Intrasubject Tear Osmolarity Changes with Two Different Types of Eyedrops

British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease

Sjögren disease (SD) is a chronic, autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology with significant impact on quality of life. Although dryness (sicca) of the eyes and mouth are the classically described features, dryness of other mucosal surfaces and systemic manifestations are common. The key management aim should be to empower the individual to manage their condition-conserving, replacing and stimulating secretions; and preventing damage and suppressing systemic disease activity. This guideline builds on and widens the recommendations developed for the first guideline published in 2017. We have included advice on the management of children and adolescents where appropriate to provide a comprehensive guideline for UK-based rheumatology teams.

Ectoine protects corneal epithelial survival and barrier from hyperosmotic stress by promoting anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-37

PURPOSE

To explore novel role and molecular mechanism of a natural osmoprotectant ectoine in protecting corneal epithelial cell survival and barrier from hyperosmotic stress.

METHODS

Primary human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs) were established from donor limbus. The confluent cultures in isosmolar medium were switched to hyperosmotic media (400-500 mOsM), with or without ectoine or rhIL-37 for different time periods. Cell viability and proliferation were evaluated by MTT or WST assay. The integrity of barrier proteins and the expression of cytokines and cathepsin S were evaluated by RT-qPCR, ELISA, and immunostaining with confocal microscopy.

RESULTS

HCECs survived well in 450mOsM but partially damaged in 500mOsM medium. Ectoine well protected HCEC survival and proliferation at 500mOsM. The integrity of epithelial barrier was significantly disrupted in HCECs exposed to 450mOsM, as shown by 2D and 3D confocal immunofluorescent images of tight junction proteins ZO-1 and occludin. Ectoine at 5-20 mM well protected these barrier proteins under hyperosmotic stress. The expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8 were dramatically stimulated by hyperosmolarity but significantly suppressed by Ectoine at 5-40 mM. Cathepsin S, which was stimulated by hyperosmolarity, directly disrupted epithelial barrier. Interestingly, anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-37 was suppressed by hyperosmolarity, but restored by ectoine at mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, rhIL-37 suppressed cathepsin S and rescued cell survival and barrier in HCECs exposed to hyperosmolarity.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that ectoine protects HCEC survival and barrier from hyperosmotic stress by promoting IL-37. This provides new insight into pathogenesis and therapeutic potential for dry eye disease.

Impact of Clinician Subjectivity on the Assessment of Dry Eye Disease Prevalence in a UK Public Health Care Patient Population

Purpose

To understand the impact of subjectivity on diagnosis rates of dry eye disease (DED) in an unbiased population.

Patients and Methods

A multicenter study enrolled 818 subjects with complete report forms (465 females, 67.1 ± 16.7 years, 353 males, 65.0 ± 15.9 years). Subjects were evaluated for staining, TBUT, tear osmolarity, meibomian gland disease, and OSDI.

Results

Physicians diagnosed 48.7% of subjects as having DED, ranging from 42.9% to 62.3% between sites. Positivity rates for staining (≥ grade 1) ranged from 41.3% to 84.1% (mean = 0.8 ± 0.9 grade), TBUT (<10s) ranged from 39.1% to 61.6% (mean = 10.4 ± 6.6 seconds), osmolarity (>308 mOsm/L) ranged from 63.7% to 72.4% (mean = 319.7 ± 20.8), MGD grading ranged from 28.9% to 51.3% (mean = 0.5 ± 0.7), and symptoms measured by OSDI ranged from 57.6% to 71.0% (mean = 23.5 ± 20.5) between sites. Tear osmolarity was the most consistent between sites (max/min positivity = 114%), followed by OSDI (123%), TBUT (158%), MGD (178%), and staining (204%). DED markers were uncorrelated (average r2 = 0.05 ± 0.07). A substantial number of subjects (N = 110) exhibited positive symptoms (OSDI = 32.4 ± 15.7) and hyperosmolarity (338.1 ± 20.1 mOsm/L) but no other obvious signs of DED (MGD grade = 0.2 ± 0.4, TBUT = 13.5 ± 7.0 seconds, staining grade = 0.4 ± 0.5).

