1
|
Muthusamy S, Smith SC. Contemporary Diagnostic Reporting for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Morphologic Aspects, Molecular Correlates, and Management Perspectives. Adv Anat Pathol 2024; 31:188-201. [PMID: 38525660 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
The diagnosis and reporting of prostatic adenocarcinoma have evolved from the classic framework promulgated by Dr Donald Gleason in the 1960s into a complex and nuanced system of grading and reporting that nonetheless retains the essence of his remarkable observations. The criteria for the "Gleason patterns" originally proposed have been continually refined by consensuses in the field, and Gleason scores have been stratified into a patient-friendly set of prognostically validated and widely adopted Grade Groups. One product of this successful grading approach has been the opportunity for pathologists to report diagnoses that signal carefully personalized management, placing the surgical pathologist's interpretation at the center of patient care. At one end of the continuum of disease aggressiveness, personalized diagnostic care means to sub-stratify patients with more indolent disease for active surveillance, while at the other end of the continuum, reporting histologic markers signaling aggression allows sub-stratification of clinically significant disease. Whether contemporary reporting parameters represent deeper nuances of more established ones (eg, new criteria and/or quantitation of Gleason patterns 4 and 5) or represent additional features reported alongside grade (intraductal carcinoma, cribriform patterns of carcinoma), assessment and grading have become more complex and demanding. Herein, we explore these newer reporting parameters, highlighting the state of knowledge regarding morphologic, molecular, and management aspects. Emphasis is made on the increasing value and stakes of histopathologists' interpretations and reporting into current clinical risk stratification and treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steven Christopher Smith
- Department of Pathology, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
- Richmond Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA
- Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, VCU Health, Richmond, VA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cui Y, Lin J, Sun D, Zhang H, Diao T, Fu Q. Nomogram for predicting the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:45. [PMID: 38281261 PMCID: PMC10822789 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05582-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is a histological subtype that differs from conventional acinar adenocarcinoma in terms of its origin, appearance, and pathological features. For IDC-P, there is currently no recognized best course of action, and its prognosis is unclear. The goal of this study is to analyze independent prognostic factors in IDC-P patients and to develop and validate a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). METHODS Clinical data for IDC-P patients were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. To identify the independent variables influencing prognosis, multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed. A nomogram model was created utilizing these variables after comparing the variations in OS and CSS among various subgroups using Kaplan‒Meier curves. Internal validation of the nomograms was verified using the bootstrap resampling method. RESULTS The study included 280 IDC-P patients in total. Marital status, summary stage, grade, and the presence of lung metastases were significant factors impacting OS, and CSS was significantly influenced by marital status, summary stage, AJCC stage, the presence of lung metastases, the presence of bone metastases, and PSA according to univariate and multivariate Cox regression models (P < 0.05). Nomogram models were created to estimate OS and CSS using these parameters. The OS prediction model's C-index was 0.744, whereas the CSS prediction model's C-index was 0.831. CONCLUSION We developed and verified nomogram models for the prediction of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and CSS in patients with IDC-P. These nomograms serve as a resource for evaluating patient prognosis, therapy, and diagnosis, ultimately improving clinical decision-making accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongqiang Cui
- Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 324 Jingwuweiqi Rd, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Junyang Lin
- Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 324 Jingwuweiqi Rd, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Dingqi Sun
- Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 324 Jingwuweiqi Rd, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 324 Jingwuweiqi Rd, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Tongxiang Diao
- Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 324 Jingwuweiqi Rd, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China.
| | - Qiang Fu
- Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 324 Jingwuweiqi Rd, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China.
- Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, China.
- Key Laboratory of Urinary Diseases in Universities of Shandong Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Naito Y, Kato M, Nagayama J, Sano Y, Matsuo K, Inoue S, Sano T, Ishida S, Matsukawa Y, Tsuzuki T, Akamatsu S. Recent insights on the clinical, pathological, and molecular features of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Urol 2024; 31:7-16. [PMID: 37728330 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, a unique histopathologic entity that is often observed (especially in advanced prostate cancer), is characterized by the proliferation of malignant cells within normal acini or ducts surrounded by a basement membrane. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is almost invariably associated with an adjacent high-grade carcinoma and is occasionally observed as an isolated subtype. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate has been demonstrated to be an independent poor prognostic factor for all stages of cancer, whether localized, de novo metastatic, or castration-resistant. It also has a characteristic genetic profile, including high genomic instability. Recognizing and differentiating it from other pathologies is therefore important in patient management, and morphological diagnostic criteria for intraductal carcinoma of the prostate have been established. This review summarizes and outlines the clinical and pathological features, differential diagnosis, molecular aspects, and management of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, as described in previous studies. We also present a discussion and future perspectives regarding intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yushi Naito
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Masashi Kato
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Jun Nagayama
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuta Sano
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kazuna Matsuo
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Satoshi Inoue
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Sano
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shohei Ishida
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shusuke Akamatsu
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Surintrspanont J, Zhou M. Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: To Grade or Not to Grade. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5319. [PMID: 38001579 PMCID: PMC10669759 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is a distinct tumor type characterized by an expansile growth of atypical glandular epithelial cells within pre-existing prostate glands and ducts and has significant implications on clinical outcomes and patient management. There is an agreement that isolated IDC-P should not be graded, and IDC-P should be reported with a comment on its clinical significance. However, whether IDC-P should be factored into Grade Group (GG) in the presence of concurrent prostate cancer (PCa) has been debated vigorously. The contradicting opinions were promulgated when the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) and the International Society of Urological Pathologists (ISUP) published their recommendations for this issue. When IDC-P is present with PCa, the ISUP recommends incorporating it in the GG for the entire case, whereas the GUPS recommends excluding it from the final GG. Consequently, pathologists and clinicians are faced with the conundrum of conflicting recommendations. In this review article, the authors evaluate the magnitude of discrepant GG between the two grading methods, explore the rationales behind the differing views of the two urological societies, present the current reporting practices for IDC-P, and propose a provisional and pragmatic guide to alleviate the dilemma of which recommendation to follow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerasit Surintrspanont
