Comparison of Dako HercepTest and Ventana PATHWAY Anti-HER2 (4B5) Tests and Their Correlation With Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization in Breast Carcinoma

Alteration of HER2 Status During Breast Cancer Progression: A Clinicopathological Analysis Focusing on HER2-Low Status

Recent studies have shown that novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) can improve clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-low breast cancers. This study aimed to investigate alteration of HER2 status during breast cancer progression with an emphasis on HER2-low status. Using 386 paired samples of primary and recurrent breast cancers, HER2 discordance rate between primary and matched recurrent samples, the relationships between HER2 discordance and clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of the patients were analyzed. HER2 discordance rate between primary breast cancer and first recurrence was 25.9% (κ = 0.586) with mostly zero-to-low (10.6%) or low-to-zero (9.3%) conversion. There was no significant difference in the discordant rates according to type or location of the recurrence. Of 70 cases with a second recurrence, HER2 discordance rate between the primary tumor and the second recurrence was 27.1% (κ = 0.554). HER2 discordance was associated with lower HER2 level, lymphovascular invasion, and progesterone receptor positivity of the primary tumor. In further analyses, HER2-zero-to-low conversion was associated with lymph node metastasis and hormone receptor (HR) positivity, whereas HER2-low-to-zero conversion was associated with HR negativity and triple-negative subtype. In survival analyses, HER2 discordance was associated with decreased overall survival of patients in the HR-positive group but not in the HR-negative group. Furthermore, patients with HER2-low-to-zero converted tumors showed worse overall survival compared with those with HER2-low concordant tumors. In conclusion, HER2 status changes during breast cancer progression in significant proportions, mostly between zero and low status. As HER2 instability increases during progression and affects clinical outcome, HER2 status needs to be reevaluated in recurrent settings.

Performance of HER2 DAKO HercepTest and Ventana 4B5 immunohistochemical assays on detecting HER2 gene-amplification in uterine serous carcinomas

We compared the performance of two commonly-used HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays in uterine serous carcinomas (USC), correlating with HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). Sixty-five USCs were stained by both HercepTest™ and PATHWAY 4B5 assays. FISH was performed by HER2 IQFISH pharmDx. Consensus HER2 IHC scoring was performed, and HER2 testing results were evaluated using USC-specific criteria. Complete concordance between HercepTest and 4B5 assays was achieved in 44/65 tumors (68%). The overall HER2 IHC/FISH concordance was 94% (45/48) by HercepTest and 91% (42/46) by 4B5. All HER2 IHC 3+ cases with HercepTest (n = 6) and 4B5 (n = 4) were gene-amplified, corresponding to specificities of 100%. For cases with IHC 2+, 41% (7/17) by HercepTest and 42% (8/19) by 4B5 had HER2 gene amplification. The sensitivity for HercepTest and 4B5 were 38% and 25%, respectively, at a cut-off of IHC 3+ (P = 0.50), and were 81% and 75%, respectively, at a cut-off of IHC 2+ (P > 0.99). Among HER2 IHC 0-1+ cases, 3/42 cases by HercepTest and 4/42 cases by 4B5 showed amplified FISH results, corresponding to overall false negative rates of 19% for HercepTest and 25% for 4B5. By using USC-specific IHC scoring criteria, both HercepTest and 4B5 assays showed high specificities (100%) for HER2 gene amplification in IHC 3+ cases, high IHC/FISH concordance, and comparable sensitivity for detecting HER2 gene amplification. The notable false negative rates using IHC 2+ as a cut-off for reflexing FISH analysis may warrant consideration for performing FISH in IHC 1+ cases until more data become available.

Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in breast tumours

In the age of precision medicine, extensive research has investigated tumour biomarkers to predict the behaviour of cancer and/or response to treatment in order to better understand the prognosis and treatment of disease. In breast cancer, significant progress has been made to categorise a common disease into subtypes defined by intrinsic tumour biology, measured by tumour biomarkers. This review encompasses the established biomarkers within breast cancer with the most up-to-date information regarding their understanding and clinical use as predictive and/or prognostic markers of breast cancer.

