SMARCA4/SMARCA2-deficient Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction

Gastric SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (SMARCA4-UT): a clinicopathological analysis of four rare cases

BACKGROUND

SMARCA4, as one of the subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, drives SMARCA4-deficient tumors. Gastric SMARCA4-deficient tumors may include gastric SMARCA4-deficient carcinoma and gastric SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (SMARCA4-UT). Gastric SMARCA4-UT is rare and challenging to diagnose in clinical practice. The present report aims to provide insight into the clinicopathological characteristics and genetic alterations of gastric SMARCA4-UTs.

RESULTS

We retrospectively reported four rare cases of gastric SMARCA4-UTs. All four cases were male, aged between 61 and 82 years. These tumors presented as ulcerated and transmural masses with infiltration, staged as TNM IV in cases 1, 2 and 4, and TNM IIIA in case 3. Pathologically, four cases presented solid architecture with undifferentiated morphology. Cases 2 and 3 showed focal necrosis and focal rhabdoid morphology. Immunohistochemical staining showed negative expression of epithelial markers and deficient expression of SMARCA4. Furthermore, positivity for Syn (cases 1, 2 and 3) and SALL4 (cases 1 and 2) were observed. Mutant p53 expression occurred in four cases, resulting in strong and diffuse staining of p53 expression in cases 1, 2 and 4, and complete loss in case 3. The Ki67 proliferative index exceeded 80%. 25% (1/4, case 4) of cases had mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). Two available cases (cases 1 and 3) were detected with SMRACA4 gene alterations. The response to neoadjuvant therapy was ineffective in case 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric SMARCA4-UT is a rare entity of gastric cancer with a poor prognosis, predominantly occurs in male patients. The tumors are typically diagnosed at advanced stages and shows a solid architecture with undifferentiated morphology. Negative expression of epithelial markers and complete loss of SMARCA4 immunoexpression are emerging as a useful diagnostic tool for rare gastric SMARCA4-UTs.

SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Esophageal Carcinoma: A Clinical Case Series and Literature Review

PURPOSE

Undifferentiated carcinoma of the esophagus (UEC) is a rare malignancy. Deficiency in SMARCA genes, critical for chromatin regulation, has been observed in cases of UEC. Research in UEC is sparse, however, and we present a case series along with a comprehensive review of the literature.

CASE SERIES

Case 1 is a 49-year-old female with abdominal pain and dysphagia and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) showing a friable mass at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction. Biopsies showed a poorly differentiated neoplasm and immunohistochemistry showed loss for SMARCA4. With metastatic disease, she agreed to undergo palliative chemotherapy and radiation, passing away at 4 months. Case 2 is an 88-year-old male with dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and distal esophageal mass with biopsy showing a malignancy with loss of SMARCA4 expression. Due to extensive metastases, he was counseled on hospice care. Case 3 is a 53-year-old male with extensive alcohol and smoking history presenting with hematemesis, passing away shortly. Posthumous histopathology consistent with undifferentiated SMARCA4-deficient carcinoma of the esophagus. Results of the literature review indicate a predilection towards males (75.0%) and a variable age range (39-88 years). Majority (76.2%) reported with a distal esophagus location. Metastatic disease was common at initial presentation. Median survival was 2.60 months. Some were managed with chemotherapy and radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Research in SMARCA-deficient UEC is very limited. It is more common in men, age is variable, and associated with Barret's esophagus. Further research is necessary to better understand it and to establish treatment guidelines; however, it is clear that SMARCA4-deficient UEC carries a significantly poor prognosis.

Undifferentiated Carcinoma of Esophagus with SMARCA4 Deletion Expressing Synaptophysin: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall

Undifferentiated carcinoma of the esophagus is an entity that is included in WHO classification of digestive systems fifth edition (2018). The definition of this entity is a malignant esophageal epithelial tumor that lacks definite microscopic features of squamous, glandular, or neuroendocrine differentiation. It is a challenging diagnosis to make due to lack of diagnostic criteria. We report a case from a 45 years old man with a mass in the lower third of esophagus. Biopsy showed an epitheloid neoplasm with sheet like growth pattern and no glandular formation. The tumor cells had prominent nucleoli and indistinct cell borders. There were occasional rhabdoid cells. By immunostains, tumor cells were focally positive for pankeratin, keratin 7, synaptophysin, negative for CDX2 and p40, INSM1, chromogranin, and CD56. Background intestinal metaplasia (Barrett esophagus) was present. Next generation sequencing of the tumor revealed SMARCA4 deep deletion. The tumor showed loss of SMARCA4 by immunostain. This case demonstrates that undifferentiated carcinoma of the esophagus with SMARCA4 deletion can express synaptophysin. Awareness of this entity is important for the correct classification of this tumor.

