Expression of PAX3 Distinguishes Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma From Histologic Mimics

Integrated Molecular and Histological Insights for Targeted Therapies in Mesenchymal Sinonasal Tract Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of mesenchymal sinonasal tract tumors (STTs), a distinct subset of STTs. Despite their rarity, mesenchymal STTs represent a unique clinical challenge, characterized by their rarity, often slow progression, and frequently subtle or overlooked symptoms. The complex anatomy of the sinonasal area, which includes critical structures such as the orbit, brain, and cranial nerves, further complicates surgical treatment options. This underscores an urgent need for more advanced and specialized therapeutic approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advancements in molecular diagnostics, particularly in next-generation sequencing, have significantly enhanced our understanding of STTs. Consequently, the World Health Organization has updated its tumor classification to better reflect the distinct histological and molecular profiles of these tumors, as well as to categorize mesenchymal STTs with greater accuracy. The growing understanding of the molecular characteristics of mesenchymal STTs opens new possibilities for targeted therapeutic interventions, marking a significant shift in treatment paradigms. This review article concentrates on mesenchymal STTs, specifically addressing sinonasal tract angiofibroma, sinonasal glomangiopericytoma, biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma, and skull base chordoma. These entities are marked by unique histopathological and molecular features, which challenge conventional treatment approaches and simultaneously open avenues for novel targeted therapies. Our discussion is geared towards delineating the molecular underpinnings of mesenchymal STTs, with the objective of enhancing therapeutic strategies and addressing the existing shortcomings in the management of these intricate tumors.

Immunohistochemistry Update in Dermatopathology and Bone and Soft Tissue Pathology

CONTEXT.—

Immunohistochemistry plays an important role in dermatopathology, particularly for melanocytic lesions and poorly differentiated malignancies. In the field of bone and soft tissue pathology, molecular methods remain the gold standard for diagnosis; however, immunohistochemistry targeting underlying molecular alterations represents a valuable screening tool, especially in areas with limited access to molecular testing.

OBJECTIVE.—

To describe the utility and limitations of new and emerging immunohistochemical stains in the diagnosis of skin, soft tissue, and bone tumors.

DATA SOURCES.—

A literature review of recently described immunohistochemical stains in the fields of dermatopathology and bone and soft tissue pathology was performed.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunohistochemistry is an important adjunctive tool for select entities in dermatopathology and bone and soft tissue pathology, and it provides pathologists with valuable evidence of their behavior, underlying molecular alterations, and line of differentiation. Furthermore, immunostains targeting molecular abnormalities have the potential to replace current molecular methods. Many of these recently described stains demonstrate higher sensitivity and specificity; however, limitations and pitfalls still exist, and correlation with morphologic and clinical findings remains essential for diagnosis.

Spindle Cell Tumors of the Sinonasal Tract: A Diagnostic Update with Focus on Ancillary Workup

Spindle cell neoplasms arising in the head and neck may be challenging to recognize due to their relative rarity. While underlying molecular alterations are increasingly elucidated, testing for these features may not be readily available. In most cases, combinations of key morphologic features and diagnostic immunohistochemical markers can be used to replace molecular diagnostics. Conversely, some molecular alterations and expression of their surrogate biomarkers are not specific for any one entity, and it is important to recognize these to avoid diagnostic pitfalls. In this review, we discuss both old and new spindle cell tumors of the sinonasal tract, with an emphasis on histologic features and clinically relevant immunohistochemical markers serving as surrogate markers for underlying genomic alterations.

