Aberrant GATA3 Staining in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall

Relationship between tumor thickness and GATA3 immunoexpression in lip and tongue squamous cell carcinomas

PURPOSE

Lower lip squamous cell carcinomas (LLSCCs) exhibit lower levels of aggressiveness, low relations with metastases and better prognosis when compared with intraoral squamous cell carcinomas. Differently from the oral tongue squamous cell carcinomas (OTSCCs) have a high tendency towards local invasion and lymph nodal dissemination. Our aim was to evaluate tumor thickness in cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma and correlate it with histological grade of malignancy and GATA3 immunoreactivity.

METHODS

Sixty specimens (30 LLSCCs and 30 OTSCCs) were scanned and digitized for the subsequent measurement of tumor thickness, histopathological examination, and quantitative analysis of GATA3 in the parenchyma and stroma of the tumors.

RESULTS

Tumor thickness was lower in LLSCC compared to OTSCCs. Immunohistochemical analysis of GATA3 in parenchyma, stroma and both compartments showed higher immunoreactivity in LLSCCs compared to OTSCCs. We observed a negative correlation between tumor thickness and GATA3 expression in parenchyma, stroma, and both compartments. Our results revealed the presence of GATA3 in all cases both in the parenchyma and in the stroma. Higher expression was more related to LLSCCs, which are known to be less aggressive tumors than OTSCCs.

CONCLUSIONS

A greater tumor thickness was found in OTSCCs, which was correlated with lower expression of GATA3, suggesting that this protein is involved in the inhibition of proliferative, migratory, and invasive capacity.

GATA3 Expression in Prostatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall

Urothelial carcinoma and prostatic adenocarcinoma can have overlapping histologic features and in some instances pose challenges to pathologists. GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a well-established tool to aid in this specific diagnostic dilemma as it has been shown to be a sensitive marker for urothelial carcinoma and a putatively specific marker in excluding prostatic adenocarcinoma. However, in encountering an index tumor of prostatic adenosquamous carcinoma positive for GATA3, herein we sought to investigate this potential diagnostic pitfall in a larger series of tumors. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed prostatic adenosquamous carcinomas diagnosed in 17 patients across the authors' institutions and personal consult collections in the past 10 years. GATA3 IHC was either reviewed or performed on tumors not previously tested. We also recorded other immunostains that were performed at initial diagnosis. Positivity for GATA3 was found in 9 of 17 (53%) tumors, all within squamous regions (2 tumors also showed concomitant moderate GATA3 positivity within glandular elements). The GATA3 positive tumors were all positive for p63 in the 7 tumors where p63 was also performed. Of all tumors tested, NKX3.1 was positive in 100% (13/13) of the glandular elements (3 tumors also showed NKX3.1 concomitant positivity within squamous regions). In summary, when encountering a carcinoma with mixed glandular/squamous features in which prostatic origin is being considered, awareness of GATA3 immunoreactivity in a subset of prostatic adenosquamous carcinoma is critical to avoid diagnostic pitfalls.

Aberrant expression of GATA3 in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate: an important pitfall

AIMS

The distinction of high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) from poorly differentiated urothelial carcinoma (UC) can be somewhat challenging on clinical and morphological grounds alone, yet it is of great importance for prognostication and choice of treatment. GATA3 is a useful immunohistochemical marker to confirm urothelial origin. However, recent works report strong GATA3 immunoexpression in primary high-grade PCa. The aim of this study was to explore GATA3 expression specifically in metastatic PCa.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The pathology databases of four tertiary institutions were queried for cases of metastatic PCa. Available slides and clinical records were reviewed by experienced genitourinary pathologists. Prostatic markers (PSA, PSAP, NKX3.1) and GATA3 immunohistochemistry were performed. A total of 163 metastatic PCa cases were included. At least one prostate marker was positive in each case of non-regional distant metastasis, confirming prostatic origin. GATA3 strong staining was found in four (2.5%) cases: two liver, one bone and one non-regional lymph-node metastases. All four patients had Grade Group 5 PCa at the initial diagnosis. The metastatic prostatic adenocarcinomas were solid, either with no gland formation (n = 3) or with only focal cribriforming (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study exploring GATA3 expression specifically in metastatic PCa. Despite being infrequent, GATA3 positivity in high-grade PCa may lead to misdiagnosis, with clinical implications. We recommend a panel of immunohistochemical markers, both prostatic and urothelial, for ruling out UC, either in primary tumour samples or in the event of metastases of unknown primary, when a genitourinary origin is suspected.

