Identification of "Double Hit" Lymphomas Using Updated WHO Criteria: Insights From Routine MYC Immunohistochemistry in 272 Consecutive Cases of Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas

A Combined Biomarker of Bright CD38 and MYC ≥55% Is Highly Predictive of Double-/Triple-Hit High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosis of high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangements (double-/triple-hit lymphoma [DTHL]) appears to mandate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for all large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Given the low incidence of DTHL, we aimed to identify flow cytometry (FC) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) features of DTHL that could be used to develop an optimal screening strategy. This combined FC-IHC approach has not yet been studied.

METHODS

We compared features of 40 cases of DTHL and 39 cases of diffuse LBCL (DLBCL) without MYC rearrangement.

RESULTS

Bright CD38 expression (CD38bright) by FC, high MYC expression (≥55%), and double-expressor phenotype by IHC were significantly associated with DTHL. The biomarker combining FC and IHC, CD38bright and/or MYC ≥55%, was superior to FC and IHC markers alone in predicting DTHL. Restricting FISH testing to approximately 25% of LBCL based on CD38brightand/or MYC ≥55% would detect approximately 95% of DTHL-BCL2 and approximately 75% of DHL-BCL6.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that the novel biomarker of CD38bright and/or MYC ≥55% is highly predictive of DTHL. Awareness of the advantages and limitations of this screening strategy would facilitate development of a rational diagnostic workflow to provide high-quality patient care.

Diagnostic Approach for Double-Hit and Triple-Hit Lymphoma Based on Immunophenotypic and Cytogenetic Characteristics of Bone Marrow Specimens

BACKGROUND

High-grade B-cell lymphoma with rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 (BCL2/BCL6), also known as double-hit lymphoma (DHL) and/or triple-hit lymphoma (THL), is a new entity of B-cell lymphoma in the 2017 WHO Classification. We retrospectively investigated D/THL and their clinico-laboratory features among cases of large B-cell lymphoma involving the bone marrow (BM), including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, and B-cell lymphomas with medium to large lymphoid cells, by additional FISH analysis of BM aspirates.

METHODS

A total of 111 patients diagnosed with aggressive B-cell lymphomas or B-cell lymphoma involving the BM with medium to large-sized malignant lymphocytes were reviewed from January 2000 to January 2018. Patients with available BM aspirates were evaluated by immunophenotyping by flow cytometry, chromosome, and FISH analysis for MYC and/or BCL2/BCL6 rearrangements.

RESULTS

In total, 23/111 (20.7%) showed MYC rearrangement, and eight (7.2%) were reclassified as D/THL on BM after FISH analysis for MYC and BCL2/BCL6. The detection of CD5(-)/CD10(+) based on flow cytometry was strongly associated with D/THL. A complex karyotype with aberrations related to regions in MYC and BCL2/BCL6 was significantly associated with D/THL. When the MYC FISH results of 28 BM aspirates and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were compared, 14% were discrepant.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunophenotypic and cytogenetic characteristics facilitate the diagnosis of D/THL in the cases with BM-involving aggressive B-cell lymphomas.

RNA-Based next generation sequencing complements but does not replace fluorescence in situ hybridization studies for the classification of aggressive B-Cell lymphomas

Aggressive B-cell lymphomas are currently classified based in part upon the presence or absence of translocations involving BCL2, BCL6, and MYC. Most clinical laboratories employ fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for the detection of these rearrangements. The potential role of RNA-based sequencing approaches in the evaluation of malignant lymphoma is currently unclear. In this study, we performed RNA sequencing (RNAseq) in 37 cases of aggressive B-cell lymphomas using a commercially available next generation sequencing assay and compared results to previously performed FISH studies. RNAseq detected 1/7 MYC (14%), 3/8 BCL2 (38%) and 4/8 BCL6 (50%) translocations identified by FISH. RNAseq also detected 1 MYC/IGH fusion in a case not initially tested by FISH due to low MYC protein expression and 2 BCL6 translocations that were not detected by FISH. RNAseq identified the partner gene in each detected rearrangement, including a novel EIF4G1-BCL6 rearrangement. In summary, RNAseq complements FISH for the detection of rearrangements of BCL2, BCL6 and MYC in the evaluation and classification of aggressive B-cell lymphomas by detecting rearrangements that may be cryptic by FISH methods and by identifying the rearrangement partner genes. Detection of these clinically important translocations may be optimized by combined use of FISH and RNAseq.