PAX1 expression in thymic epithelial neoplasms and morphologic mimics

Thymic epithelial neoplasms are morphologically diverse and can pose a diagnostic challenge that is complicated by a lack of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers that are entirely sensitive and specific for thymic epithelium. Polyclonal PAX8 is often used in this context, but it is not a specific marker. The PAX1 transcription factor shares significant homology with PAX8 and plays an integral role in thymic development in humans and murine models. This study evaluated the role of PAX1 IHC in differentiating thymic epithelial neoplasms from morphologic mimics on whole slide tissue sections. The PAX1 antibody stained all 74 thymoma cases; however, there was wide variability in staining intensity within each subtype. The antibody was less sensitive in thymic carcinomas and thymic neuroendocrine tumors compared to thymomas and demonstrated weak staining in a subset of morphologic mimics (21 squamous cell carcinomas, 6 pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors, 1 mesothelioma, 1 lymphoblastic lymphoma, and 1 granulosa cell tumor). With a H-score positive threshold of 75, the antibody had 100% specificity, and sensitivities of 92%, 56%, and 47% in thymomas, thymic neuroendocrine tumors, and thymic carcinomas respectively. The PAX1 antibody showed frequent geographic reduction in staining consistent with compromised antigenicity from variable formalin fixation. PAX1 IHC has a moderate-to-high sensitivity for thymic epithelial neoplasms; however, the wide staining variability and fixation effects may lead to difficulty with consistent interpretation. This marker is unlikely to supplant the role of PAX8 in diagnostic practice, but it may be a useful addition to immunohistochemistry panels when evaluating for thymic primary tumors.

Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma with Orbital and Skull Base Involvement Report of 3 Cases and Systematic Review of the Literature

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a rare malignant tumour of the upper nasal cavity and ethmoid sinuses that presents predominantly in middle aged female patients and show a characteristic infiltrative and hypercellular proliferation of spindle cells that demonstrate a specific immunoreactivity. We present three cases with BSNS that had different presenting complaints, either sinonasal or orbital problems, underwent endoscopic surgical treatment and/or radiotherapy and have been disease free on long follow up. A systematic review of all published cases was performed to identify all BSNS cases known at present. BSNS requires prompt and correct diagnosis with accurate surgical resection as well as consideration of radiotherapy. Our three cases confirm the findings of the literature and support that BSNS is an aggressive but treatable malignant disease of the sinonasal tract.

Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma with a Novel PAX7::PPARGC1 Fusion: Expanding the Spectrum of Gene Fusions Beyond the PAX3 Gene

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a rare low-grade malignancy occurring in the sinonasal tract that is characterized by dual neural and myogenic differentiation. Rearrangements involving the PAX3 gene, usually with MAML3, are a hallmark of this tumor type and their identification are useful for diagnosis. Rarely, a MAML3 rearrangement without associated PAX3 rearrangement has been described. Other gene fusions have not been previously reported. Herein, we report a 22 year-old woman with a BSNS harboring a novel gene fusion involving the PAX7 gene (specifically PAX7::PPARGC1A), which is a paralogue of PAX3. The histologic features of the tumor were typical with two exceptions: a lack of entrapment of surface respiratory mucosa and no hemangiopericytoma-like vasculature. Immunophenotypically, the tumor was notably negative for smooth muscle actin, which is usually positive in BSNS. However, the classic S100 protein-positive, SOX10-negative staining pattern was present. In addition, the tumor was positive for desmin and MyoD1 but negative for myogenin, a pattern that is common among BSNS with variant fusions. Awareness of the possibility of PAX7 gene fusions in BSNS is important as it may aid in the diagnosis of PAX3 fusion negative tumors.

Challenging differential diagnoses in small biopsies from the sinonasal tract

Sinonasal biopsy specimens are a challenging area in anatomic pathology. The small, often fragmented or crushed nature of these biopsies can hinder morphologic assessment. Additionally, many of the tumors in this area are rare and share morphologic, and sometime immunophenotypic similarities. In many cases, immunohistochemistry is helpful if not necessary to reach a specific diagnosis. In other cases, a specific diagnosis is not possible and a differential diagnosis must be given on a biopsy specimen despite access to a well-equipped immunohistochemistry laboratory. This review article groups some of the more challenging entities in the sinonasal region based on morphologic patterns. These include low grade squamoid lesions such as sinonasal (Schneiderian) papilloma and DEK::AFF2 rearranged carcinoma, glandular neoplasms such as intestinal and non-intestinal type sinonasal adenocarcinoma, high-grade carcinomas such as HPV-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma, NUT carcinoma and SWI/SNF deficient carcinomas, small round blue cell tumors such as teratocarcinosarcoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma and olfactory neuroblastoma, and finally, low grade spindle cell neoplasms such as glomangiopericytoma, biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma and solitary fibrous tumor.