Aggressive prostatic adenocarcinoma with urothelial-like morphology, with frequent CK7/CK20/HMWK expression and occasional diffuse neuroendocrine features: A clinicopathologic study of 12 cases

INTRODUCTION

Prostatic adenocarcinoma can occasionally display urothelial carcinoma morphology, which prompts immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies to determine its lineage. Typically, prostate cancer is characterized by the lack of cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK20 and high molecular weight keratin (HMWK) expression, as opposed to bladder cancer.

METHODS

We report a series of 12 prostatic adenocarcinoma cases with unusual urothelial-like morphology, diagnosed at two academic institutions in Toronto between 2018 and 2023, and analyzed by immunohistochemistry for prostatic, urothelial, and neuroendocrine marker expression. We collected patient age, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) status, tumour site, histomorphology, Grade group (GG) and results of genetic testing.

RESULTS

The median age of the 12 patients included in this case series was 75.5 years (range 41-85). A history of prostatic cancer was noted in 7/12 (58%) patients. Five of nine (56%) patients had elevated serum PSA level at diagnosis. Six of eleven (55%) patients had prior ADT. Tumour sites were prostate (n = 6), bladder (n = 3), liver metastases (n = 2), and lung metastasis (n = 1). GGs of the primary tumours were GG3 (n = 1) and GG5 (n = 8). The observed urothelial-like morphology was diffuse in ten cases, and focal in two cases. CK7 was strong/diffuse in 8/11 tested cases, and focal weak in one case. CK20, HMWK, p63 and GATA3 were patchy/focal/weak/moderate in 3/6, 4/7, 4/8 and 2/9 cases, respectively. Ten (83%) cases were positive for at least one prostatic marker; eight (67%) cases had loss/weak staining of at least one prostatic marker. AR loss was seen in 2/7 (29%) cases. Seven of ten (70%) cases had diffuse/strong expression of at least one neuroendocrine marker. No trend was evident between prior ADT/AR status and any IHC result. Molecular analyses for DNA damage repair (DDR) genes (n = 6) demonstrated one ATM deletion (bladder). In addition, one TMPRSS2:ERG fusion (lung metastasis) was identified.

CONCLUSION

This series comprises high-grade and/or metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma cases with distinctive urothelial-like morphology and frequent aberrant CK7/CK20/HMWK expression. Their histomorphology, highly suggestive of an urothelial origin, represents a diagnostic pitfall that can lead to considerable management repercussions. The fact that a high proportion of the reported cases had loss/weak expression of at least one of the tested prostatic-specific markers, and occasionally a diffuse positivity for neuroendocrine markers highlights the importance of (1) clinical history and (2) utilization of broad IHC panels to correctly diagnose such unusual prostate cancer cases.

Prostate Cancer: Update on Grading and Reporting

The Gleason scoring system and Grade Group systems facilitate accurate grading and reporting of prostate cancer, which are essential tasks for surgical pathologists. Gleason Pattern 4 is critical to recognize because it signifies a risk for more aggressive behavior than Gleason Pattern 3 carcinoma. Prostatic adenocarcinoma with radiation or androgen therapy effect, with aberrant P63 expression, or with Paneth cell-like differentiation represent pitfalls in prostate cancer grading because although they display architecture associated with aggressive behavior in usual prostatic adenocarcinoma, they do not behave aggressively and using conventional Gleason scoring in these tumors would significantly overstate their biologic potential.

