Pseudoendocrine Sarcoma: Clinicopathologic Analysis of 23 Cases of a Distinctive Soft Tissue Neoplasm With Metastatic Potential, Recurrent CTNNB1 Mutations, and a Predilection for Truncal Locations

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: from genesis to molecular pathways and therapeutic strategies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are the most common primary liver cancers. Little is known about the combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-ICC) variant and the proper therapeutic strategies. Out of over 1200 available studies about cHCC-ICC, we selected the most representative ones that reflected updated information with application to individualized therapy. Based on literature data and own experience, we hypothesize that two molecular groups of cHCC-ICC can be identified. The proposed division might have a significant therapeutic role. Most cases develop, like HCC, on a background of cirrhosis and hepatitis and share characteristics with HCC; thus, they are named HCC-type cHCC-ICC and therapeutic strategies might be like those for HCC. This review also highlights a new carcinogenic perspective and identifies, based on literature data and the own experience, a second variant of cHCC-ICC called ICC-type cHCC-ICC. Contrary to HCC, these cases show a tendency for lymph node metastases and ICC components in the metastatic tissues. No guidelines have been established yet for such cases. Individualized therapy should be, however, oriented toward the immunoprofile of the primary tumor and metastatic cells, and different therapeutic strategies should be used in patients with HCC- versus ICC-type cHCC-ICC.

Utility of LEF1 to differentiate desmoid fibromatosis from its histologic mimics

Diagnosis of desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF) may be challenging on biopsy due to morphologic overlap with reactive fibrosis (scar) and other uniform spindle cell neoplasms. Evaluation of nuclear β-catenin, a surrogate of Wnt pathway activation, is often difficult in DF due to weak nuclear expression and high background membranous/cytoplasmic staining. Lymphoid enhancer-factor 1 (LEF1) is a recently characterized effector partner of β-catenin which activates the transcription of target genes. We investigated the performance of LEF1 and β-catenin immunohistochemistry in a retrospective series of 156 soft tissue tumors, including 35 DF, 3 superficial fibromatosis, and 121 histologic mimics (19 soft tissue perineurioma, 8 colorectal perineurioma, 4 intraneural perineurioma, 26 scars, 23 nodular fasciitis, 6 low-grade fibromyxoid sarcomas, 6 angioleiomyomas, 5 neurofibromas, 5 dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, 3 low-grade myofibroblastic sarcomas, 3 synovial sarcomas, 3 inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors, 2 schwannomas, and 1 each of Gardner-associated fibroma, radiation-associated spindle cell sarcoma, sclerotic fibroma, dermatofibroma, and glomus tumor). LEF1 expression was not only seen in 33/35 (94%) of DF but also observed in 19/23 (82%) nodular fasciitis, 7/19 (37%) soft tissue perineurioma, 2/3 (66%) synovial sarcoma, and 6/26 (23%) scar, as well as in 1 radiation-associated spindle cell sarcoma. The sensitivity and specificity of LEF1 IHC for diagnosis of DF were 94% and 70%, respectively. By comparison, β-catenin offered similar sensitivity, 94%, but 88% specificity. Positivity for LEF1 and β-catenin in combination showed sensitivity of 89%, lower than the sensitivity of β-catenin alone (94%); however, the combination of both LEF1 and β-catenin improved specificity (96%) compared to the specificity of β-catenin alone (88%). Although LEF1 has imperfect specificity in isolation, this stain has diagnostic utility when used in combination with β-catenin.