Conclusion

Subjective signs of DED varied considerably, whereas objective measurements of OSDI and osmolarity were the most consistent between sites. A large proportion of subjects exhibited high symptoms and hyperosmolarity but no other obvious signs of dry eye disease, most of whom were undiagnosed by clinical assessment without access to the osmolarity measurement.

Ectoine, from a Natural Bacteria Protectant to a New Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Ectoine, a novel natural osmoprotectant, protects bacteria living in extreme environments. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic effect of ectoine for dry eye disease. An experimental dry eye model was created in C57BL/6 mice exposed to desiccating stress (DS) with untreated mice as controls (UT). DS mice were dosed topically with 0.5-2.0% of ectoine or a vehicle control. Corneal epithelial defects were detected via corneal smoothness and Oregon Green dextran (OGD) fluorescent staining. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines were evaluated using RT-qPCR and immunofluorescent staining. Compared with UT mice, corneal epithelial defects were observed as corneal smoothness irregularities and strong punctate OGD fluorescent staining in DS mice with vehicle. Ectoine treatment protected DS mice from corneal damage in a concentration-dependent manner, and ectoine at 1.0 and 2.0% significantly restored the corneal smoothness and reduced OGD staining to near normal levels. Expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) and chemokines CCL3 and CXCL11 was significantly elevated in the corneas and conjunctivas of DS mice, whereas 1.0 and 2.0% ectoine suppressed these inflammatory mediators to near normal levels. Our findings demonstrate that ectoine can significantly reduce the hallmark pathologies associated with dry eye and may be a promising candidate for treating human disease.

Hyaluronic acid in the treatment of dry eye disease

Dry eye disease (DED) is a highly prevalent and debilitating condition affecting several hundred million people worldwide. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a naturally occurring glycosaminoglycan commonly used in the treatment of DED. This review aims to critically evaluate the literature on the safety and efficacy of artificial tears containing HA used in DED treatment. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, including MEDLINE, and in Embase via Ovid with the search term: "(hyaluronic acid OR hyaluronan OR hyaluronate) AND (dry eye OR sicca)". A total of 53 clinical trials are included in this review, including eight placebo-controlled trials. Hyaluronic acid concentrations ranged from 0.1% to 0.4%. Studies lasted up to 3 months. A broad spectrum of DED types and severities was represented in the reviewed literature. No major complications or adverse events were reported. Artificial tears containing 0.1% to 0.4% HA were effective at improving both signs and symptoms of DED. Two major gaps in the literature have been identified: 1. no study investigated the ideal drop frequency for HA-containing eyedrops, and 2. insufficient evidence was presented to recommend any specific HA formulation over another. Future investigations assessing the optimal drop frequency for different concentrations and molecular weights of HA, different drop formulations, including tonicity, and accounting for DED severity and aetiology are essential for an evidence-based, individualized approach to DED treatment.

Diurnal variations of tear film osmolarity on the ocular surface

The measurement of tear film osmolarity has been suggested as a gold standard in the diagnosis of dry eye. Many tear film physiological variables oscillate during the day. This review summarises current clinical knowledge regarding diurnal osmolarity variation in the tear film. A critical analysis is presented in respect of of sample size and characteristics, differences in the diurnal osmolarity variation on healthy versus altered tear film conditions or environment, and time of day and number of measurements undertaken. A comparison of 21 studies was made for studies in which one of the main objectives was to analyse the variance of tear film osmolarity at different time-points in a day on human cohorts. Tear film osmolarity appeard to be somewhat influenced by the time of day in healthy subjects and patients with ocular surface disease, or altered by environmental conditions. Both healthy and non-physiological tear film cohorts showed variations in results depending on the study: no variations during the day or statistically different values at some point in the day. These differences could be in the middle of the day or between the beginning and the end of the day, with higher values in the morning than in the afternoon, or even the opposite situation. The possibility of diurnal variations in tear film osmolarity should be considered by the clinician since the time of day when the tear film measurements are made can be critical in making the right diagnosis. Future studies in the diurnal variation field may have to use a well-established range of measurement time-points and a larger group of healthy subjects and and subjects who have a tear film altered by pathological or environmental conditions.

