IL-8 Expression in Granulocytic Epithelial Lesions of Idiopathic Duct-centric Pancreatitis (Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis). Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:1129-1138. [PMID: 28614208 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000891]

Autoimmune pancreatitis: Biopsy interpretation and differential diagnosis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is classified into type 1 (IgG4-related) and type 2 (IgG4-unrelated) and the interpretation of pancreatic biopsy findings plays a crucial role in their diagnosis. Needle biopsy of type 1 AIP in the acute or subacute phase shows a diffuse lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, storiform fibrosis, obliterative phlebitis, and the infiltration of many IgG4-positive plasma cells. In a later phase, changes become less inflammatory and more fibrotic, making interpretations more challenging. Confirmation of the lack of 'negative' findings that are unlikely to occur in type 1 AIP (e.g., neutrophilic infiltration, abscess) is important to avoid an overdiagnosis. The number of IgG4-positive plasma cells increases to >10 cells/high-power field (hpf), and the IgG4/IgG-positive plasma cell ratio exceeds 40 %. However, these are minimal criteria and typical cases show >30 positive cells/hpf and a ratio >70 % even in biopsy specimens. Therefore, cases with a borderline increase in this number or ratio need to be diagnosed with caution. In cases of ductal adenocarcinoma, the upstream pancreas rarely shows type 1 AIP-like changes; however, the ratio of IgG4/IgG-positive plasma cells is typically <40 %. Although the identification of a granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL) is crucial for type 2 AIP, this finding needs to be interpreted in conjunction with a background dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. An isolated neutrophilic duct injury can occur in peritumoral or obstructive pancreatitis. Drug-induced pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease often mimics type 2 AIP clinically and pathologically. IL-8 and PD-L1 are potential ancillary immunohistochemical markers for type 2 AIP, requiring validation studies.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: Cornerstones and future perspectives

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an autoimmune subtype of chronic pancreatitis resulting from the aberrant immune response against the pancreas, leading to inflammation and fibrosis. Although AIP is rare, its incidence is increasing and is often misdiagnosed as other pancreatic diseases. AIP is commonly classified into two types. Type 1 AIP (AIP-1) is typically associated with elevated serum immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) levels and systemic manifestations, while type 2 AIP is typically a more localized form of the disease, and may coexist with other autoimmune disorders, especially inflammatory bowel diseases. Additionally, there is emerging recognition of a third type (type 3 AIP), which refers to immunotherapy-triggered AIP, although this classification is still gaining acceptance in medical literature. The clinical manifestations of AIP mainly include painless jaundice and weight loss. Elevated serum IgG4 levels are particularly characteristic of AIP-1. Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical, laboratory, radiological, and histological findings, given the similarity of AIP symptoms to other pancreatic disorders. The mainstay of treatment for AIP is steroid therapy, which is effective in most cases. Severe cases might require additional imm-unosuppressive agents. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge of AIP, encompassing its epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options. We also address the challenges and controversies in diagnosing and treating AIP, such as distinguishing it from pancreatic cancer and managing long-term treatment, highlighting the need for increased awareness and knowledge of this complex disease.

An Update on the Role of Immunohistochemistry in the Evaluation of Pancreatic/Liver/Gastrointestinal Luminal Tract Disorders

CONTEXT.—

Immunohistochemistry serves as an ancillary diagnostic tool for a wide variety of neoplastic and nonneoplastic disorders, including infections, workup of inflammatory conditions, and subtyping neoplasms of the pancreas/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract. In addition, immunohistochemistry is also used to detect a variety of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

OBJECTIVE.—

To highlight an update on the role of immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of pancreatic/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract disorders.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and authors' research data and personal practice experience were used.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool, assisting in the diagnosis of problematic tumors and benign lesions of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract, and also in the prediction of prognosis and therapeutic response for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

Autoimmune pancreatitis type 2 (idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis): A comprehensive review