CTNNB1 mutation-driven hybrid tumor: desmoid fibromatosis with an unusual associated epithelioid component arising in association with a neuromuscular choristoma

CTNNB1 mutations play important roles in the development of soft tissue tumors, such as desmoid fibromatosis (DF), sinonasal tract angiofibroma, sinonasal glomangiopericytoma, intranodal palisaded myofibroblastoma, neuromuscular choristoma (NMC), and the recently reported pseudoendocrine sarcoma. Here, we report a unique hybrid soft tissue tumor with classic DF, unusual epithelioid component, and NMC in a 23-year-old female. The classic DF and NMC and the unusual epithelioid component and NMC were locally intermixed and closely related to each other. Immunohistochemically, the DF, unusual epithelioid component, and NMC exhibited nuclear positivity for β-catenin to varying degrees. More critically, all of the above components harbored identical CTNNB1 p.Ser45Pro missense mutations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only reported CTNNB1 mutation-driven hybrid tumor with DF, unusual epithelioid component, and NMC. The present case further confirmed that CTNNB1-mutational soft tissue tumors are highly heterogeneous, but the morphological spectrum is wide and consecutive.

GLI1-Altered Mesenchymal Tumors

GLI1-altered mesenchymal tumors comprise an emerging group of neoplasms characterized by fusions or amplifications involving GLI1, a gene that encodes a key regulator of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. In recent years, tumors with GLI1 alterations have been reported across a variety of anatomic sites and a broad age range. Although these tumors can exhibit a wide morphologic spectrum and a variable immunophenotype, they frequently present with monomorphic ovoid cells arranged in distinctive nests with a rich, arborizing vascular network. Recent evidence indicates that they have the potential to metastasize, which suggests that they may be best considered a sarcoma.

Emerging mesenchymal tumour types and biases in the era of ubiquitous sequencing

New tumour types are being described at increasing frequency, and most new tumour types are now identified via retrospective review of next-generation sequencing data. This contrasts with the traditional, morphology-based method of identifying new tumour types, and while the sequencing-based approach has accelerated progress in the field, it has also introduced novel and under-recognised biases. Here, we discuss tumour types identified based on morphology, including superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumour, pseudoendocrine sarcoma and cutaneous clear cell tumour with melanocytic differentiation and ACTIN::MITF fusion. We also describe tumour types identified primarily by next-generation sequencing, including epithelioid and spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma, round cell neoplasms with EWSR1::PATZ1 fusion, cutaneous melanocytic tumour with CRTC1::TRIM11 fusion, clear cell tumour with melanocytic differentiation and MITF::CREM fusion and GLI1-altered mesenchymal neoplasms, including nested glomoid neoplasm.

Pseudoendocrine sarcoma: clinicopathologic, molecular, and epigenetic features of one case

Pseudoendocrine sarcoma (PES) is a recently described neoplasm typically arising in paravertebral soft tissues. Histologically, PES resembles well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors but lacks expression of epithelial/neuroendocrine markers, and most show aberrant nuclear β-catenin positivity. We describe the clinicopathological and molecular features and DNA methylation profile of one PES. A resected paraspinal soft tissue mass in a 52-year-old man showed a neuroendocrine-like neoplasm, negative for keratin, and synaptophysin and showing diffuse nuclear β-catenin expression. Targeted NGS confirmed a CTNNB1 (p.S37C) mutation. Whole genome methylation analysis showed no match to any methylation class in the central nervous system tumor (versions 11b6 and 12b6) or sarcoma classifier (calibrated scores of ≤0.3), but clustered together with a recently reported PES in which methylation analysis was also performed. He remained disease-free for 18 months after surgery, followed by chemoradiation. As more cases are examined, our findings suggest that PES may have a unique methylation profiling signature.

[Special mesenchymal neoplasms of the head and neck: Update from the 2022 WHO]

Similar to the approach adopted in the classification of tumors in other organs, a new feature of the current Word Health Organization (WHO) classification of the head and neck tumors is the exclusion of soft tissue tumors from single organs and their inclusion in a separate chapter devoted to them. This applies to tumors that are principally ubiquitous but show a predilection for the head and neck sites. The only exception to this rule represents those entities that are almost restricted to a specific head and neck site/organ (such as nasopharyngeal angiofibroma, sinonasal glomangiopericytoma, and biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma), which remain in their respective organ chapters. Included among soft tissue tumors are some old but still underrecognized entities, such as phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors, and newly defined entities, such as GLI1-altered tumors. The aim of including these entities is to enhance recognition of these uncommon but likely under-recognized entities to better characterize them in the future. This review summarizes the main features of these rare entities and discusses their differential diagnoses.

