Unexpected PAX8 Immunoreactivity in Metastatic High-grade Breast Cancer

Lessons Learned, Challenges Taken, and Actions Made for "Precision" Immunohistochemistry. Analysis and Perspectives From the NordiQC Proficiency Testing Program

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has for decades been an integrated method within pathology applied to gain diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information. However, the multimodality of the analytical phase of IHC is a challenge to ensure the reproducibility of IHC, which has been documented by external quality assessment (EQA) programs for many biomarkers. More than 600 laboratories participate in the Nordic immunohistochemical Quality Control EQA program for IHC. In the period, 2017-2021, 65 different biomarkers were assessed and a total of 31,967 results were evaluated. An overall pass rate of 79% was obtained being an improvement compared with 71% for the period, 2003-2015. The pass rates for established predictive biomarkers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2) for breast carcinoma were most successful showing mean pass rates of 89% to 92%. Diagnostic IHC biomarkers as PAX8, SOX10, and different cytokeratins showed a wide spectrum of pass rates ranging from 37% to 95%, mean level of 75%, and attributed to central parameters as access to sensitive and specific antibodies but also related to purpose of the IHC test and validation performed accordingly to this. Seven new diagnostic biomarkers were introduced, and all showed inferior pass rates compared with the average level for diagnostic biomarkers emphasizing the challenge to optimize, validate, and implement new IHC biomarkers. Nordic immunohistochemical Quality Control operates by "Fit-For-Purpose" EQA principles and for programmed death-ligand 1, 2 segments are offered aligned to the "3-dimensional" approach-bridging diagnostic tests, drugs to be offered, and diseases addressed. Mean pass rates of 65% and 79% was obtained in the 2 segments for programmed death-ligand 1.

SOX17: A Highly Sensitive and Specific Immunomarker for Ovarian and Endometrial Carcinomas

PAX8 is the most commonly used immunomarker to link a carcinoma to the gynecologic tract; however, it lacks specificity. Through mining The Cancer Genome Atlas mRNA expression profile data, we identified SOX17 as a potential specific marker at the mRNA level for gynecologic tumors. To evaluate the utility of this marker in the identification of the gynecologic origin of a given carcinoma, we performed immunochemical staining in a large cohort of ovarian and endometrial cancer cases (n = 416), together with a large cohort of solid tumors from other organs (n = 1544) in tissue microarrays. Similar to PAX8, SOX17 was highly expressed in different subtypes of ovarian carcinoma (97.5% for SOX17 vs 97% for PAX8 in serous carcinoma, 90% vs 90% in endometrioid carcinoma, and 100% vs 100% in clear cell carcinoma), except for mucinous carcinoma (0% vs 27%), and was also highly expressed in different subtypes of endometrial carcinoma (88% vs 84% in endometrioid carcinoma, 100% vs 100% in serous and clear cell carcinoma). SOX17 was not expressed in thyroid and renal cell carcinomas, whereas PAX8 expression was high (86% and 85%, respectively). In addition, SOX17 was expressed at low levels in cervical adenocarcinoma (20%) and had no expression in cervical squamous carcinoma, mesothelioma, and carcinomas from the breast, lung, pancreas, colon, stomach, liver, bladder, and salivary gland. Our data indicate that SOX17 is not only a sensitive but also a specific marker for the origin of ovarian and endometrial carcinomas.

Identifying SOX17 as a Sensitive and Specific Marker for Ovarian and Endometrial Carcinomas

Similar to PAX8, SOX17 was recently identified as a master transcription factor of ovarian cancer based on RNA sequencing data. We explored SOX17 utility in diagnosing ovarian tumors and other gynecologic tumors. We systematically evaluated SOX17 expression on tissue microarrays of 398 ovarian tumors of various types, 93 endometrial carcinomas, 80 cervical carcinomas, and 1371 nongynecologic carcinomas, such as those of kidney, thyroid, breast, colon, bladder, liver, bile duct, adrenal gland, pancreas, brain, and lung and malignant melanoma. In addition, we evaluated SOX17 expression in whole tissue sections from 60 gynecologic carcinomas and 10 angiosarcomas. The results demonstrated that SOX17 was highly expressed in most ovarian and endometrial tumors with strong intensity. However, unlike PAX8, it was predominately negative in other tested tumor types, including kidney and thyroid tumors. In particular, SOX17 was highly expressed in the following pathologic subtypes of ovarian tumors: serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, endometrioid carcinoma, and germ cell tumors. SOX17 was mostly negative in mucinous carcinoma and sex cord stromal tumors. In addition, SOX17 was expressed in vascular endothelial cells and was positive in all tested angiosarcomas. In summary, our results demonstrate that SOX17 is a sensitive and specific marker for ovarian nonmucinous carcinomas and endometrial carcinomas. For ovarian germ cell tumors and angiosarcomas, SOX17 demonstrates higher specificity than PAX8, with comparable sensitivity. Furthermore, SOX17 positivity in endothelial cells serves as an internal positive control, making it an excellent marker.