- Department of Pathology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok 10330, Thailand;
- Special Task Force for Activating Research (STAR), Department of Pathology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| | - Ming Zhou
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kryvenko ON, Punnen S, Udayakumar TS, Gaston SM, Tao W, Ma W, Stoyanova R, Pollack A. Experimental Support for the Possibility of Retrograde Genesis of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate. Int J Surg Pathol 2023; 31:184-189. [PMID: 35521917 DOI: 10.1177/10668969221098080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background. Historically, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) was postulated to be a retrograde spread of high-grade invasive prostate cancer. There is evidence that IDC-P can primarily originate in the prostatic ducts. The retrograde genesis has never been experimentally or clinically confirmed before. Methods. Biopsy proven intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer was orthotopically grafted in the prostate of severe combined immunodeficiency gamma mice. Cancer growth was monitored by serum PSA levels. The animals were sacrificed and grafted areas were histological examined. Results. Twenty-one of 23 mice survived and demonstrated rising serum PSA. In 10 of 21 animals, human prostate cancer was identified orthotopically. Except for one case where the human biopsy showed a Grade Group 2 prostate cancer and mouse graft was Grade Group 5, other 9 specimens showed comparable grades. One of the specimens demonstrated a cribriform invasive prostate cancer and adjacent IDC-P. Conclusion. These experimental data offer some evidence that invasive prostate cancer can demonstrate a retrograde spread in the prostatic ducts as IDC-P. Its ability to primarily arise in the ducts has been demonstrated in other studies. However, the issue which remains unresolved is in its most common presentation of IDC-P intermixed with high-grade invasive cancer if it is the former or the latter which came first. Possibly resolving this dilemma will shed some light on the existing controversies if IDC-P should or should not be graded when invasive cancer is present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleksandr N Kryvenko
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Department Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Sanoj Punnen
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Sandra M Gaston
- Department Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Wensi Tao
- Department Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Wendi Ma
- Department Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Radka Stoyanova
- Department Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Alan Pollack
- Department Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tohi Y, Ishikawa R, Kato T, Miyakawa J, Matsumoto R, Mori K, Mitsuzuka K, Inokuchi J, Matsumura M, Shiga K, Naito H, Kohjimoto Y, Kawamura N, Inoue M, Kinoshita H, Hashimoto K, Goto K, Haba R, Kakehi Y, Sugimoto M. Clinical outcomes of intraductal carcinoma or cribriform in radical prostatectomy specimens of men opting for active surveillance: data from the PRIAS-JAPAN study. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:299-305. [PMID: 36472710 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02277-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among early stage prostate cancer patients, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) and invasive cribriform are key prognostic factors; however, their presence and clinical significance following active surveillance (AS) are unknown. In men who opted for AS, we aimed to examine the presence and impact of IDC-P or cribriform, utilizing radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. METHODS We re-reviewed 137 RP specimens available in the PRIAS-JAPAN prospective cohort between January 2010 and September 2020. We assessed the presence of IDC-P or cribriform, and compared the patients' characteristics and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence-free survival after RP between groups with and without IDC-P or cribriform. In addition, we examined the predictive factors associated with IDC-P or cribriform. RESULTS The percentage of patients with IDC-P or cribriform presence was 34.3% (47 patients). IDC-P or cribriform pattern was more abundant in the higher Gleason grade group in RP specimens (P < 0.001). The rates of PSA recurrence-free survival were significantly lower in the IDC-P or cribriform groups than in those without them (log rank P = 0.0211). There was no association between IDC-P or cribriform on RP with the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4,5 score on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before RP even with adjustments for other covariates (OR, 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.511-3.980, P = 0.497). CONCLUSIONS IDC-P or cribriform comprised approximately one-third of all RP specimens in men who underwent RP following AS, confirming their prognostic significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichiro Tohi
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1, Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa, 761-0793, Japan.
| | - Ryou Ishikawa
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Takuma Kato
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1, Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa, 761-0793, Japan
| | - Jimpei Miyakawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuji Matsumoto
- Department of Renal and Genito-Urinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Mitsuzuka
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Junichi Inokuchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masafumi Matsumura
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime, Japan
| | | | - Hirohito Naito
- Department of Urology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yasuo Kohjimoto
- Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Norihiko Kawamura
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaharu Inoue
- Department of Urology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Kinoshita
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Medical Center, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kohei Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Keisuke Goto
- Department of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Reiji Haba
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kakehi
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1, Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa, 761-0793, Japan
| | - Mikio Sugimoto
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1, Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa, 761-0793, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kench JG, Amin MB, Berney DM, Compérat EM, Cree IA, Gill AJ, Hartmann A, Menon S, Moch H, Netto GJ, Raspollini MR, Rubin MA, Tan PH, Tsuzuki T, Turjalic S, van der Kwast TH, Zhou M, Srigley JR. WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer. Histopathology 2022; 81:447-458. [PMID: 35758185 PMCID: PMC9542779 DOI: 10.1111/his.14711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary and Male Genital Systems encompasses several updates to the classification and diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma as well as incorporating advancements in the assessment of its prognosis, including recent grading modifications. Some of the salient aspects include: (1) recognition that prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN)-like carcinoma is not synonymous with a pattern of ductal carcinoma, but better classified as a subtype of acinar adenocarcinoma; (2) a specific section on treatment-related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma in view of the tight correlation between androgen deprivation therapy and the development of prostatic carcinoma with neuroendocrine morphology, and the emerging data on lineage plasticity; (3) a terminology change of basal cell carcinoma to "adenoid cystic (basal cell) cell carcinoma" given the presence of an underlying MYB::NFIB gene fusion in many cases; (4) discussion of the current issues in the grading of acinar adenocarcinoma and the prognostic significance of cribriform growth patterns; and (5) more detailed coverage of intraductal carcinoma of prostate (IDC-P) reflecting our increased knowledge of this entity, while recommending the descriptive term atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP) for lesions falling short of IDC-P but containing more atypia than typically seen in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). Lesions previously regarded as cribriform patterns of HGPIN are now included in the AIP category. This review discusses these developments, summarising the existing literature, as well as the emerging morphological and molecular data that underpins the classification and prognostication of prostatic carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James G Kench