Colorectal Carcinoma With Sarcomatoid Components: Report of 15 Cases and Literature Review of an Exceedingly Rare Carcinoma Subtype

Colorectal carcinoma with sarcomatoid components (which includes so-called carcinosarcomas and sarcomatoid carcinomas) is a rare subtype with 50 reported cases in the literature and overlapping criteria with undifferentiated carcinoma. We collected and described 15 cases from 10 men and 5 women, with a mean age of 66 years. Symptoms included abdominal pain and gastrointestinal bleeding. Most tumors presented in the rectosigmoid region, with a mean size of 8.2 cm. The sarcomatoid component, on average, represented 58% of the tumors and took many forms, including spindled (10 cases), anaplastic (9 cases), and rhabdoid (3 cases); one case showed osteoid matrix. Tumor budding was usually high, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were usually low. The sarcomatoid component was keratin-positive in 10 cases. One case showed loss of mismatch repair protein expression, and 2 cases showed SMARCA4 loss (1 also with SMARCA2 loss). Molecular testing identified mutations in KRAS (n=1), NRAS (n=2), BRAF (n=2), APC (n=1), and TP53 (n=1) in a few cases. Tumors often presented at advanced stage, with 11 cases pT4, 9 cases with nodal metastases, and 7 cases with distant metastases. Follow-up was available for 10 cases (median: 2 months), with 2 alive without disease, 3 alive with disease, and 5 dead. Our findings roughly corresponded with those in previously reported cases. Colorectal carcinoma with sarcomatoid components is rare and aggressive, with a poor prognosis for many patients. We suggest that spindled cells, anaplasia, heterologous elements, and/or a component with definable sarcomatous lineage be used to distinguish colorectal carcinoma with sarcomatoid components from undifferentiated carcinoma.

SMARCA4 Mutations in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: An Observational Study via a Next-Generation Sequencing Panel

BACKGROUND

The clinical impact of SMARCA4 mutations (SMARCA4ms) in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) remains underexplored. This study aimed to examine the association of SMARCA4ms with clinical outcomes and co-occurrence with other gene mutations identified through a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel in GEA patients.

METHODS

A total of 256 patients with metastatic or recurrent GEA who underwent NGS panel profiling at the MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2016 and 2022 were included. Comparative analyses were performed to assess clinical outcomes related to SMARCA4ms. The frequency and types of SMARCA4ms and their co-occurrence with other gene mutations were also examined.

RESULTS

SMARCA4ms were identified in 19 patients (7.4%). These SMARCA4ms were significantly associated with non-signet ring cell subtype (p = 0.044) and PD-L1 positive expression (p = 0.046). No difference in survival between the SMARCA4m and SMARCA4-normal group was observed (p = 0.84). There were significant associations between SMARCA4ms and FANCA, IGF1R, KRAS, FANCL, and PTEN alterations. Notably, 15 of the 19 SMARCA4m cases involved SNV missense mutations, with frequent co-occurrences noted with TP53, KRAS, ARID1A, and ERBB2 mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

These results serve as the first comprehensive examination of the relationship between SMARCA4ms and clinical outcomes in GEA.

SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Tumor of the Esophagus: Diagnostic Pitfalls in Immunohistochemical Profiles

SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors (SMARCA4-UT) are a newly described entity and are typically seen in the thoracic cavity. However, these tumors have been described in other body sites, including the esophagus. These tumors are rare, aggressive neoplasms, characterized by the loss of protein product of SMARCA4 (Brahma-related gene-1) and the preservation of INI1 (SMARCB1) expression. Here, we present two tumors of SMARCA4-UT of the esophagus with its microscopic appearance and immunohistochemical profile. We also include a literature review of SMARCA4-deficient tumors of the tubular gastrointestinal tract with their immunohistochemical and mismatch repair profiles for each specimen. Due to its non-specific histologic appearance and variable staining in expanded immunohistochemical panels, this tumor frequently overlaps with other tumor types, making the diagnosis of SMARCA4-UT challenging. These tumors are often associated with intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus and are thought to represent a high-grade undifferentiated transformation of a conventional esophageal adenocarcinoma. These tumors are typically associated with poor clinical outcomes and have poor response to conventional therapies. Currently, there are no standard guidelines for treatment of these tumors; however, palliative radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy may provide benefit. More recently, immunotherapy and novel therapeutic targets have shown some promise for these patients.