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an uncommon fibro-inflammatory disorder precipitated by autoimmune/inflammatory reactions. Currently, there are two clinical subtypes of AIP (type 1 [AIP-1] and type 2 [AIP-2]) that correspond to two histologic descriptors (lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis, respectively). While our understanding of AIP-1 has evolved considerably over the years, little is known about AIP-2 due to its rarity, often leading to misdiagnosis, delayed treatment, and even unnecessary surgical resection. Compared to AIP-1, AIP-2 exhibits distinct clinical and histologic features. Because AIP-2 is a pancreas-restricted disease without a specific serum marker, the evaluation of histologic features (e.g., granulocytic epithelial lesions) is essential for an accurate diagnosis. Patients with AIP-2 respond well to glucocorticoids, with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies as a promising alternative therapy. The prognosis of AIP-2 is generally favorable and relapse is uncommon. Here, we provide an overview of our current knowledge on the clinical features, diagnosis, therapeutic regimens, prognosis, and putative mechanisms underlying AIP-2. Notably, the diagnostic differentiation between AIP-2, especially the mass-forming/focal type, and pancreatic cancer is important, but challenging. In this regard, endoscopic ultrasound-guided core biopsy has a key role, but novel diagnostic markers and modalities are clearly needed.

Autoimmune Pancreatitis: From Pathogenesis to Treatment

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease. The diagnosis of AIP is difficult and should be made by a comprehensive evaluation of clinical, radiological, serological, and pathological findings. Two different types of AIP have been identified: autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 (AIP-1), which is considered a pancreatic manifestation of multiorgan disease related to IgG4, and autoimmune pancreatitis type 2 (AIP-2), which is considered a pancreas-specific disease not related to IgG4. Although the pathophysiological conditions seem to differ between type 1 and type 2 pancreatitis, both respond well to steroid medications. In this review, we focused on the pathogenesis of the disease to develop a tool that could facilitate diagnosis and lead to the discovery of new therapeutic strategies to combat autoimmune pancreatitis and its relapses. The standard therapy for AIP is oral administration of corticosteroids. Rituximab (RTX) has also been proposed for induction of remission and maintenance therapy in relapsing AIP-1. In selected patients, immunomodulators such as azathioprine are used to maintain remission. The strength of this review, compared with previous studies, is that it focuses on the clear difference between the two types of autoimmune pancreatitis with a clearly delineated and separate pathogenesis. In addition, the review also considers various therapeutic options, including biologic drugs, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy, a well-tolerated and effective second-line therapy for AIP type 2 relapses or steroid dependence. Other biologic therapies are also being explored that could provide a useful therapeutic alternative to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, which are poorly tolerated due to significant side effects.

Type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis associated with severe ulcerative colitis: Three case reports

BACKGROUND

Type two autoimmune pancreatitis is a rare and difficult to diagnose, steroid responsive non-IgG4 inflammatory pancreatopathy that can be associated with inflammatory bowel disease.

CASE SUMMARY

This case series describes three cases with varied clinical presentations and re-presentations of autoimmune pancreatitis, and all associated with an aggressive course of ulcerative colitis. The pancreatopathy was independent of bowel disease activity and developed in one case following colectomy.

CONCLUSION

Clinician awareness about this condition is important to allow early diagnosis, treatment and avoid unnecessary pancreatic surgery.

Granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL) in heterotopic pancreas

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is dependent on typical radiologic imaging and the presence of the granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL), which is characterized by ductal neutrophilic infiltration with or without neutrophilic acinar infiltration.

METHODS

We evaluated GEL and related clinicopathologic factors in 165 resected heterotopic pancreata (HPs) [57 gastric (35%), 56 duodenal (34%), 30 omental (18%), and 22 jejunal (13%)] and 29 matched orthotopic pancreata routinely examined during surgery.

RESULTS

GEL was noted in 8% (13/165) of HPs, including ductal epithelial (6/13, 46%) and intraluminal (8/13, 62%) neutrophilic infiltrations. However, there was no GEL in orthotopic pancreata. Abdominal pain was observed in 6 (46%) patients with GEL-positive HPs. GEL was more commonly observed in HPs having symptoms (p = 0.029), a larger size (p = 0.028), and an infiltrative growth pattern (p = 0.006). In addition, periductal lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and fibrosis (both p < 0.001), interstitial fibrosis (p = 0.017), acinar neutrophilic infiltration (p = 0.032), venulitis (p = 0.050), acinar ductal metaplasia (ADM; p = 0.040), and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia/intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (PanIN/IPMN; p < 0.001) were more commonly seen in HPs with GEL than in those without GEL. Inflammatory bowel disease was present only in one patient with GEL-negative HP.

CONCLUSIONS

GELs are detected in a subset of HPs without clinical evidence of AIP. Therefore, for the diagnosis of AIP, GEL should be carefully interpreted with the context of other histologic, clinical, and radiologic findings.