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic OncologyRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, NSW Health PathologyCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- The University of SydneyCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Mahul B Amin
- The University of Tennessee Health Science CenterMemphisTNUSA
| | - Daniel M Berney
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Bartshealth NHS TrustRoyal London HospitalLondonUK
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of PathologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Ian A Cree
- International Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
| | - Anthony J Gill
- The University of SydneyCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Pacific HighwaySt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NürnbergErlangenGermany
| | - Santosh Menon
- Department of PathologyTata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National InstituteMumbaiIndia
| | - Holger Moch
- Department of Pathology and Molecular PathologyUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - George J Netto
- Heersink School of MedicineThe University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamALUSA
| | - Maria R Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular DiagnosticsUniversity Hospital CareggiFlorenceItaly
| | - Mark A Rubin
- Department for BioMedical ResearchUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Puay Hoon Tan
- Division of Pathology, Singapore General HospitalSingaporeSingapore
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical PathologyAichi Medical University HospitalNagakuteJapan
| | - Samra Turjalic
- Skin and Renal UnitsRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Cancer Dynamics LaboratoryThe Francis Crick InstituteLondonUK
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathobiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Ming Zhou
- Pathology and Laboratory MedicineTufts Medical CenterBostonMAUSA
| | - John R Srigley
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathobiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Algohary A, Alhusseini M, Breto AL, Kwon D, Xu IR, Gaston SM, Castillo P, Punnen S, Spieler B, Abramowitz MC, Dal Pra A, Kryvenko ON, Pollack A, Stoyanova R. Longitudinal Changes and Predictive Value of Multiparametric MRI Features for Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with MRI-Guided Lattice Extreme Ablative Dose (LEAD) Boost Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184475. [PMID: 36139635 PMCID: PMC9496901 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated the longitudinal changes in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) (T2-weighted, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE-)MRI) of prostate cancer patients receiving Lattice Extreme Ablative Dose (LEAD) radiotherapy (RT) and the capability of their imaging features to predict RT outcome based on endpoint biopsies. Ninety-five mpMRI exams from 25 patients, acquired pre-RT and at 3-, 9-, and 24-months post-RT were analyzed. MRI/Ultrasound-fused biopsies were acquired pre- and at two-years post-RT (endpoint). Five regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed: Gross tumor volume (GTV), normally-appearing tissue (NAT) and peritumoral volume in both peripheral (PZ) and transition (TZ) zones. Diffusion and perfusion radiomics features were extracted from mpMRI and compared before and after RT using two-tailed Student t-tests. Selected features at the four scan points and their differences (Δ radiomics) were used in multivariate logistic regression models to predict the endpoint biopsy positivity. Baseline ADC values were significantly different between GTV, NAT-PZ, and NAT-TZ (p-values < 0.005). Pharmaco-kinetic features changed significantly in the GTV at 3-month post-RT compared to baseline. Several radiomics features at baseline and three-months post-RT were significantly associated with endpoint biopsy positivity and were used to build models with high predictive power of this endpoint (AUC = 0.98 and 0.89, respectively). Our study characterized the RT-induced changes in perfusion and diffusion. Quantitative imaging features from mpMRI show promise as being predictive of endpoint biopsy positivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Algohary
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Mohammad Alhusseini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Adrian L. Breto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Deukwoo Kwon
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Isaac R. Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Sandra M. Gaston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Patricia Castillo
- Department of Radiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Sanoj Punnen
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Benjamin Spieler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Matthew C. Abramowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Oleksandr N. Kryvenko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Alan Pollack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Radka Stoyanova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-305-243-5856
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Destouni M, Lazaris AC, Tzelepi V. Cribriform Patterned Lesions in the Prostate Gland with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Significance. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133041. [PMID: 35804812 PMCID: PMC9264941 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary A cribriform structure is defined as a continuous proliferation of cells with intermingled lumina. Various entities may have a cribriform morphology within the prostate gland, ranging from normal, to benign, to borderline and even to malignant lesions. This review summarizes the morphologic features of entities that have a cribriform morphology within the prostate gland, with an emphasis on their differential diagnosis, molecular profile and clinical significance. The basic aim is to assist the pathologist with challenging and controversial cases and inform the clinician on the clinical implications of cribriform morphology. Abstract Cribriform glandular formations are characterized by a continuous proliferation of cells with intermingled lumina and can constitute a major or minor part of physiologic (normal central zone glands), benign (clear cell cribriform hyperplasia and basal cell hyperplasia), premalignant (high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia), borderline (atypical intraductal cribriform proliferation) or clearly malignant (intraductal, acinar, ductal and basal cell carcinoma) lesions. Each displays a different clinical course and variability in clinical management and prognosis. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge regarding the morphological features, differential diagnosis, molecular profile and clinical significance of the cribriform-patterned entities of the prostate gland. Areas of controversy regarding their management, i.e., the grading of Intaductal Carcinoma, will also be discussed. Understanding the distinct nature of each cribriform lesion leads to the correct diagnosis and ensures accuracy in clinical decision-making, prognosis prediction and personalized risk stratification of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Destouni
- Department of Cytopathology, Hippokrateion General Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Andreas C. Lazaris
- First Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Vasiliki Tzelepi