NUT carcinoma and thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumour: facts and controversies

NUT carcinoma and thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumour are unique entities in the 5th edition of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Classification of Thoracic Tumours, whose definitions include molecular genetic abnormalities. These aggressive tumours require rapid work-ups on biopsies, but a broad list of differential diagnoses poses challenges for practising pathologists. This review provides an update on their key clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, as well as controversies regarding tumour classification and diagnostic strategy. Phenotypical assessment plays a substantial role in diagnosis because recurrent and predictable clinicopathological findings exist, including robust immunohistochemical phenotypes. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for appropriate management and a clearer understanding of the disease.

Superior Identification of Metastatic Lesions by 68 Ga-FAPI-46 to 18 F-FDG PET/CT in a Case of SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Carcinoma of Stomach

ABSTRACT

SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated carcinoma is a new clinical entity characterized by SMARCA4 inactivation and has a dismal prognosis because of rapid growth. In this case, we reported 18 F-FDG and 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT imaging findings in a patient with SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated carcinoma of stomach. 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT showed much higher tumor-to-background contrast of primary tumor and revealed more metastatic lesions than 18 F-FDG PET/CT. This case demonstrated the superiority of 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT over 18 F-FDG for identifying both primary and metastatic lesions in SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated carcinoma. This observation may add the information on the benefit of FAPI PET in oncology imaging.

Esophageal carcinoma with SMARCA4 mutation: Unique diagnostic challenges

Esophageal carcinoma with SMARCA4 deficiency or dysfunction is a recently recognized entity. This study describes the clinicopathologic features of four cases of esophageal carcinoma with SMARCA4 mutation, three with deep deletion and one with missense mutation. Patients include 3 males and 1 female, with an age range of 45-68 years old. Histologically, the neoplasms showed frequent mitotic activity, large nucleus and prominent nucleoli. Glandular differentiation was variable from not identifiable to approximately 20% in the biopsy material. Percentage of rhabdoid morphology was also variable from not identifiable to 20% of the biopsy material. For these cases, one case was diagnosed SMARCA4 deficient esophageal carcinoma based on the biopsy of a retroperitoneal lymph node showing loss of BRG1 by immunostain, and next generation sequencing confirmed deep deletion of SMARCA4. The other three cases had diagnosis of undifferentiated carcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma, and the SMARCA4 deep deletion or mutation was discovered by next generation sequencing. Molecular analysis showed TP53 mutation in all the three cases with SMARCA4 deep deletion. Two of the patients deceased 72 and 78 days after diagnosis, and the other two patients showed limited or no treatment response to chemotherapy. In conclusion, esophageal carcinoma with SMARCA4 mutation may pose significant diagnostic challenge for surgical pathologists due to its variable morphology and immunoprofile, and accurate classification of this entity requires recognition of the spectrum of morphology and utilization of BRG1 immunostain and next generating sequencing.

SMARCA4 Mutations in Carcinomas of the Esophagus, Esophagogastric Junction, and Stomach

