1
|
Southworth E, Thomson JP, Croy I, Churchman M, Arends MJ, Hollis RL, Gourley C, Herrington CS. Whole exome sequencing reveals diverse genomic relatedness between paired concurrent endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. Eur J Cancer 2024; 208:114205. [PMID: 38986422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Concurrent non-serous endometrial and ovarian tumours are often managed clinically as two separate primary tumours, but almost all exhibit evidence of a genomic relationship. METHODOLOGY This study investigates the extent of relatedness using whole exome sequencing, which was performed on paired non-serous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas from 27 patients with concurrent tumours in a cohort with detailed clinicopathological annotation. Four whole exome sequencing-derived parameters (mutation, mutational burden, mutational signatures and mutant allele tumour heterogeneity scores) were used to develop a novel unsupervised model for the assessment of genomic similarity to infer genomic relatedness of paired tumours. RESULTS This novel model demonstrated genomic relatedness across all four parameters in all tumour pairs. Mutations in PTEN, ARID1A, CTNNB1, KMT2D and PIK3CA occurred most frequently and 24 of 27 (89 %) tumour pairs shared identical mutations in at least one of these genes, with all pairs sharing mutations in a number of other genes. Ovarian endometriosis, CTNNB1 exon 3 mutation, and progression and death from disease were present across the similarity ranking. Mismatch repair deficiency was associated with less genomically similar pairs. DISCUSSION Although there was diversity across the cohort, the presence of genomic similarity in all paired tumours supports the hypothesis that concurrent non-serous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas are genomically related and may have arisen from a common origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Southworth
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - John P Thomson
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Ian Croy
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Michael Churchman
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Mark J Arends
- Edinburgh Pathology, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Robert L Hollis
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - C Simon Herrington
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; Edinburgh Pathology, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yamakado T, Tanei ZI, Ishikawa Y, Kimura T, Ishida Y, Tanaka S. Sporadic gastric foveolar-type adenoma with morular metaplasia. Pathol Int 2024. [PMID: 39016619 DOI: 10.1111/pin.13462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuhiro Yamakado
- Department of Pathology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
- Center for Neuromuscular Disease, Child Health and Development, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Zen-Ichi Tanei
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yuka Ishikawa
- Center for Neuromuscular Disease, Child Health and Development, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Taichi Kimura
- Department of Pathology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yusuke Ishida
- Department of Pathology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Shinya Tanaka
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
- Institute for Chemical Reaction Design and Discovery (WPI-ICReDD), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Davies KD, Smith LP, Guimaraes-Young A, Corr BR, Fisher CM, Guntupalli SR, Berning AA, Post MD, Pino D, Aisner DL, Wolsky RJ. Prospective Clinical Prognostication of Endometrial Carcinomas Based on Next-Generation Sequencing and Immunohistochemistry-Real-World Implementation and Results at a Tertiary Care Center. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2024; 43:335-348. [PMID: 37922951 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Based on findings from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer algorithm, endometrial carcinoma can now be stratified into 4 prognostically distinct subgroups based on molecular alterations and immunohistochemical (IHC) aberrations. In this study, we describe the de novo adoption and clinical reporting of prognostic subgroup classification based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) and IHC analyses of all endometrial carcinoma resections at a single institution, framed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment model. Results from the first 13 months show 188 tumors underwent analysis by a combination of IHC and a medium-sized (56 analyzed genes) NGS-based assay. All cases were assigned as either POLE ( POLE -mutated) (5.3%), mismatch repair deficient (27.7%), no specific molecular profile (45.7%), or p53 abnormal (21.3%) inclusive of multiple-classifier cases. NGS-based analysis revealed additional distinctions among the subgroups, including reduced levels of PI3K pathway activation in the p53 abnormal subgroup, an increased rate of CTNNB1 activating mutation in the no specific molecular profile subgroup, and lower TP53 mutation variant allele frequencies in POLE and mismatch repair deficient subgroups compared with the p53 abnormal subgroup. Overall, we describe the testing protocol, reporting, and results of a combination of NGS and IHC to prospectively prognosticate endometrial carcinomas at a single tertiary care center.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen M, Wang D, Xu Y, Yang C. Upregulation of sperm-associated antigen 5 expression in endometrial carcinoma was associated with poor prognosis and immune dysregulation, and promoted cell migration and invasion. Sci Rep 2024; 14:13415. [PMID: 38862557 PMCID: PMC11166665 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64354-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Sperm-associated antigen 5 (SPAG5) regulates cancer cell invasion and is involved in the progression of many cancers. However, the role of SPAG5 in endometrial carcinoma (EC) is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of SPAG5 in EC and its potential molecular mechanism. The UALCAN tool and cBioPortal were used to analyze the expression and alterations of SPAG5 in EC, respectively. OncoLnc was used for survival analysis. We analyzed the effects of SPAG5 on immune cell infiltration and the expression levels of immune checkpoints. We also overexpressed and knocked down SPAG5 in EC cells to explore the effect of SPAG5 regulation on migration, invasion, apoptosis, and the cell cycle of EC cells. We found that SPAG5 was overexpressed and the SPAG5 gene was often mutated in EC. High SPAG5 expression was significantly associated with poor overall survival in patients with EC. SPAG5 also affected the level of immune cell infiltration in the TIME and the expression of immune checkpoints lymphocyte activating 3 (LAG3) and T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) in patients with EC. It may also be involved in the immunotherapy response in these patients. In vitro experiments showed that SPAG5 promotes cancer cell migration and invasion. In conclusion, this study lays the foundation for further understanding the molecular mechanisms of EC involving SPAG5 and contributes to diagnosing and managing this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manru Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Dan Wang
- Department of BigData, Beijing Medintell Bioinformatic Technology Co., LTD, Beijing, China
| | - Yanyu Xu
- Department of BigData, Beijing Medintell Bioinformatic Technology Co., LTD, Beijing, China
| | - Chenggang Yang
- Department of BigData, Beijing Medintell Bioinformatic Technology Co., LTD, Beijing, China.
- Department of Research and Development, Gu'an Bojian Bio-Technology Co., LTD, Langfang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ordulu Z, Watkins J, Ritterhouse LL. Molecular Pathology of Ovarian Epithelial Neoplasms: Predictive, Prognostic, and Emerging Biomarkers. Clin Lab Med 2024; 44:199-219. [PMID: 38821641 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
This review focuses on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular biomarkers in ovarian epithelial neoplasms in the context of their morphologic classifications. Currently, most clinically actionable molecular findings are reported in high-grade serous carcinomas; however, the data on less common tumor types are rapidly accelerating. Overall, the advances in genomic knowledge over the last decade highlight the significance of integrating molecular findings with morphology in ovarian epithelial tumors for a wide-range of clinical applications, from assistance in diagnosis to predicting response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zehra Ordulu
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02124, USA
| | - Jaclyn Watkins
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02124, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yin Z, Wang M. Real-world study of lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2024; 50:663-670. [PMID: 38332458 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence on the role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is limited to less common histology subtypes of epithelial advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. Patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer were included and divided into two groups based on whether they received retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. The primary outcomes are overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS Among the 10 184 included patients, 5472 patients underwent debulking surgery with retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, while 4712 patients only underwent debulking surgery. No differences were found in the baseline information between the two groups after propensity score matching. Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy during debulking surgery was associated with improved 5-year OS (43.41% vs. 37.49%, p < 0.001) and 5-year CSS (46.43% vs. 41.79%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis further validate the retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy increased the 5-year OS and CSS in patients with high-grade serous cancer. Although the results were not validated in the less common ovarian cancer (including endometrial cancer, mucinous cancer, low-grade serous cancer, and clear cell cancer), the tendency showed patients with the above four subtypes may benefit from the lymphadenectomy which is restricted for small sample size after propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy could further improve the survival outcome during debulking surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The conclusion was affected by the histology subtypes of ovarian cancer and further studies are needed to validate the conclusion in less common ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziran Yin
- University Hospital Leipzig and Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ming Wang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University. Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gatius S, Matias Guiu X, Davidson B. Molecular features for timely cancer diagnosis and treatment - tumors of the ovary, fallopian tube and endometrium. Virchows Arch 2024; 484:339-351. [PMID: 38099957 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03710-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Gynecologic pathology has moved, within only a few years, from being a diagnostic area devoid of molecular testing into a diagnostic discipline in which such analyses are becoming routine. The direct relevance of molecular characterization to the choice of treatment of patients with carcinomas originating in both the uterus and adnexae makes it likely that such testing will only expand along with our understanding of the molecular make-up of these tumors. As a consequence, gynecologic pathologists have become an integral part of patient management, rather than lab personnel providing external services.In parallel, molecular testing is expanding as a tool for diagnosing rare tumors affecting these organs, including soft tissue tumors, sex cord-stromal tumors and germ cell tumors, as well as other rare entities. Increased knowledge in this area bears directly on the ability to diagnose these tumors in a reproducible manner, as well as recognize and consult on genetic diseases. Hopefully, despite the inherent difficulty in studying rare cancers, it will also translate into new therapeutic options for the malignant ones among these rare cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Gatius
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, Lleida, Spain.
