The Influence of Tumor Stage on the Prognostic Value of Ki-67 Index and Mitotic Count in Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Modified Histopathological Grading Optimizes Prediction of Survival Outcomes in Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

CONTEXT

One of the major prognostic indices in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is Ki67 proliferation index.

OBJECTIVE

To identify optimal grading Ki67 cutoffs to delineate differences in prognosis of patients with small intestinal NETs (SI-NETs).

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of 551 SI-NET patients diagnosed from 1993 through 2021 at 5 European referral centers with a mean (±SD) follow-up time of 51.5 (±52.9) months, measuring rates of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS).

RESULTS

Median age at baseline was 62.3 (range, 17-90) years; 252 (45.7%) patients were female. All SI-NETs were well-differentiated, with 326 being grade 1 (G1; 59.2%), 169 G2 (30.7%), and 8 G3 (1.5), while 48 tumors were unspecified grade (8.7%). The median Ki67 was 2% (range, 1%-70%). At baseline, 247 (44.8%) patients had distant metastases (stage IV), 217 locoregional disease (41.1%; stage III), while 29 (7.1%) and 25 (4.5%) presented at stages II and I, respectively. Median OS was 214.7 (95% CI, 152.7-276.6) months and median EFS was 79.8 (68.2-91.5) months. In multivariable Cox-regression OS analysis, the proposed modified histopathological Ki67 grading system (Ki67 5%-10% group: HR = 2.2 [95% CI, 1.15-4.31], P = .018 and Ki67 ≥ 10% group: HR = 5.11 [2.87-9.09], P < .001), age (HR = 1.07 [1.04-1.09], P < .001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR = 1.08 [1-1.16], P = .028), and TNM stage (HR = 1.79 [1.05-3.06], P = .034) were independent predictors for death. Pertinent EFS analysis confirmed the proposed modified histopathological Ki67 grading system (Ki67 ≥ 10% group: HR = 4.01 [2.6-6.37], P < .001) and age (HR = 1.04 [1.02-1.05], P < .001) as independent predictors for recurrence, progression, and/or death.

CONCLUSION

Ki67 proliferation index was a strong and independent predictor of OS and EFS. A modified histopathological grading system applying Ki67 cutoffs of 5% and 10% could be superior to predict differences in SI-NET patient survival outcomes.

Debating Deposits, Redux: Substantial Interobserver Agreement Exists in Distinguishing Tumor Deposits From Nodal Metastases in Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

CONTEXT

Recent data suggest mesenteric tumor deposits (MTDs) indicate poor prognosis in small bowel well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (SB-NETs), including compared to positive lymph nodes, making their distinction crucial.

OBJECTIVE

To study interobserver agreement in distinguishing SB-NET MTDs from positive nodes.

DESIGN

Virtual slides from 36 locally metastatic SB-NET foci were shared among 7 gastrointestinal pathologists, who interpreted each as an MTD or a positive node. Observers ranked their 5 preferred choices among a supplied list of potentially useful histologic features, for both options. Diagnostic opinions were compared using Fleiss multirater and Cohen weighted κ analyses.

RESULTS

Preferred criteria for MTD included irregular shape (n = 7, top choice for 5), perineural invasion/nerve entrapment (n = 7, top choice for 2), encased thick-walled vessels (n = 7), and prominent fibrosis (n = 6). Preferred criteria for positive nodes included peripheral lymphoid follicles (n = 6, top choice for 4), round shape (n = 7, top choice for 2), peripheral lymphocyte rim (n = 7, top choice for 1), subcapsular sinuses (n = 7), and a capsule (n = 6). Among 36 foci, 10 (28%) each were unanimously diagnosed as MTD or positive node. For 13 foci (36%), there was a diagnosis favored by most observers (5 or 6 of 7): positive node in 8, MTD in 5. Only 3 cases (8%) had a near-even (4:3) split. Overall agreement was substantial (κ = .64, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial interobserver agreement exists for distinguishing SB-NET MTDs from lymph node metastases. Favored histologic criteria in making the distinction include irregular shape and nerve/vessel entrapment for MTD, and peripheral lymphocytes/lymphoid follicles and round shape for positive nodes.

Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine (si-NET) describe a heterogenous group of neoplasms. Based on the Ki67 proliferation index si-NET are divided into G1 (Ki67 < 2%), G2 (Ki67 3-20%) and rarely G3 (Ki67 > 20%) tumors. However, few studies evaluate the impact of tumor grading on prognosis in si-NET. Moreover, si-NET can form distinct lymphatic spread patterns to the mesenteric root, aortocaval lymph nodes, and distant organs. This study aims to identify prognostic factors within the lymphatic spread patterns and grading.

METHODS

Demographic, pathological, and surgical data of 208 (90 male, 118 female) individuals with si-NETs treated at Charité University Medicine Berlin between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 113 (54.5%) specimens were defined as G1 and 93 (44.7%) as G2 tumors. Interestingly, splitting the G2 group in two subgroups: G2 low (Ki67 3-9%) and G2 high (Ki67 10-20%), displayed significant differences in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.008) and progression free survival (PFS) (p = 0.004) between these subgroups. Remission after surgery was less often achieved in patients with higher Ki67 index (> 10%). Lymph node metastases (N +) were present in 174 (83.6%) patients. Patients with isolated locoregional disease showed better PFS and OS in comparison to patients with additional aortocaval and distant lymph node metastases.

CONCLUSION

Lymphatic spread pattern influences patient outcome. In G2 tumors, low and high grading shows heterogenous outcome in OS and PFS. Differentiation within this group might impact follow-up, adjuvant treatment, and surgical strategy.

Practice patterns for reporting digestive system neuroendocrine neoplasms: results from a large, comprehensive international survey

AIMS

Criteria for the interpretation of digestive system neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) continue to evolve. Although there are some literature recommendations regarding workup and diagnosis of these lesions, different practice patterns exist among pathologists when signing out these specimens. The aim of this study was to assess practice trends among pathologists worldwide when reporting these neoplasms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We created an online survey with multiple questions pertaining to digestive NENs. The results were analysed based on type of practice setting, years of sign-out experience, and practice location. Respondents included 384 practicing pathologists: 70% academic, 30% private practice; 63% gastrointestinal (GI) pathology-subspecialised, 37% not; 39% North American, 42% European, 19% others; 45% with ≤10 years in practice; 55% with >10 years. Some question responses were chosen by the majority (e.g. 85% use both mitotic count and Ki67 index for grading NENs, 82% complete a synoptic, and Ki67 stain even for small incidental appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours [NETs], and 96% utilize the diagnosis of grade 3 NET). However, some questions showed varying responses, including counting mitotic figures, Ki67 stain interpretation, and pancreatic grade 3 NEN workup. Pathologists also had some variability in interpreting regional metastatic foci of small bowel NETs and in choosing blocks for Ki67 staining in multifocal lesions.

CONCLUSION

There existed scenarios wherein practice patterns varied despite recommendations in the literature, and there were also scenarios lacking clear guidelines wherein pathologists used varying judgement. This survey highlights current key grey areas in digestive system NEN evaluation, leading to variation in practice patterns.

Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

The latest WHO classification cleanly divides gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms into neuroendocrine tumor (NET; well-differentiated, any grade) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC; poorly differentiated, high-grade by definition), along with mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. NECs are always aggressive, with multiple mutations; they are treated with chemotherapy. NETs have widely different presentations, behavior, and management depending on site of origin. Esophageal examples are vanishingly rare. Most gastric and appendiceal tumors are indolent, as are many colonic and rectal tumors. The duodenum is home to some unusual variants of NET, and jejunal/ileal NETs frequently metastasize, which impacts their staging and clinical management.

How to Manage Small Intestine (Jejunal and Ileal) Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Presenting with Liver Metastases?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (siNENs) are slowly growing tumours with a low malignant potential. However, more than half of the patients present with distant metastases (stage IV) and nearly all with locoregional lymph node (LN) metastases at the time of surgery. The value of locoregional treatment is discussed controversially.