Single-cell RNA sequencing highlights intratumor heterogeneity and intercellular network featured in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma

Despite improvements in microscopically neurosurgical techniques made in recent years, the prognosis of adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) is still unsatisfactory. Little is known about cellular atlas and biological features of ACP. Here, we carried out integrative analysis of 44,038 single-cell transcriptome profiles to characterize the landscape of intratumoral heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment (TME) in ACP. Four major neoplastic cell states with distinctive expression signatures were defined, which further revealed the histopathological features and elucidated unknown cellular atlas of ACP. Pseudotime analyses suggested potential evolutionary trajectories between specific neoplastic cell states. Notably, a distinct oligodendrocyte lineage was identified in ACP, which was associated with immunological infiltration and neural damage. In addition, we described a tumor-centric regulatory network based on intercellular communication in TME. Together, our findings represent a unique resource for deciphering tumor heterogeneity of ACP, which will improve clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies.

GLI1 Immunohistochemistry Distinguishes Mesenchymal Neoplasms With GLI1 Alterations From Morphologic Mimics

Glioma-associated oncogene 1 ( GLI1 ) alterations have been described in pericytoma with t(7;12), gastroblastoma, plexiform fibromyxoma, and an emerging class of GLI1 -rearranged or amplified mesenchymal neoplasms including "nested glomoid neoplasm". The immunophenotype of these tumor types is nonspecific, making some cases difficult to diagnose without sequencing. The utility of GLI1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in distinguishing nested glomoid neoplasms and pericytomas with t(7;12) from morphologic mimics is unknown. To investigate the diagnostic value of GLI1 IHC, we determined its sensitivity and specificity in a "test cohort" of 23 mesenchymal neoplasms characterized by GLI1 alterations, including 12 nested glomoid neoplasms (7 GLI1 -rearranged, 4 GLI1 amplified, and 1 unknown GLI1 status), 9 pericytomas with t(7;12), 1 gastroblastoma, and 1 malignant epithelioid neoplasm with PTCH1 :: GLI1 fusion. GLI1 IHC was 91.3% sensitive in this cohort; all tumors except 2 pericytomas with t(7;12) expressed GLI1. GLI1 was also expressed in 1 of 8 (12%) plexiform fibromyxomas. Nineteen of 22 GLI1-positive tumors showed nuclear and cytoplasmic staining, while 3 showed nuclear staining only. GLI1 IHC was 98.0% specific; among morphologic mimics [40 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, 10 atypical lung carcinoids, 20 paragangliomas, 20 glomus tumors, 20 solitary fibrous tumors, 10 Ewing sarcomas, 10 alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (ARMS), 10 BCOR -altered sarcomas, 10 myoepitheliomas, 9 myopericytomas, 9 epithelioid schwannomas, 9 ossifying fibromyxoid tumors, 10 biphasic synovial sarcomas, 10 PEComas, 31 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 10 inflammatory fibroid polyps, 11 pseudoendocrine sarcomas], 5 of 249 tumors expressed GLI1 (2 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, 1 ARMS, 1 Ewing sarcoma, 1 BCOR -altered sarcoma). GLI1 IHC was also performed on a separate cohort of 13 molecularly characterized mesenchymal neoplasms in which GLI1 copy number gain was identified as a putatively secondary event by DNA sequencing (5 dedifferentiated liposarcoma [DDLPS], 2 adenosarcomas, 2 unclassified uterine sarcomas, 1 leiomyosarcoma, 1 ARMS, 1 intimal sarcoma, 1 osteosarcoma); 2 DDLPS, 1 ARMS, and 1 unclassified uterine sarcoma expressed GLI1. Lastly, because pleomorphic sarcomas sometimes show GLI1 amplification or copy number gain, GLI1 IHC was performed on a separate "pleomorphic sarcoma" cohort: GLI1 was expressed in 1 of 27 DDLPS, 1 of 9 leiomyosarcomas, and 2 of 10 pleomorphic liposarcomas, and it was negative in 23 well-differentiated liposarcomas and 9 unclassified pleomorphic sarcomas. Overall, GLI1 IHC was 91.3% sensitive and 98.0% specific for mesenchymal tumor types with driver GLI1 alterations among morphologic mimics. GLI1 expression was less frequent in other tumor types with GLI1 copy number gain. Given its specificity, in the appropriate morphologic context, GLI1 IHC may be a useful diagnostic adjunct for mesenchymal neoplasms with GLI1 alterations.