| | - Xavier Matias Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, Lleida, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ben Davidson
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital Montebello, Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310, Oslo, Norway.
- University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, N-0316, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li JJ, Lee CS. The Role of the AT-Rich Interaction Domain 1A Gene ( ARID1A) in Human Carcinogenesis. Genes (Basel) 2023; 15:5. [PMID: 38275587 PMCID: PMC10815128 DOI: 10.3390/genes15010005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
The switch/sucrose non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) (SWI/SNF) complex uses energy from ATP hydrolysis to mobilise nucleosomes on chromatin. Components of SWI/SNF are mutated in 20% of all human cancers, of which mutations in AT-rich binding domain protein 1A (ARID1A) are the most common. ARID1A is mutated in nearly half of ovarian clear cell carcinoma and around one-third of endometrial and ovarian carcinomas of the endometrioid type. This review will examine in detail the molecular functions of ARID1A, including its role in cell cycle control, enhancer regulation, and the prevention of telomerase activity. ARID1A has key roles in the maintenance of genomic integrity, including DNA double-stranded break repair, DNA decatenation, integrity of the cohesin complex, and reduction in replication stress, and is also involved in mismatch repair. The role of ARID1A loss in the pathogenesis of some of the most common human cancers is discussed, with a particular emphasis on gynaecological cancers. Finally, several promising synthetic lethal strategies, which exploit the specific vulnerabilities of ARID1A-deficient cancer cells, are briefly mentioned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Jing Li
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia;
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Cheok Soon Lee
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia;
- Discipline of Pathology, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ye W, Wang Q, Lu Y. Construction and validation of prognostic nomogram and clinical characteristics for ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: an SEER-based cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:13607-13618. [PMID: 37515614 PMCID: PMC10590339 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05172-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) is the second most commonly occurring ovarian epithelial malignancy, but the associated prognostic factors remain obscure. This study aimed to analyze independent prognostic factors for patients with OEC and to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of these patients. METHODS Clinical information of patients with OEC (2000-2019) was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors, and nomogram models were constructed using independent prognostic factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to verify the accuracy and validity of the nomogram. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the differences in OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among subgroups. RESULTS A total of 4628 patients with OEC were included, being divided into training (n = 3238) and validation (n = 1390) sets (7:3 ratio). On multivariate Cox analysis, AJCC stage, age, tumor size, differentiation, chemotherapy, and lymph node resection were significant predictors of survival outcomes (P < 0.05). Resection of 1-3 lymph nodes in early-stage OEC patients did not significantly prolong OS (P > 0.05), but resection of ≥ 4 lymph nodes in early-stage improved OS and CSS (P < 0.05). The OS of early-stage patients was not related to whether or not they received chemotherapy (P > 0.05). Lymph node resection and chemotherapy significantly improved the prognosis of patients with advanced OEC (P < 0.05). The c-index of nomogram prediction model was 0.782. ROC with good discrimination, calibration plots with high consistency, and DCA with large net benefit rate result in large clinical value. CONCLUSION AJCC stage, differentiation, tumor size, age, chemotherapy, and lymph node dissection were prognostic factors of OEC. The constructed nomogram prediction model can effectively predict the prognosis of OEC patients and improve the accuracy of clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanlu Ye
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110003, Liaoning, China
| | - Qing Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110003, Liaoning, China
| | - Yanming Lu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110003, Liaoning, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Heinze K, Cairns ES, Thornton S, Harris B, Milne K, Grube M, Meyer C, Karnezis AN, Fereday S, Garsed DW, Leung SC, Chiu DS, Moubarak M, Harter P, Heitz F, McAlpine JN, DeFazio A, Bowtell DD, Goode EL, Pike M, Ramus SJ, Pearce CL, Staebler A, Köbel M, Kommoss S, Talhouk A, Nelson BH, Anglesio MS. The Prognostic Effect of Immune Cell Infiltration Depends on Molecular Subtype in Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3471-3483. [PMID: 37339172 PMCID: PMC10472107 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is the second most-common type of ovarian carcinoma, comprising 10%-20% of cases. Recently, the study of ENOC has benefitted from comparisons to endometrial carcinomas including defining ENOC with four prognostic molecular subtypes. Each subtype suggests differential mechanisms of progression, although tumor-initiating events remain elusive. There is evidence that the ovarian microenvironment may be critical to early lesion establishment and progression. However, while immune infiltrates have been well studied in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, studies in ENOC are limited. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We report on 210 ENOC, with clinical follow-up and molecular subtype annotation. Using multiplex IHC and immunofluorescence, we examine the prevalence of T-cell lineage, B-cell lineage, macrophages, and populations with programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death-ligand 1 across subtypes of ENOC. RESULTS Immune cell infiltrates in tumor epithelium and stroma showed higher densities in ENOC subtypes with known high mutation burden (POLEmut and MMRd). While molecular subtypes were prognostically significant, immune infiltrates were not (overall survival P > 0.2). Analysis by molecular subtype revealed that immune cell density was prognostically significant in only the no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype, where immune infiltrates lacking B cells (TILB minus) had inferior outcome (disease-specific survival: HR, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-14.7; P < 0.05). Similar to endometrial carcinomas, molecular subtype stratification was generally superior to immune response in predicting outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Subtype stratification is critical for better understanding of ENOC, in particular the distribution and prognostic significance of immune cell infiltrates. The role of B cells in the immune response within NSMP tumors warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolin Heinze
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Evan S. Cairns
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Shelby Thornton
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Bronwyn Harris
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Katy Milne
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Charlotte Meyer
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anthony N. Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dale W. Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samuel C.Y. Leung
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Derek S. Chiu
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Malak Moubarak
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
- Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jessica N. McAlpine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anna DeFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David D.L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Malcolm Pike
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
| | - C. Leigh Pearce
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Brad H. Nelson
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li Y, Du P, Zeng H, Wei Y, Fu H, Zhong X, Ma X. Integrative models of histopathological images and multi-omics data predict prognosis in endometrial carcinoma. PeerJ 2023; 11:e15674. [PMID: 37583914 PMCID: PMC10424667 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to predict the molecular features of endometrial carcinoma (EC) and the overall survival (OS) of EC patients using histopathological imaging. Methods The patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were separated into the training set (n = 215) and test set (n = 214) in proportion of 1:1. By analyzing quantitative histological image features and setting up random forest model verified by cross-validation, we constructed prognostic models for OS. The model performance is evaluated with the time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (AUC) over the test set. Results Prognostic models based on histopathological imaging features (HIF) predicted OS in the test set (5-year AUC = 0.803). The performance of combining histopathology and omics transcends that of genomics, transcriptomics, or proteomics alone. Additionally, multi-dimensional omics data, including HIF, genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, attained the largest AUCs of 0.866, 0.869, and 0.856 at years 1, 3, and 5, respectively, showcasing the highest discrepancy in survival (HR = 18.347, 95% CI [11.09-25.65], p < 0.001). Conclusions The results of this experiment indicated that the complementary features of HIF could improve the prognostic performance of EC patients. Moreover, the integration of HIF and multi-dimensional omics data might ameliorate survival prediction and risk stratification in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yueyi Li