Histological features of autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis with a correlation with imaging findings

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is characterized by a tumefactive inflammatory lesion resembling pancreatic carcinoma. Type 1 AIP is a pancreatic manifestation of IgG4-related disease characterized by unique histological features that can be identified on imaging. The capsule-like rim, which is a collar of hypertrophic lesion surrounding the pancreas, consists of lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and fibrosis, and storiform fibrosis is often identified. Hypertrophic lesions of various microscopic architectures such as the ducts, veins (obliterative phlebitis), arteries (periarteritis), and nerves are observed without parenchymal damage. The pancreatic lobules keep their contours, but the acinar cells are diminished and replaced by numerous inflammatory cells. These features provide clues to arrive at a diagnosis of type 1 AIP and to distinguish it from pancreatic carcinoma on imaging. In contrast, type 2 AIP is an epithelium-centered inflammation involving the ducts and lobules. Neutrophilic infiltration in the epithelium and/or lumens (granulocytic epithelial lesion) is a characteristic finding. Lobular swelling due to inflammation is the cause of pancreatic enlargement. IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis is histologically similar to the hypertrophic ductal lesion in type 1 AIP and characterized by wall thickening due to inflammation and luminal stenosis. The epithelium is intact, which is different from bile duct carcinomas and primary sclerosing cholangitis, the latter of which is characterized by inflammation targeting the epithelium. Although the histological features of type 1 AIP and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis are unique, the biopsy diagnosis of these diseases has limitations, which should be recognized by clinicians.

Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Consensus and Controversies

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has attracted much attention in the last two decades, and due to the diagnostic value of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), the number of cases diagnosed in clinical practice has markedly increased. However, in contrast to prototypic IgG4-related type 1 AIP, a minor subtype of AIP, referred to as type 2 AIP, is less widely known and has thus not yet been characterized in detail. Type 2 AIP is unrelated to IgG4 and is a completely distinct entity from type 1 AIP. One confusing factor is that the two types of AIP share patterns of clinical presentation (e.g., acute pancreatitis and painless jaundice) and imaging abnormalities (e.g., diffuse or segmental enlargement). Since there are currently no established serum markers, the diagnosis of type 2 AIP is highly challenging and requires the tissue confirmation of neutrophilic injury to the pancreatic ducts, a finding designated as a granulocytic epithelial lesion. Approximately one-third of cases are associated with inflammatory bowel disease, particularly ulcerative colitis; however, the pathological relationship between these two conditions has not yet been clarified. Unanswered questions relate to its pathophysiology, the potential development of a similar granulocytic injury in other organs, and the characteristics of pediatric cases. This review summarizes consensus and controversies surrounding type 2 AIP, with the aim of increasing awareness and highlighting the unmet needs of this underrecognized condition.

Pembrolizumab-induced autoimmune side effects of colon and pancreas in a patient with lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to be effective for treating many carcinomas. However, the activated immune response may lead to the development of multiple immune-related adverse events, including rare immune-mediated inflammation due to autoimmune mechanisms. An 82-year-old man was diagnosed with large cell lung cancer (T1aN3M1 stage IVB) and was treated with inhibitors of the programmed cell death receptor-1, pembrolizumab. Diarrhea and melena occurred after six doses of pembrolizumab, and colonoscopy revealed mucosal inflammation of the rectum and sigmoid colon in a continuous manner, resembling the typical endoscopic findings of ulcerative colitis. Subsequently, fever and hyperamylasemia appeared, and the patient was diagnosed with pancreatitis resembling type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis on imaging tests and cytological examination, which showed infiltration of inflammatory cells, mainly neutrophils. Steroid therapy was administered and both, colitis and pancreatitis markedly improved. Here, we present a patient who developed colitis and pancreatitis after ICI treatment for advanced lung cancer. Both are thought to be due to autoimmune side effects of pembrolizumab. Although pancreatitis is a rare irAE, clinicians should be aware of the development of pancreatitis, especially in the case of irAE colitis resembling ulcerative colitis.

Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations in biopsy-proven type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis: comparative analysis with biopsy-proven type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune processes are now an increasingly recognized cause of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Autoimmune pancreatitis is a rare, benign pathology with two distinct clinicopathologic subtypes. The aim of this study was to compare the presentation, diagnostic considerations and outcomes of patients with biopsy-proven type 1 and 2 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).