RECENT FINDINGS

In stage I to III disease, locoregional surgery was currently shown to be curative prolonging survival. In stage IV disease, surgery may prolong survival in selected patients with the chance to cure locoregional disease besides radical/debulking liver surgery. It may improve the quality of life and may prevent severe local complications resulting in a state of chronic malnutrition and severe intestinal ischaemia or bowel obstruction. Locoregional tumour resection offers the opportunity to be curative or to focus therapeutically on liver metastasis, facilitating various other therapeutic modalities. Risks and benefits of the surgical intervention need to be balanced individually.

Impact of Peritoneal Metastasis on Survival of Patients With Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor

The liver and peritoneum are the 2 most common distant metastatic sites for small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NET). In this study, we evaluated the differential impact of hepatic and/or peritoneal metastasis on prognosis of SI-NET patients. Surgical Pathology archives were searched for SI-NET resections performed between January 1, 1994 and August 31, 2017. Two hundred nineteen cases with clinical follow-up data were identified. Pathology reports and electronic medical records were reviewed. The 219 patients included 104 females and 115 males with a median age of 59 years (range, 19 to 85 y). There were 71 (33%) cases without hepatic or peritoneal metastasis, 80 (37%) with hepatic metastasis only, 14 (6%) with peritoneal metastasis only, and 53 (24%) with both hepatic and peritoneal metastasis at the time of surgery or during follow-up. The number of primary tumors, largest tumor size, lymph node metastasis, pT category, and sex were not significant independent prognostic factors in multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression. Age was the only variable other than presence of metastatic disease that was associated with worse prognosis (5% increase in risk/year of age; 95% confidence interval, 1.7%-8.2%; P=0.003). After controlling for patient age, pairwise comparisons of marginal linear predictions showed increased risk with peritoneal metastasis, with or without associated hepatic metastasis, compared to hepatic metastasis only. In conclusion, although limited by the number of patients with peritoneal metastasis only, these results support substratifying patients with metastatic SI-NET by anatomic site of metastasis.

Prognostic Performance of Different Lymph Node Staging Systems in Patients With Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background: The prognostic significance of the lymph node (LN) classification for small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the prognostic assessment of different LN staging systems. Methods: Patients with SBNETs were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The X-tile program was used to determine the cutoff value of the resected lymph nodes (RLNs), negative lymph nodes (NLNs), lymph node ratio (LNR), and the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the differences between different periods. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the prognostic value of different LN staging systems on cause-specific survival (CSS). The relative discriminative abilities of the different LN staging systems were assessed using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Harrell consistency index (HCI). Result: A total of 3,680 patients were diagnosed with SBNETs between 1988 and 2014 from the SEER database. A significant difference over time (1988-1999 vs. 2000-2014) was seen in age (P <0.001), tumor differentiation (P <0.001), T stage (P <0.001), and RLN (P <0.001) subgroups. Multivariate Cox survival analysis identified that LN status stratified by the number of RLNs, NLNs, LNR, and LODDS all predicted CSS in patients with SBNETs (all P <0.05), whereas the number of positive lymph nodes (PLNs) failed (P = 0.452). When assessed using categorical variables, LODDS staging systems showed the best prognostic performance (HCI: 0.766, AIC: 7,575.154) in the whole population. Further analysis based on different RLNs after eliminating the missing data showed that when the RLNs are <12, the LODDS (HCI: 0.769, AIC: 1,088.731) maintained the best prognostic performance as well when the RLNs are ≥12 (HCI: 0.835, AIC: 825.692). Among patients with LNR scores of 0 or 1, there was a residual heterogeneity of outcomes that were better stratified and characterized by the LODDS. Conclusion: LODDS was a better predicator of survival when LN status was stratified as a categorical variable and should be considered when assessing the prognosis of patients with SBNETs to allow a more reliable means to stratify patient survival.