- Department of Targeting Therapy & Immunology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Peixin Du
- Laboratory of Integrative Medicine, Clinical Research Center for Breast, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Hao Zeng
- Laboratory of Integrative Medicine, Clinical Research Center for Breast, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yuhao Wei
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Haoxuan Fu
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Xi Zhong
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xuelei Ma
- Department of Targeting Therapy & Immunology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pizarro D, Romero I, Pérez-Mies B, Redondo A, Caniego-Casas T, Carretero-Barrio I, Cristóbal E, Gutiérrez-Pecharromán A, Santaballa A, D'Angelo E, Hardisson D, Vieites B, Matías-Guiu X, Estévez P, Guerra E, Prat J, Poveda A, López-Guerrero JA, Palacios J. The Prognostic Significance of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, PD-L1, BRCA Mutation Status and Tumor Mutational Burden in Early-Stage High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma-A Study by the Spanish Group for Ovarian Cancer Research (GEICO). Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11183. [PMID: 37446361 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241311183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Early stages are under-represented in studies on the molecular and immune features of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and specific studies focused on early-stage HGSOC are required for a better prognostic stratification and to personalize chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of CD8+ and CD4+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumoral cell PD-L1 expression, BRCA mutational status and tumor mutation burden (TMB) in early-stage HGSOC. A retrospective study was performed on stage I and II HGSOC from the Molecular Reclassification of Early Stages of Ovarian Cancer (RECLAMO) cohort from the Spanish Group of Ovarian Cancer Research (GEICO). Centralized histological typing was performed based on morphological and immunohistochemical features. Intraepithelial (i) and stromal (s) CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and PD-L1 were evaluated on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and TMB were analyzed in tumor DNA using next-generation sequencing. The study included 124 tumors. High iCD8+ (>20 TILs/core), low/intermediate CD4+ (<20 TILs/core) and high CD8+/CD4+ ratio (>35/core) were associated with favorable outcomes. Tumor cell PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 1) was present in only 8% of tumors. In total, 11 (16%) and 6 (9%) out of 69 HGSOC tested carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Median TMB of 40 tumors analyzed was 5.04 mutations/Mb and only 6 tumors had 10 or more mutations/Mb. BRCA status and TMB were not associated with TILs or prognosis. When compared with studies on advanced HGSOC, our results suggested that prognostic variables differed according to stage and that more studies focused on early stages of HGSOC are needed to better stratify these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Pizarro
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Romero
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, 46009 Valencia, Spain
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
| | - Belén Pérez-Mies
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | - Andrés Redondo
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz, IdiPAZ, 28046 Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Tamara Caniego-Casas
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene Carretero-Barrio
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | - Eva Cristóbal
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ana Santaballa
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Emanuela D'Angelo
- Department of Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences, University "G.D'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, 66013 Chieti, Italy
| | - David Hardisson
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Pathology Department, University Hospital La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Begoña Vieites
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Xavier Matías-Guiu
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Pathology and Medical Oncology Departments, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, IRBLLEIDA, University of Lleida, 25003 Lleida, Spain
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Purificación Estévez
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Oncology Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
- Seville Biomedical Research Institute (IBIS), 41013 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Eva Guerra
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Oncology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Prat
- Pathology Department, Emeritus Faculty, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrés Poveda
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Initia Oncología, Hospital Quironsalud Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - José Antonio López-Guerrero
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, 46009 Valencia, Spain
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
| | - José Palacios
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Köbel M, Kang E, Weir A, Rambau PF, Lee C, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, Meagher NS, Riggan MJ, Alsop J, Anglesio MS, Beckmann MW, Bisinotto C, Boisen M, Boros J, Brand AH, Brooks‐Wilson A, Carney ME, Coulson P, Courtney‐Brooks M, Cushing‐Haugen KL, Cybulski C, Deen S, El‐Bahrawy MA, Elishaev E, Erber R, Fereday S, Fischer A, Gayther SA, Barquin‐Garcia A, Gentry‐Maharaj A, Gilks CB, Gronwald H, Grube M, Harnett PR, Harris HR, Hartkopf AD, Hartmann A, Hein A, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Huang Y, Jakubowska A, Jimenez‐Linan M, Jones ME, Kennedy CJ, Kluz T, Koziak JM, Lesnock J, Lester J, Lubiński J, Longacre TA, Lycke M, Mateoiu C, McCauley BM, McGuire V, Ney B, Olawaiye A, Orsulic S, Osorio A, Paz‐Ares L, Ramón y Cajal T, Rothstein JH, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Shah M, Sharma R, Sherman ME, Shvetsov YB, Singh N, Steed H, Storr SJ, Talhouk A, Traficante N, Wang C, Whittemore AS, Widschwendter M, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Benitez J, Berchuck A, Bowtell DD, Candido dos Reis FJ, Campbell I, Cook LS, DeFazio A, Doherty JA, Fasching PA, Fortner RT, García MJ, Goodman MT, Goode EL, Gronwald J, Huntsman DG, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Kommoss S, Le ND, Martin SG, Menon U, Modugno F, Pharoah PDP, Schildkraut JM, Sieh W, Staebler A, Sundfeldt K, Swerdlow AJ, Ramus SJ, Brenton JD. p53 and ovarian carcinoma survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study. J Pathol Clin Res 2023; 9:208-222. [PMID: 36948887 PMCID: PMC10073933 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
Our objective was to test whether p53 expression status is associated with survival for women diagnosed with the most common ovarian carcinoma histotypes (high-grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) using a large multi-institutional cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium. p53 expression was assessed on 6,678 cases represented on tissue microarrays from 25 participating OTTA study sites using a previously validated immunohistochemical (IHC) assay as a surrogate for the presence and functional effect of TP53 mutations. Three abnormal expression patterns (overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic) and the normal (wild type) pattern were recorded. Survival analyses were performed by histotype. The frequency of abnormal p53 expression was 93.4% (4,630/4,957) in HGSC compared to 11.9% (116/973) in EC and 11.5% (86/748) in CCC. In HGSC, there were no differences in overall survival across the abnormal p53 expression patterns. However, in EC and CCC, abnormal p53 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for women diagnosed with EC in multivariate analysis compared to normal p53 as the reference (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-3.47, p = 0.0011) and with CCC (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.22, p = 0.012). Abnormal p53 was also associated with shorter overall survival in The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II EC and CCC. Our study provides further evidence that functional groups of TP53 mutations assessed by abnormal surrogate p53 IHC patterns are not associated with survival in HGSC. In contrast, we validate that abnormal p53 IHC is a strong independent prognostic marker for EC and demonstrate for the first time an independent prognostic association of abnormal p53 IHC with overall survival in patients with CCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
| | - Eun‐Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
| | - Ashley Weir
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical ResearchParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Peter F Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
- Pathology DepartmentCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences‐BugandoMwanzaTanzania
| | - Cheng‐Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABCanada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Nicola S Meagher
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Marjorie J Riggan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE)University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Christiani Bisinotto
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical SchoolUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