The double-hit signature identifies double-hit diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with genetic events cryptic to FISH

High-grade B-cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (HGBL-DH/THs) include a group of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) with inferior outcomes after standard chemoimmunotherapy. We recently described a gene expression signature that identifies 27% of germinal center B-cell DLBCLs (GCB-DLBCLs) as having a double-hit-like expression pattern (DHITsig) and inferior outcomes; however, only half of these cases have both MYC and BCL2 translocations identifiable using standard breakapart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Here, 20 DHITsig+ GCB-DLBCLs apparently lacking MYC and/or BCL2 rearrangements underwent whole-genome sequencing. This revealed 6 tumors with MYC or BCL2 rearrangements that were cryptic to breakapart FISH. Copy-number analysis identified 3 tumors with MYC and 6 tumors with MIR17HG gains or amplifications, both of which may contribute to dysregulation of MYC and its downstream pathways. Focal deletions of the PVT1 promoter were observed exclusively among DHITsig+ tumors lacking MYC translocations; this may also contribute to MYC overexpression. These results highlight that FISH fails to identify all HGBL-DH/THs, while revealing a range of other genetic mechanisms potentially underlying MYC dysregulation in DHITsig+ DLBCL, suggesting that gene expression profiling is more sensitive for identifying the biology underlying poor outcomes in GCB-DLBCL.

HIV-Associated "Double-Hit" Lymphoma of the Tonsil: A First Reported Case

Double-hit lymphoma (DHL) is a unique subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by atleast two rearrangements involving MYC, BLC2, and/or BCL6. These lymphomas are uncommon and aggressive, responding poorly to typical chemotherapy regimens. Lymphomas rarely arise from the oral cavity or tonsils, and those presenting as a neck mass are predominantly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. To date, primary DHL of the tonsils has yet to be described in the literature. Here, we report a case of a 44 year-old male patient with well-controlled human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who presented with a sore throat. He subsequently developed acute respiratory compromise due to a rapidly enlarging tonsillar mass. Pathologic and genetic analysis confirmed the presence of BCL6 and MYC rearrangements suggestive of DHL of the tonsils. In a young patient with HIV and a neck mass, it is essential that lymphoma remains on the list of differential diagnoses as prompt diagnosis and treatment may prevent complications from its rapid expansion.

Current perspectives on the treatment of double hit lymphoma

Introduction: Double hit lymphoma (DHL) represents a new diagnostic category with genetic, immunohistochemical and clinical characteristics intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma. Patients with DHL usually experience poor survival after frontline R-CHOP treatment and require alternative therapies. However, the ideal therapeutic options remain undefined. Areas covered: Traditional therapies for the treatment of DHL are discussed, including intensive induction, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), methotrexate CNS-directed prophylaxis, and radiation therapy. The authors further introduce small-molecule inhibitors targeting myc or bcl-2 signaling pathways, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody and immunomodulatory drugs as novel approaches. Expert opinion: No standard treatment exists for DHL. At present, DA-EPOCH-R exhibits an upfront induction option. Central nervous system prophylaxis with methotrexate is recommended as part of the induction therapy. For those who do not obtain complete remission, HSCT or clinical trials should be considered. Targeted approaches, especially chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and small-molecule inhibitors targeting myc or bcl-2, exhibit the potential of improving outcomes for patients with DHL. High-throughput sequencing is a promising technique both at diagnosis and relapse, in order to predict outcomes and potential novel therapies.

Dissecting aggressive B-cell lymphoma through genomic analysis - What is clinically relevant?

The aggressive B-cell lymphomas are a diverse collection of cancers grouped together based on clinical behavior and derivation from B lymphocytes. Genomic analyses on these tumours are now translating into improved classification systems and identification of underpinning targetable biology. Simple karyotyping revealed key translocations involving MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 that have impacted lymphoma classification in the World Health Organization classification scheme. Subsequently, gene expression profiling identified molecular subgroups within the most common lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): activated B-cell-like and germinal centre B-cell-like. Finally, next generation sequencing has revealed a modest number of frequently mutated genes and a long list of infrequent mutations. The mutational landscapes involve diverse genes associated with dysregulated signalling, epigenetic modification, blockade of cellular differentiation, and immune evasion. These mutational "signatures" are enriched in the different aggressive lymphoma subtypes impacting phenotypes and identifying therapeutic targets. Challenges to implementing genomic assays into clinical practice remain.