Redefining early cervical neoplasia: recent progress

Sequential gene expression analysis of cervical malignant transformation identifies RFC4 as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker

BACKGROUND

Cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is known to arise through increasingly higher-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) or cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs). This study aimed to describe sequential molecular changes and identify biomarkers in cervical malignant transformation.

METHODS

Multidimensional data from five publicly available microarray and TCGA-CESC datasets were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry was carried out on 354 cervical tissues (42 normal, 62 CIN1, 26 CIN2, 47 CIN3, and 177 SCC) to determine the potential diagnostic and prognostic value of identified biomarkers.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that normal epithelium and SILs presented higher molecular homogeneity than SCC. Genes in the region (e.g., 3q, 12q13) with copy number alteration or HPV integration were more likely to lose or gain expression. The IL-17 signaling pathway was enriched throughout disease progression with downregulation of IL17C and decreased Th17 cells at late stage. Furthermore, we identified AURKA, TOP2A, RFC4, and CEP55 as potential causative genes gradually upregulated during the normal-SILs-SCC transition. For detecting high-grade SIL (HSIL), TOP2A and RFC4 showed balanced sensitivity (both 88.2%) and specificity (87.1 and 90.1%), with high AUC (0.88 and 0.89). They had equivalent diagnostic performance alone to the combination of p16^INK4a and Ki-67. Meanwhile, increased expression of RFC4 significantly and independently predicted favorable outcomes in multi-institutional cohorts of SCC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our comprehensive study of gene expression profiling has identified dysregulated genes and biological processes during cervical carcinogenesis. RFC4 is proposed as a novel surrogate biomarker for determining HSIL and HSIL+, and an independent prognostic biomarker for SCC.

[The 2019 FIGO classification for cervical carcinoma-what's new?]

Numerous therapeutic and prognostic studies of cervical carcinoma have necessitated a revision of the FIGO classification.For microinvasive carcinomas, the horizontal dimension is no longer considered and diagnosis and staging will solely be made by the depth of cervical stromal invasion. Lymphovascular invasion beyond the deepest point of stromal infiltration by tumor cells does not alter the stage.There will be a new subclassification of macroinvasive carcinoma confined to the uterine cervix, which will be made by largest tumor extension as follows: FIGO IB1/T1b1 - invasive carcinoma >0.5 cm depth of stromal invasion and ≤2 cm in largest dimension, FIGO IBII/T1b2: - invasive carcinoma >2 cm and ≤4 cm, FIGO IBII/T1b3 - invasive carcinoma >4 cm. Pelvic as well as para-aortic lymph nodes will be defined as regional nodes. Pelvic lymph node metastases only will be categorised as FIGO IIIC1/pN1a and para-aortic lymph node involvement with or without concomitant pelvic involvement will be FIGO IIIC2/pN1b. Uterine corpus as well as adnexal involvement are not relevant for staging purpose.

Transforming human papillomavirus infection and the esophageal transformation zone: prime time for total excision/ablative therapy?

High-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) infection is causal for almost all cervical malignancy (both squamous and adenocarcinoma), 90% of anal neoplasia, 70% of penile tumors, and 25% of head and neck cancers. The shared immunogenetics of cervical and esophageal malignancy suggests that HPV infection could well be a common denominator in the etiology of both cancers. In this regard, we have demonstrated that transcriptionally active hr-HPV (genotypes 16 and 18) is strongly associated with Barrett's dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Increasing hr-HPV viral load and integration status has been linked with greater disease severity along the Barrett metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence as has been demonstrated in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer. HPV infections in both the cervix and esophagus are both focal, i.e., present in greater quantities at the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ). HPV affinity is to junctional tissue, as basal cells are particularly accessible at the squamocolumnar transformation zone and especially susceptible to this viral infection. We have postulated that progressive acid damage to the esophagus increases the likelihood of mucosal breaks enabling the virus to enter the basal layer of the transformation zone. The SCJ is the transformation zone of the esophagus and is strikingly similar to the transition zone (ectoendocervical SCJ) of the uterine cervix where almost all high-grade cervical lesions and cancers arise including 80% of adenocarcinomas. These transition zone cells exhibit features of squamous epithelium as well as glandular cells, which have been described in both Barrett's esophagus and cervical mucosa. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is derived from a discrete population of embryonic cells residing at the SCJ. There is loss of SCJ immune-phenotype following excision without regeneration at other junctional sites. Prevention of cervical cancer in up to 80-95% of patients with screen-detected CIN is dependent on the excision/ablation of the entire transformation zone. The persistence of hr-HPV 16/18 following eradication of CIN is a significant risk factor for recurrence. Similarly, we have demonstrated that persistent hr-HPV infection 16/18 and p53 overexpression are associated with treatment failure after endoscopic ablation of BD/EAC. Thus, we believe that excision/ablation of the SCJ in patients with BD/intramucosal EAC should be performed to reduce the potential malignant risk. We propose to test this hypothesis by a multicenter randomized controlled trial whereby patients (both HPV positive and those which are virus negative) will be allocated into two arms: complete excision of the SCJ via endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in addition to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) ± EMR of BD/intramucosal EAC (experimental arm) versus current standard of care (RFA ± EMR) of said lesions. Treatment efficacy in both groups will be evaluated by comparing disease elimination, regression/progression, and recurrence (if any). All patients would be entered into an intensive endoscopic surveillance protocol (biannually) for at least 2 years with lesional/neosquamous biopsies to compare the recurrence rate of both dysplasia/neoplasia in both arms. Viral (HPV DNA/p16INK4A/E6/E7 mRNA) and host biomarkers (e.g., p53) will be analyzed both at baseline and posttreatment intervals. A positive study would initiate development of tools best suited for SCJ destruction.

