Mesenchymal Hamartoma of the Liver in Older Children: An Adult Variant or a Different Entity? Report of a Case With Review of the Literature

Outcomes of Primary Tumor Excision do not Differ from Non-Resection Methods in Pediatric Mesenchymal Hamartoma of the Liver: A Rapid Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

To conduct a rapid systematic review comparing the outcomes of primary tumor resection versus non-resection on patients with hepatic mesenchymal hamartoma.

METHODS

We searched the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from January 1, 2000 to March 31, 2022. Studies that described cases of hepatic mesenchymal hamartoma, including management and outcomes, were included.

RESULTS

62 articles met inclusion criteria with 95 cases in total. Patients were assigned to the primary tumor resection (n = 85) or non-resection (n = 10) cohort based on the described management. Similar rates of morbidity (17% vs 20%) and mortality (6 vs 10%) were identified between cohorts. There were no differences in sex, liver lobe involvement, or tumor size among study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete tumor resection should remain the gold standard for hepatic mesenchymal hamartomas when an adequate liver remnant exists. Reports of non-resected tumors demonstrating spontaneous regression or stability with watchful waiting have poor long term follow-up and have inadequate evidence of a true mesenchymal hamartoma diagnosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Pediatric hepatic vascular tumors: clinicopathologic characteristics of 33 cases and proposed updates to current classification schemes

Pediatric hepatic vascular tumors (HVTs) are rare neoplasms with features distinct from their cutaneous counterparts. Their behavior ranges from benign to malignant, with each subtype having therapeutic differences. Histopathologic descriptions of large cohorts are scarce in the literature. Thirty-three putative HVTs diagnosed from 1970 to 2021 were retrieved. All available clinical and pathologic materials were reviewed. Lesions were reclassified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of pediatric tumors [1] as hepatic congenital hemangioma (HCH; n = 13), hepatic infantile hemangioma (HIH; n = 10), hepatic angiosarcoma (HA; n = 3), and hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH; n = 1). Vascular malformations (n = 5) or vascular-dominant mesenchymal hamartoma (n = 1) were excluded. HCH frequently showed involutional changes, whereas HIH often had anastomosing channels and pseudopapillae formation. HA had solid areas with epithelioid and/or spindled endothelial morphology, significant atypia, increased mitoses, high proliferation index, and occasionally necrosis. On morphology analysis, a subset of HIH showed features worrisome for progression to HA including solid glomeruloid proliferation, increased mitoses, and epithelioid morphology. The widely metastatic and fatal HEH was observed in a 5-year-old male with multiple liver lesions. Immunohistochemically, HIHs and HA were Glucose transporter isoform 1 (GLUT-1) positive. One HIH patient died from postoperative complications, whereas 3 are alive without disease. Five HCH patients are alive and well. Two of three HA patients died of disease, and 1 is alive without recurrence. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of pediatric HVTs reviewing clinicopathologic features based on current Pediatric WHO nomenclature [1]. We highlight diagnostic challenges and propose inclusion of an intermediate category between HIH and HA which warrants closer follow-up.

Rare benign tumors of the liver: still rare?

Background

Benign liver tumors are common. They do not spread to other areas of the body, and they usually do not pose a serious health risk. In fact, in most cases, benign liver tumors are not diagnosed because patients are asymptomatic. When they are detected, it’s usually because the person has had medical imaging tests, such as an ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) scan, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for another condition.

Materials and methods

A search of the literature was made using cancer literature and the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS) database for the following keywords: “hepatic benign tumors”, “hepatic cystic tumors”, “polycystic liver disease”, “liver macroregenerative nodules”, “hepatic mesenchymal hamartoma”, “hepatic angiomyolipoma”, “biliary cystadenoma”, and “nodular regenerative hyperplasia”.

Discussion and conclusion

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in some areas of the world; there is an increasing incidence worldwide. Approximately 750,000 new cases are reported per year. More than 75 % of cases occur in the Asia-Pacific region, largely in association with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The incidence of HCC is increasing in the USA and Europe because of the increased incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Unlike the liver HCC, benign tumors are less frequent. However, they represent a chapter always more interesting of liver disease. In fact, a careful differential diagnosis with the forms of malignant tumor is often required in such a way so as to direct the patient to the correct therapy. In conclusion, many of these tumors present with typical features in various imaging studies. On occasions, biopsies are required, and/or surgical removal is needed. In the majority of cases of benign hepatic tumors, no treatment is indicated. The main indication for treatment is the presence of significant clinical symptoms or suspicion of malignancy or fear of malignant transformation.

Mesenchymal hamartoma or embryonal sarcoma of the liver in childhood: a difficult diagnosis before complete surgical excision

BACKGROUND

Clinical experience shows that the primary diagnosis of mesenchymal hamartoma (MHL) and embryonal sarcoma of the liver (ESL) recurrently is mistaken, leading to inadequate managements. We evaluated the accuracy of the primary diagnosis of those liver tumors, compared with the final histological diagnosis.

METHODS

Records of 25 children (0-16 years, treated 01/1989-01/2013) with final diagnosis of MHL or ESL were analyzed.

RESULTS

Final diagnosis was MHL in 18/25 children (10 solid-cystic, 2 cystic, 6 solid) and ESL in 7/25 (4 solid-cystic, 1 cystic, 2 solid). Only 3/7 ESL patients and 15/18 MHL patients fell into the "typical" age group. In 13/25 children primary diagnosis was based on imaging only. Overall, primary diagnosis was concordant with the final diagnosis in 17/25 patients. Of 99/25 biopsied cases, 4/9 biopsy results exposed the wrong final diagnosis; of cystic-solid masses 4/14 were mistaken, of cystic masses 1/3, of solid masses 3/8.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative diagnosis of MHL and ESL is challenging because of atypical clinical presentation, misleading "typical" radiological findings, and difficult interpretation of biopsies. If feasible, complete surgical resection of, in particular, solid-cystic liver masses in the pediatric age group must be aimed for, to get a definitive, final diagnosis, followed by an adequate treatment strategy.