| | - Michelle Boisen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Alison H Brand
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Michael E Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of MedicineUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Madeleine Courtney‐Brooks
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Kara L Cushing‐Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWAUSA
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Suha Deen
- Department of HistopathologyNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical CentreNottinghamUK
| | - Mona A El‐Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and ReproductionImperial College London, Hammersmith HospitalLondonUK
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - AOCS Group
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Anna Fischer
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | | | - Aleksandra Gentry‐Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials UnitInstitute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Helena Gronwald
- Department of Propaedeutics, Physical Diagnostics and Dental PhysiotherapyPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Paul R Harnett
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer CentreWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Holly R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWAUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWAUSA
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital of UlmUlmGermany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Brenda Y Hernandez
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Yajue Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic DiagnosticsPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | | | - Michael E Jones
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsInstitute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow UniversityRzeszówPoland
| | | | - Jaime Lesnock
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Teri A Longacre
- Department of PathologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | - Maria Lycke
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyInstitute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | | | - Bryan M McCauley
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | - Britta Ney
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Ana Osorio
- Genetics Service, Fundación Jiménez DíazMadridSpain
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
| | - Luis Paz‐Ares
- H12O‐CNIO Lung Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
- Oncology DepartmentHospital Universitario 12 de OctubreMadridSpain
| | | | - Joseph H Rothstein
- Department of Genetics and Genomic SciencesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Population Health Science and PolicyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Minouk J Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Mark E Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo ClinicJacksonvilleFLUSA
| | - Yurii B Shvetsov
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABCanada
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, North Zone, Alberta Health ServicesEdmontonABCanada
| | - Sarah J Storr
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research CentreBiodiscovery Institute, University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE)University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
- Department of Biomedical Data ScienceStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | | | - Lynne R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Javier Benitez
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - David D Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Francisco J Candido dos Reis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical SchoolUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Linda S Cook
- Epidemiology, School of Public HealthUniversity of ColoradoAuroraCOUSA
- Community Health Sciences, University of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUTUSA
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of NorwayOsloNorway
| | - María J García
- Computational Oncology Group, Structural Biology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cedars‐Sinai Cancer, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research CentreVancouverBCCanada
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Division of Acute Disease Epidemiology, South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlColumbiaSCUSA
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer AgencyVancouverBCCanada
| | - Stewart G Martin
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research CentreBiodiscovery Institute, University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials UnitInstitute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Public HealthPittsburghPAUSA
- Women's Cancer Research CenterMagee‐Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer CenterPittsburghPAUSA
| | - Paul DP Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterWest HollywoodCAUSA
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Genetics and Genomic SciencesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Population Health Science and PolicyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical ScienceSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Division of Breast Cancer ResearchThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Talia KL, McCluggage WG. The diverse morphology and immunophenotype of ovarian endometrioid carcinomas. Pathology 2023; 55:269-286. [PMID: 36759286 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Endometrioid carcinoma (EC) accounts for approximately 10-12% of ovarian epithelial malignancies but compared to its relative frequency, results in a disproportionate number of diagnostically difficult cases with potential for misdiagnosis. In this review the protean and diverse morphologies of ovarian EC are discussed, including 'metaplastic' changes, EC with spindle cell differentiation/corded and hyalinised features and EC with sex cord-like formations. The propensity for 'transdifferentiation' in ovarian ECs is also discussed, one example being the association with a somatically derived yolk sac tumour. Although immunohistochemistry may be extremely useful in diagnosing EC and in distinguishing between EC and other ovarian epithelial malignancies, metastatic neoplasms and sex cord-stromal tumours, this review also discusses the propensity for ovarian EC to exhibit an aberrant immunophenotype which may compound diagnostic uncertainty. The genomic characteristics of these tumours and the recent 'incorporation' of seromucinous carcinoma into the EC category are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen L Talia
- Royal Children's Hospital, Royal Women's Hospital and Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hollis RL. Molecular characteristics and clinical behaviour of epithelial ovarian cancers. Cancer Lett 2023; 555:216057. [PMID: 36627048 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian carcinoma (OC) is an umbrella term for multiple distinct diseases (histotypes), each with their own developmental origins, clinical behaviour and molecular profile. Accordingly, OC management is progressing away from a one-size-fits all approach, toward more molecularly-driven, histotype-specific management strategies. Our knowledge of driver events in high grade serous OC, the most common histotype, has led to major advances in treatments, including PARP inhibitor use. However, these agents are not suitable for all patients, most notably for many of those with rare OC histotypes. Identification of additional targeted therapeutic strategies will require a detailed understanding of the molecular landscape in each OC histotype. Until recently, tumour profiling studies in rare histotypes were sparse; however, significant advances have been made over the last decade. In particular, reports of genomic characterisation in endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous and low grade serous OC have significantly expanded our understanding of mutational events in these tumour types. Nonetheless, substantial knowledge gaps remain. This review summarises our current understanding of each histotype, highlighting recent advances in these unique diseases and outlining immediate research priorities for accelerating progress toward improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Hollis
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gilks CB, Selinger CI, Davidson B, Köbel M, Ledermann JA, Lim D, Malpica A, Mikami Y, Singh N, Srinivasan R, Vang R, Lax SF, McCluggage WG. Data Set for the Reporting of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S119-S142. [PMID: 36305537 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The move toward consistent and comprehensive surgical pathology reports for cancer resection specimens has been a key development in supporting evidence-based patient management and consistent cancer staging. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) previously developed a data set for reporting of the ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinomas which was published in 2015. In this paper, we provide an update on this data set, as a second edition, that reflects changes in the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumours as well as some other minor modifications. The data set has been developed by a panel of internationally recognized expert pathologists and a clinician and consists of "core" and "noncore" elements to be included in surgical pathology reports, with detailed commentary to guide users, including references. This data set replaces the widely used first edition, and will facilitate consistent and accurate case reporting, data collection for quality assurance and research, and allow for comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters between different populations.