Distinctive Nested Glomoid Neoplasm: Clinicopathologic Analysis of 20 Cases of a Mesenchymal Neoplasm With Frequent GLI1 Alterations and Indolent Behavior

Recently, it has been recognized that a subset of primary soft tissue neoplasms with GLI1 gene alterations exhibit nested architecture and can mimic glomus tumors or well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Here, we report a series of 20 such neoplasms, which we have provisionally termed "distinctive nested glomoid neoplasm." Eleven patients (55%) were female and 9 were male. The median age at presentation was 41.5 years (range: congenital to 74 y). The anatomic distribution was wide, with body sites including the trunk (7 tumors), lower extremity (5), tongue (4), upper extremity (3), and neck (1). Excluding tumors of the tongue, 10 tumors (62%) arose in deep soft tissue and 6 (38%) arose primarily in the subcutis. Tumor size ranged from 0.9 to 11.1 cm (median: 3 cm). Distinctive nested glomoid neoplasms are composed of nests of round-to-ovoid cells with scant, palely eosinophilic cytoplasm and monomorphic nuclei with vesicular chromatin and small nucleoli. The nests are invested by prominent capillary networks, and they are situated within large lobules separated by irregular, thick fibrous septa. Among 18 tumors for which adjacent non-neoplastic tissue could be assessed, perivascular proliferation of tumor cells was identified in 16 tumors (89%). Microcystic architecture was present at least focally in 8 tumors (40%), and myxoid stroma was identified at least focally in 5 (25%). Seven tumors (35%) showed clear cell features. By immunohistochemistry, some tumors expressed MDM2 (7/15; 47%), S100 (5 of 19; 26%), STAT6 (2 of 5; 20%), and AE1/AE3 (1/5; 20%). Tumors rarely expressed pan-keratin (1/10; 10%) or CAM5.2 (1/10), and all tumors were negative for β-catenin (12 tumors), chromogranin (12), synaptophysin (11), epithelial membrane antigen (10), desmin (10), smooth muscle actin (9), INSM1 (7), and CD34 (6). GLI1 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on 7 tumors, and next-generation sequencing was performed on 15 tumors (10 DNA sequencing only, 1 RNA sequencing only, 4 both DNA and RNA sequencing). Sixteen tumors, including all 15 tested by next-generation sequencing and an additional case tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization only, were found to harbor GLI1 gene alterations: 10 harbored GLI1 gene rearrangements (3 ACTB :: GLI1 , 2 PTCH1 :: GLI1 , 1 HNRNPA1 :: GLI1 , 1 NEAT1 :: GLI1 , 1 TXNIP :: GLI1 , 2 undetermined fusion partners), and 6 harbored GLI1 amplification. Clinical follow-up was available for 10 patients (50%; range: 3 mo to 10 y; median: 6.4 y), including 8 with >1 year of follow-up. Three patients (30%) experienced local recurrence (at intervals of 3 mo to 10 y). None developed distant metastases or died of disease as yet. Overall, our findings support the notion that a subset of GLI1 -altered soft tissue neoplasms are indolent, morphologically distinctive nested glomoid neoplasms that should not be classified as sarcomas.

