Identification of CD5/Cyclin D1 Double-negative Pleomorphic Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Clinicopathologic, Genetic, and Gene Expression Study

Identification of CD5/SOX11 double-negative pleomorphic mantle cell lymphoma

Cyclin D1 protein-positive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has an immunophenotype of CD5(-) cyclin D1(+) SOX11(-), and most cases lack a CCND1 rearrangement and have a gene expression profile of DLBCL. Rarely, cyclin D1 protein-positive DLBCL harbors a CCND1 rearrangement, and some genetic copy number features typical of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have been detected. Since gene expression studies have not been performed, whether such CCND1-rearranged cases represent cyclin D1 protein-positive DLBCL or CD5/SOX11 double-negative pleomorphic MCL remains unclear. To date, no cases of CD5/SOX11 double-negative MCL have been reported. In this study, we collected eight cases initially diagnosed as cyclin D1 protein-positive DLBCL, including four with a CCND1 rearrangement and four without. Immunohistochemically, all four CCND1-rearranged cases had >50% of tumor cells positive for cyclin D1 protein, whereas only one (25%) non-rearranged case had >50% positive tumor cells. Analysis of genome-wide copy number, mutational, and gene expression profiles revealed that CCND1-rearranged cases were similar to MCL, whereas CCND1-non-rearranged cases resembled DLBCL. Despite the SOX11 negativity by immunohistochemistry, CCND1-rearranged cases had a notable trend (P = 0.064) of higher SOX11 mRNA levels compared to non-rearranged cases. Here, we show for the first time that CCND1 rearrangement could be useful for identifying CD5/SOX11 double-negative pleomorphic MCL in cases diagnosed as cyclin D1 protein-positive DLBCL. Cases with >50% cyclin D1 protein-positive tumor cells immunohistochemically and higher SOX11 mRNA levels are more likely to have a CCND1 rearrangement, and fluorescence in situ hybridization can be used to detect the rearrangement.

SOX11+ Large B-Cell Neoplasms: Cyclin D1-Negative Blastoid/Pleomorphic Mantle Cell Lymphoma or Large B-Cell Lymphoma?

Large or blastoid B-cell neoplasms that are SOX11+ are a diagnostic dilemma and raise a differential diagnosis of cyclin D1-negative blastoid/pleomorphic mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) versus diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or blastoid high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with aberrant SOX11 expression. Here we report a study cohort of 13 SOX11+ large/blastoid B-cell neoplasms. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was negative for CCND1 rearrangement in all 13 cases; 1 of 8 (12.5%) cases tested showed CCND2 rearrangement and 2 (25%) cases had extracopies of CCND2. Gene expression profiling showed that the study group had a gene expression signature similar to cyclin D1+ blastoid/pleomorphic MCL but different from DLBCL. Principal component analysis revealed that the cohort cases overlapped with cyclin D1+ blastoid/pleomorphic MCL but had minimal overlap with DLBCL. All patients in the cohort had clinicopathologic features similar to those reported for patients with cyclin D1+ MCL. We also performed a survey of SOX11 expression in a group of 85 cases of DLBCL and 24 cases of blastoid HGBL. SOX11 expression showed a 100% specificity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of MCL. Overall, the results support the conclusion that large or blastoid B-cell neoplasms that are positive for SOX11 are best classified as cyclin D1-negative blastoid/pleomorphic MCL, and not as DLBCL or blastoid HGBL. We also conclude that SOX11 is a specific marker for the diagnosis of MCL, including cyclin D1-negative blastoid/pleomorphic MCL cases and should be performed routinely on blastoid/large B-cell neoplasms to help identify potential cases of cyclin D1-negative blastoid/pleomorphic MCL.