Collapse
|
17
|
Prieto-Potin I, Idrovo F, Suárez-Gauthier A, Díaz-Blázquez M, Astilleros-Blanco de Córdova L, Chamizo C, Zazo S, Carvajal N, López-Sánchez A, Pérez-Buira S, Aúz-Alexandre CL, Manso R, Plaza-Sánchez J, de Lucas-López V, Pérez-González N, Martín-Valle S, Cristóbal I, Casado V, García-Foncillas J, Rojo F. Comprehensive Approach to Genomic and Immune Profiling: Insights of a Real-World Experience in Gynecological Tumors. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12081903. [PMID: 36010253 PMCID: PMC9406465 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Gynecological cancer accounts for an elevated incidence worldwide requiring responsiveness regarding its care. The comprehensive genomic approach agrees with the classification of certain tumor types. We evaluated 49 patients with gynecological tumors undergoing high-throughput sequencing to explore whether identifying alterations in cancer-associated genes could characterize concrete histological subtypes. We performed immune examination and analyzed subsequent clinical impact. We found 220 genomic aberrations mostly distributed as single nucleotide variants (SNV, 77%). Only 3% were classified as variants of strong clinical significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 of ovarian high-grade serous (HGSC) and uterine endometrioid carcinoma. TP53 and BRCA1 occurred in 72% and 28% of HGSC. Cervical squamous cell carcinoma was entirely HPV-associated and mutations occurred in PIK3CA (60%), as well as in uterine serous carcinoma (80%). Alterations were seen in PTEN (71%) and PIK3CA (60%) of uterine endometrioid carcinoma. Elevated programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was associated with high TILs. Either PD-L1 augmented in deficient mis-matched repair (MMR) proteins or POLE mutated cases when compared to a proficient MMR state. An 18% received genotype-guided therapy and a 4% immunotherapy. The description of tumor subtypes is plausible through high-throughput sequencing by recognizing clinically relevant alterations. Additional concomitant assessment of immune biomarkers identifies candidates for immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iván Prieto-Potin
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Franklin Idrovo
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Suárez-Gauthier
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - María Díaz-Blázquez
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Chamizo
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Sandra Zazo
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Nerea Carvajal
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Almudena López-Sánchez
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Sandra Pérez-Buira
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Laura Aúz-Alexandre
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebeca Manso
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Jenifer Plaza-Sánchez
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Virginia de Lucas-López
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Nuria Pérez-González
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara Martín-Valle
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ion Cristóbal
- Cancer Unit for Research on Novel Therapeutic Targets, Oncohealth Institute, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Translational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Victoria Casado
- Translational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús García-Foncillas
- Cancer Unit for Research on Novel Therapeutic Targets, Oncohealth Institute, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Translational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Federico Rojo
- Department of Pathology, CIBERONC, UAM, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital Health Research Institute, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rabban JT, Chen LM, Devine WP. Homologous Recombination Deficiency and Ovarian Cancer Treatment Decisions: Practical Implications for Pathologists for Tumor Typing and Reporting. Surg Pathol Clin 2022; 15:219-234. [PMID: 35715159 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Clinical testing for homologous repair (HR) deficiency (HRD) in ovarian cancers has emerged as a means to tailor the use of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy to the patients most likely to respond. The currently available HRD tests evaluate tumor tissue for genomic evidence of impairment of the HR pathway of DNA damage repair, which, if present, renders the tumor vulnerable to PARP inhibitors in conjunction with platinum chemotherapy. Germline or somatic mutation of BRCA1/2 is a major contributor HRD. Thus, tubo-ovarian/peritoneal high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is enriched by HRD. After highlighting the general concepts underlying HRD testing and PARP inhibitor therapy, this review discusses practical roles for pathologists to maximize the opportunities for eligible patients with ovarian cancer to benefit from HRD testing, chiefly by applying contemporary diagnostic criteria for ovarian cancer tumor typing and navigating through potential pitfalls of tumor types that may mimic HGSC but are unlikely to harbor HRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph T Rabban
- Surgical Pathology Division, Pathology Department, University of California San Francisco, 1825 4th Street, M-2359, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| | - Lee-May Chen
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - W Patrick Devine
- Molecular Pathology Division, Pathology Department, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Heinze K, Nazeran TM, Lee S, Krämer P, Cairns ES, Chiu DS, Leung SC, Kang EY, Meagher NS, Kennedy CJ, Boros J, Kommoss F, Vollert HW, Heitze F, du Bois A, Harter P, Grube M, Kraemer B, Staebler A, Kommoss FK, Heublein S, Sinn HP, Singh N, Laslavic A, Elishaev E, Olawaiye A, Moysich K, Modugno F, Sharma R, Brand AH, Harnett PR, DeFazio A, Fortner RT, Lubinski J, Lener M, Tołoczko-Grabarek A, Cybulski C, Gronwald H, Gronwald J, Coulson P, El-Bahrawy MA, Jones ME, Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Gorringe KL, Campbell I, Cook L, Gayther SA, Carney ME, Shvetsov YB, Hernandez BY, Wilkens LR, Goodman MT, Mateoiu C, Linder A, Sundfeldt K, Kelemen LE, Gentry-Maharaj A, Widschwendter M, Menon U, Bolton KL, Alsop J, Shah M, Jimenez-Linan M, Pharoah PD, Brenton JD, Cushing-Haugen KL, Harris HR, Doherty JA, Gilks B, Ghatage P, Huntsman DG, Nelson GS, Tinker AV, Lee CH, Goode EL, Nelson BH, Ramus SJ, Kommoss S, Talhouk A, Köbel M, Anglesio MS. Validated biomarker assays confirm that ARID1A loss is confounded with MMR deficiency, CD8 + TIL infiltration, and provides no independent prognostic value in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas. J Pathol 2022; 256:388-401. [PMID: 34897700 PMCID: PMC9544180 DOI: 10.1002/path.5849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
ARID1A (BAF250a) is a component of the SWI/SNF chromatin modifying complex, plays an important tumour suppressor role, and is considered prognostic in several malignancies. However, in ovarian carcinomas there are contradictory reports on its relationship to outcome, immune response, and correlation with clinicopathological features. We assembled a series of 1623 endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas, including 1078 endometrioid (ENOC) and 545 clear cell (CCOC) ovarian carcinomas, through combining resources of the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) Consortium, the Canadian Ovarian Unified Experimental Resource (COEUR), local, and collaborative networks. Validated immunohistochemical surrogate assays for ARID1A mutations were applied to all samples. We investigated associations between ARID1A loss/mutation, clinical features, outcome, CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8+ TILs), and DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). ARID1A loss was observed in 42% of CCOCs and 25% of ENOCs. We found no associations between ARID1A loss and outcomes, stage, age, or CD8+ TIL status in CCOC. Similarly, we found no association with outcome or stage in endometrioid cases. In ENOC, ARID1A loss was more prevalent in younger patients (p = 0.012) and was associated with MMRd (p < 0.001) and the presence of CD8+ TILs (p = 0.008). Consistent with MMRd being causative of ARID1A mutations, in a subset of ENOCs we also observed an association with ARID1A loss-of-function mutation as a result of small indels (p = 0.035, versus single nucleotide variants). In ENOC, the association with ARID1A loss, CD8+ TILs, and age appears confounded by MMRd status. Although this observation does not explicitly rule out a role for ARID1A influence on CD8+ TIL infiltration in ENOC, given current knowledge regarding MMRd, it seems more likely that effects are dominated by the hypermutation phenotype. This large dataset with consistently applied biomarker assessment now provides a benchmark for the prevalence of ARID1A loss-of-function mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers and brings clarity to the prognostic significance. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolin Heinze
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Tayyebeh M. Nazeran
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sandra Lee
- University of Calgary, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Pauline Krämer
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University Hospital Tübingen, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Evan S. Cairns
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Derek S. Chiu
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samuel C.Y. Leung
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Eun Young Kang
- University of Calgary, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Nicola S. Meagher
- University of New South Wales, Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Catherine J. Kennedy
- The University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jessica Boros
- The University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Friedrich Kommoss
- Medizin Campus Bodensee, Institute of Pathology, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Hans-Walter Vollert
- Medizin Campus Bodensee, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Florian Heitze
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Marcel Grube
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University Hospital Tübingen, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Kraemer
- University Hospital Tübingen, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Annette Staebler
- University Hospital Tübingen, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Felix K.F. Kommoss
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine Heublein
- University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Naveena Singh
- Barts Health National Health Service Trust, Department of Pathology, London, UK
| | - Angela Laslavic
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, PA, USA
| | - Alex Olawaiye
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, PA, USA
| | - Kirsten Moysich
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, PA, USA
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Westmead Hospital, Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison H. Brand
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul R. Harnett
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Renée T. Fortner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marcin Lener