Emerging Landscape of Targeted Therapy of Breast Cancers With Low Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Protein Expression

CONTEXT.—

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer is currently classified as negative or positive for selecting patients for anti-HER2 targeted therapy. The evolution of the HER2 status has included a new HER2-low category defined as an HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification. This new category opens the door to a targetable HER2-low breast cancer population for which new treatments may be effective.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the current literature on the emerging category of breast cancers with low HER2 protein expression, including the clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features, and outline the clinical trials and best practice recommendations for identifying HER2-low-expressing breast cancers by immunohistochemistry.

DATA SOURCES.—

We conducted a literature review based on peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, regulatory communications, ongoing and past clinical trials identified through ClinicalTrials.gov, and the authors' practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The availability of new targeted therapy potentially effective for patients with breast cancers with low HER2 protein expression requires multidisciplinary recognition. In particular, pathologists need to recognize and identify this category to allow the optimal selection of patients for targeted therapy.

Standardized pathology report for HER2 testing in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer

Since the release of the DESTINY-Breast04 (DB-04) trial findings in June 2022, the field of pathology has seen a renaissance of HER2 as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer. The trial focused on patients with metastatic breast cancer who were classified as "HER2-low," i.e., those with immunohistochemistry (IHC) HER2 1 + or 2 + and negative in situ hybridization (ISH) results. The study revealed that treating these patients with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) instead of the oncologist's chosen chemotherapy led to outstanding improvements in survival. This has challenged the existing binary HER2 pathological classification system, which categorized tumors as either positive (overexpression/amplification) or negative, as per the ASCO/CAP 2018 guideline reaffirmed by ASCO/CAP 2023 guideline update. Given that DB-04 excluded patients with HER2 IHC score 0 status, the results of the ongoing DB-06 trial may shed further light on the potential benefits of T-DXd therapy for these patients. Roughly half of all breast cancers are estimated to belong to the HER2-low category, which does not represent a distinct or specific subtype of cancer. Instead, it encompasses a diverse group of tumors that exhibit clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular variations. However, HER2-low offers a distinctive biomarker status that identifies a specific therapeutic regimen (i.e., T-DXd) linked to a favorable prognosis in breast cancer. This unique association emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying these tumors. Differentiating between a HER2 IHC score 0 and score 1 + has not been clinically significant until now. To ensure accurate classification and avoid misdiagnosis, it is necessary to adopt standardized procedures, guidelines, and specialized training for pathologists in interpreting HER2 expression in the lower spectrum. Additionally, the utilization of artificial intelligence holds promise in supporting this endeavor. Here, we address the current state of the art and unresolved issues in assessing HER2-low status, with a particular emphasis on the score 0. We explore the dilemma surrounding the exclusion of HER2-zero patients from potentially beneficial therapy based on traditional HER2 testing. Additionally, we examine the clinical context, considering that DB-04 primarily involved heavily pretreated late-stage metastatic breast cancers. We also delve into emerging evidence suggesting that extrapolating HER2-low status from the original diagnosis may lead to misleading results. Finally, we provide recommendations for conducting high-quality testing and propose a standardized pathology report in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer.

The prevalence and clinical significance of HER2 expression in prostate adenocarcinoma

AIMS

Abnormalities in HER2 are well-established oncogenic drivers and are approved therapeutic targets in various malignancies. Prior studies evaluating HER2 expression in prostate cancer (PCa) have yielded variable results. Most of these studies used immunohistochemistry scoring systems based on breast cancer data. The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence and clinical significance of HER2 expression using a scoring system that better reflects the HER2 staining pattern observed in PCa.

METHODS

We randomly selected similar numbers of localized low risk (AJCC stage I), locally advanced (AJCC stages II & III), and metastatic (AJCC stage IV) PCa patients treated at the DC VA Medical Center between 2000 and 2022. Among them, we included patients who had sufficient PCa tissue samples and clinical information required for this analysis. Two experienced pathologists independently scored HER2 expression (Ventana Pathway anti-HER2) according to a modified gastric cancer HER2 scoring system.