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kryvenko ON, Iakymenko OA, De Lima Guido LP, Bhattu AS, Merhe A, Mouzannar A, Briski LM, Oymagil I, Lugo I, Nemov I, Ritch CR, Kava BR, Punnen S, Jorda M, Parekh DJ, Gonzalgo ML. Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Controlled for Tumor Grade, Stage, and Margin Status Does Not Independently Influence the Likelihood of Biochemical Recurrence in Localized Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 146:1012-1017. [PMID: 34739539 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0048-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) has historically been considered to be an aggressive subtype of prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE.— To investigate if PDA is independently associated with worse biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival after radical prostatectomy. DESIGN.— A review of 1584 radical prostatectomies was performed to grade, stage, and assess margin status in each tumor nodule. Radical prostatectomies with localized PDA (ie, those lacking metastasis) in the tumor nodule with the highest grade and stage and worst margin status were matched with prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma according to grade, stage, and margin status. The effect of PDA on BCR was assessed by multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS.— Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma was present in 171 cases. We excluded 24 cases because of lymph node metastasis (n = 13), PDA not in the highest-grade tumor nodule (n = 9), and positive surgical margin in a lower-grade tumor nodule (n = 2). The remaining 147 cases included 26 Grade Group (GG) 2, 44 GG3, 6 GG4, and 71 GG5 cancers. Seventy-six cases had extraprostatic extension, 33 had seminal vesicle invasion, and 65 had positive margins. Follow-up was available for 113 PDA and 109 prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma cases. Prostate-specific antigen density (odds ratio, 3.7; P = .001), cancer grade (odds ratio, 3.3-4.3; P = .02), positive surgical margin (odds ratio, 1.7; P = .02), and tumor volume (odds ratio, 1.3; P = .02) were associated with BCR in multivariable analysis. Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma, its percentage, intraductal carcinoma, and cribriform Gleason pattern 4 were not significant independent predictors of BCR. CONCLUSIONS.— Advanced locoregional stage, higher tumor grade, and positive surgical margin status rather than the mere presence of PDA are more predictive of worse BCR-free survival outcomes following radical prostatectomy in men with a component of PDA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleksandr N Kryvenko
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Kryvenko, Iakymenko, De Lima Guido, Briski, Lugo, Nemov, Jorda), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Department of Urology (Kryvenko, Bhattu, Merhe, Mouzannar, Oymagil, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,The Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kryvenko, Briski, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Oleksii A Iakymenko
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Kryvenko, Iakymenko, De Lima Guido, Briski, Lugo, Nemov, Jorda), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Luiz P De Lima Guido
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Kryvenko, Iakymenko, De Lima Guido, Briski, Lugo, Nemov, Jorda), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Amit S Bhattu
- Department of Urology (Kryvenko, Bhattu, Merhe, Mouzannar, Oymagil, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Ali Merhe
- Department of Urology (Kryvenko, Bhattu, Merhe, Mouzannar, Oymagil, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Ali Mouzannar
- Department of Urology (Kryvenko, Bhattu, Merhe, Mouzannar, Oymagil, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Laurence M Briski
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Kryvenko, Iakymenko, De Lima Guido, Briski, Lugo, Nemov, Jorda), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,The Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kryvenko, Briski, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Irfan Oymagil
- Department of Urology (Kryvenko, Bhattu, Merhe, Mouzannar, Oymagil, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Isabella Lugo
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Kryvenko, Iakymenko, De Lima Guido, Briski, Lugo, Nemov, Jorda), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Ivan Nemov
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Kryvenko, Iakymenko, De Lima Guido, Briski, Lugo, Nemov, Jorda), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Chad R Ritch
- Department of Urology (Kryvenko, Bhattu, Merhe, Mouzannar, Oymagil, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,The Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kryvenko, Briski, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Bruce R Kava
- Department of Urology (Kryvenko, Bhattu, Merhe, Mouzannar, Oymagil, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,The Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kryvenko, Briski, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Sanoj Punnen
- Department of Urology (Kryvenko, Bhattu, Merhe, Mouzannar, Oymagil, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,The Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kryvenko, Briski, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Merce Jorda
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Kryvenko, Iakymenko, De Lima Guido, Briski, Lugo, Nemov, Jorda), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Department of Urology (Kryvenko, Bhattu, Merhe, Mouzannar, Oymagil, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,The Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kryvenko, Briski, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Dipen J Parekh
- Department of Urology (Kryvenko, Bhattu, Merhe, Mouzannar, Oymagil, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,The Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kryvenko, Briski, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- Department of Urology (Kryvenko, Bhattu, Merhe, Mouzannar, Oymagil, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,The Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kryvenko, Briski, Ritch, Kava, Punnen, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Plante A, Dallaire F, Grosset AA, Nguyen T, Birlea M, Wong J, Daoust F, Roy N, Kougioumoutzakis A, Azzi F, Aubertin K, Kadoury S, Latour M, Albadine R, Prendeville S, Boutros P, Fraser M, Bristow RG, van der Kwast T, Orain M, Brisson H, Benzerdjeb N, Hovington H, Bergeron A, Fradet Y, Têtu B, Saad F, Trudel D, Leblond F. Dimensional reduction based on peak fitting of Raman micro spectroscopy data improves detection of prostate cancer in tissue specimens. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS 2021; 26:JBO-210212R. [PMID: 34743445 PMCID: PMC8571651 DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.26.11.116501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men. An accurate diagnosis of its severity at detection plays a major role in improving their survival. Recently, machine learning models using biomarkers identified from Raman micro-spectroscopy discriminated intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) from cancer tissue with a ≥85 % detection accuracy and differentiated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) from IDC-P with a ≥97.8 % accuracy. AIM To improve the classification performance of machine learning models identifying different types of prostate cancer tissue using a new dimensional reduction technique. APPROACH A radial basis function (RBF) kernel support vector machine (SVM) model was trained on Raman spectra of prostate tissue from a 272-patient cohort (Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, CHUM) and tested on two independent cohorts of 76 patients [University Health Network (UHN)] and 135 patients (Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, CHUQc-UL). Two types of engineered features were used. Individual intensity features, i.e., Raman signal intensity measured at particular wavelengths and novel Raman spectra fitted peak features consisting of peak heights and widths. RESULTS Combining engineered features improved classification performance for the three aforementioned classification tasks. The improvements for IDC-P/cancer classification for the UHN and CHUQc-UL testing sets in accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) are (numbers in parenthesis are associated with the CHUQc-UL testing set): +4 % (+8 % ), +7 % (+9 % ), +2 % (6%), +9 (+9) with respect to the current best models. Discrimination between HGPIN and IDC-P was also improved in both testing cohorts: +2.2 % (+1.7 % ), +4.5 % (+3.6 % ), +0 % (+0 % ), +2.3 (+0). While no global improvements were obtained for the normal versus cancer classification task [+0 % (-2 % ), +0 % (-3 % ), +2 % (-2 % ), +4 (+3)], the AUC was improved in both testing sets. CONCLUSIONS Combining individual intensity features and novel Raman fitted peak features, improved the classification performance on two independent and multicenter testing sets in comparison to using only individual intensity features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Plante
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Frédérick Dallaire
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrée-Anne Grosset
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Université de Montréal, Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tien Nguyen
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mirela Birlea