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Tołoczko-Grabarek
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Helena Gronwald
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Propaedeutics, Physical Diagnostics and Dental Physiotherapy, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Centre, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Penny Coulson
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, London, UK
| | - Mona A El-Bahrawy
- Imperial College London, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michael E. Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, London, UK
| | - Minouk J. Schoemaker
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, London, UK
| | - Anthony J. Swerdlow
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Breast Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Kylie L. Gorringe
- The University of Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Women’s Cancer Program, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ian Campbell
- The University of Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Research Division, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Linda Cook
- The University of New Mexico, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Simon A. Gayther
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael E. Carney
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, HI, USA
| | - Yurii B. Shvetsov
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Epidemiology Program, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | | | - Lynne R. Wilkens
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Epidemiology Program, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Marc T. Goodman
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Constantina Mateoiu
- Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Linder
- Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Linda E. Kelemen
- Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, UK
- University College London, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, London, UK
| | | | - Usha Menon
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, UK
| | - Kelly L. Bolton
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Division of Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mitul Shah
- Addenbrookes Hospital, Department of Histopathology, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - James D. Brenton
- University of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kara L. Cushing-Haugen
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Holly R. Harris
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Doherty
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Blake Gilks
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- University of Calgary, Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - David G. Huntsman
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gregg S. Nelson
- University of Calgary, Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Anna V. Tinker
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Department of Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- University of Alberta, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brad H. Nelson
- Trev & Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- University of New South Wales, Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- University Hospital Tübingen, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Aline Talhouk
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- University of Calgary, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, and BC Cancer. British Columbia’s Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE), Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Similä-Maarala J, Soovares P, Pasanen A, Ahvenainen T, Vahteristo P, Bützow R, Lassus H. TCGA molecular classification in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas: Novel data on clear cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 165:577-584. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
21
|
The Evolution of Ovarian Carcinoma Subclassification. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020416. [PMID: 35053578 PMCID: PMC8774015 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Historically, cancers presenting with their main tumor mass in the ovary have been classified as ovarian carcinomas (a concise term for epithelial ovarian cancer) and treated with a one-size-fits-all approach. Over the last two decades, a growing molecular understanding established that ovarian carcinomas consist of several distinct histologic types, which practically represent different diseases. Further research is now delineating several molecular subtypes within each histotype. This histotype/molecular subtype subclassification provides a framework of grouping tumors based on molecular similarities for research, clinical trial inclusion and future patient management. Abstract The phenotypically informed histotype classification remains the mainstay of ovarian carcinoma subclassification. Histotypes of ovarian epithelial neoplasms have evolved with each edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours. The current fifth edition (2020) lists five principal histotypes: high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), mucinous carcinoma (MC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC) and clear cell carcinoma (CCC). Since histotypes arise from different cells of origin, cell lineage-specific diagnostic immunohistochemical markers and histotype-specific oncogenic alterations can confirm the morphological diagnosis. A four-marker immunohistochemical panel (WT1/p53/napsin A/PR) can distinguish the five principal histotypes with high accuracy, and additional immunohistochemical markers can be used depending on the diagnostic considerations. Histotypes are further stratified into molecular subtypes and assessed with predictive biomarker tests. HGSCs have recently been subclassified based on mechanisms of chromosomal instability, mRNA expression profiles or individual candidate biomarkers. ECs are composed of the same molecular subtypes (POLE-mutated/mismatch repair-deficient/no specific molecular profile/p53-abnormal) with the same prognostic stratification as their endometrial counterparts. Although methylation analyses and gene expression and sequencing showed at least two clusters, the molecular subtypes of CCCs remain largely elusive to date. Mutational and immunohistochemical data on LGSC have suggested five molecular subtypes with prognostic differences. While our understanding of the molecular composition of ovarian carcinomas has significantly advanced and continues to evolve, the need for treatment options suitable for these alterations is becoming more obvious. Further preclinical studies using histotype-defined and molecular subtype-characterized model systems are needed to expand the therapeutic spectrum for women diagnosed with ovarian carcinomas.
Collapse
|
22
|
Rodriguez M, Kang EY, Farrington K, Cook LS, Le ND, Karnezis AN, Lee CH, Nelson GS, Terzic T, Lee S, Köbel M. Accurate Distinction of Ovarian Clear Cell From Endometrioid Carcinoma Requires Integration of Phenotype, Immunohistochemical Predictions, and Genotype: Implications for Lynch Syndrome Screening. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:1452-1463. [PMID: 34534137 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) are both associated with endometriosis but differ in histologic phenotype, biomarker profile, and survival. Our objectives were to refine immunohistochemical (IHC) panels that help distinguish the histotypes and reassess the prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) in immunohistochemically confirmed OCCC. We selected 8 candidate IHC markers to develop first-line and second-line panels in a training set of 344 OCCC/OEC cases. Interobserver reproducibility of histotype diagnosis was assessed in an independent testing cohort of 100 OCC/OEC initially without and subsequently with IHC. The prevalence of MMRd was evaluated using the testing cohort and an expansion set of 844 ovarian carcinomas. The 2 prototypical combinations (OCCC: Napsin A+/HNF1B diffusely+/PR-; OEC: Napsin A-/HNF1B nondiffuse/PR+) occurred in 75% of cases and were 100% specific. A second-line panel (ELAPOR1, AMACR, CDX2) predicted the remaining cases with 83% accuracy. Integration of IHC improved interobserver reproducibility (κ=0.778 vs. 0.882, P<0.0001). The prevalence of MMRd was highest in OEC (11.5%, 44/383), lower in OCCC (1.7%, 5/297), and high-grade serous carcinomas (0.7%, 5/699), and absent in mucinous (0/126) and low-grade serous carcinomas (0/50). All 5 MMRd OCCC were probable Lynch syndrome cases with prototypical IHC profile but ambiguous morphologic features: 3/5 with microcystic architecture and 2/5 with intratumoral stromal inflammation. Integration of first-line and second-line IHC panels increases diagnostic precision and enhances prognostication and triaging for predisposing/predictive molecular biomarker testing. Our data support universal Lynch syndrome screening in all patients with OEC when the diagnosis of other histotypes has been vigorously excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Linda S Cook
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Preventative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency
| | - Anthony N Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | | | - Sandra Lee
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Clinical factors and biomarker profiles associated with patient outcome in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma - Emphasis on tumor grade. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:187-194. [PMID: 34711431 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The role of clinicopathological factors and molecular markers in prognostic classification of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EnOC) is not established. Tumor grade is used in risk assessment, but the role of current 3-tier grading system has been challenged. METHODS Clinicopathological factors and 12 immunohistochemical biomarkers (PR, ER, β-catenin, vimentin, ARID1A, HNF1-β, p53, p16, MIB-1, E-cadherin, c-erb-B2 and L1CAM) were analyzed as regards patient outcome in 215 contemporarily classified EnOCs. RESULTS Of clinical parameters, grade and stage appeared as strong independent prognostic factors both for disease-free and disease-specific overall survival. Grades 1-3 distinguished clearly from each other in the survival analysis, whereas stages I-II and stages III-IV clustered with each other. PR, ER, nuclear β-catenin and vimentin positivity were associated with favorable overall outcome and clinical parameters, whereas abnormal expression of p53, overexpression of p16 and L1CAM positivity were associated with aggressive disease characteristics and poor survival. The frequency of good-prognosis markers PR and β-catenin gradually decreased and poor-prognosis markers p53, p16 and L1CAM gradually increased from grade 1-3. However, vimentin and ER were expressed at similar frequencies across different grades and presented with independent prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS We found histological grade and disease stage, but not residual tumor, to be independent clinical prognostic factors in EnOC. A set of good-prognosis markers (PR, ER, β-catenin and vimentin) and poor-prognosis markers (p53, p16 and L1CAM) were identified. Our findings support continuation of the use of the 3-tier grading system for EnOC and provide clinically feasible IHC biomarkers for prognostic profiling.