New Challenges in the Differential Diagnosis of High-Grade Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Serous Carcinoma

While screening has improved early detection of primary breast cancers, it may also identify metastasis to the breast in rare instances. High-grade carcinomas identified on breast screening may have non-specific morphology and immunoprofiles, making distinction from metastasis problematic. High-grade carcinomas frequently lose expression of specific tumor markers. New evidence specifically challenges GATA3/PAX8 exclusivity in the differential diagnosis of high-grade triple-negative breast cancer and high-grade serous carcinoma of müllerian origin. This case series provides a careful and detailed review of immunohistochemistry interpretation, with focus on PAX8, and the potential pitfalls in making a definitive pathological diagnosis, which is essential in determining oncological treatment options.

Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast Metastatic to the Ovary: A Clinicopathologic Study of 38 Cases

We evaluated the clinicopathologic features of 38 cases of metastatic lobular (n=33) or predominantly lobular (n=5) carcinoma involving the ovary. The patients were from 39 to 91 years of age (mean: 53 y). In 2 cases, the breast primary and ovarian metastasis were diagnosed synchronously, and in 5, the breast primary was only discovered after the metastatic carcinoma in the ovary was found. In the majority of cases (79%), both ovaries were involved; the mean ovarian tumor size was 5.9 cm. The ovarian tumors demonstrated a range of architectural patterns including macronodular (71%), diffuse/solid growth (87%), single-cell infiltration (87%), cords (74%), and small nests/clusters (50%). Nine cases demonstrated focal signet ring cell morphology. The associated stromal reaction ranged from none to marked, with almost half of cases demonstrating a marked stromal response, largely prominent sclerosis. A variety of neoplasms, most typically sex cord-stromal tumors, lymphoma/leukemia, and desmoplastic small round cell tumor, may enter the differential. In addition to the obvious help afforded in most cases by the clinical history, a combination of judicious sampling, particularly to unearth the delicate cords or single-cell growth of lobular carcinoma, appropriate consideration of the cytologic features of the neoplastic cells, and immunohistochemistry can resolve the diverse issues in differential diagnosis that may arise.

Immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of renal epithelial neoplasms

Despite the increasing number of newly identified renal neoplasms, the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can usually be reached with careful histologic examination and a limited immunohistochemical (IHC) panel. Clear cell, papillary, chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma account for more than 90% of renal neoplasia in adults, and sophisticated ancillary tools are usually unnecessary. Renal tumors with entity-defining genetic alterations may ultimately require molecular confirmation via cytogenetics or sequencing technologies, such as RCC with TFE3, TFEB, or ALK gene rearrangements, or TFEB amplified RCC. In fumarate hydratase-deficient and succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC, highly specific IHC markers can strongly suggest the diagnosis. In the metastatic setting, PAX8 and carbonic anhydrase 9 are among the most helpful markers for confirming RCC and clear cell type, respectively; however, caution should be exercised in the absence of a current or historical renal mass. In diagnostically challenging cases, such as renal eosinophilic tumors with low-grade nuclear features, or infiltrative high-grade tumors, careful examination coupled with a judicious panel of IHC markers usually resolves the diagnosis. This review offers concise algorithms for diagnosis of kidney neoplasia with the latest recognized, provisional, and emerging entities to daily pathology practice.

PAX-8 Expression in Salivary Duct Carcinoma

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a high-grade adenocarcinoma resembling breast ductal carcinoma. It accounts for ~10% of malignant tumors of the salivary glands. Most cases show expression of CK7 and androgen receptor. PAX-8 is a transcription factor, with expression reported in renal, Müllerian, and thyroid carcinomas. Previous studies have described an absence of PAX-8 immunostaining in most primary salivary gland neoplasms, including SDCs. However, PAX-8 expression is frequently found in neoplasms that can metastasize to salivary glands, suggesting the possibility that this protein can be used to differentiate SDC from secondary neoplastic involvement of the salivary gland. We evaluated the expression of PAX-8 in 14 cases of SDC from our institution. One case showed diffuse moderate to strong PAX-8 positivity, while 2 tumors showed focal weak staining. Therefore, we conclude that although the majority of SDC are negative for PAX-8, rare diffuse positivity can be seen in these primary salivary gland tumors. This could potentially pose difficulty in ruling out metastatic disease from another PAX-8-positive primary neoplasm.