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jahg Wong
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Daoust
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Noémi Roy
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - André Kougioumoutzakis
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Feryel Azzi
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kelly Aubertin
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Samuel Kadoury
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Computer Engineering and Software Engineering, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mathieu Latour
- Université de Montréal, Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Department of Pathology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Roula Albadine
- Université de Montréal, Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Department of Pathology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Susan Prendeville
- University Health Network, Laboratory Medicine Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Boutros
- Informatics & Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Human Genetics, Los Angeles, California, United States
- University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Urology, Los Angeles, California, United States
- University of California, Los Angeles, Institute for Precision Health, Los Angeles, California, United States
- University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Fraser
- Informatics & Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rob G. Bristow
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Michèle Orain
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hervé Brisson
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nazim Benzerdjeb
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hélène Hovington
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alain Bergeron
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Department of Surgery, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yves Fradet
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Department of Surgery, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bernard Têtu
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Université Laval, Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Dominique Trudel
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Frédéric Leblond
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Université de Montréal, Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer: The Impact of Grading Criteria and the Significance of the Amount of Intraductal Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215454. [PMID: 34771617 PMCID: PMC8582560 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Prognostic grade group (PGG) is an important prognostic parameter in prostate cancer that guides therapeutic decisions. The cribriform pattern and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) are two histological patterns, that have additional prognostic significance. However, discrepancies exist regarding the handling of IDC according to the guidelines published by two international genitourinary pathology societies. Furthermore, whether, in addition to its presence, the amount of IDC is also of importance has not been studied before. Lastly, the handling of tertiary patterns has also been a matter of debate in the literature. (2) Methods: A total of 129 prostatectomy cases were retrieved and a detailed histopathologic analysis was performed. (3) Results: Two cases (1.6%) upgraded their PGG, when IDC was incorporated in the grading system. The presence and the amount of IDC, as well as the presence of cribriform carcinoma were associated with adverse pathologic characteristics. Interestingly, in six cases (4.7%) there was a difference in PGG when using the different guidelines regarding the handling of tertiary patterns. In total, 6.2% of the cases would be assigned a different grade depending on the guidelines followed. (4) Conclusions: These findings highlight a potential area of confusion among pathologists and clinicians and underscore the need for a consensus grading system.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hayee A, Lugo I, Iakymenko OA, Kwon D, Briski LM, Zhao W, Nemov I, Punnen S, Ritch CR, Pollack A, Jorda M, Stoyanova R, Parekh DJ, Gonzalgo ML, Kryvenko ON. Anterior or Posterior Prostate Cancer Tumor Nodule Location Predicts Likelihood of Certain Adverse Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 146:833-839. [PMID: 34669939 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0104-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Effect of tumor nodule (TN) location in the prostate on adverse radical prostatectomy (RP) outcomes is not well studied in contemporary cohort. OBJECTIVE.— To investigate the significance of TN location with respect to extraprostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion (SV+), and positive margin status (SM+) in 1388 RPs. DESIGN.— Each TN at RP was independently graded, staged, and volumetrically assessed. TNs with at least 80% of their volume occupying either the anterior or posterior part of the prostate were categorized accordingly and included in our study, while all other TNs were excluded. RESULTS.— A total of 3570 separate TNs (median = 3 per RP; range = 1-7 per RP) were scored. There were 1320 of 3570 (37%) anterior TNs and 2250 of 3570 (63%) posterior TNs. Posterior TNs were more likely to be higher grade, and exhibit EPE (18% versus 9.4%) and SV+ (4% versus 0.15%), all P < .001. Anterior TNs with EPE were more likely to exhibit SM+ than posterior TNs with EPE (62% versus 30.8%, P < .001). TN location, grade, and volume were significant factors associated with adverse RP outcomes in our univariable analysis. When we controlled for grade and tumor volume in a multivariable analysis using anterior TN location as a reference, posterior TN location was an independent predictor of EPE and SV+ and was less likely to be associated with SM+ (odds ratio = 3.1, 81.5, and 0.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS.— These associations may be useful in preoperative surgical planning, particularly with respect to improving radiographic analysis of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amin Hayee
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Isabella Lugo
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Oleksii A Iakymenko
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Deukwoo Kwon
- Department of Public Health Sciences (Kwon), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Laurence M Briski
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Wei Zhao
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Ivan Nemov
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Sanoj Punnen
- Department of Urology (Punnen, Ritch, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Chad R Ritch
- Department of Urology (Punnen, Ritch, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Alan Pollack
- Radiation Oncology (Pollack, Stoyanova), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Merce Jorda
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Department of Urology (Punnen, Ritch, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Radka Stoyanova
- Radiation Oncology (Pollack, Stoyanova), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Dipen J Parekh
- Department of Urology (Punnen, Ritch, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- Department of Urology (Punnen, Ritch, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Oleksandr N Kryvenko
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Department of Urology (Punnen, Ritch, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sailer VW, Perner S, Wild P, Köllermann J. [Localized prostate cancer]. DER PATHOLOGE 2021; 42:603-616. [PMID: 34648048 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-021-00997-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most prevalent noncutaneous cancer in men. The Gleason grading is considered to be the strongest prognostic parameter regarding progression-free survival and overall survival. The original grading system has been modified during the last decade resulting in a more precise prognostic tool. The pretreatment Gleason score guides clinical management and is a key component in S3 guidelines for prostate cancer. In addition to Gleason score several other histologic findings in prostate needle biopsy influence patient management. In this second part of our CME series about prostate cancer, we will discuss the diagnosis of prostate cancer and current guidelines for reporting prostate cancer. In addition, we will highlight prostate lesions of urothelial origin and neuroendocrine prostate cancer as well as prognostic biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V W Sailer
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23563, Lübeck, Deutschland.
