Application of BRAF V600E mutation analysis for the diagnosis of metanephric adenofibroma

Metanephric stromal tumor with BRAF V600E mutation in an adult patient: Case report and literature review

Metanephric stromal tumor (MST) is a rare, benign pediatric renal neoplasm of uncertain histogenesis that belongs to the metanephric family of tumors. MST involving adult patients is very uncommon, which could cause significant diagnostic confusions. Recent molecular studies have revealed recurrent BRAF mutations in MST in pediatric patients which may serve as powerful diagnostic tools for distinguishing MST from other renal stromal tumors. We present a BRAF-mutated MST in an adult patient with a brief review of the pertinent literature. To our knowledge, our case represents to date the sixth report of adult MST and the first adult MST proven to harbor BRAF mutation. This is a 41-year-old man who was incidentally identified to have a left renal mass by ultrasonography. He had a 5-year history of hypertension which could be controlled with oral antihypertensive drug. Partial nephrectomy was performed which demonstrated a 2.6-cm, oval, circumscribed mass with a fibrotic and firm texture. Microscopic examination showed a hypocellular, spindle cell neoplasm with entrapped nephrons, within a predominantly fibrous and focally myxoid stroma. Foci of hyalinized stroma surrounding entrapped native renal tubules or blood vessels to form concentric collarettes-like structures, and small-sized arterioles showing angiodysplasia, were observed. Immunostains showed the tumor cells to be diffusely positive for CD34. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis was negative for rearrangements involving both the EWSR1 and FUS loci. Targeted next-generation sequencing disclosed a pathogenic mutation of BRAF exon15: c.1799T>A (p.V600E). The patient’s hypertension normalized without oral antihypertensive drugs 2 months postoperatively and he was in good status 12 months after the surgery. Our case highlights the diagnostic dilemma of MST occurring in adults and points to the usefulness of molecular detection of BRAF mutation for arriving at accurate diagnosis.

New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia

The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) reviewed recent advances in renal neoplasia, particularly post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, to provide an update on existing entities, including diagnostic criteria, molecular correlates, and updated nomenclature. Key prognostic features for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain WHO/ISUP grade, AJCC/pTNM stage, coagulative necrosis, and rhabdoid and sarcomatoid differentiation. Accrual of subclonal genetic alterations in clear cell RCC including SETD2, PBRM1, BAP1, loss of chromosome 14q and 9p are associated with variable prognosis, patterns of metastasis, and vulnerability to therapies. Recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines increasingly adopt immunotherapeutic agents in advanced RCC, including RCC with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid changes. Papillary RCC subtyping is no longer recommended, as WHO/ISUP grade and tumor architecture better predict outcome. New papillary RCC variants/patterns include biphasic, solid, Warthin-like, and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. For tumors with 'borderline' features between oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC, a term "oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, not further classified" is proposed. Clear cell papillary RCC may warrant reclassification as a tumor of low malignant potential. Tubulocystic RCC should only be diagnosed when morphologically pure. MiTF family translocation RCCs exhibit varied morphologic patterns and fusion partners. TFEB-amplified RCC occurs in older patients and is associated with more aggressive behavior. Acquired cystic disease (ACD) RCC-like cysts are likely precursors of ACD-RCC. The diagnosis of renal medullary carcinoma requires a negative SMARCB1 (INI-1) expression and sickle cell trait/disease. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) can be distinguished from papillary RCC with overlapping morphology by losses of chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 22. MTSCC with adverse histologic features shows frequent CDKN2A/2B (9p) deletions. BRAF mutations unify the metanephric family of tumors. The term "fumarate hydratase deficient RCC" ("FH-deficient RCC") is preferred over "hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome-associated RCC". A low threshold for FH, 2SC, and SDHB immunohistochemistry is recommended in difficult to classify RCCs, particularly those with eosinophilic morphology, occurring in younger patients. Current evidence does not support existence of a unique tumor subtype occurring after chemotherapy/radiation in early childhood.