RESULTS

Out of the 231 patients included, 85 % self-identified as Black. 58.9 % of patients expressed HER2 (1+: 35.5 %; 2+: 18.2 %; 3+: 5.2 %). Validity of the results was confirmed using the HercepTest antibody. Higher HER2 expression was associated with a higher Gleason Score/Grade Group and advanced disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the adverse prognostic impact on HER2 in PCa. We propose the use of a modified scoring system to evaluate HER2 expression in PCa. The observed high prevalence of HER2 expression supports the consideration of novel HER2-targeted therapies addressing even low levels of HER2 expression in future PCa trials.

The Significance of Recognition of Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 Low in Breast Cancer Therapy

In response to recent clinical trials that demonstrate the clinical benefit of antibody-drug conjugate drug therapy in breast cancer (BC) with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemical scores of 1+ or 2+ and negative in situ hybridization results, a new concept of "HER2-low BC" has emerged to describe this newly relevant therapeutic category of BC. Clinical recognition of HER2-low BC has caused a paradigm shift in the therapeutic landscape and management of patients with BC and resulted in rapid changes in clinical practice guidelines. In addition the American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologists (ASCO-CAP) recently updated their HER2 Guidelines Recommendations to specifically address HER2-low BC. A literature search in PubMed of peer-reviewed articles, regulatory communications, and relevant practice guidelines pertaining to HER2-low BC was conducted. In this review, we have summarized current published knowledge regarding the clinicopathologic and molecular features, diagnostic criteria, and most current guideline recommendations regarding HER2-low BC, and also highlight ongoing practical and diagnostic challenges when identifying HER2-low BC in routine clinical practice.

HER2-Low Breast Cancer-Diagnostic Challenges and Opportunities for Insights from Ongoing Studies: A Podcast

Breast cancer has been traditionally classified as either human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive or HER2-negative based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring and/or gene amplification. HER2-positive breast cancer (defined as IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ and in situ hybridization [ISH]+) is routinely treated with HER2-targeted therapies, while HER2-negative breast cancer (defined as IHC 0, IHC 1+, or IHC 2+/ISH-) was not previously eligible for HER2-targeted therapy. Some tumors traditionally defined as HER2-negative express low levels of HER2 (i.e., HER2-low breast cancer, defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-). Recently reported results from the DESTINY-Breast04 trial demonstrated that the HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) improved survival in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer, leading to the approval of T-DXd in the US and EU for patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer after prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting or disease recurrence within 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. As the first HER2-targeted therapy approved for the treatment of HER2-low breast cancer, this represents a change in the clinical landscape and presents new challenges, including identifying patients with HER2-low breast cancer. In this podcast, we discuss the strengths and limitations of current methodologies for classifying HER2 expression and future research that will help refine the identification of patients expected to benefit from HER2-targeted therapy, such as T‑DXd or other antibody-drug conjugates. Although current methodologies are not optimized to identify all patients with HER2-low breast cancer who may potentially benefit from HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates, they are likely to identify many. Ongoing studies-including the DESTINY-Breast06 trial evaluating T-DXd in patients with HER2-low breast cancer and those with tumors expressing very low levels of HER2 (IHC > 0 to < 1+)-will provide insights that may improve the identification of patient populations expected to benefit from HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates. Supplementary file1 (MP4 123466 KB).

Comparison of HercepTest™ mAb pharmDx (Dako Omnis, GE001) with Ventana PATHWAY anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) in breast cancer: correlation with HER2 amplification and HER2 low status