p16 Immunohistochemistry Is Not Always Required For Accurate Diagnosis of Grade 2 Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

OBJECTIVES

Preinvasive squamous neoplasms of the lower genital tract are currently classified using a two-tier system (high- or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) as directed by the Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) guidelines but may also be subclassified as intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (-IN1), -IN2, or -IN3. The LAST recommended that all diagnoses of -IN2 be supported by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for p16. We examined whether p16 and Ki-67 IHC are necessary to diagnose -IN2 when the lesion has obvious high-grade histology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

p16 and Ki-67 IHC were performed prospectively and retrospectively on vulvar, vaginal, and cervical specimens with an initial diagnosis of -IN2 based on hematoxylin and eosin morphology, and a final diagnosis was made after consensus review.

RESULTS

Five of 46 prospective and four of 38 retrospective cases were p16 negative. The diagnosis of -IN2 was maintained in eight of these nine cases because of compelling high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion histology. Overall, p16 and Ki-67 IHC altered the -IN2 diagnosis to a lower grade in only one of 84 cases (1.2%, <0.01%-7.1%). Moreover, p16 was positive in all cases where the preanalytic impression was of -IN2/3 (13/13).

CONCLUSIONS

p16 IHC lacks utility in cases of morphologically obvious -IN2, because the stain is positive in most cases. The LAST recommendation to use p16 IHC to support all diagnoses of -IN2 will result in performing the immunostain in many circumstances where it is not medically necessary. Among cases that are p16 negative, many have compelling high-grade morphology. The LAST perspective that the stain trumps histology may allow false-negative IHC results to prevail.

p16ink4 and cytokeratin 7 immunostaining in predicting HSIL outcome for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a case series, literature review and commentary

p16ink4 and cytokeratin 7 (CK7) have been proposed to identify low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) at greater or lesser risk for an outcome of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). We correlated CK7 and p16ink4 staining in LSILs with outcome on follow-up and placed this information in the context of prior reports. Cervical LSIL biopsies with at least 1-year follow-up information were immunostained for CK7 and p16ink4. Follow-up outcomes included no SIL, LSIL (persistence) or HSIL (CIN2+). In all, 109 LSILs were studied and 18.3% stained positive for CK7. Ninety-one percent of CK7-negative LSILs regressed, 4.5% persisted, and 4.5% had an HSIL outcome, versus 60, 20, and 20% of CK7-positive LSILs, respectively (P=0.036). p16ink4 status did not significantly associate with outcome. Review of the literature revealed a highly variable rate of both positive p16ink4 immunoreactivity in LSIL and CIN2+ outcome for p16-positive LSIL but a consistently high negative predictive value (>90%) in the case of no/low p16 expression. Inter-observer reproducibility for the diagnosis of CIN2 in the literature ranged from poor to good, with unanimous agreement on the diagnosis of CIN2 occurring in less than 25% of cases. As with high-risk human papillomavirus testing, the most clinically useful result of p16ink4 staining is a negative test, implying no lesion or CIN1 and conferring a low risk of HSIL outcome. HSIL outcomes ('progression') are highly variable and are subject to wide differences in inter-observer interpretation for CIN2. This argues against the wisdom of relying on p16ink4 to both predict CIN2+ or upgrade CIN1 to CIN2. It also begs the question of whether CIN2 should be replaced by an alternate and less pejorative term (SIL of intermediate grade) for lesions that are not reproducibly classified as LSIL or HSIL, with an appropriate management scheme.