Top 10 Significant Spindled Head and Neck Lesions to Scrutinze

BACKGROUND

Spindled lesions are a challenging area in head and neck pathology. This is particularly true in the sinonasal tract, where several uncommon entities with both unique and overlapping morphologic, immunophenotypic, and/or molecular features can occur.

METHODS

Review.

RESULTS

The clinicopathologic characteristics of biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma and nine important differential diagnostic considerations with one or more overlapping feature are summarized to establish a practical framework for approaching spindled lesions of the sinonasal tract.

CONCLUSION

Morphologic evaluation is central to the work up of sinonasal spindle cell lesions-in particular, cellular morphology, tumor architecture and growth pattern, and the presence of admixed epithelial elements - however, focused immunohistochemical analysis of neural, myogenic, rhabdomyoblastic, epithelial, and/or melanocytic marker expression and/or ancillary tests for tumor-specific molecular alterations may be necessary for definitive diagnosis.

Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma with a Novel PAX3::FOXO6 Fusion: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSS) is a low-grade, locally aggressive sarcoma unique to the sinonasal region. BSS is most common in middle aged patients and affects women more frequently than men. It is characterized by a bland spindled cell proliferation with neural and myogenic differentiation. BSS are usually associated with rearrangement t(2;4)(q35;q31.1) resulting in a PAX3::MAML3 fusion. Less commonly, other genes are found in combination with PAX3 and some cases reported in the literature have an unknown fusion partner.

METHODS

A 54-year-old man presented with nasal mass. Endoscopic resection showed a low-grade spindle cell neoplasm with morphologic features of BSS and immunohistochemical and next generation sequencing were performed to confirm the diagnosis.

RESULTS

The tumor was positive for S100 and smooth muscle actin but negative for SOX10. Next generation sequencing demonstrated a novel PAX3::FOXO6 gene fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a PAX3::FOXO6 gene fusion has never been reported, this finding combined with the morphologic and immunophenotypic features supports the diagnosis of supports the diagnosis of BSS.

Small Biopsy Samples: Are They Representative for Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma?

(1) Background: Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a rare low-grade neoplasm of the sinonasal tract. It is characterized by specific PAX3 gene rearrangements and both myogenic and neural differentiation. The purpose of the study was to describe the histologic, immunohistochemical and molecular features of BSNS and indicate important clues for small incisional biopsy diagnostics. (2) Methods: Archival samples from patients with nasal cavities or ethmoid sinuses tumors were searched for BSNS cases. Inclusion criteria were the presence of spindle cell morphology and low-grade appearance. Both biopsy and resection specimens were stained for identical IHC panels including, i.a., S100, SMA, SOX10 and PAX3. FISH for PAX3 and SS18 was performed on biopsy specimens. (3) Results: BSNS diagnosis was made in 6 cases included in the study and confirmed by PAX3 rearrangement by FISH in 5 specimens. The pattern of IHC expression was identical for paired biopsy and resection samples apart from one BSNS case. (4) Conclusions: Incisional biopsy seems to be a sufficient method to establish BSNS diagnosis in most cases. Characteristic morphological features together with S100, SOX10 and SMA as the screening markers are useful for confirming the diagnosis. In cases of divergent morphology and immunoprofile evaluation of PAX3 rearrangement is vital.

Spindle Cell/Sclerosing Rhabdomyosarcoma With PAX8::PPARG Fusion

The spindle cell/sclerosing subtype of rhabdomyosarcoma is classified based on genetic features into the three categories of MYOD1-mutated, gene fusion-driven, and a subset without a currently identified genetic driver event. The gene fusion-driven spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcomas are heterogenous and characterized by increasing numbers of gene fusions, the most common gene partners being VGLL2, NCOA2, and TFCP2. Here we report a spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma that arose in the orbit of a 4-year-old male. This tumor harbored a unique PAX8::PPARG fusion. PAX8::PPARG fusions have previously only been described in follicular thyroid carcinoma and follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Our report adds to the growing number of gene fusions in spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcomas.