| | - S Perner
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23563, Lübeck, Deutschland.,Institut für Pathologie, Forschungszentrum Borstel, Leibniz Lungenzentrum, Borstel, Deutschland
| | - P Wild
- Dr. Senckenbergisches Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - J Köllermann
- Dr. Senckenbergisches Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Iakymenko OA, Lugo I, Briski LM, Nemov I, Punnen S, Kwon D, Pollack A, Stoyanova R, Parekh DJ, Jorda M, Gonzalgo ML, Kryvenko ON. Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and tumor volume predict adverse pathological stage and margin status at radical prostatectomy in grade Group 2 and grade Group 3 prostate cancers. Prostate 2021; 81:866-873. [PMID: 34184782 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing percentages of Gleason pattern 4 (GP4%) in radical prostatectomy (RP) correlate with an increased likelihood of nonorgan-confined disease and earlier biochemical recurrence (BCR). However, there are no detailed RP studies assessing the impact of GP4% and corresponding tumor volume (TV) on extraprostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle (SV) invasion (SV+), and positive surgical margin (SM) status (SM+). METHODS In 1301 consecutive RPs, we analyzed each tumor nodule (TN) for TV, Grade Group (GG), presence of focal versus nonfocal EPE, SV+ , and SM+. Using GG1 (GP4% = 0) TNs as a reference, we recorded GP4% for all GG2 or GG3 TNs. We performed a multivariable analysis (MVA) using a mixed effects logistic regression that tested significant variables for risk of EPE, SV+, and SM+, as well as a multinomial logistic regression model that tested significant variables for risks of nonorgan-confined disease (pT2+, pT3a, and pT3b) versus organ-confined disease (pT2). RESULTS We identified 3231 discrete TNs ranging from 1 to 7 (median: 2.5) per RP. These included GG1 (n = 2115), GG2 (n = 818), GG3 (n = 274), and GG4 (n = 24) TNs. Increasing GP4% weakly paralleled increasing TV (tau = 0.07, p < .001). In MVA, increasing GP4% and TV predicted a greater likelihood of EPE (odds ratio [OR]: 1.03 and 4.41), SV+ (OR: 1.03 and 3.83), and SM+ (1.01, p = .01 and 2.83), all p < .001. Our multinomial logistic regression model demonstrated an association between GP4% and the risk of EPE (i.e., pT3a and pT3b disease), as well as an association between TV and risk of upstaging (all p < .001). CONCLUSIONS Both GP4% and TV are independent predictors of adverse pathological stage and margin status at RP. However, the risks for adverse outcomes associated with GP4% are marginal, while those for TV are strong. The prognostic significance of GP4% on BCR-free survival has not been studied controlling for TV and other adverse RP findings. Whether adverse pathological stage and margin status associated with larger TV could decrease BCR-free survival to a greater extent than increasing RP GP4% remains to be studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleksii A Iakymenko
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Isabella Lugo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Laurence M Briski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ivan Nemov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Sanoj Punnen
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Deukwoo Kwon
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alan Pollack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Radka Stoyanova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Dipen J Parekh
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Merce Jorda
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Oleksandr N Kryvenko
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Iczkowski KA, van Leenders GJLH, van der Kwast TH. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:1007. [PMID: 33481387 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Theodorus H van der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate gland (IDCP) is characterized by an expansile, architecturally, and cytologically atypical proliferation of prostatic epithelial cells within preexisting prostatic ducts and acini. There has been a wider recognition of IDCP by practicing pathologists since its recognition as a separate category in the World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 classification of tumours of the prostate gland. However, there is also a lack of clarity regarding the diagnosis and reporting of IDCP, which has been compounded by divergent expert recommendations regarding the grading of invasive prostate cancers associated with an intraductal component. The International Society of Urological Pathologists (ISUP) recommends that the IDCP component should be incorporated into the Gleason score, while the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) recommends excluding it when grading prostate cancer. This review seeks to clarify some of these issues and outline a pragmatic approach to reporting IDCP, particularly in needle biopsies. Diagnostic issues and terminology for lesions falling short of IDCP but exceeding that of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia are discussed. The management of patients whose prostate biopsies show only IDCP without an associated invasive component is controversial. Some experts recommend radical therapy, while others recommend prompt repeat biopsy. An alternative clinicopathologic approach that takes into consideration the extent, histomorphology, and location (with respect to a radiologic abnormality) of IDCP, as well as radiologic features, is outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murali Varma
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Similarities and Differences in the 2019 ISUP and GUPS Recommendations on Prostate Cancer Grading: A Guide for Practicing Pathologists. Adv Anat Pathol 2021; 28:1-7. [PMID: 33027069 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Contemporary subspecialization of practice in prostate pathology has seen a transition to complex, nuanced reporting, where a growing number of histopathologic parameters may signal differences in patient management. In this context, the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) and the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) both published proceedings papers on the grading of prostate cancer in 2019. Overall, the 2 prostate cancer grading manuscripts reached many of the same conclusions and recommendations. Yet, each consensus was conducted somewhat differently, and in a couple of key areas, each reached different conclusions and recommendations. Herein, sourced from the experience and viewpoints of members of both societies, we provide the practicing pathologist a summary of the shared recommendations, and of the discordances. It is anticipated that these 2 documents will inform future iterations of recommendations and guidelines for reporting prostate cancer by organizations such as the College of American Pathologists, the Royal College of Pathologists, and the European Society of Pathology, which will promote best practices for their respective constituents. Our goal is to provide the practicing pathologist a useful catalog of the main points of both, allowing each practitioner to make informed decisions and understand any divergent opinions as may arise between observers for individual cases.
