Impact of a low-vision self-management program on informal caregivers

Patient-centred care in ophthalmology: current practices, effectiveness and challenges

PURPOSE

To summarise different patient-centred care approaches that can be used in ophthalmology and review their effectiveness.

METHODS

An Entrez Pubmed search on publications concerning different patient-centred care was performed on September 7, 2021. Articles on animal research, non-English language and review articles were excluded after manually screening by two authors.

RESULTS

A total of 16 articles were reviewed after curation by the authors for relevance. Patient-centred care has advantages in improving disease knowledge, enhancing doctor-patient communications and improving mental well-being of patients. Various methods including intensive patient education, patient-centred communication techniques during consultations, personal disease records, education programme for caregivers, on-site ocular care for residential care home resident and shared medical appointments can be used to enhance patient-centred care.

CONCLUSIONS

Current strategies in patient-centred care in ophthalmology were found to be useful. However, they have not been widely practised and more studies would be required generate an evidence-based recommendation for future use.

An exploratory study on support for caregivers of people with vision impairment in the UK

Purpose

Many of the UK's 2.5 million individuals living with vision loss receive support from relatives or friends (so‐called ‘informal caregivers’). However, there is limited understanding of how caregivers of people with visual impairment (PVI) are, or feel, supported by UK healthcare/statutory services and charities. This exploratory study was conducted to explore caregivers' experiences and their suggestions for enhancing support.

Methods

Participants self‐identifying as UK‐based caregivers of PVI (N = 100) volunteered to undertake an online survey, distributed through charity partners. The survey was comprised of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire‐8 (CSQ‐8, a validated, self‐report measure of satisfaction with support services), Likert‐type questions and two open‐ended, free‐text questions. Interview participants (N = 22) were then selected from survey respondents, and semi‐structured interviews were conducted to focus on caregivers' ideas for improving support. The Framework Method was used for inductive analysis of the free‐text question responses and interview data.

Results

The mean (SD) CSQ‐8 score was 21.60 (7.2), with no significant differences by demographic, relationship or vision‐related factors, likely limited by the small subgroup sizes. Qualitative data demonstrated the heterogeneity of participating caregivers' experiences, highlighting the importance of personalised support for caregivers. Many participants advocated enhancing informational, practical, emotional and social support for caregivers, and stressed the importance of accessible services and consistent points of contact to turn to for support and advice.

Conclusions

Although our sample was arguably better connected to support services than the general caregiver population, this study identified concrete suggestions to improve practical, emotional and peer support for caregivers of PVI.

What support is beneficial for caregivers of individuals with vision impairment?

Previous studies and reviews have documented the stress and challenges that may be associated with providing informal care for individuals with vision impairment (IVI). This scoping review was therefore conducted in order to synthesise published literature about forms of support which may benefit the informal caregivers of both adults and children with vision impairment (VI), and to identify research gaps in the support available for this population. A systematic literature search was carried out using CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO and PsycARTICLES, followed by citation tracking. A total of 23 published studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The included studies focused on: exploring caregiver support needs (8/23); novel interventions supporting caregivers of IVI (10/23); evaluating usual care (2/23); and exploring how treatment for IVI directly impacts the caregiver (3/23). Overall, support for caregivers of IVI is a relatively new research topic, with no eligible studies identified before 1999. Twelve of the 23 studies (52%) focused on support for caregivers of adults with VI, while 11 (48%) focused on support for caregivers of children with VI. The studies illustrate that support groups may generally help to improve caregivers' knowledge and awareness of VI, although benefits for emotional wellbeing are more modest. Support interventions for parents of children with VI appear to reduce stress effectively; however, evidence regarding the value of interventions for caregivers of adults with vision impairment is less clear, partly due to small samples and a lack of standardised, comparable outcome measures. Caregivers often express a need for better information about the condition of the IVI, even when information is apparently available. Further research is required comparing the benefits of different support modalities for caregivers of people with VI over longer follow-up periods.

'Dual Sensory Loss Protocol' for Communication and Wellbeing of Older Adults With Vision and Hearing Impairment - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives

Many older adults with visual impairment also have significant hearing loss. The aim was to investigate the effectiveness of a newly developed Dual Sensory Loss (DSL) protocol on communication and wellbeing of older persons with DSL and their communication partners (e.g., spouse or child) in the Netherlands and Belgium.

Methods

Participants (N = 131) and their communication partners (n = 113) were randomized in the “DSL-protocol” intervention group or a waiting-list control group. The intervention took 3 to 5 weeks. Occupational therapists focused on optimal use of hearing aids, home-environment modifications and effective communication strategies. The primary outcome was the Communication Strategies domain of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired (CPHI). Secondary outcomes measured in participants were the Low Vision Quality Of Life Adjustment subscale, the Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale, De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale and the Fatigue Assessment Scale. The Hearing Handicap and Disability Inventory (HHDI) - Reaction of Others subscale and the Care-related Quality of Life - 7 Dimensions was measured in communication partners. Measurements were taken at baseline and 3-month follow-up. Linear mixed models (LMM) were used to analyze effects between groups over time for every outcome measure.

Results

Intention-to-treat analyses showed a significant effect of the DSL-protocol on the use of verbal strategies (effect size SMD = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.95) in favor of the control group, however, this effect was non-significant after adjustment for confounding. Effect sizes of other outcomes varied between −0.23 [−0.57, 0.12] and 0.30 [−0.05, 0.64]. The LMM showed a significant effect on the HHDI-Reaction of others scale in favor of communication partners in the treatment group, however, the effect did not remain significant at a 0.01 significance level and the effect size was very small and non-significant 0.12, 95% CI [−0.27 to 0.51]. Adjusted analyses did not reveal treatment effects.

Conclusion

The DSL-protocol did not clearly contribute to the enhancement of communication and wellbeing in DSL-patients. Possible reasons for the lack of effects are OTs not being comfortable giving advice on communication and psychosocial issues or the short-term treatment and follow-up period. Further study is warranted to find out how the protocol may be adapted or whether it is necessary to involve mental healthcare professionals.

Clinical Trial Registration

www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NTR2843.

Estimation of depression prevalence in patients with Stargardt disease using PHQ-9 and Zung scores

PURPOSE

To evaluate the psychological impact and depression prevalence in patients with Stargardt disease.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study including 39 patients with Stargardt disease and 32 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. All participants underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination and completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Zung Depression Inventory questionnaire. Results were analyzed using IBM SPSS 22.0 software.

RESULTS

The patient group consisted of 19 men and 20 women with mean age of 36.9 ± 5.4 years and control group of 19 men and 13 women with mean age of 42.5 ± 10.1 years. The mean values of PHQ-9 and Zung scores for patients and healthy individuals were 10.9 ± 4.9, 46.7 ± 11.1, 6.7 ± 5.4, and 41.1 ± 8.5, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in PHQ-9 scores (independent samples t test: p = 0.001), but not in Zung scores (Mann-Whitney test: p = 0.053). The PHQ-9 and Zung scores appeared to be moderately but significantly correlated (Pearson coefficient 0.44, p<0.0001). In addition, PHQ-9 score seems to be raised along with age, whereas both scores are low when best-corrected visual acuity is high.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Stargardt disease exhibited more depressive symptoms compared to healthy individuals according mainly to PHQ-9 scores. Moderate depression was significantly correlated visual function decline.