Diagnosis of soft tissue tumors using immunohistochemistry as a surrogate for recurrent fusion oncoproteins

Soft tissue neoplasms encompass a broad spectrum of clinicopathologic manifestations. In a subset of soft tissue tumors, spanning a wide range of clinical behavior from indolent to highly aggressive, recurrent genetic translocations yield oncogenic fusion proteins that drive neoplastic growth. Beyond functioning as primary mechanisms of tumorigenesis, recurrent translocations represent key diagnostic features insofar as the presence of a particular oncogenic gene fusion generally points to specific tumor entities. In addition to more direct methods for identifying recurrent translocations, such as conventional cytogenetics or fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry for a component of the fusion oncoprotein increasingly is being used as a surrogate marker, exploiting the tendency of these fusion components to be distinctively overexpressed by translocation-bearing tumor cells. Diagnostic immunohistochemistry can also be used to identify the characteristic gene expression changes that occur downstream of oncogenic fusions. Here, we review the use of immunohistochemistry to detect surrogate markers of recurrent translocations in soft tissue tumors, focusing on the practical applications and limitations of this diagnostic approach.

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma: Report of 3 cases with a review of literature

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a rare recently described distinct spindle cell sarcoma which arises exclusively in the sinonasal region and is characterized by concomitant neural and myogenic differentiation. Before this neoplasm was characterized, most were classified as other entities including adult fibrosarcoma, monophasic synovial sarcoma and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. By immunohistochemistry, these tumors characteristically express S100 and smooth muscle actin (SMA) and/or muscle specific actin (MSA). Most cases harbor rearrangements of PAX3 (paired box gene 3), and the most frequent translocation partner is MAML3 (mastermind like transcriptional coactivator 3). Herein, we described three cases of BSNS involving the nasal cavity with or without paranasal sinus involvement. We also did a literature review of the clinical features, histologic and immunophenotypic findings, cytogenetics, pathogenesis and behavior of this rare entity.

PAX8-positive, Cytokeratin-positive Intra-abdominal Ewing Sarcoma Masquerading as a Mullerian Carcinoma in a Postmenopausal Female

Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma presenting as intra-abdominal or pelvic disease in adult female patients is very rare and may lead to diagnostic difficulty due to clinical and histologic overlap with Mullerian adenocarcinomas, which are far more common. We report a case of an intra-abdominal Ewing sarcoma in a postmenopausal female patient whose clinical and radiological presentation closely resembled that of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Biopsy of an omental nodule revealed numerous histologic features suggestive of a Mullerian carcinoma, including gland-like rosettes, strong, diffuse PAX8 immunoreactivity and cytokeratin expression. After excluding other differential diagnostic considerations, the possibility that this might represent an intra-abdominal Ewing sarcoma was entertained. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing demonstrated the presence of an EWSR1-ERG fusion transcript, confirming the diagnosis. The differential diagnostic considerations when dealing with this unusual clinical scenario and the uncommon yet important pitfall of PAX8 immunoreactivity in Ewing sarcoma are discussed.

Orbital Involvement by Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma With a Literature Review

PURPOSE

To document a case of a biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma that impinged on the orbit via a tumor-induced mucocele and review the previous literature devoted to this condition.

METHODS

A clinicopathologic case report with detailed histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and radiological studies with tabulations of previously reported cases and immunohistochemical stains for ruling out mimicking lesions.

RESULTS

A biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma arose from the ethmoid sinus in a middle-aged man. The tumor induced a mucocele that bowed the medial orbital lamina papyracea into the orbit and caused diplopia and mild proptosis. The biopsy's dual positivity for S100 and smooth muscle actin together with positive paired box 3 immunohistochemical staining established the diagnosis of biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma.