Deficiency of SMARCA4, a member of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, has been described in a subset of undifferentiated gastroesophageal carcinomas with an aggressive clinical course. The full spectrum and frequency of SMARCA4 mutations in gastroesophageal cancer are unknown. We interrogated our institutional database and identified patients with gastroesophageal carcinomas who underwent cancer next-generation sequencing. We classified SMARCA4 mutations, assessed histologic features, and correlated SMARCA4 mutations with SMARCA4 protein expression by immunohistochemistry. SMARCA4 mutations were identified in gastroesophageal carcinomas from 107 (9.1%) of 1174 patients. Forty-nine SMARCA4 mutations, including 26 missense variants and 23 protein-truncating variants, were interpreted as pathogenic in 42 (3.6%) of 1174 patients. Thirty (71%) of 42 cancers with pathogenic SMARCA4 mutations were located in the esophagus or esophagogastric junction, and 12 cancers (29%) were located in the stomach. Sixty-four percent of carcinomas with pathogenic truncating SMARCA4 variants were poorly differentiated or undifferentiated compared with 25% of carcinomas with pathogenic missense variants. Eight of 12 carcinomas with truncating SMARCA4 variants and none of the 7 carcinomas with pathogenic SMARCA4 missense variants showed loss of SMARCA4 expression by immunohistochemistry. Four carcinomas with pathogenic truncating SMARCA4 variants were associated with Barrett esophagus. SMARCA4-mutated gastroesophageal cancers were enriched for APC (31%) and CTNNB1 (14%) mutations and exhibited similar frequency of TP53 (76%) and ARID1A (31%) mutations compared with gastroesophageal cancers without pathogenic SMARCA4 mutations. The median overall survival was 13.6 months for patients who presented with metastasis at diagnosis and 22.7 months for patients without metastasis. Overall, SMARCA4-mutated gastroesophageal cancers exhibit a spectrum of histologic grade, an association with Barrett esophagus, and a concurrent mutational pattern similar to SMARCA4-wild-type gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. Although SMARCA4-deficient gastroesophageal carcinomas are associated with poorly differentiated and undifferentiated histology, the spectrum of histologic and molecular features suggests overlapping pathogenic pathways with conventional gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas.

Malignant undifferentiated epithelioid neoplasms with MAML2 rearrangements: A clinicopathologic study of seven cases demonstrating a heterogenous entity

Among mesenchymal tumors, MAML2 gene rearrangements have been described in a subset of composite hemangioendothelioma and myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma (MIFS). However, we have recently encountered MAML2-related fusions in a group of seven undifferentiated malignant epithelioid neoplasms that do not fit well to any established pathologic entities. The patients included five males and two female, aged 41-71 years old (median 65 years). The tumors involved the deep soft tissue of extremities (hip, knee, arm, hand), abdominal wall, and the retroperitoneum. Microscopically, the tumors consisted of solid sheets of atypical epithelioid to histiocytoid cells with abundant cytoplasm. Prominent mitotic activity and necrosis were present in 4 cases. In 3 cases, the cells displayed hyperchromatic nuclei or conspicuous macronucleoli, and were admixed with background histiocytoid cells and a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. By immunohistochemistry (IHC), the neoplastic cells had a nonspecific phenotype. On targeted RNA sequencing, MAML2 was the 3' partner and fused to YAP1 (4 cases), ARHGAP42 (2 cases), and ENDOD1 (1 case). Two cases with YAP1::MAML2 harbored concurrent RAF kinase fusions (RBMS3::RAF1 and AGK::BRAF, respectively). In 2 cases with targeted DNA sequencing, mutations in TP53, RB1 and PTEN were detected in 1 case, and PDGFRB mutations, CCNE1 amplifications and CDKN2A/2B deletion were detected in another case, which showed strong and diffuse PDGFRB expression by IHC. Of the 4 cases with detailed clinical history (median follow-up period 8 months), three developed distant metastatic disease (one of which died of disease); one case remained free of disease 3 years following surgical excision. In conclusion, we describe a heterogeneous series of MAML2-rearranged undifferentiated malignant epithelioid neoplasms, a subset of which may overlap with a recently described MIFS variant with YAP1::MAML2 fusions, further expanding the clinicopathologic spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasms with recurrent MAML2 gene rearrangements.

Malignant undifferentiated and rhabdoid tumors of the gastroesophageal junction and esophagus with SMARCA4 loss: a case series

Undifferentiated SMARCA4-deficient carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction is a rare, highly aggressive, and diagnostically challenging malignancy. Here we present a case series of high-grade undifferentiated malignant neoplasms of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction that share SMARCA4 loss by immunohistochemistry and demonstrate a rhabdoid phenotype. Five cases are presented, including 4 men and 1 woman with an age range of 48-79 years. Interestingly, only one case showed intestinal metaplasia (Barrett's esophagus) and no cases demonstrated glandular dysplasia or glandular differentiation. In all, the lesional cells were immunoreactive with antibodies to keratins (3/5), CD34 (2/4), and CD138 (4/5). SMARCA4 expression was diffusely lost in all cases, whereas SMARCB1 expression was intact. OncoScan™ assay demonstrated loss of SMARCA4 in all cases analyzed. Additional OncoScan™ findings included abnormalities of CDKN2A in 2 of 3 cases, abnormalities of TP53 in 2 of 3 cases, and abnormalities of PTPRD in 2 of 3 cases, among other abnormalities.