Pediatric Renal Tumors: Updates in the Molecular Era

Molecular characterization has led to advances in the understanding of pediatric renal tumors, including the association of pediatric cystic nephromas with DICER1 tumor syndrome, the metanephric family of tumors with somatic BRAF mutations, the characterization of ETV6-NTRK3-negative congenital mesoblastic nephromas, the expanded spectrum of gene fusions in translocation renal cell carcinoma, the relationship of clear cell sarcoma of the kidney with other BCOR-altered tumors, and the pathways affected by SMARCB1 alterations in rhabdoid tumors of the kidney. These advances have implications for diagnosis, classification, and treatment of pediatric renal tumors.

Paediatric metanephric tumours: a clinicopathological and molecular characterisation

To characterize metanephric tumours in children, we performed a literature review investigating paediatric metanephric adenomas (MA), metanephric stromal tumours (MST) and metanephric adenofibromas (MAF). Including two patients from our own institution (MA, MAF), 110 individual cases (41 MA, 20 MAF, 49 MST) were identified. Additionally, fifteen composite tumours were identified, with areas of MA/MAF and Wilms tumour (WT) or papillary carcinoma. No distinct clinical or radiological features could be defined. In pure metanephric tumours, histologically proven distant metastases were reported once (MA), relapse was reported once (MST) and one tumour-related death occurred (MST). Somatic BRAF-V600E mutations were tested in 15 cases, and identified in 3/6 MA, 3/3 MAF, and 6/6 MST. In our institution the MA harboured a somatic KRAS-G12R mutation. Overall, paediatric metanephric tumours are difficult to discriminate from other renal tumours at presentation, behave relatively benign, and the occurrence of composite tumours warrants analysis of underlying (genetic) pathways.

Renal Tumors of Childhood-A Histopathologic Pattern-Based Diagnostic Approach

Renal tumors comprise approximately 7% of all malignant pediatric tumors. This is a highly heterogeneous group of tumors, each with its own therapeutic management, outcome, and association with germline predispositions. Histopathology is the key in establishing the correct diagnosis, and therefore pathologists with expertise in pediatric oncology are needed for dealing with these rare tumors. While each tumor shows different histologic features, they do have considerable overlap in cell type and histologic pattern, making the diagnosis difficult to establish, if based on routine histology alone. To this end, ancillary techniques, such as immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis, can be of great importance for the correct diagnosis, resulting in appropriate treatment. To use ancillary techniques cost-effectively, we propose a pattern-based approach and provide recommendations to aid in deciding which panel of antibodies, supplemented by molecular characterization of a subset of genes, are required.

Distinct clinicopathological features in metanephric adenoma harboring BRAF mutation

BRAF mutation recently has been reported in metanephric adenoma. We sought to determine the clinical and morphologic features of BRAF-mutated metanephric adenoma and to correlate BRAF mutation with BRAF V600E immunohistochemical staining results. A series of 48 metanephric adenomas and 15 epithelial-predominant nephroblastomas were analyzed for the occurrence of BRAF mutation (BRAF V600E/V600E complex, BRAF V600D, BRAF V600K and BRAF V600R) using the BRAF RGQ PCR kit (Qiagen). Immunohistochemistry was performed using monoclonal mouse antibodies against p16^INK4 and VE1 (Spring Bioscience), recognizing the BRAF V600E mutant protein. Forty-one of 48 cases (85%) showed BRAF V600E mutation; none of the other BRAF variants was detected. Of 41 BRAF-mutated metanephric adenomas, 33 showed positive VE1 immunostaining (sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%); in all cases we detected p16^INK4 expression regardless of BRAF mutation status. All epithelial-predominant nephroblastomas were BRAF-wild-type and none expressed VE1. The following features were associated with BRAF V600E mutation: older patients (p=0.01), female predominance (p=0.005) and the presence of a predominantly acinar architecture (p=0.003). In summary, BRAF-mutated metanephric adenomas were associated with older age, female predominance, and the presence of a predominant acinar component. A subset (20%) of BRAF-mutated metanephric adenomas was not detected by VE1 immunostaining.