[S3 guidelines on diagnostics and treatment of cervical cancer: Demands on pathology]

Between 2011 and the end of 2014 the former consensus S2k guidelines for the diagnostics and treatment of cervical cancer were updated and upgraded to S3 level, methodologically based on the regulations of the German Cancer Society (DKG). The present article summarizes the relevant aspects for the sectioning, histopathological workup, diagnostics and reporting for the pathology of invasive cancer of the uterine cervix. The recommendations are based on the most recent World Health Organization (WHO) and TNM classification systems and consider the needs of the clinician for appropriate surgical and radiotherapeutic treatment of patients. Detailed processing rules of colposcopy-guided diagnostic biopsies, conization and trachelectomy as well as for radical hysterectomy specimens and lymph node resection (including sentinel lymph node resection) are given. In the guidelines deep stromal invasion in macroinvasive cervical cancer is defined for the first time as tumor infiltration of > 66% of the cervical stromal wall. Furthermore, morphological prognostic factors for microinvasive and macroinvasive cervical cancer are summarized.

Human Papillomavirus Genotyping and p16(INK4a) Expression in Cervical Lesions: A Combined Test to Avoid Cervical Cancer Progression

Cervical cancer is a major public health problem in Morocco. The cervical cancer has a long precancerous period that provides an opportunity for the screening and treatment. Improving screening tests is a priority goal for the early diagnosis of cervical cancer. This study was conducted to evaluate the combination of p16(INK4a) protein expression, human papillomavirus (HPV) typing, and histopathology for the identification of cervical lesions with high risk to progress to cervical cancer among Moroccan women. A total of 96 cervical biopsies were included in this study. Signal amplification in situ hybridization with biotinylated probes was used to detect HPV. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the expression of p16(INK4a) protein. HPV DNA was detected in 74.0% of the biopsies (71/96). Of the seventy-one positive HPV cases, we detected 67.6% (48/71) of high risk (HR)-HPV (HPV 16 and 18), 24% of low risk-HPV (HPV 6 and 11), 1.4% intermediate risk-HPV (HPV 31, 33, and 35), and 7% coinfections (HPV 6/11 and 16/18). Overexpression of p16(INK4a) protein was observed in 72.9% (70/96) of the biopsies. In addition, p16(INK4a) protein detection was closely correlated with recovery of HR HPV. Our result showed that p16(INK4a) expression level is correlated with HR-HPV status.

Cervical squamocolumnar junction-specific markers define distinct, clinically relevant subsets of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

Low-grade cervical squamous abnormalities (low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [LSIL, CIN1]) can be confused with or followed by high-grade (HSIL, CIN2/3) lesions, expending considerable resources. Recently, a cell of origin for cervical neoplasia was proposed in the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ); HSILs are almost always SCJ, but LSILs include SCJ and SCJ subsets. Abnormal cervical biopsies from 214 patients were classified by 2 experienced pathologists (panel) as LSIL or HSIL using published criteria. SILs were scored SCJ and SCJ using SCJ-specific antibodies (keratin7, AGR2, MMP7, and GDA). Assessments of interobserver agreement, p16 staining pattern, proliferative index, and outcome were compared. The original diagnostician agreed with the panel diagnosis of HSIL and SCJ LSIL in all cases (100%). However, for SCJ LSIL, panelists disagreed with each other by 15% and with the original diagnostician by 46.2%. Comparing SCJ and SCJ LSILs, 60.2% and 94.9% were p16 positive, 23% and 74.4% showed strong (full-thickness) p16 staining, and 0/54 (0%) and 8/33 (24.2%) with follow-up had an HSIL outcome, respectively. Some SCJ LSILs are more likely to both generate diagnostic disagreement and be associated with HSIL. Conversely, SCJ LSILs generate little observer disagreement and, when followed, have a very low risk of HSIL outcome. Thus, SCJ biomarkers in conjunction with histology may segregate LSILs with very low risk of HSIL outcome and conceivably could be used as a management tool to reduce excess allocation of resources to the follow-up of these lesions.

MOLECULAR MARKERS OF EARLY CERVICAL NEOPLASIA

Pure morphological distinction of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) from their mimics can be challenging. Diagnosis can be difficult with nonconventional HSILs associated with a metaplastic phenotype, squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) that defy precise classification such as "eosinophilic dysplasias", and those that overlap with columnar neoplasms, including stratified variants of adenocarcinoma in situ ("SMILE"). Gene expression and protein profiling have identified biomarkers with the potential to decrease diagnostic variability and increase specificity of histological and cytological analysis. Among the ones clinically useful for HSIL detection are p16(INK4A) and MIB-1 which complement each other, differentiating SIL from normal/atrophic (MIB-1 low) or reactive/immature metaplastic (p16(INK4A) scattered) epithelium. Additional markers, including ProEx(TM) C, have been proposed but their added value is yet to be established. In the final analysis, biomarkers are most helpful for distinguishing benign immature or atrophic proliferations from HSIL. The distinction of LSIL from HSIL must be made on the hematoxylin and eosin-stained section and should be made with care, given the potential consequences of a diagnosis of CIN2 or CIN3.