Osmolality and pH of commercially available contact lens care solutions and eye drops

PURPOSE

The physical properties of contact lens care solutions and Eye Drops (ED) may affect initial comfort and dry eye symptomatology in contact lens wearers, although these properties are not always provided by manufacturers. The present study aimed to measure and compare the osmolality and pH of commercially available contact lens care solutions and ED.

METHODS

Forty-four solutions were tested (17 lens care solutions and 27 ED) and classified by the presence and/or combination of the viscosity/lubrication-enhancing ingredients. Solution osmolality was obtained with the Fiske 110 osmometer and pH was measured with a micro-pH 2000. Each measurement was taken ten times, following the manufacturer's instructions, while controlling for room temperature and humidity. Differences between the values of the physical properties of the solutions were analysed by type and viscosity/lubrication-enhancing agent subclassification.

RESULTS

Osmolality ranged from 192.6 ± 2.17 to 364.6 ± 2.88 mOsm/Kg, while pH ranged from 6.35 [6.35-6.26] to 7.99 [7.99-8.00]. A significant difference in the osmolality and pH values of contact lens care solutions and ED was found when classified by type or viscosity/lubrication-enhancing agent (ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis respectively, both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The physical properties of some contact lens care solutions and ED are not readily available. The osmolality and pH values of various commercially available lens care solutions and ED vary significantly both by type and viscosity/lubrication-enhancing ingredients.

Tear osmolarity after cataract surgery

Purpose

To evaluate the changes in tear film osmolarity and Schirmer I test after cataract surgery.

Methods

This single-center, prospective study included patients with no subjective complaints about dry eye disease. Patients with the following conditions were excluded: contact lens wearers, patients with diabetes, pseudoexfoliation, pterygia, and eye drops users. The eye that had not undergone surgery was considered the control group. Tear osmolarity and Schirmer I test were evaluated before surgery and during the first postoperative month.

Results

Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. Before surgery, tear osmolarity was 301.2 ± 15.09 Osm/L in the study group and 302.3 ± 14.21 mOsm/L in the control group (P = 0.2), while Schirmer I test averaged 13.4 ± 10.50 mm in the study group and 13.7 ± 10.79 mm in the control group (P = 0.6). The next morning, the tear osmolarity decreased to <275 mOsm/L in the study group while in the control group, the value increased to 303.1 mOsm/L ± 13.68 (P = 0.008). The Schirmer I test in the same morning showed an increase up to 19.9 ± 9.73 mm in the study group and to 15.7 ± 10.19 mm in the control group (P = 0.01). One week later, the tear osmolarity increased to 311.8 ± 14.85 mOsm/L, while the control group averaged 301.7 ± 11.84 mOsm/L (P = 0.013). The Schirmer I test results decreased to 15.8 ± 9.37 mm in the study group and 13.9 ± 10.19 mm in the control group (P = 0.07) one week after the surgery. One month after surgery, tear osmolarity and Schirmer I test results in the study group decreased to the control group level (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The tear osmolarity results increased to the dry eye disease level in the first postoperative week. Over the course of one month, the difference in tear osmolarity and Schirmer I test values for the study and control groups leveled off.

Estimating basal tear osmolarity in normal and dry eye subjects

PURPOSE

Tear osmolarity (tOsm) is used as a measure of severity in dry eye disease (DED) and has been proposed as an index of body hydration. In DED the level of tear hyperosmolarity is compared with that of a control population. It is proposed here that a better index of body hydration and a more valid reference point in DED can be acquired by measuring the tOsm after a period of evaporative suppression.

