRT Classic baseline minus HRT II baseline) were -0.01 (-0.06, 0.03) mm/y, -0.01 (-0.06, 0.04) mm/y, and -0.0 (-0.09, 0.05) mm/y using the Moorfields, 320 µm, and standard RPs, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although HRT software is backward-compatible, follow-up RA measurements made in the same eye using HRT Classic and HRT II devices display statistically and clinically meaningful systematic differences when HRT Classic topographies are used as a baseline.

Agreement between Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-I and -II in detecting glaucomatous changes using topographic change analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the suitability of including both Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-I (HRT-I) and HRT-II examinations in the same longitudinal series for HRT topographic change analysis (TCA) and to evaluate parabolic error correction (PEC) to improve the agreement between HRT-I and HRT-II examinations.

METHODS

A total of 66 eyes from the University of California San Diego Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study with baseline HRT-I and HRT-II examinations obtained on the same day and ≥ 3 HRT-II follow-up examinations were included. Two TCA analyses, HRT-I examination at baseline (HRT-I-mixed series) and HRT-II examination at baseline (HRT-II-only series) were compared. Agreement between the HRT-I-mixed and HRT-II-only series were estimated using Bland-Altman plots. Agreement was assessed: (1) using the current HRT software settings (PEC applied only to HRT-II-only series), and (2) modified HRT settings (PEC also applied to HRT-I-mixed series).

RESULTS

With current HRT software settings, the HRT-I-mixed series significantly overestimated change locations (ie, red pixels) compared with the HRT-II-only series as indicated by statistically significant proportional biases in the Bland-Altman analysis. By applying PEC to HRT-I-mixed series there were no statistically significant biases in the TCA parameter estimates compared with the HRT-II-only series.

CONCLUSION

In some eyes, HRT-I and HRT-II baseline examinations are not interchangeable in TCA analysis without parabolic error correction. HRT-I-mixed series detected more changes characteristic of glaucoma when there were only minimal changes in the HRT-II-only series. Our results suggest that in the majority of cases, with PEC, HRT-I examinations may be included in a longitudinal series containing HRT-II examinations.