1
|
Nguyen JK, Harik LR, Klein EA, Li J, Corrigan D, Liu S, Chan E, Hawley S, Auman H, Newcomb LF, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR, Filson CP, Simko JP, Nelson PS, Tretiakova MS, Troyer D, True LD, Vakar-Lopez F, Weight CJ, Lin DW, Brooks JD, McKenney JK. Proposal for an optimised definition of adverse pathology (unfavourable histology) that predicts metastatic risk in prostatic adenocarcinoma independent of grade group and pathological stage. Histopathology 2024; 85:598-613. [PMID: 38828674 PMCID: PMC11365761 DOI: 10.1111/his.15231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Histological grading of prostate cancer is a powerful prognostic tool, but current criteria for grade assignment are not fully optimised. Our goal was to develop and test a simplified histological grading model, based heavily on large cribriform/intraductal carcinoma, with optimised sensitivity for predicting metastatic potential. METHODS AND RESULTS Two separate non-overlapping cohorts were identified: a 419-patient post-radical prostatectomy cohort with long term clinical follow-up and a 209-patient post-radical prostatectomy cohort in which all patients had pathologically confirmed metastatic disease. All prostatectomies were re-reviewed for high-risk histological patterns of carcinoma termed 'unfavourable histology'. Unfavourable histology is defined by any classic Gleason pattern 5 component, any large cribriform morphology (> 0.25 mm) or intraductal carcinoma, complex intraluminal papillary architecture, grade 3 stromogenic carcinoma and complex anastomosing cord-like growth. For the outcome cohort, Kaplan-Meier analysis compared biochemical recurrence, metastasis and death between subjects with favourable and unfavourable histology, stratified by pathological stage and grade group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated adding unfavourable histology to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) post-prostatectomy nomogram and stratification by percentage of unfavourable histology. At 15 years unfavourable histology predicted biochemical recurrence, with sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 88%, metastatic disease at 100 and 48% and death at 100 and 46%. Grade group 2 prostate cancers with unfavourable histology were associated with metastasis independent of pathological stage, while those without had no risk. Histological models for prediction of metastasis based on only large cribriform/intraductal carcinoma or increasing diameter of cribriform size improved specificity, but with lower sensitivity. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models demonstrated that unfavourable histology significantly improved discriminatory power of the MSKCC post-prostatectomy nomogram for biochemical failure (likelihood ratio test P < 0.001). In the retrospective review of a separate RP cohort in which all patients had confirmed metastatic disease, none had unequivocal favourable histology. CONCLUSIONS Unfavourable histology at radical prostatectomy is associated with metastatic risk, predicted adverse outcomes better than current grading and staging systems and improved the MSKCC post-prostatectomy nomogram. Most importantly, unfavourable histology stratified grade group 2 prostate cancers into those with and without metastatic potential, independent of stage. While unfavourable histology is driven predominantly by large cribriform/intraductal carcinoma, the recognition and inclusion of other specific architectural patterns add to the sensitivity for predicting metastatic disease. Moreover, a simplified dichotomous model improves communication and could increase implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane K. Nguyen
- Robert J. Tomsich Institute of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Lara R. Harik
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Eric A. Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jianbo Li
- Lerner Research Institute, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Dillon Corrigan
- Lerner Research Institute, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shiguang Liu
- Department of Pathology, University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Emily Chan
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sarah Hawley
- Canary Foundation, Palo Alto, CA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Lisa F. Newcomb
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Peter R. Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Jeff P. Simko
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Peter S. Nelson
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Maria S. Tretiakova
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Dean Troyer
- Department of Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
| | - Lawrence D. True
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Funda Vakar-Lopez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Daniel W Lin
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - James D. Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Jesse K. McKenney
- Robert J. Tomsich Institute of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zacharouli K, Vageli DP, Koukoulis GK, Ioannou M. Patient with prostatic adenocarcinoma with plasmacytoid features and an aberrant immunohistochemical phenotype diagnosed by biopsy and a mini-review of plasmacytoid features in the genitourinary system: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol 2022; 16:67. [PMID: 35154707 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2022.2500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies in men. Most of these tumors are adenocarcinomas. Plasmacytoid is a rare variant of adenocarcinoma described by previous studies in the genitourinary system and is characterized by the plasmacytoid appearance of tumor cells with abundant cytoplasm and abnormally placed hyperchromatic nuclei. However, to the best of our knowledge, plasmacytoid adenocarcinoma has rarely been described in the prostate. This report describes a new case of plasmacytoid adenocarcinoma of the prostate diagnosed by biopsy and summarizes the known literature on plasmacytoid features in the genitourinary system. A 62-year-old male patient presented to the hospital with urinary retention, hematuria, weakness and weight loss. The digital rectal examination revealed an irregular enlargement. Laboratory findings showed elevated levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA; 43.6 ng/ml). Transrectal ultrasound showed invasion of the right seminal vesicle. Prostate tumor core biopsies were collected and sent for diagnosis. Histological examination revealed a high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma Gleason score of 5+5 (total score 10). The tumor cells had a plasmacytoid appearance with abundant cytoplasm and abnormally placed hyperchromatic nuclei. The immunohistochemical phenotype was characterized by abundant positivity for cytokeratin (CK)AE1/AE3 and PSA. By contrast, tumor cells were negative for p63, CK 34BE12 and GATA binding protein 3 (urothelial markers), synaptophysin (neuroendocrine marker). Tumor cells were also negative for E-cadherin, which is particularly indicative of CDH1 alterations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of a plasmacytoid adenocarcinoma of the prostate diagnosed by biopsy, showing an irregular immunophenotype that may indicate somatic CDH1 alterations. The presentation of a novel rare variant of prostatic carcinoma that differs from other neoplasms of the genitourinary system may contribute to an improved understanding of this uncommonly found histological pattern that may also be mandatory due to the clinical and prognostic implications of this diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantina Zacharouli
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41500 Larissa, Greece
| | - Dimitra P Vageli
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41500 Larissa, Greece
| | - George K Koukoulis
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41500 Larissa, Greece
| | - Maria Ioannou
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41500 Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|