METHODS

A retrospective review of the Queensland Health pathology database of histologically proven AIP was conducted. Parameters compared included demographics, diagnostic criterion and post-treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients had a confirmed histological diagnosis of AIP (type 1 = 13, type 2 = 10). Patients with type 2 AIP were younger (median age 49 versus 59 years, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in gender distribution of disease at presentation. Type 2 AIP presented with significant increased focal pancreatic changes on cross-sectional imaging (80% versus 54%, P < 0.05). Serum IgG4 levels were raised (>1.40 g/L) in 69% of patients with type 1 AIP and not detected in type 2 (P < 0.01). Concurrent underlying inflammatory bowel disease was present in a higher proportion of type 2 AIP (40% versus 15%, P < 0.05). A significantly increased proportion of patients with type 2 AIP underwent surgical resection (70% versus 30%, P < 0.05). Conservative management was utilized in more patients with type 1 disease (54% versus 30%). On follow-up, two patients have experienced symptomatic relapse at 6-18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic challenges do exist and clinicians must suspect 2 type AIP in young, serum IgG4-negative inflammatory bowel disease patients with recurrent pancreatitis.

Steroid-responsive pancreatitides

Autoimmune pancreatitis has received considerable attention, especially due to the marked effect of corticosteroid therapy on its clinical course. Knowledge, especially regarding type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis, has significantly increased over the last decades, and despite significant differences in pathophysiology and outcomes, both type 1 and 2 autoimmune pancreatitis are still considered different types of the same disease. Some have proposed a different nomenclature reflecting these differences. Although the term steroid-responsive pancreatitides may be interpreted as synonymous to type 1 and 2 autoimmune pancreatitis, these are not the only pancreatic conditions that show a response to steroid therapy. Acute pancreatitis caused by vasculitis and connective tissue diseases and acute pancreatitis secondary to checkpoint inhibitors or programmed cell death receptor antibody-mediated blockage cancer therapy may also benefit from steroid treatment. This review presents current concepts on these disorders, aiming to increase awareness, analyze similarities and differences, and propose a new nomenclature that reflects their specific particularities, clustering them under the term “steroid-responsive pancreatitides”.

Tumefactive Inflammatory Diseases of the Pancreas

Advances in the past two decades have resulted in the recognition of several tumefactive pancreatic lesions that, on histologic evaluation, show a varying combination of inflammation and fibrosis. Autoimmune pancreatitis, the prototypic tumefactive pancreatic fibroinflammatory lesion, is composed of two distinct diseases, type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and the less common type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. Although designated as autoimmune pancreatitis, the two diseases show little morphologic or pathogenic overlap. In type 1 disease, subsets of T lymphocytes (type 2 helper T cells, regulatory T cells, and T follicular helper 2 cells) are hypothesized to drive the inflammatory reaction. The B-cell response is characterized by an oligoclonal expansion of plasmablasts, with dominant clones that vary among patients and distinct clones that emerge at the time of relapse. Although the precise role of IgG4 in this condition remains uncertain, recent studies suggest that other IgG subclasses (eg, IgG1) may mediate the immune reactions, whereas IgG4 represents a response to dampen excessive inflammation. A recent study of type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis highlights the role of CXCL8 (alias IL-8), with duct epithelium and infiltrating T lymphocytes expressing this chemokine; the latter may contribute to the distinct form of neutrophilic inflammation in this disease. The review also highlights other forms of mass-forming chronic pancreatitis: follicular pancreatitis, groove pancreatitis, and those associated with rheumatologic diseases.

Serum Interleukin-8 in Patients with Different Origin of Intra-Abdominal Infections in Perioperative Period

Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are associated with high levels of pro-inflammatory serum IL-8 and poor outcomes, but data on IL-8 levels in various inflammatory reactions are contradictory. A better understanding of the diagnostic role of IL-8 is important, since the clinical relevance remains unclear. Methods: That was a single-center observational longitudinal cross-sectional study included 56 patients with various origins of intra-abdominal infections: 24 patients with postoperative abscesses, 12 patients with primary intra-abdominal abscesses, and 20 patients with diffuse peritoneal collection. Perioperative serum concentrations of interleukin-8 IL-8 were investigated at the day before surgery, on the 2nd–3rd day, and on the 5th–7th day after surgery. The hypothesis suggested that there was a difference in serum IL-8 in patients with IAI of different origin in the perioperative period. Results: The study showed that the level of serum IL-8 in patients with intra-abdominal infections of different origins is lower in comparison with healthy individuals. Despite the fact that we did not detect any statistically significant differences in the level of IL-8 in serum in IAI of different origin in the perioperative period, its lowest index was observed in the patients with postoperative abscesses on the 5th–7th days after surgical intervention. The levels of serum IL-8 ≤49.71 pg/mL and ≤48.88 pg/mL may serve as diagnostic markers for primary and postoperative abscesses with significant sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: Our results differ from previous studies that showed high serum IL-8. High-quality clinical trials are needed to better comprehend the role of inflammatory mediators in IAI with different origin.