CONCLUSION

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma, which can involve the orbit in 25% of cases, is a rare head and neck malignancy that has only recently been described. Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma is a low-grade, locally aggressive, nonmetastasizing sarcoma displaying both neural and muscle differentiation. It is further characterized by rearrangements of the PAX3 gene with multiple fusion partners, most commonly MAML3 (Mastermind like transcriptional coactivator 3). It occurs predominantly in middle-aged women and exclusively in the sinonasal tract. However, it can spread throughout the central facial structures to invade the brain if not detected early. Ophthalmologists should be aware of this new entity to avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment. The previous literature devoted to this condition was reviewed and analyzed for clinical, radiological, histopathological, and immunohistochemical features. In circumstances where molecular testing is not available, paired box 3 immunohistochemical staining can be used as an alternative diagnostic marker. The current case is most unusual because the orbital findings were induced by a mucocele caused by the tumor that obstructed the sinus ostium. This produced diplopia without direct tumor invasion into the orbital fat.

Emerging Entities and New Diagnostic Markers for Head and Neck Soft Tissue and Bone Tumors

Bone and soft tissue tumors of the head and neck are relatively uncommon tumors that often represent a diagnostic challenge because of the wide range of entities that must be considered in the differential diagnosis. Over the past few years, classification of bone and soft tissue tumors has evolved primarily because of substantial contributions from molecular genetics, with the identification of new markers that are increasingly used to complement histopathologic findings in the routine diagnostic workup. This review focuses on the recently described mesenchymal tumors that preferentially involve the head and neck region, with a focus on the most relevant novel immunohistochemical and molecular findings, including gene fusions and mutations, that can help in the diagnosis and in the assessment of clinical behavior.

Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumors: An Update on Biomarkers That Correlate with Molecular Alterations

The diagnosis of benign and malignant soft tissue and bone neoplasms is a challenging area of surgical pathology, due to the large number, rarity, and histologic diversity of tumor types. In recent years, diagnosis and classification has been aided substantially by our growing understanding of recurrent molecular alterations in these neoplasms. Concurrently, the role of diagnostic immunohistochemistry has also expanded, with the development of numerous biomarkers based on underlying molecular events. Such biomarkers allow us to infer the presence of these events and can therefore substitute for other ancillary molecular genetic techniques (e.g., fluorescence in situ hybridization, polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing). In this review, we discuss a range of biomarkers currently available for these neoplasms, highlighting the accuracy, staining characteristics, and interpretation pitfalls of each antibody. These include immunohistochemical antibodies that represent reliable surrogates for the detection of gene fusions (e.g., STAT6, CAMTA1, FOSB, DDIT3) and more recently described breakpoint-specific antibodies (e.g., SS18-SSX, PAX3/7-FOXO1). Additionally, discussed are markers that correlate with the presence of gene amplifications (e.g., MDM2, CDK4), deletions (e.g., SMARCB1, SMARCA4), single nucleotide variants (e.g., G34W, K36M), aberrant methylation (H3K27me3), and increased expression as discovered through gene expression profiling (e.g., MUC4, DOG1, ETV4, NKX2.2, NKX3.1).

RREB1-MKL2 fusion in a spindle cell sinonasal sarcoma: biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma or ectomesenchymal chondromyxoid tumor in an unusual site?

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a rare, low grade spindle cell sarcoma, recently recognized in the WHO classification of head and neck tumors, which is characterized by a dual myogenic and neural differentiation and recurrent gene fusions, often involving PAX3-MAML3, and less commonly PAX3 fusions with other partners such as NCOA1, NCOA2, or WWTR1. Yet, in about 4% of tumors no gene rearrangements are identified. Herein, we describe a RREB1-MKL2 fusion in a BSNS lesion occurring in a 73-year-old female patient with a right maxillo-ethmoidal angle lesion. The polypoid, moderately cellular tumor with infiltrative submucosal growth was composed of fascicles of relatively bland spindle cells embedded in a loose collagenous matrix. The tumor cells showed moderate amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm with indistinct borders and uniform, pale, ovoid to slender nuclei. The slowly proliferating neoplastic cells co-expressed smooth muscle actin and S100, and showed focal nuclear positivity for ß-catenin, while lacking staining for cytokeratins, desmin, myogenin, caldesmon, glial fibrillary acid protein, and SOX-10. Molecular analysis by targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing identified an in-frame fusion between exon 8 of RREB1 and exon 11 of MKL2, a genetic event that was reported to be a molecular hallmark of ectomesenchymal chondromyxoid tumor. Gene rearrangements in both genes were independently verified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). To evaluate its recurrent potential an additional group of 15 fusion negative BSNS were tested for abnormalities in RREB1 and MKL2 genes by FISH, but no additional positive cases were identified.