Association of mammographic density with blood DNA methylation

Background: Altered DNA methylation may be an intermediate phenotype between breast cancer risk factors and disease. Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. However, no studies to date have identified an epigenetic signature of mammographic density. We performed an epigenome-wide association study of mammographic density.

Methods: White blood cell DNA methylation was measured for 385 postmenopausal women using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array. Differential methylation was assessed using genome-wide, probe-level, and regional analyses. We implemented a resampling-based approach to improve the stability of our findings.

Results: On average, women with elevated mammographic density exhibited DNA hypermethylation within CpG islands and gene promoters compared to women with lower mammographic density. We identified 250 CpG sites for which DNA methylation was significantly associated with mammographic density. The top sites were located within genes associated with cancer, including HDLBP, TGFB2, CCT4, and PAX8, and were more likely to be located in regulatory regions of the genome. We also identified differential DNA methylation in 37 regions, including within the promoters of PAX8 and PF4, a gene involved in the regulation of angiogenesis. Overall, our results paint a picture of epigenetic dysregulation associated with mammographic density.

Conclusion: Mammographic density is associated with differential DNA methylation throughout the genome, including within genes associated with cancer. Our results suggest the potential involvement of several genes in the biological mechanisms behind differences in breast density between women. Further studies are warranted to explore these potential mechanisms and potential links to breast cancer risk.

Polyclonal PAX8 expression in carcinomas of the biliary tract - Frequent non-specific staining represents a potential diagnostic pitfall

Paired box protein 8 (PAX8) is a transcription factor that is considered a relatively specific marker of carcinomas of the thyroid, kidney, and Müllerian/Wolffian duct derivatives. Unexpected PAX8 immunoreactivity has occasionally been reported in other tumors. The frequency of PAX8 expression in carcinomas of the biliary tract is not well studied. We evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of PAX8 in 73 cases of biliary tract carcinoma. We found that 28 of 73 (38%) biliary tract carcinomas had variable immunoreactivity for PAX8, assessed by a widely used polyclonal antibody (ProteinTech Group, Chicago, IL). This included 3 (4%) of cases with strong diffuse, and 14 (19%) of cases with strong focal staining. Strong PAX8 expression was more frequent in distal bile duct carcinomas than other biliary sites (p = 0.015), and showed a weak association with advanced T stage (T3-T4 versus T1-T2; p = 0.09). No correlation was observed between PAX8 positivity and age at diagnosis, gender, or lymph node metastasis. The 28 polyclonal PAX8-positive cases were largely negative for monoclonal PAX8 and PAX6 immunostains, with only rare tumor cells with weak immunoreactivity being present in a subset of cases. We show that a substantial fraction of biliary tract carcinomas exhibit immunoreactivity with a widely used polyclonal PAX8 antibody. Pathologists should be aware of this potential pitfall during the diagnostic workup of hepatobiliary lesions to avoid misdiagnosis as a metastasis from a PAX8-positive tumor.

TRPS1: a highly sensitive and specific marker for breast carcinoma, especially for triple-negative breast cancer

Currently there is no highly specific and sensitive marker to identify breast cancer-the most common malignancy in women. Breast cancer can be categorized as estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) types based on the expression of ER, PR, and HER2. Although GATA3 is the most widely used tumor marker at present to determine the breast origin, which has been shown to be an excellent marker for ER-positive and low-grade breast cancer, but it does not work well for TNBC with sensitivity as low as <20% in metaplastic breast carcinoma. In the current study, through TCGA data mining we identified trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) as a specific gene for breast carcinoma across 31 solid tumor types. Moreover, high mRNA level of TRPS1 was found in all four subtypes of breast carcinoma including ER/PR-positive luminal A and B types, HER2-positive type, and basal-type/TNBC. We then analyzed TRPS1 expression in 479 cases of various types of breast cancer using immunochemistry staining, and found that TRPS1 and GATA3 had comparable positive expression in ER-positive (98% vs. 95%) and HER2-positive (87% vs. 88%) breast carcinomas. However, TRPS1 which was highly expressed in TNBC, was significantly higher than GATA3 expression in metaplastic (86% vs. 21%) and nonmetaplastic (86% vs. 51%) TNBC. In addition, TRPS1 expression was evaluated in 1234 cases of solid tumor from different organs. In contrast to the high expression of GATA3 in urothelial carcinoma, TRPS1 showed no or little expression in urothelial carcinomas or in other tumor types including lung adenocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, colon and gastric adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and ovarian carcinoma. These findings suggest that TRPS1 is a highly sensitive and specific marker for breast carcinoma and can be used as a great diagnostic tool, especially for TNBC.