Collapse
|
24
|
Ordulu Z, Watkins J, Ritterhouse LL. Molecular Pathology of Ovarian Epithelial Neoplasms: Predictive, Prognostic, and Emerging Biomarkers. Surg Pathol Clin 2021; 14:415-428. [PMID: 34373093 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2021.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
This review focuses on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular biomarkers in ovarian epithelial neoplasms in the context of their morphologic classifications. Currently, most clinically actionable molecular findings are reported in high-grade serous carcinomas; however, the data on less common tumor types are rapidly accelerating. Overall, the advances in genomic knowledge over the last decade highlight the significance of integrating molecular findings with morphology in ovarian epithelial tumors for a wide-range of clinical applications, from assistance in diagnosis to predicting response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zehra Ordulu
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02124, USA
| | - Jaclyn Watkins
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02124, USA
| | - Lauren L Ritterhouse
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02124, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Barnes BM, Nelson L, Tighe A, Burghel GJ, Lin IH, Desai S, McGrail JC, Morgan RD, Taylor SS. Distinct transcriptional programs stratify ovarian cancer cell lines into the five major histological subtypes. Genome Med 2021; 13:140. [PMID: 34470661 PMCID: PMC8408985 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00952-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) is a heterogenous disease consisting of five major histologically distinct subtypes: high-grade serous (HGSOC), low-grade serous (LGSOC), endometrioid (ENOC), clear cell (CCOC) and mucinous (MOC). Although HGSOC is the most prevalent subtype, representing 70-80% of cases, a 2013 landmark study by Domcke et al. found that the most frequently used OC cell lines are not molecularly representative of this subtype. This raises the question, if not HGSOC, from which subtype do these cell lines derive? Indeed, non-HGSOC subtypes often respond poorly to chemotherapy; therefore, representative models are imperative for developing new targeted therapeutics. METHODS Non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF) was applied to transcriptomic data from 44 OC cell lines in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, assessing the quality of clustering into 2-10 groups. Epithelial OC subtypes were assigned to cell lines optimally clustered into five transcriptionally distinct classes, confirmed by integration with subtype-specific mutations. A transcriptional subtype classifier was then developed by trialling three machine learning algorithms using subtype-specific metagenes defined by NMF. The ability of classifiers to predict subtype was tested using RNA sequencing of a living biobank of patient-derived OC models. RESULTS Application of NMF optimally clustered the 44 cell lines into five transcriptionally distinct groups. Close inspection of orthogonal datasets revealed this five-cluster delineation corresponds to the five major OC subtypes. This NMF-based classification validates the Domcke et al. analysis, in identifying lines most representative of HGSOC, and additionally identifies models representing the four other subtypes. However, NMF of the cell lines into two clusters did not align with the dualistic model of OC and suggests this classification is an oversimplification. Subtype designation of patient-derived models by a random forest transcriptional classifier aligned with prior diagnosis in 76% of unambiguous cases. In cases where there was disagreement, this often indicated potential alternative diagnosis, supported by a review of histological, molecular and clinical features. CONCLUSIONS This robust classification informs the selection of the most appropriate models for all five histotypes. Following further refinement on larger training cohorts, the transcriptional classification may represent a useful tool to support the classification of new model systems of OC subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany M Barnes
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Building, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Louisa Nelson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Building, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Anthony Tighe
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Building, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4GJ, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - I-Hsuan Lin
- Bioinformatics Core Facility, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Michael Smith Building, Dover Street, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Sudha Desai
- Department of Histopathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Joanne C McGrail
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Building, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Robert D Morgan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Building, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4GJ, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Stephen S Taylor
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Building, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4GJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
D'Alessandris N, Travaglino A, Santoro A, Arciuolo D, Scaglione G, Raffone A, Inzani F, Zannoni GF. TCGA molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: A quantitative systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:427-432. [PMID: 34446267 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) shares morphological and molecular features with endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). Several studies assessed the four TCGA groups of EEC, i.e. POLE-mutated (POLEmut), mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), no specific molecular profile (NSMP) and p53-abnormal (p53abn), in OEC; however, it is unclear whether the TCGA groups have the same distribution and clinicopathological features between OEC and EEC. OBJECTIVE To assess the distribution and clinicopathological features of the TCGA groups in OEC. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out by searching 7 electronic databases from January 2013 to April 2021 for studies assessing the TCGA classification in OEC. Prevalence of each TCGA group in OEC and of FIGO grade 3 and stage>I was pooled using a random-effect model. Prevalence of TCGA groups was compared between OEC and EEC, extracting EEC data from a previous meta-analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analyses were performed for progression-free survival (PFS). A significant p-value<0.05 was adopted. RESULTS Four studies with 785 patients were included. The frequency of the TCGA groups in OEC vs EEC was: POLEmut = 5% vs 7.6% (p = 0.594); MMRd = 14.6% vs 29.2% (p < 0.001); p53abn = 14% vs 7.8% (p = 0.097); NSMP = 66.4% vs 55.4% (p = 0.002). The pooled prevalence of FIGO grade 3 was: POLEmut = 19.2%; MMRd = 18.3%; p53abn = 38.1%; NSMP = 14.5%. The pooled prevalence of FIGO stage >I was: POLEmut = 31.6%; MMRd = 42.8%; p53abn = 48.5%; NSMP = 24.6%. Two-, 5- and 10-year PFS was: POLEmut = 100%, 100%, and 100%; MMRd = 89.1%, 82.2% and 73.3%; p53abn = 61.7%, 50.2% and 39.6%; NSMP = 87.7%, 79.6% and 65.5%. The hazard ratio for disease progression (reference = NSMP) was: POLEmut = not estimable (no events); MMRd = 0.825 (p = 0.626); p53abn = 2.786 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION The prognostic value of the TCGA groups was similar between OEC and EEC, despite the differences in the frequency and pathological features of each group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta D'Alessandris
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Antonio Travaglino
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy; Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Angela Santoro
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Damiano Arciuolo
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Giulia Scaglione
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Antonio Raffone
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Frediano Inzani
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy; Istituto di Anatomia Patologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Davila JI, Chanana P, Sarangi V, Fogarty ZC, Weroha SJ, Guo R, Goode EL, Huang Y, Wang C. Frequent POLE-driven hypermutation in ovarian endometrioid cancer revealed by mutational signatures in RNA sequencing. BMC Med Genomics 2021; 14:165. [PMID: 34158040 PMCID: PMC8218518 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-021-01017-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) is encoded by the POLE gene, and POLE-driven tumors are characterized by high mutational rates. POLE-driven tumors are relatively common in endometrial and colorectal cancer, and their presence is increasingly recognized in ovarian cancer (OC) of endometrioid type. POLE-driven cases possess an abundance of TCT > TAT and TCG > TTG somatic mutations characterized by mutational signature 10 from the Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC). By quantifying the contribution of COSMIC mutational signature 10 in RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) we set out to identify POLE-driven tumors in a set of unselected Mayo Clinic OC. METHODS Mutational profiles were calculated using expressed single-nucleotide variants (eSNV) in the Mayo Clinic OC tumors (n = 195), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) OC tumors (n = 419), and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) normal ovarian tissues (n = 84). Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) of the mutational profiles inferred the contribution per sample of four distinct mutational signatures, one of which corresponds to COSMIC mutational signature 10. RESULTS In the Mayo Clinic OC cohort we identified six tumors with a predicted contribution from COSMIC mutational signature 10 of over five mutations per megabase. These six cases harbored known POLE hotspot mutations (P286R, S297F, V411L, and A456P) and were of endometrioid histotype (P = 5e-04). These six tumors had an early onset (average age of patients at onset, 48.33 years) when compared to non-POLE endometrioid OC cohort (average age at onset, 60.13 years; P = .008). Samples from TCGA and GTEx had a low COSMIC signature 10 contribution (median 0.16 mutations per megabase; maximum 1.78 mutations per megabase) and carried no POLE hotspot mutations. CONCLUSIONS From the largest cohort of RNA-seq from endometrioid OC to date (n = 53), we identified six hypermutated samples likely driven by POLE (frequency, 11%). Our result suggests the clinical need to screen for POLE driver mutations in endometrioid OC, which can guide enrollment in immunotherapy clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime I Davila
- Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, St Olaf College, Northfield, MN, USA.