Deep Learning-Based Nuclear Morphometry Reveals an Independent Prognostic Factor in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blastoid/pleomorphic morphology is associated with short survival in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but its prognostic value is overridden by Ki-67 in multivariate analysis. Herein, a nuclear segmentation model was developed using deep learning, and nuclei of tumor cells in 103 MCL cases were automatically delineated. Eight nuclear morphometric attributes were extracted from each nucleus. The mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis of each attribute were calculated for each case, resulting in 32 morphometric parameters. Compared with those in classic MCL, 17 morphometric parameters were significantly different in blastoid/pleomorphic MCL. Using univariate analysis, 16 morphometric parameters (including 14 significantly different between classic and blastoid/pleomorphic MCL) emerged as significant prognostic factors. Using multivariate analysis, Biologic MCL International Prognostic Index (bMIPI) risk group (P = 0.025), low skewness of nuclear irregularity (P = 0.020), and high mean of nuclear irregularity (P = 0.047) emerged as independent adverse prognostic factors. Additionally, a morphometric score calculated from the skewness and mean of nuclear irregularity (P = 0.0038) was an independent prognostic factor in addition to bMIPI risk group (P = 0.025), and a summed morphometric bMIPI score was useful for risk stratification of patients with MCL (P = 0.000001). These results demonstrate, for the first time, that a nuclear morphometric score is an independent prognostic factor in MCL. It is more robust than blastoid/pleomorphic morphology and can be objectively measured.

Decreased CD11c-positive dendritic cells in the tumor microenvironment predict double-hit/triple-hit genotype and survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is a potentially curable disease. However, it is heterogenous, and the prognosis is poor if the tumor cells harbor fusions involving MYC and BCL2 or MYC and BCL6 (double-hit [DH] lymphoma), or fusions involving all three genes (triple-hit [TH] lymphoma). Fluorescence in situ hybridization is currently the gold standard for confirming the presence of DH/TH genotypes. However, the test is laborious and not readily available in some laboratories. Germinal center B (GCB) signatures and dual expression of MYC and BCL2 are commonly used as initial screening markers (traditional model) in clinical practice. Our study proposes immunohistochemical markers for more conveniently and accessibly screening DH/TH genotypes in DLBCL. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathological parameters of patients with DLBCL. We assessed the proliferative index, apoptotic index, and tumor microenvironment (TME), with regard to T cells and CD11c(+) dendritic cells, in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. We then generated a decision tree as a screening algorithm to predict DH/TH genotypes and employed decision curve analysis to demonstrate the superiority of this new model in prediction. We also assessed the prognostic significance of related parameters. Our study revealed that GCB subtypes, a Ki67 proliferative index higher than 70%, and BCL2 expression were significantly associated with DH/TH genotypes. Decreased CD11c(+) dendritic cells in the TME indicated additional risk. Our proposed screening algorithm outperformed a traditional model in screening for the DH/TH genotypes. In addition, decreased CD11c(+) dendritic cells in the DLBCL TME were an independent unfavorable prognosticator. In conclusion, we provide a convenient, well-performing model that predicts DH/TH genotypes in DLBCL. The prognostic significance of CD11c(+) dendritic cells in the TME might influence the classification and development of immunotherapy for DLBCL in the future.

CD5-negative blastoid variant mantle cell lymphoma: a diagnostic dilemma

We encountered two cases of CD5^- blastoid variant mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), prompting us to investigate the proportion of CD5 negativity in MCL and assess the diagnosis of aggressive MCL variants. Among 117 patients diagnosed with MCL, CD5 negativity was observed in 13% (13/104) of cases with classical MCL and 15% (2/13) of cases with blastoid/pleomorphic variant MCL. Of the aggressive MCL variant cases, tumor cells exhibited intermediate nuclear size and required differential diagnosis between blastoid variant and classical MCL in six patients, and classical MCL cells were found in the background of aggressive variant tumors or in other sites in six patients. Of 1534 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), CD5 positivity was observed in 8% (121/1534) of cases. Immunohistochemical staining for cyclin D1 performed for these cases revealed one cyclin D1-positive and IGH/CCND1 fusion-positive case (0.9%, 1/114), namely pleomorphic variant MCL. Of the remaining 1413 patients initially diagnosed with CD5^- DLBCL, the diagnoses of two patients (0.1%) were amended to CD5^- blastoid variant MCL in the relapse phase based on morphology, cyclin D1 immunostaining, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. The incidence of CD5 negativity was similar between classical MCL and two aggressive variants. Accurate diagnosis of MCL variants was enabled by identifying a classical MCL component and/or CD5 positivity; however, we misdiagnosed two cases of CD5^- blastoid variant MCL. A small number of MCL variants may be included in CD5^- DLBCL cases. The diagnosis of CD5^- aggressive variant MCL remains challenging but crucial because of its therapeutic significance.