METHOD

8 normal and DED subjects were recruited, their tOsm measured in uncontrolled environmental 'clinic conditions'. Then in experiment 1 they entered a controlled environment chamber and had tOsm measured after 45 minutes of eye closure and then, with the eyes open, at 15 minute intervals for a further 45 minutes, at a relative humidity (RH) of 45%. Alternatively, in experiment 2, they had tOsm measured every 15 minutes for 45 minutes during exposure to 70% RH, as a separate measure to suppress evaporation.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in tOsm occurred in both normal and DED subjects after lid closure in experiment 1 (normal RE p=0.015; normal LE p=0.006; DED RE p=0.0002; DED LE p=0.01). The tOsm also fell slightly after exposure to 70% RH in experiment 2 significant in the LE of normal group only (normal LE p=0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Suppression of tear evaporation resulted in a fall in tOsm, close to that of plasma osmolarity (285-295mOsm/L). It is proposed that this new measure, termed Basal Tear Osmolarity (BTO), could provide a valuable index of plasma osmolarity and hence of body hydration and in DED, a personal baseline against which to gauge the severity of tear hyperosmolarity.

Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature

Objective

To evaluate the evidence in the peer-reviewed literature regarding the use of tear osmolarity as a physiological marker to diagnose, grade severity, and track therapeutic response in dry eye disease (DED). In addition, to review the evidence for the role of tear osmolarity in the pathophysiology of DED and ocular surface disease.

Methods

A literature review of all publications after the year 2000, which included the keywords “tear osmolarity”, was conducted. Relevant articles were graded according to quality of evidence and research, using the University of Michigan Practice Guideline and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) rating systems. Articles were further categorized by the nature of any reported financial support and by the overall impression they provided related to tear osmolarity.

Results

A total of 164 articles were identified as relevant to the search criteria, although some were editorials, and some were written in a foreign language. Of the total, it was possible to grade 159, and an overall impression was generated for 163. A positive impression of tear osmolarity in DED diagnosis was evident in 72% (117/163) of all articles, with a neutral impression in a further 21% (35/163); 7% had a negative impression. The percentage of positive impressions appeared independent of the quality of research; 73% (38/52) of articles graded high/moderate quality supported the use of tear film osmolarity measurement in DED diagnosis. Impressions were also independent of the source of financial support, with 72% (75/104) of independent studies positive.

Conclusion

The literature broadly supports the use of tear film osmolarity as an objective numerical measure for diagnosing, grading severity, and managing treatment of DED.

Role of hyperosmolarity in the pathogenesis and management of dry eye disease: proceedings of the OCEAN group meeting

Dry eye disease (DED), a multifactorial disease of the tears and ocular surface, is common and has a significant impact on quality of life. Reduced aqueous tear flow and/or increased evaporation of the aqueous tear phase leads to tear hyperosmolarity, a key step in the vicious circle of DED pathology. Tear hyperosmolarity gives rise to morphological changes such as apoptosis of cells of the conjunctiva and cornea, and triggers inflammatory cascades that contribute to further cell death, including loss of mucin-producing goblet cells. This exacerbates tear film instability and drives the cycle of events that perpetuate the condition. Traditional approaches to counteracting tear hyperosmolarity in DED include use of hypotonic tear substitutes, which have relatively short persistence in the eye. More recent attempts to counteract tear hyperosmolarity in DED have included osmoprotectants, small organic molecules that are used in many cell types throughout the natural world to restore cell volume and stabilize protein function, allowing adaptation to hyperosmolarity. There is now an expanding pool of clinical data on the efficacy of DED therapies that include osmoprotectants such as erythritol, taurine, trehalose and L-carnitine. Osmoprotectants in DED may directly protect cells against hyperosmolarity and thereby promote exit from the vicious circle of DED physiopathology.