Collapse
|
19
|
Delahunt B, Egevad L, Samaratunga H, Srigley JR, Cheng L, Clouston D, Furusato B, Kench J, Leite KRM, MacLennan GT, Moch H, Pan CC, Ro J, Tsuzuki T, van der Kwast T, Wheeler T, Yaxley JW. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is not a diagnostic entity. Histopathology 2020; 78:342-344. [PMID: 32970871 DOI: 10.1111/his.14260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Brett Delahunt
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Wellinton School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Lars Egevad
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hemamali Samaratunga
- Aquesta Uropathology and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - John R Srigley
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Bungo Furusato
- Department of Pathology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and Cancer Genomics Unit, Clinical Genomics Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - James Kench
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katia R M Leite
- Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gregory T MacLennan
- Department of Pathology and Urology, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Holger Moch
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Chin-Chen Pan
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jae Ro
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Theodorus van der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas Wheeler
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John W Yaxley
- Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Wesley Urology Clinic, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rijstenberg LL, Hansum T, Hollemans E, Kweldam CF, Kümmerlin IP, Bangma CH, van der Kwast TH, Roobol MJ, van Leenders GJLH. Intraductal carcinoma has a minimal impact on Grade Group assignment in prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Histopathology 2020; 77:742-748. [PMID: 32542746 PMCID: PMC7692905 DOI: 10.1111/his.14179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Intraductal carcinoma (IDC) is an adverse histopathological parameter for prostate cancer outcome, but is not incorporated in current tumour grading. To account for its dismal prognosis and to omit basal cell immunohistochemistry, it has been proposed to grade IDC on the basis of its underlying architectural pattern. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of IDC grade assignment on prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy tumour grading. METHODS AND RESULTS A cohort of 1031 prostate cancer biopsies and 835 radical prostatectomies were assigned a Grade Group according to the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology guidelines, without incorporation of IDC in grading. Tumour grading was compared with a Grade Group in which IDC was graded on the basis of its underlying architecture. Of 1031 biopsies, 139 (13.5%) showed IDC. Grade assignment of IDC led to a Grade Group change in 17 (1.6%) cases: four of 486 (0.8%) Grade Group 1 cases were reclassified as Grade Group 2, nine of 375 (2.4%) Grade Group 2 cases were reclassified as Grade Group 3, and four of 58 (6.9%) Grade Group 4 cases were reclassified as Grade Group 5. IDC was observed in 213 of 835 (25.5%) radical prostatectomies, and its grading led to a change in tumour grade in five of 835 (0.6%) patients, with upgrading in two of 207 (1.0%) patients with Grade Group 1 cancer, in two of 420 (0.5%) patients with Grade Group 2 cancer, and in one of 50 (2%) patients with Grade Group 4 cancer. CONCLUSION IDC grade assignment led to a Grade Group change in 1.6% of prostate biopsy specimens and in 0.6% of radical prostatectomy specimens. Although the inclusion of IDC in or the exclusion of IDC from the Grade Group might affect decision-making in individual patients, it has a minimal impact on overall prostate cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Lucia Rijstenberg
- Department of PathologyErasmus MCUniversity Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Tim Hansum
- Department of PathologyErasmus MCUniversity Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Eva Hollemans
- Department of PathologyErasmus MCUniversity Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Charlotte F Kweldam
- Department of PathologyErasmus MCUniversity Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of PathologyMaasstad HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Intan P Kümmerlin
- Department of PathologyErasmus MCUniversity Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Chris H Bangma
- Department of UrologyErasmus MCUniversity Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Monique J Roobol
- Department of UrologyErasmus MCUniversity Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zong Y, Montironi R, Massari F, Jiang Z, Lopez-Beltran A, Wheeler TM, Scarpelli M, Santoni M, Cimadamore A, Cheng L. Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: Pathogenesis and Molecular Perspectives. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 7:955-963. [PMID: 33132109 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P), a clinicopathological entity characterized by malignant prostatic epithelial cells growing within ducts and/or acini, has a distinct architectural pattern, cytological features, and biological behavior. Whereas most IDC-P tumors could be derived from adjacent high-grade invasive cancer via retrograde spreading of cancer cells along benign ducts and acini, a small subset of IDC-P may arise from the transformation and intraductal proliferation of precancerous cells induced by various oncogenic events. These isolated IDC-P tumors possess a distinct mutational profile and may function as a carcinoma in situ lesion with de novo intraductal outgrowth of malignant cells. Further molecular characterization of these two types of IDC-P and better understanding of the mechanisms underlying IDC-P formation and progression could be translated into valuable biomarkers for differential diagnosis and actionable targets for therapeutic interventions. PATIENT SUMMARY: Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is an aggressive type of prostate cancer associated with high risk for local recurrence and distant metastasis. In this review, we discussed pathogenesis, biomarkers, differential diagnoses, and therapeutic strategies for this tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Zong
- Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesco Massari
- Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Zhong Jiang
- Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Antonio Lopez-Beltran
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cordoba University, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Thomas M Wheeler
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marina Scarpelli
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Alessia Cimadamore
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
van Leenders GJLH, Verhoef EI, Hollemans E. Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading. Histopathology 2020; 77:850-861. [PMID: 32683729 PMCID: PMC7756302 DOI: 10.1111/his.14214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The Gleason grading system is one of the most important factors in clinical decision‐making for prostate cancer patients, and is entirely based on the classification of tumour growth patterns. In recent years it has become clear that some individual growth patterns themselves have independent prognostic value, and could be used for better personalised risk stratification. In this review we summarise recent literature on the clinicopathological value and molecular characteristics of individual prostate cancer growth patterns, and show how these, most particularly cribriform architecture, could alter treatment decisions for prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Esther I Verhoef
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Hollemans
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Varma M, Epstein JI. Head to head: should the intraductal component of invasive prostate cancer be graded? Histopathology 2020; 78:231-239. [PMID: 32692448 DOI: 10.1111/his.14216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The reporting of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDCP) is controversial, with conflicting recommendations having recently been published by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) and the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS). Both recommend that isolated (pure) IDCP should not be graded. However, the ISUP recommends incorporating the IDCP component of invasive prostate cancer in the Gleason score, whereas the GUPS recommends reporting IDCP as a comment, independently of the Gleason score. The arguments for and against incorporating the IDCP component of invasive prostate cancer in the Gleason score are discussed in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murali Varma
- Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.,University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Leenders GJ, van der Kwast TH, Grignon DJ, Evans AJ, Kristiansen G, Kweldam CF, Litjens G, McKenney JK, Melamed J, Mottet N, Paner GP, Samaratunga H, Schoots IG, Simko JP, Tsuzuki T, Varma M, Warren AY, Wheeler TM, Williamson SR, Iczkowski KA. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2020; 44:e87-e99. [PMID: 32459716 PMCID: PMC7382533 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 285] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Five years after the last prostatic carcinoma grading consensus conference of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP), accrual of new data and modification of clinical practice require an update of current pathologic grading guidelines. This manuscript summarizes the proceedings of the ISUP consensus meeting for grading of prostatic carcinoma held in September 2019, in Nice, France. Topics brought to consensus included the following: (1) approaches to reporting of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 quantities, and minor/tertiary patterns, (2) an agreement to report the presence of invasive cribriform carcinoma, (3) an agreement to incorporate intraductal carcinoma into grading, and (4) individual versus aggregate grading of systematic and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies. Finally, developments in the field of artificial intelligence in the grading of prostatic carcinoma and future research perspectives were discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David J. Grignon