Squamous intraepithelial lesions arising in benign endocervical polyps: a report of 9 cases with correlation to the Pap smears, HPV analysis, and immunoprofile

Endocervical polyps are common benign lesions that typically arise in the endocervical canal of women from 40 to 60 years old. The reported incidence of squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) occurring in an endocervical polyp is typically less than 1/1,000 (0.1%). We report on 9 cases of SIL arising in otherwise classic benign endocervical polyps; these lesions were from a pool of about 1500 endocervical polyps for an incidence of approximately 0.5%. Five cases were low-grade SIL; of the 4 cases of high-grade SIL, 1 was associated with an invasive squamous cell carcinoma. In 8/9 cases, there was no evidence of SIL on colposcopic examination or biopsy of the remainder of the cervix. There were 12 Pap smears (either concurrent or from 6 mo to 2 yr before the biopsy-proven SIL) taken from the 9 women and most (10/12%-83%) were diagnosed as normal (7), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), favor reactive changes (1), or ASCUS (2) whereas the other 2 (17%) smears were diagnosed as low-grade SIL. Human papillomavirus DNA was evident in 7/8 (88%) of the polyps with SIL as determined by in situ hybridization. We conclude that cervical SILs can occur de novo in endocervical polyps, their incidence may be increasing, and, due to their presence in the endocervical canal, where they are much less accessible to sampling with a cytobrush/spatula, may not be evident in the Pap smear.

Detection of HPV-induced cervical (pre) neoplastic lesions: a tissue microarray (TMA) study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a panel of biomarkers in the characterization of human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced cervical lesions. Management of these lesions depends on their histologic confirmation. Misinterpretation especially for benign mimics results in a significant diagnostic disagreement. For these reasons, a continuous effort is still needed to discover surrogate markers, which could support the final diagnosis. Archival biopsies of normal ectocervical and endocervical tissues, squamous metaplasia, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma in situ, and adenocarcinoma were retrieved to perform a tissue microarray (TMA). A panel of markers was tested on the TMA obtained slides by in situ hybridization (HPV DNA) and immunohistochemistry (p16, involucrin, Ki-67, and HPV L1 proteins). The sensitivity to detect high-risk HPV DNA increased with lesion's severity. In situ hybridization signals suggesting integrated viral physical status predominated in CIN II/III, squamous cell carcinoma, and glandular (pre) neoplastic lesions. The p16 and Ki-67 protein expression increased from CIN I to CIN III and to infiltrative lesions. Involucrin positivity was better appreciated in well-differentiated diagnostic entities (ectocervix, mature metaplasia, and CIN I). HPV L1 antibody detected the viral capsid protein in a low proportion of CIN I and II. In conclusion, using a panel of cervical biomarkers improves the final reporting of various HPV-induced epithelial lesions. Carefully constructed TMA with single spots of 1-mm diameter are powerful tools, which have a high reliability in representing full tissue sections.

Variations of mitotic index in normal and dysplastic squamous epithelium of the uterine cervix as a function of endometrial maturation

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is a premalignant (dysplastic) lesion that is characterized by abnormal cellular proliferation, maturation and nuclear atypia. The intraepithelial distribution, density, and nature (typical or atypical) of mitotic figures are routinely utilized diagnostic criteria to grade dysplasia and to distinguish high-grade dysplasia from potential histologic mimics such as transitional metaplasia, atrophy or immature squamous metaplasia. In this study, we evaluated the total mitotic indices of the cervical epithelia in hysterectomy specimens from patients with and without dysplastic lesions and investigated a possible relationship between mitotic index and hormonal status, using the endometrial maturation phase as a surrogate indicator of the latter. Two hundred seventy-four cervices from hysterectomy specimens (135 cases without dysplasia, 33, 35 and 71 cases with grades 1, 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, respectively) were analyzed. A cervical mitotic index (total mitotic figures/10 high-power fields in the most proliferative area) was determined for each case. The endometrium in each case was classified into atrophic, early proliferative, late proliferative and secretory. For all three dysplasia grades, cases in the proliferative endometrium group always had a higher average mitotic index than those in the secretory and atrophic endometrium groups; this observation also held true for the benign cases. Furthermore, in all three dysplasia grades, the average mitotic index was always lowest in the atrophic endometrium group. Although the mitotic index showed expected patterns of increases with increasing dysplasia grades for most of the endometrial phases, this was not a universal finding. Notably, the average mitotic index for our cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 cases with late proliferative endometrium was higher than our cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 cases with secretory and atrophic endometrium. It is concluded that hormonal status, as reflected in endometrial maturation, can significantly affect the mitotic index of dysplastic squamous epithelium of the uterine cervix. Our findings confirm that the pathologic grading of dysplasia, especially in equivocal cases such as in metaplastic squamous epithelium, should not be solely dependent on the finding mitoses in the cervical squamous epithelium. The full composite of histopathologic features should form the basis for this determination.