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Pritha Chanana
- Division of Shared Resources, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Zachary C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - S John Weroha
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ruifeng Guo
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Yajue Huang
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chen S, Li Y, Qian L, Deng S, Liu L, Xiao W, Zhou Y. A Review of the Clinical Characteristics and Novel Molecular Subtypes of Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:668151. [PMID: 34150634 PMCID: PMC8210668 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.668151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynecologic cancers that has the highest mortality rate. Endometrioid ovarian cancer, a distinct subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, is associated with endometriosis and Lynch syndrome, and is often accompanied by synchronous endometrial carcinoma. In recent years, dysbiosis of the microbiota within the female reproductive tract has been suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer, with some specific pathogens exhibiting oncogenic having been found to contribute to cancer development. It has been shown that dysregulation of the microenvironment and accumulation of mutations are stimulatory factors in the progression of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. This would be a potential therapeutic target in the future. Simultaneously, multiple studies have demonstrated the role of four molecular subtypes of endometrioid ovarian cancer, which are of particular importance in the prediction of prognosis. This literature review aims to compile the potential mechanisms of endometrioid ovarian cancer, molecular characteristics, and molecular pathological types that could potentially play a role in the prediction of prognosis, and the novel therapeutic strategies, providing some guidance for the stratified management of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuangfeng Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yuebo Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Lili Qian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Sisi Deng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Luwen Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Weihua Xiao
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, The CAS Key Laboratory of Innate Immunity and Chronic Disease, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.,Institute of Immunology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Ying Zhou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Integrated molecular characterisation of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma identifies opportunities for stratification. NPJ Precis Oncol 2021; 5:47. [PMID: 34079052 PMCID: PMC8172925 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-021-00187-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EnOC) is an under-investigated ovarian cancer type. Recent studies have described disease subtypes defined by genomics and hormone receptor expression patterns; here, we determine the relationship between these subtyping layers to define the molecular landscape of EnOC with high granularity and identify therapeutic vulnerabilities in high-risk cases. Whole exome sequencing data were integrated with progesterone and oestrogen receptor (PR and ER) expression-defined subtypes in 90 EnOC cases following robust pathological assessment, revealing dominant clinical and molecular features in the resulting integrated subtypes. We demonstrate significant correlation between subtyping approaches: PR-high (PR + /ER + , PR + /ER−) cases were predominantly CTNNB1-mutant (73.2% vs 18.4%, P < 0.001), while PR-low (PR−/ER + , PR−/ER−) cases displayed higher TP53 mutation frequency (38.8% vs 7.3%, P = 0.001), greater genomic complexity (P = 0.007) and more frequent copy number alterations (P = 0.001). PR-high EnOC patients experience favourable disease-specific survival independent of clinicopathological and genomic features (HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.04–0.71). TP53 mutation further delineates the outcome of patients with PR-low tumours (HR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.14–5.75). A simple, routinely applicable, classification algorithm utilising immunohistochemistry for PR and p53 recapitulated these subtypes and their survival profiles. The genomic profile of high-risk EnOC subtypes suggests that inhibitors of the MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways, alongside PARP inhibitors, represent promising candidate agents for improving patient survival. Patients with PR-low TP53-mutant EnOC have the greatest unmet clinical need, while PR-high tumours—which are typically CTNNB1-mutant and TP53 wild-type—experience excellent survival and may represent candidates for trials investigating de-escalation of adjuvant chemotherapy to agents such as endocrine therapy.
Collapse
|
30
|
Li H, Wang S, Yao Q, Liu Y, Yang J, Xu L, Yang G. A Combined Long Noncoding RNA Signature as a Candidate Prognostic Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:624240. [PMID: 34123783 PMCID: PMC8191461 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.624240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Dysregulated long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) contributing to ovarian cancer (OC) development may serve as prognostic biomarker. We aimed to explore a lncRNA signature to serve as prognostic biomarker of OC. Methods Univariate Cox regression was conducted on the lncRNA expression dataset from the TCGA cohort, and 246 genes significantly associated with survival were retained for building a model. A random forest survival model was carried out, and a model was developed using 6 genes with the highest frequency. The selected genes were applied in a Cox multivariate regression model for prognostic prediction by calculating the risk score. We also used CCK-8, EdU, and colony formation assays to validate the function of these lncRNAs in OC cells. Results This study confirmed that the 6-lncRNA combined signature was related to OC prognosis. Systematic analysis demonstrated that lncRNA-associated genes were enriched in oncogenic signalling pathways. Five out of the 6 lncRNAs participated in OC proliferation. Conclusion We established a 6-lncRNA combined signature for OC prognosis, which may serve as powerful prognostic biomarker for OC after further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Li
- Central Laboratory, the Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuoer Wang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qianlan Yao
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Pathology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Liu
- Department of Gynecology, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Postanesthesia Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lun Xu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Gong Yang
- Central Laboratory, the Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Cancer Institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hollis RL, Thomson JP, Stanley B, Churchman M, Meynert AM, Rye T, Bartos C, Iida Y, Croy I, Mackean M, Nussey F, Okamoto A, Semple CA, Gourley C, Herrington CS. Molecular stratification of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma predicts clinical outcome. Nat Commun 2020; 11:4995. [PMID: 33020491 PMCID: PMC7536188 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18819-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EnOC) demonstrates substantial clinical and molecular heterogeneity. Here, we report whole exome sequencing of 112 EnOC cases following rigorous pathological assessment. We detect a high frequency of mutation in CTNNB1 (43%), PIK3CA (43%), ARID1A (36%), PTEN (29%), KRAS (26%), TP53 (26%) and SOX8 (19%), a recurrently-mutated gene previously unreported in EnOC. POLE and mismatch repair protein-encoding genes were mutated at lower frequency (6%, 18%) with significant co-occurrence. A molecular taxonomy is constructed, identifying clinically distinct EnOC subtypes: cases with TP53 mutation demonstrate greater genomic complexity, are commonly FIGO stage III/IV at diagnosis (48%), are frequently incompletely debulked (44%) and demonstrate inferior survival; conversely, cases with CTNNB1 mutation, which is mutually exclusive with TP53 mutation, demonstrate low genomic complexity and excellent clinical outcome, and are predominantly stage I/II at diagnosis (89%) and completely resected (87%). Moreover, we identify the WNT, MAPK/RAS and PI3K pathways as good candidate targets for molecular therapeutics in EnOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Hollis
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - John P Thomson
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Barbara Stanley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Michael Churchman
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alison M Meynert
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tzyvia Rye
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Clare Bartos
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Yasushi Iida
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ian Croy
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Melanie Mackean
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Fiona Nussey
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Colin A Semple
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - C Simon Herrington
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Liu J, Nie S, Wu Z, Jiang Y, Wan Y, Li S, Meng H, Zhou S, Cheng W. Exploration of a novel prognostic risk signatures and immune checkpoint molecules in endometrial carcinoma microenvironment. Genomics 2020; 112:3117-3134. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|