Performance of the new CE-IVD-marked HercepTest™ mAb pharmDx (Dako Omnis) assay (HercepTest (mAb)) was compared against the PATHWAY® anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) (PATHWAY 4B5) assay using 119 pre-selected breast cancer samples covering the entire range of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression scores (0, 1 + , 2 + , 3 +). The sensitivity and specificity of both assays were assessed based on consensus IHC scores and amplification status, as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) according to 2018 ASCO/CAP testing guidelines. There was a high concordance between results from the HercepTest (mAb) and PATHWAY 4B5 assays for HER2-negative (IHC 0, 1 + , 2 + and FISH negative) and HER2-positive (IHC 3 + , 2 + and FISH positive) breast carcinomas (98.2%). Regarding individual IHC scores, complete agreement was achieved in 69.7% (83/119) of cases, and all but one of the discordant cases were due to higher HER2-status scoring using the HercepTest (mAb). Thus, more tumors were overscored as IHC 2 + by HercepTest (mAb) (27 versus 15) as evidenced by their lower FISH positivity rate (48.1% versus 80%). However, two amplified tumors identified as IHC 2 + by HercepTest (mAb) were missed by PATHWAY 4B5 (IHC 1 +). Four additional cases identified as IHC 2 + by HercepTest (mAb), with FISH ratio < 2 but elevated gene counts (≥ 4 to < 6), were recorded negative by PATHWAY 4B5. The HercepTest (mAb) detects HER2 expression with higher sensitivity in tumors with gene amplification (ISH group 1) and increased gene counts (ISH group 4) as well as in HER2-low tumors (HER2 IHC2 + /FISH negative or IHC 1 +). Future studies will demonstrate whether this translates into improved patient selection especially for new HER2-directed therapies.

Development and Validation of StrataNGS, a Multiplex PCR, Semiconductor Sequencing-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test

Despite widespread use in targeted tumor testing, multiplex PCR/semiconductor (Ion Torrent) sequencing-based assessment of all comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) variant classes has been limited. Herein, we describe the development and validation of StrataNGS, a 429-gene, multiplex PCR/semiconductor sequencing-based CGP laboratory-developed test performed on co-isolated DNA and RNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens with ≥2 mm² tumor surface area. Validation was performed in accordance with MolDX CGP validation guidelines using 1986 clinical formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples and an in-house developed optimized bioinformatics pipeline. Across CGP variant classes, accuracy ranged from 0.945 for tumor mutational burden (TMB) status to >0.999 for mutations and gene fusions, positive predictive value ranged from 0.915 for TMB status to 1.00 for gene fusions, and reproducibility ranged from 0.998 for copy number alterations to 1.00 for splice variants and insertions/deletions. StrataNGS TMB estimates were highly correlated to those from whole exome- or FoundationOne CDx-determined TMB (Pearson r = 0.998 and 0.960, respectively); TMB reproducibility was 0.996 (concordance correlation coefficient). Limit of detection for all variant classes was <20% tumor content. Together, we demonstrate that multiplex PCR/semiconductor sequencing-based tumor tissue CGP is feasible using optimized bioinformatic approaches described herein.

HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines

PURPOSE

HER2 overexpression and gene amplification are routinely tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), respectively. In addition, HER2 mRNA expression is also tested by the Oncotype DX assay. Discordance between laboratories among the different assays remains a problem. To improve the routine HER2 reporting, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) updated their guidelines in 2018. Our study will compare concordance of HER2 status by IHC and FISH using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines with Oncotype DX.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 657 estrogen receptor positive primary breast cancer cases with available Oncotype DX tests between 2011 and 2018. Medical records were reviewed for HER2 results by IHC, FISH, and Oncotype DX. The HER2 results by different assays and between 2013 and 2018 guidelines were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 657 cases, 280 were tested by IHC, FISH, and Oncotype DX. HER2-equivocal cases by IHC 2013 guidelines were all negative (67/67, 100%) by FISH 2018 guidelines and by Oncotype DX. HER2-equivocal cases by FISH 2013 guidelines were all negative (16/16, 100%) by FISH 2018 guidelines, while 15/16 (93.8%) negative and 1/16 (6.2%) equivocal by Oncotype DX. The HER2-equivocal and HER2-negative groups were similar in age, gender, histology, grade, and Ki67 score.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 concordance was highest between Oncotype DX (99.6%) and FISH per 2018 guidelines. This suggests that the ASCO/CAP 2018 guidelines improved the accurate stratification of HER2-equivocal cases.