Liver-specific Sirtuin6 ablation impairs liver regeneration after 2/3 partial hepatectomy

Sirtuin 6 (Sirt6) is an NAD+-dependent deacetylase that regulates central metabolic functions such as glucose homeostasis, fat metabolism, and cell apoptosis. However, the tissue-specific function of Sirt6 in liver regeneration remains unknown. Here, we show that liver-specific Sirt6 knockout (Sirt6LKO) impaired liver reconstitution after 2/3 partial hepatectomy, which was attributed to an alteration of cell cycle progression. Sirt6 LKO delayed hepatocyte transition into S phase during liver regeneration, as shown by the analysis of cell cycle-related proteins and the immuno staining of Ki-67 and 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU). The delayed cell cycle in Sirt6 LKO mice was attributed to the disruption of m-TOR and Akt activity, which is an important pro-proliferation pathway in liver regeneration. Sirt6 LKO also reduced carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄ )-induced liver damage. Our results suggest that Sirt6 LKO impaired liver regeneration via delayed cell cycle and impaired m-TOR and Akt activity.

Should Ki67 immunohistochemistry be performed on all lesions in multifocal small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours?

AIMS

Well-differentiated small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs) are often multifocal, and this has been suggested to impart worse disease-free survival. Practice guidelines have not been established for World Health Organisation (WHO) grading of multiple primary lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 68 patients with ileal/jejunal SI-NET for a combined total of 207 primary lesions. Each case was evaluated for patient age and sex; size of all tumours; presence of lymph node metastases, mesenteric tumour deposits or distant metastases; and disease-specific outcome. Ki67 staining was performed on all 207 primary lesions. The relationship between multifocality and clinicopathological factors was compared using Fisher's exact test. Outcome was tested using Cox proportional hazard regression. Forty-two patients had unifocal disease, and 26 had multifocal disease (median five lesions, range = 2-32). Most tumours were WHO grade 1 (201 of 207, 97%). Of the five patients with grades 2/3 tumours, three patients had unifocal disease, one patient had two subcentimetre grade 2 lesions (including the largest) and eight subcentimetre grade 1 lesions, and one patient had one 1.6-cm grade 3 lesion and one subcentimetre grade 1 lesion. There was a positive correlation between tumour size and Ki67 index (coefficient 0.28; 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.52, P = 0.017). There was no significant association between multifocality and nodal metastases, mesenteric tumour deposits, distant metastases or disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with multifocal SI-NET, unless a particular lesion has a high mitotic rate, only staining the largest lesion for Ki67 should serve to grade almost all cases accurately. Multifocality does not appear to significantly impact patient survival.

Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumor (G3 NET) in a Background of Multiple Serotonin Cell Neoplasms of the Ileum Associated with Carcinoid Syndrome and Aggressive Behavior

Grade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs) have been characterized in the pancreas and stomach and distinguished from low-to-intermediate grade (G1-G2) NETs, as well as from highly malignant, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Up to now, no G3 NET has been thoroughly described in the distal small intestine. We herein report a case of a 61-year-old man presenting with carcinoid syndrome. The surgical specimen showed, in a background of small G1 ileal NETs, a larger, grade 3 NET, which retained the nesting pattern and the expression of serotonin, chromogranin-A, and type 2A somatostatin receptors, typical of well-differentiated jejuno-ileal NETs. The patient had G3 NET metastasis to the liver and he died 14 months after surgery, due to deterioration in his clinical conditions.

High minichromosome maintenance protein 7 proliferation indices: a powerful predictor of progression in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms without distant metastasis at the time of surgery

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) have an unpredictable clinical course that varies from indolent to highly malignant. No immunohistochemical markers are available for reliable prediction of the biological behavior of early stage PanNENs. Minichromosome maintenance protein 7 (MCM7) is a putative powerful marker of cell proliferation. Whether the expression of MCM7 is related to the risk of PanNENs progression remains unclear. We assessed the clinical behavior of 156 PanNENs with respect to stage, grade, Ki-67 index, MCM7 index, and other pathologic features. A high MCM7 index was significantly associated with larger tumor size (P < .001), nonfunctioning tumor (P < .001), increased grade (P < .0001), and later TNM stage (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, G2/G3 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-3.62; P < .001), stage III/IV (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.31-3.41; P < .001), and MCM7 labeling index >5% (HR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.30-11.17; P = .02) were independent negative prognostic factors related to the risk of tumor progression in stage I-IV disease. MCM7 labeling index >5% was associated with an increased risk of progression in stages I-V, I-III, and I-II. Our study confirms that MCM7 is a valuable marker for assessing the progression of PanNENs, especially in patients with early stage disease and without distant metastasis.