Poorly Differentiated Scrotal Carcinoma With Apocrine Immunophenotype

ABSTRACT

Cutaneous carcinoma of the scrotum is rare with the most common type being squamous cell carcinoma. Here, we report 6 cases of poorly differentiated carcinoma with apocrine immunophenotype. Mean age at presentation was 68 years (range: 31-91 years). Clinical presentation included eczematous rash over mass, scrotal cyst, ulcerated mass, and mass. Tumor size ranged from 1.2 to 5.5 cm (average 2.5 cm). The tumors were solid with involvement of the dermis/hypodermis and composed of cords and nests of eosinophilic cells displaying nuclei with prominent nucleoli and surrounded by desmoplastic stroma. Focal squamous differentiation was evident in one case (17%). An intraductal component was seen in one case (17%). Pagetoid spread in the epidermis was seen in 3 cases. There was no morphologic evidence of apocrine differentiation. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells were positive for GCDFP-15 (n = 6/6), GATA3 (n = 6/6), CK7 (n = 5/5), AR (n = 4/4), and mammaglobin (n = 3/5). Five (83%) patients had metastases at diagnosis. Treatment included wide local excisions and inguinal lymph node dissection, followed by chemotherapy (gemcitabine, carboplatin; n = 3), trastuzumab/Lupron (n = 1), tamoxifen/Arimidex (n = 1), and radiotherapy (n = 1). Two patients (40%) were dead of disease, less than 2 years from diagnosis. Four patients developed metastases to lymph nodes, liver, bones, and lungs. Molecular analysis (n = 2) detected a HER-2 mutation in one and microsatellite instability in another. Although the presence of an intraepidermal pagetoid component could hint toward the diagnosis of invasive extramammary Paget disease, tumors without an intraepidermal component could be diagnostically challenging given the lack of morphologic evidence of apocrine differentiation.

GATA3 positivity is associated with poor prognosis in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

AIMS

GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) is a zinc finger transcription factor with diverse biological functions and is an excellent diagnostic marker for breast and urothelial carcinoma. We aimed to study GATA3 expression in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and its significance with respect to histological features, clinical parameters and overall survival.

METHODS

We characterised GATA3 immunohistochemistry in 40 patients with oesophageal SCC. Electronic medical records were reviewed for clinical and follow-up information, as well as patient survival.

RESULTS

Eleven (28%) oesophageal SCC were positive for GATA3. The predominant stain patterns were patchy, with either mild or moderate intensities. Patients with GATA3-positive tumours showed significantly shorter overall survival than those with GATA3-negative tumours (p=0.023, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, GATA3 positivity was an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival (p=0.019, HR 5.671). Surgery, definitive chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and initial clinical stage were confirmed as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the incidence of GATA3 positivity in oesophageal SCC and showed GATA3 positivity is associated with poor prognosis in oesophageal SCC.

Mining The Cancer Genome Atlas gene expression data for lineage markers in distinguishing bladder urothelial carcinoma and prostate adenocarcinoma

Distinguishing bladder urothelial carcinomas from prostate adenocarcinomas for poorly differentiated carcinomas derived from the bladder neck entails the use of a panel of lineage markers to help make this distinction. Publicly available The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) gene expression data provides an avenue to examine utilities of these markers. This study aimed to verify expressions of urothelial and prostate lineage markers in the respective carcinomas and to seek the relative importance of these markers in making this distinction. Gene expressions of these markers were downloaded from TCGA Pan-Cancer database for bladder and prostate carcinomas. Differential gene expressions of these markers were analyzed. Standard linear discriminant analyses were applied to establish the relative importance of these markers in lineage determination and to construct the model best in making the distinction. This study shows that all urothelial lineage genes except for the gene for uroplakin III were significantly expressed in bladder urothelial carcinomas (p < 0.001). In descending order of importance to distinguish from prostate adenocarcinomas, genes for uroplakin II, S100P, GATA3 and thrombomodulin had high discriminant loadings (> 0.3). All prostate lineage genes were significantly expressed in prostate adenocarcinomas(p < 0.001). In descending order of importance to distinguish from bladder urothelial carcinomas, genes for NKX3.1, prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific acid phosphatase, prostein, and prostate-specific membrane antigen had high discriminant loadings (> 0.3). Combination of gene expressions for uroplakin II, S100P, NKX3.1 and PSA approached 100% accuracy in tumor classification both in the training and validation sets. Mining gene expression data, a combination of four lineage markers helps distinguish between bladder urothelial carcinomas and prostate adenocarcinomas.