Duct-obstructive pancreatitis with granulocytic epithelial lesion in a patient with ulcerative colitis: An atypical manifestation of type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis?

Type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) typically presents with diffuse or focal enlargement of the pancreas; however, its diverse clinical presentation has not yet been clarified. We herein described a 46-year-old man with a 1-month history of ulcerative colitis who presented with imaging features of a mass-like lesion in the pancreatic body with upstream duct dilatation and serum CA19-9 elevation. He underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy for suspected malignancy. Histologically, the area radiologically suspected to be duct dilatation consisted of necrotic tissue, in which the disrupted main pancreatic duct was involved. The area radiologically suspected to be the mass lesion showed features of pancreatitis without discrete mass. In addition, several ducts showed neutrophilic duct injury similar to granulocytic epithelial lesions observed in type 2 AIP. Immunohistochemistry revealed the aberrant expression of IL-8 in the pancreatic ductules and infiltrating CD3-positive T-lymphocytes, findings recently identified in type 2 AIP. The present case is not typical for either type 2 AIP or other known conditions, but extreme examples of type 2 AIP may present with ductal obstruction because of severe neutrophilic duct injury. IL-8 immunostaining may also assist in establishing a diagnosis of type 2 AIP with an atypical presentation.

Advances in IgG4-related pancreatobiliary diseases

Autoimmune pancreatitis is an unusual form of pancreatitis that is histologically characterised by a massive infiltration of lymphocytes and IgG4-positive plasma cells and storiform fibrosis. The disease is recognised as a pancreatic manifestation of IgG4-related disease. IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis is a biliary counterpart that is typically associated with autoimmune pancreatitis. Two parallel immunological responses are thought to underlie the pathophysiology of these diseases: a pro-inflammatory, tissue-destructive process and an anti-inflammatory feedback response, which probably relates to IgG4 production. These diseases should be differentiated from conditions with a similar presentation (eg, pancreatobiliary malignancy, primary sclerosing cholangitis) by comparison of serum IgG4 concentration, imaging features, other organ involvement, histology, and steroid responsiveness. Corticosteroids are first-line drugs, although rituximab has been shown to effectively deplete B cells in IgG4-related disease. Although the risk of relapse is high, no standardised treatment protocol exists for relapsed cases.

Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis with Crohn's Disease

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a distinct subtype of pancreatitis, which is classified into type 1 and 2 based on the clinicopathological features. According to the international consensus diagnostic criteria, pancreas resection or core biopsy specimens are recommended to make an accurate histological evaluation. However, the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for histological evaluation has also been reported. Furthermore, the simultaneous presentation of type 2 AIP and Crohn's disease (CD) is very rare, especially in the Asian population. Therefore, we herein report a case of type 2 AIP with CD, which was diagnosed using EUS guided FNA with a 22-gauge needle.

Unique properties of IgG4 antibody and its clinical application in autoimmune pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is defined as a unique form of chronic pancreatitis characterized by clinical presentation with obstructive jaundice, a dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate and fibrosis histologically, and a dramatic response to steroids therapeutically. The possible role of IgG4 in driving the pathology of AIP is a controversial subject that has not been addressed satisfactorily.  Objective: The purpose of this review is to discuss the unique biology of IgG4 that are important for its role and the clinical applications for serologic detection.

METHODS

Review of current literature about IgG4 antibody in the clinical application in AIP.

RESULTS

High serum levels of IgG4 are an important biomarker and broadly used for diagnosis, differentiation from diseases especially pancreatic cancer, and as a parameter to indicate disease activity, extra-pancreatic lesions, and treatment monitoring. However, some controversial studies show it has a limited specificity and sensitivity in these conditions.  Conclusion: Although increasing studies have promoted our understanding of the structure and function of IgG4, there is still dilemma between the beneficial and the adverse aspect of IgG4 in the pathogenesis of AIP.