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Andrew J. Evans
- Department of Laboratory Information Support Systems, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Glen Kristiansen
- Institute of Pathology of the University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Geert Litjens
- Diagnostic Image Analysis Group and the Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jonathan Melamed
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Nicholas Mottet
- Urology Department, University Hospital
- Department of Surgery, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France
| | | | - Hemamali Samaratunga
- Department of Pathology, University of Queensland School of Medicine, and Aquesta Uropathology, St Lucia, QLD
| | - Ivo G. Schoots
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam
| | - Jeffry P. Simko
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Murali Varma
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales
| | - Anne Y. Warren
- Department of Pathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas M. Wheeler
- Department of Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Sean R. Williamson
- Department of Pathology, Henry Ford Health System and Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Grosset AA, Dallaire F, Nguyen T, Birlea M, Wong J, Daoust F, Roy N, Kougioumoutzakis A, Azzi F, Aubertin K, Kadoury S, Latour M, Albadine R, Prendeville S, Boutros P, Fraser M, Bristow RG, van der Kwast T, Orain M, Brisson H, Benzerdjeb N, Hovington H, Bergeron A, Fradet Y, Têtu B, Saad F, Leblond F, Trudel D. Identification of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on tissue specimens using Raman micro-spectroscopy: A diagnostic accuracy case-control study with multicohort validation. PLoS Med 2020; 17:e1003281. [PMID: 32797086 PMCID: PMC7428053 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in North American men. Pathologists are in critical need of accurate biomarkers to characterize PC, particularly to confirm the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P), an aggressive histopathological variant for which therapeutic options are now available. Our aim was to identify IDC-P with Raman micro-spectroscopy (RμS) and machine learning technology following a protocol suitable for routine clinical histopathology laboratories. METHODS AND FINDINGS We used RμS to differentiate IDC-P from PC, as well as PC and IDC-P from benign tissue on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded first-line radical prostatectomy specimens (embedded in tissue microarrays [TMAs]) from 483 patients treated in 3 Canadian institutions between 1993 and 2013. The main measures were the presence or absence of IDC-P and of PC, regardless of the clinical outcomes. The median age at radical prostatectomy was 62 years. Most of the specimens from the first cohort (Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal) were of Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (51%) while most of the specimens from the 2 other cohorts (University Health Network and Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval) were of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 (51% and 52%, respectively). Most of the 483 patients were pT2 stage (44%-69%), and pT3a (22%-49%) was more frequent than pT3b (9%-12%). To investigate the prostate tissue of each patient, 2 consecutive sections of each TMA block were cut. The first section was transferred onto a glass slide to perform immunohistochemistry with H&E counterstaining for cell identification. The second section was placed on an aluminum slide, dewaxed, and then used to acquire an average of 7 Raman spectra per specimen (between 4 and 24 Raman spectra, 4 acquisitions/TMA core). Raman spectra of each cell type were then analyzed to retrieve tissue-specific molecular information and to generate classification models using machine learning technology. Models were trained and cross-validated using data from 1 institution. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 87% ± 5%, 86% ± 6%, and 89% ± 8%, respectively, to differentiate PC from benign tissue, and 95% ± 2%, 96% ± 4%, and 94% ± 2%, respectively, to differentiate IDC-P from PC. The trained models were then tested on Raman spectra from 2 independent institutions, reaching accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities of 84% and 86%, 84% and 87%, and 81% and 82%, respectively, to diagnose PC, and of 85% and 91%, 85% and 88%, and 86% and 93%, respectively, for the identification of IDC-P. IDC-P could further be differentiated from high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), a pre-malignant intraductal proliferation that can be mistaken as IDC-P, with accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities > 95% in both training and testing cohorts. As we used stringent criteria to diagnose IDC-P, the main limitation of our study is the exclusion of borderline, difficult-to-classify lesions from our datasets. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we developed classification models for the analysis of RμS data to differentiate IDC-P, PC, and benign tissue, including HGPIN. RμS could be a next-generation histopathological technique used to reinforce the identification of high-risk PC patients and lead to more precise diagnosis of IDC-P.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrée-Anne Grosset
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Frédérick Dallaire
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Computer Engineering and Software Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tien Nguyen
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Engineering Physics, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mirela Birlea
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jahg Wong
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Daoust
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Engineering Physics, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Noémi Roy
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - André Kougioumoutzakis
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Feryel Azzi
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kelly Aubertin
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Samuel Kadoury
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Computer Engineering and Software Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mathieu Latour
- Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Roula Albadine
- Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Susan Prendeville
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Boutros
- Informatics & Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Institute for Precision Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Michael Fraser
- Informatics & Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rob G. Bristow
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Michèle Orain
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hervé Brisson
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nazim Benzerdjeb
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hélène Hovington
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alain Bergeron
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yves Fradet
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bernard Têtu
- Oncology Division, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec–Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Frédéric Leblond
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Engineering Physics, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Dominique Trudel
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen-Maxwell D, Prendeville S. Grading of prostate cancer: the impact of including intraductal carcinoma on the overall Grade Group assigned in diagnostic biopsies. Histopathology 2020; 77:503-507. [PMID: 32358793 DOI: 10.1111/his.14132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The Gleason score/Grade Group (GrG) is a key parameter for clinical decision-making in prostate cancer. The World Health Organization currently recommends that intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDCP) should not be factored into the GrG; however, grading of IDCP is controversial, with variability among genitourinary pathologists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of grading of the IDCP component on the final GrG in prostate biopsies. METHODS AND RESULTS The study included 123 prostate biopsies (12 cores +/- additional MRI-targeted cores) with GrG1-GrG4 invasive carcinoma and IDCP. All cases were graded by a genitourinary pathologist using two different methods: (i) grading of invasive carcinoma only; and (ii) grading of both invasive carcinoma and IDCP. The overall GrG, excluding the IDCP component, was GrG1 in 3% (n = 4) of cases, GrG2 in 37% (n = 45), GrG3 in 52% (n = 64), and GrG4 in 8% (n = 10). When the IDCP component was included in grading, the overall GrG changed in 28 cases (23%). The GrG increased by one grade in 15 of 28 cases (54%), and by two or more grades in 13 of 28 cases (46%). Upgrading was due to comedonecrosis (39%, 11/28), solid growth (4%, 1/28), or an increased proportion of Gleason grade 4 (57%, 16/28). CONCLUSIONS Although the GrG was unchanged in the majority of cases, grading of IDCP altered the final GrG in a significant minority of biopsies in this series, and often by more than one grade, which may have important implications for risk categorisation of individual patients. These findings highlight the need for consensus on grading of IDCP in routine practice, and the optimal method of incorporating IDCP into clinical risk models for patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan Prendeville
- Department of Histopathology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|