Nasal spindle cell tumor with rhabdomyoblastic features: A rare and diagnostically difficult case

Nasal spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma is very rare. The tumor is sometimes confused with other spindle cell tumors. We herein report a case of nasal spindle cell tumor in a 62-year-old woman. The patient first presented herself to a medical doctor’s office after an episode of left epistaxis. An intranasal tumor was found and resected. The tumor was composed of spindle cells, and she was diagnosed with desmoid-type fibromatosis. Five years after the initial episode, an intranasal tumor was found again. The tumor showed a fascicular growth pattern with high cellularity and was predominantly composed of spindle cells. Scattered eosinophilic rhabdomyoblasts were also observed. She was diagnosed with spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma. This is a unique case report not only because nasal spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma is very rare but also because the tumor was initially diagnosed as desmoid-type fibromatosis. It is important to consider spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma as a differential diagnosis of nasal spindle cell tumors.

Clinicopathologic and Molecular Features of a Series of 41 Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcomas Expanding Their Molecular Spectrum

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a locally aggressive tumor occurring in the sinonasal region. It harbors both myogenic and neural differentiation and is characterized by PAX3 rearrangement with MAML3 as the most frequent fusion partner, but the partner of PAX3 remains unidentified in a subset of cases. About 70 cases have been reported so far. In this study, we report a series of 41 cases with clinical, pathologic, and molecular description. Twenty-five (61%) patients were female individuals, and the median age was 49 years. Tumors arose predominantly in the nasal cavity and ethmoidal sinuses. Local recurrences occurred in 8 cases of the 25 (32%). Histologic features were characteristic of BSNS, with 5 cases showing focal rhabdomyoblastic differentiation. Immunohistochemistry showed a constant positivity of S100 protein and PAX3 and negativity of SOX10. MyoD1 was focally positive in 91% of cases, whereas only 20% were positive for myogenin. Molecular analysis showed a PAX3-MAML3 transcript in 37 cases (90%). RNA sequencing was performed in the 4 negative cases for PAX3-MAML3 fusion, and it showed that 1 case harbored a PAX3-FOXO1 fusion, as previously described in the literature, and 2 novel fusions: PAX3-WWTR1 fusion in 2 cases and PAX3-NCOA2 fusion in 1 case. RNA sequencing results were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and Sanger sequencing. The PAX3-NCOA2-positive case showed focal rhabdomyoblastic differentiation. In conclusion, we report 2 novel fusions (PAX3-WWTR1 and PAX3-NCOA2) in BSNS and show that MyoD1 is more sensitive than myogenin for demonstrating myogenic differentiation in this tumor.

Soft Tissue Special Issue: Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma: A Review with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma is an anatomically restricted low-grade malignant neoplasm with dual neural and myogenic differentiation composed of a monotonous population of spindled cells with herringbone/fascicular architecture. These tumors demonstrate a unique immunoprofile with relatively consistent S100-protein and actin expression in conjunction with more variable desmin, myogenin and myoD1 staining. SOX10 is uniformly negative. Genetically, the majority of tumors harbor PAX3-MAML3 fusions, with alternate PAX3 partners including FOXO1, NCOA1, NCOA2 and WWTR1. Although the differential diagnosis of BSNS is broad, careful morphologic inspection together with targeted ancillary studies is often sufficient to arrive at the correct diagnosis. As these tumors have significant local recurrence rates but lack metastatic potential, awareness and accurate diagnosis of this rare and newly described neoplasm is critical for appropriate management.

Practical Application of Lineage-Specific Immunohistochemistry Markers: Transcription Factors (Sometimes) Behaving Badly

CONTEXT.—

Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that regulate gene expression and control RNA transcription from DNA. Lineage-specific TFs have increasingly been used by pathologists to determine tumor lineage, especially in the setting of metastatic tumors of unknown primary, among other uses. With experience gathered from its daily application and increasing pitfalls reported from immunohistochemical studies, these often-touted highly specific TFs are not as reliable as once thought.