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of SWI/SNF complex subunits in undifferentiated gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) complex is an evolutionarily conserved chromatin remodeling complex that displays dysfunction in many tumors, especially undifferentiated carcinoma. Cancer stem cells (CSC), a special type of undifferentiated cancer cells with stem cell-like properties, play an essential role in tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. In undifferentiated gastric carcinomas, the association of SWI/SNF complexes with clinicopathological features, CSC phenotype, and the prognosis is not fully understood.

METHODS

We collected a cohort of 21 patients with undifferentiated/dedifferentiated gastric carcinoma. We next performed immunohistochemistry staining for the five subunits of the SWI/SNF complex (ARID1A, ARID1B, SMARCA2, SMARCA4, and SMARCB1), and four mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6), as well as other markers such as p53, PD-L1, and cancer stem cell (CSC) markers (SOX2, SALL4). Then, we investigated the correlation of SWI/SNF complex subunits with clinicopathological characters and performed prognostic analysis.

RESULTS

We observed SMARCA2 loss in 12 cases (57.14%), followed by ARID1A (5 cases, 23.81%) and SMARCA4 (3 cases, 14.29%). Fourteen cases (66.67%) lost any one of the SWI/SNF complex subunits, including 3 cases with SMARCA2 and ARID1A co-loss, and 3 cases with SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 co-loss. Correlation analysis revealed that the CSC phenotype occurred more frequently in the SWI/SNF complex deficient group (P = 0.0158). Survival analysis revealed that SWI/WNF complex deficiency, undifferentiated status, CSC phenotype, and the loss of SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 resulted in worse survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses screened out three independent factors associated with worse prognosis: undifferentiated status, SWI/SNF complex deficiency, and lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

The SWI/SNF complex deficiency was more likely to result in a CSC phenotype and worse survival and was an independent prognostic factor in undifferentiated/dedifferentiated gastric carcinoma.

Thoracic SMARCA2-deficient But SMARCA4-preserved Tumors With Undifferentiated Morphology Combined With Claudin-4 Negativity

Thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (SMARCA4-UT) is a recently recognized tumor characterized by inactivation of SMARCA4, a SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable chromatin remodeler, detectable by immunohistochemistry. SMARCA4-UT shows undifferentiated or rhabdoid morphology with claudin-4 negativity. However, thoracic undifferentiated tumors with the same histologic features as SMARCA4-UTs but a preserved SMARCA4 expression have so far been underrecognized. We herein report 3 cases of thoracic undifferentiated tumors with isolated loss of SMARCA2 but retained expression of SMARCA4 and SMARCB1. The present tumors were found in 2 men and 1 woman, 40 to 50 years old. All patients were heavy smokers (≥20 pack-years). The tumors were generally large masses located in the mediastinum, lung>chest wall, or lung and composed of relatively monotonous, round to epithelioid cells with variably rhabdoid cells. Immunohistochemically, the tumors showed claudin-4 negativity with variable expression of cytokeratin. All cases showed highly aggressive clinical behavior with overall survival of 2 to 10 months. These SMARCA2-deficient tumors with preserved SMARCA4 expression appeared to be clinicopathologically indistinguishable from SMARCA4-UTs, except for in their SMARCA4 status. This variant may expand the spectrum of SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable-deficient undifferentiated tumors of the thoracic region beyond SMARCA4-UT.