Novel uses of immunohistochemistry in breast pathology: interpretation and pitfalls

Immunohistochemistry is an essential component of diagnostic breast pathology. The emergence of novel assays and applications is accompanied by new interpretation criteria and potential pitfalls. Immunohistochemistry assists in supporting breast origin for primary or metastatic carcinomas and identifying non-mammary metastases to the breast; however, no single immunostain is perfectly sensitive nor specific. GATA3 and Sox10 are particularly useful immunostains to identify triple negative breast carcinoma, which are often negative for other markers of mammary differentiation. Sox10 labeling is a major potential diagnostic pitfall, as Sox10 and S-100 label both triple negative breast carcinoma and metastatic melanoma; a pan-cytokeratin immunostain should always be included for this differential diagnosis. Novel immunohistochemistry serves as surrogates for the molecular alterations unique to several of special-type breast carcinomas, including the use of MYB in adenoid cystic carcinoma, pan-TRK in secretory carcinoma, and mutant IDH2 in tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity (TCCRP). In addition, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is an emerging, albeit imperfect, biomarker for breast cancer immunotherapy, with different assay parameters and scoring criteria in breast carcinoma compared to other tumor types. The expanding repertoire of novel immunohistochemistry provides additional diagnostic tools and biomarkers that improve diagnostic breast pathology and patient care.

PAX8 Expression in Breast Cancer

PAX8 expression is frequently detected in renal, thyroidal, and Müllerian carcinomas, and PAX8 immunohistochemistry is often used to confirm the origin of these tumors. Tumors metastatic to the breast may masquerade as primary breast lesions. PAX8 is strongly expressed in tumors of Müllerian origin and largely negative in breast primaries, but an immunohistochemical expression of PAX8 in breast cancer has not been systematically evaluated in a large series. We analyzed 266 cases of invasive carcinoma of the breast on tissue microarrays and whole tissue sections with a PAX8 monoclonal antibody. Both the extent (focal or diffuse) and intensity (weak, moderate, or strong) of nuclear staining were assessed in the tumor cells. In total, 16 cases (6.02%) were positive for PAX8 (12 with weak and 4 with moderate staining). Expression was diffuse in 7 cases and focal in 9 cases. All 16 PAX8-positive tumors were histologic grade III invasive ductal carcinomas, 13 of these were triple-negative, 2 were HER2-positive, only and 1 was progesterone receptor-positive only. Strong PAX8 nuclear expression was not seen in any of the cases. PAX8 was negative in breast tumors with neuroendocrine features. Our study demonstrated a low rate of PAX8 expression in breast cancer. When present, PAX8 expression was only seen in high-grade invasive ductal carcinomas, mostly triple-negative. The presence of PAX8 immunoreactivity alone cannot exclude mammary origin, especially when only weak to moderate staining is observed, so the correlation with available clinical and pathologic data helps to ensure an accurate diagnosis.

Salivary gland-type mammary carcinoma arising in microglandular adenosis: A case report and clinicopathological review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Microglandular adenosis (MGA) is a rare benign proliferative lesion lacking a myoepithelial cell layer; 27% of all reported cases have progressed to invasive carcinoma. Salivary gland-type carcinomas of the breast are also uncommon, representing 2% of all breast cancers. This wide spectrum of neoplasms tends to be triple negative and generally has an excellent prognosis. Given the rarity of salivary gland-type carcinomas of the breast arising from MGA, there are few reports of these cases in literature. As such, there is uncertainty regarding their diagnosis and treatment strategies.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We report the rare case of a 66-year-old woman who presented with a triple negative, invasive carcinoma with salivary gland-type features, arising from MGA. The patient underwent mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy, followed by Taxotere and Cyclophosphamide (TC) chemotherapy and 50 Gy in 25 fractions of radiation to her chest wall. We reviewed the available literature on salivary gland-type breast carcinomas arising from MGA.

DISCUSSION

Despite the generally unfavourable characteristics associated with carcinoma arising in microglandular adenosis (MGACA), most patients with MGACA have favourable outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present case and reviewed cases are consistent with the literature on MGA, atypical MGA (AMGA), and MGACA. Future study of this rare entity is warranted to establish a consensus surrounding its clinical significance and treatment methods.