OBJECTIVES.—

To summarize the established roles of many of the commonly used TFs in clinical practice and to discuss known and potential sources for error (eg, false-positivity from cross-reactivity, aberrant, and overlap "lineage-specific" expression) in their application and interpretation.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and the authors' personal practice experience were used. Several examples selected from the University Health Network (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) are illustrated.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The application of TF diagnostic immunohistochemistry has enabled pathologists to better assess the lineage/origin of primary and metastatic tumors. However, the awareness of potential pitfalls is essential to avoid misdiagnosis.

[Diagnostic challenge of biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma]

Sinonasal biphenotypic sarcoma has recently been described and included in the 2017 WHO classification. It is a low-grade sarcoma which is characterized by PAX3 rearrangements. It remains a diagnostic challenge because of its scarcity, and its considerable histologic overlap with other cellular spindle cell neoplasms. The histologic features, the immunoprofile and the main differential diagnoses of sinonasal biphenotypic sarcoma are presented through a case.

Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry for Soft Tissue and Bone Tumors: An Update

Although some soft tissue and bone tumors can be identified based on histologic features alone, immunohistochemistry plays a critical diagnostic role for most mesenchymal tumor types. The discovery of recurrent genomic alterations in many benign and malignant mesenchymal neoplasms has added important biologic insights and expanded the spectrum of some diagnostic subgroups. Some tumors are defined by unique genomic alterations, whereas others share abnormalities that are not tumor-specific and can be observed in a sometimes broad range of biologically unrelated neoplasms. We herein focus on novel immunohistochemical markers, based on molecular genetic alterations, which are particularly useful in the diagnostic workup of selected groups of soft tissue and bone tumors, including recently described entities, specifically round cell sarcomas (Ewing sarcoma, CIC-rearranged sarcoma, and BCOR-rearranged sarcoma), vascular tumors (epithelioid hemangioma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, and pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma), SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms, adipocytic tumors (spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma, atypical spindle cell lipomatous tumor, and conventional atypical lipomatous tumor), giant cell-rich bone tumors (giant cell tumor of bone and chondroblastoma), and biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma. Given the complex nature of sarcoma classification, and the rarity of many mesenchymal tumor types, careful integration of clinical presentation, imaging features, histology, immunophenotype, and cytogenetic/molecular alterations is crucial for accurate diagnosis of soft tissue and bone tumors.

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma: demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, molecular features, and prognosis of a recently described entity

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a recently recognized type of sarcoma arising exclusively in the sinonasal tract displaying unique clinical course, histopathology, and genetics. Due to its rarity, only case series and case reports are available. In order to provide an overview of the current understanding of this disease, we present a comprehensive review of the literature and present three previously unreported cases of BSNS. A total of 55 genetically characterized and 41 cases without molecular data were identified in the literature. Two-thirds of patients were female and the peak incidence was in the fifth decade. Fatal outcome was rare (two cases with intracranial extension) and local recurrence occurred in 31.6%, all occurring within 5 years after initial treatment. Histologically, BSNS is highly cellular in the majority of cases and composed of fascicles of spindle cells, with entrapped hyperplastic surface epithelium being a frequent finding. The immunohistochemical profile is characteristic due to the biphasic nature of this lesion, with shared features of both myogenic and neural origin. Rhabdomyoblastic differentiation is apparent in a subset of cases. The most common genetic event is the PAX3-MAML3 fusion (58.6%) but isolated PAX3 rearrangement (19.2%), absence of rearrangements (9.1%), PAX3-FOXO1 (8.1%), PAX3-NCOA1 (4%), and isolated MAML3 rearrangement (2%) have also been reported. In conclusion, the recognition of BSNS is crucial due to its relatively indolent clinical course. A selected immunohistochemical panel and/or molecular confirmation can be used to aid in appropriate diagnosis and consequently in prognostication and to avoid overtreatment with chemotherapy regimens used in its mimics.