SWI/SNF Complex-deficient Undifferentiated Carcinoma of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Clinicopathologic Study of 30 Cases With an Emphasis on Variable Morphology, Immune Features, and the Prognostic Significance of Different SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 Subunit Deficiencies

Undifferentiated carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract has variable rhabdoid features. Expression of switch/sucrose nonfermenting (SWI/SNF) complex subunits is reportedly lost in a portion of cases; however, the prognostic significance of this loss remains unknown. Herein, 30 undifferentiated carcinoma cases were assessed for the expression of 4 SWI/SNF complex subunits (SMARCB1, SMARCA2, SMARCA4, and ARID1A). Tumor origin sites comprised stomach (40.0%), large intestine (20.0%), small intestine (16.7%), lower esophagus and stomach fundus (13.3%), ileocecal junction (3.3%), rectum (3.3%), and pancreas (3.3%). The tumors were composed of epithelioid neoplastic cells arranged in diffuse solid or discohesive sheets, nests, cords, poor cohesive pseudoglandular, and trabecular patterns. Rhabdoid tumor cells were identified in 66.7% (20/30) of cases. In total, 29/30 (96.7%) showed complete loss of at least 1 SWI/SNF subunit: SMARCA4-/SMARCA2- (11), isolated SMARCA4- (2), SMARCA4-/SMARCA2 unknown (6), isolated SMARCA2- (7), SMARCA2-/ARID1A- (1), and isolated ARID1A- (2). Negative or decreased expression (≤10% positive) of pan-cytokeratin was observed in 58.6% (17/29) of cases. In addition, 66.7% (20/30) of patients were late-stage (III or IV), and 65.2% (15/23) of stage IIB to IV patients succumbed to the disease at a mean clinical follow-up of 12.7 months. Specifically, patients with loss of SMARCA4 expression had the worst overall survival (P=0.028) and disease-free survival (P=0.006) rates, compared with those with SMARCA4 expression. The loss or decreased expression of epithelial markers is thus common in SWI/SNF complex-deficient undifferentiated carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract, and loss of SMARCA4 correlates with poor prognosis.

Molecular features of primary hepatic undifferentiated carcinoma

The clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of primary hepatic undifferentiated carcinoma are poorly defined. It is speculated that primary hepatic undifferentiated carcinoma develops in the setting of preceding primary hepatic carcinoma. We investigated 14 primary hepatic undifferentiated carcinomas through targeted next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry. A panel of genes commonly mutated in primary liver carcinomas were examined. We found a similar clinical context as primary hepatic carcinoma, including a high prevalence of chronic viral hepatitis (86%), cirrhosis (57%), and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (29%). Tumors had sheet-like and poorly cohesive growth patterns. Rhabdoid cytomorphology was observed in four samples. Notably, the most common genetic mutations in primary hepatic undifferentiated carcinoma were in the promoter of TERT (n = 8, 57%) and TP53 (n = 8, 57%), which are common in hepatocellular carcinoma. The mutation rate of TP53 was elevated compared with hepatocellular carcinoma. No other typical genetic features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were identified, such as an IDH1/IDH2 mutation, FGFR2 fusions, or aberrant BAP1 expression. Furthermore, novel switch/sucrose nonfermenting complex inactivation was found, including SMARCA4/SMARCA2 (n = 1) and PBRM1 deficiency (n = 2). The three tumors demonstrated poorly cohesive histology, including rhabdoid features. High PD-L1 expression (57%) was observed in a majority of the tumors. Primary hepatic undifferentiated carcinoma shares clinical and genetic features with hepatocellular carcinoma but harbors progressive molecular characteristics that may initiate tumor dedifferentation. High PD-L1 expression in primary hepatic undifferentiated carcinoma may be a useful biomarker for potential immunotherapeutic strategies.

Immunohistochemistry as predictive and prognostic markers for gastrointestinal malignancies

Biomarkers play a key role in the comprehensive pathologic evaluation of gastrointestinal malignancies. These biomarkers can be predictive, indicating whether a tumor is likely to respond to a particular therapy, or prognostic, providing information about the likely course and outcome of a disease. This review article will discuss available immunohistochemical stains for assessing these markers, including staining rationale, scoring criteria, associated systemic therapies, and pictorial examples. PD-L1, HER2, and mismatch repair status can be evaluated via immunohistochemistry for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal carcinomas. Biomarkers currently play a more limited role in evaluation of pancreatic and small bowel malignancies. Immunohistochemistry can also be used to evaluate biomarker status in gastrointestinal stromal tumors, gastrointestinal malignancies with NTRK gene fusions, and undifferentiated carcinomas with switch-sucrose non-fermentable complex abnormalities.