Case report: pseudoendocrine sarcoma, a clinicopathologic report of a newly described soft tissue neoplasm

Papke et al. recently reported a series of twenty-three soft tissue lesions chiefly arising in older adults featuring distinct morphological and genetic characteristics. Pseudoendocrine sarcoma (PS) is the somewhat descriptive and provisional term adopted for the newly reported mesenchymal neoplasm. Since the publication of the original paper published in January 2022, a single case of PS has been published. Pseudoendocrine sarcoma shows a predilection for the paravertebral deep soft tissues of the trunk, low-grade neuroendocrine-like histological features, and hallmark CTNNB1 activating mutations.Herein, we will discuss a case of a 72-year-old woman presenting with a 4-cm laterocervical mass. Hematoxylin and eosin slides showed a multilobular proliferation of monomorphic epithelioid cells with speckled chromatin arranged in nests and trabeculae. Immunohistochemical staining and molecular analysis were consistent with the newly proposed entity.

New molecular entities of soft tissue and bone tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The advances of molecular techniques have led to the refinement of the classification of mesenchymal tumors, leading to newly introduced entities in the recently published fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumors, which are discussed in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

For the first time, entities are included of which the name refers to the underlying molecular alteration including round cell sarcoma with EWSR1 -non-ETS fusions, CIC -rearranged sarcoma, and sarcoma with BCOR genetic alteration. EWSR1-SMAD3 -positive fibroblastic tumor and NTRK -rearranged spindle cell neoplasm are provisionally included as 'emerging' entities based on the underlying molecular alteration, though the entity still needs to be better defined. Other newly recognized entities are not named after their molecular change, but the molecular alteration helped to delineate them from others: atypical spindle cell/pleomorphic lipomatous tumor, anastomosing hemangioma, angiofibroma of soft tissue, myxoid pleomorphic liposarcoma, and poorly differentiated chordoma.

SUMMARY

Classification of mesenchymal tumors is increasingly based on the underlying molecular changes, although this cannot be interpreted separately from clinical, morphological, and immunohistochemical characteristics.

Fine needle aspiration biopsy of epithelioid-mesenchymal neoplasm with PTCH1-GLI1 fusion: A case report

Mesenchymal tumors harboring GLI1 gene fusions are a rare new entity that typically occur in the head and neck region of young to middle aged adults, with a particular predilection for the tongue. We report herein a case of epithelioid mesenchymal tumor with PTCH1-GLI1 gene fusion of the right submental region in an 82-year-old male never smoker. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) with concomitant core needle biopsy was performed. Cytology smears revealed a hypercellular, monotonous aspirate comprised of epithelioid to plasmacytoid cells with round regular nuclei and moderate amounts of cytoplasm. There were admixed granulomata. The patient underwent surgical resection with limited neck dissection and subsequent pathologic examination with performed next generation sequencing confirmed the presence of epithelioid mesenchymal tumor with PTCH1-GLI1 gene fusion. To our knowledge, this is the first reported example of a mesenchymal tumor harboring GLI1 gene fusion initially evaluated by FNA.

Mesenchymal/non-epithelial mimickers of neuroendocrine neoplasms with a focus on fusion gene-associated and SWI/SNF-deficient tumors

Mimickers of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) include a number of important pitfall tumors. Here, we describe our experience with mesenchymal mimics of NENs to illustrate their spectrum and draw the attention particularly to a group of mesenchymal/non-epithelial neoplasms (MN) that combine epithelioid histology with neuroendocrine (NE-) features and peculiar genetic abnormalities. In a consultation series of 4498 cases collected between 2009 and 2021, 2099 neoplasms expressing synaptophysin and/or chromograninA were reviewed and analyzed. A total of 364 (18%) were diagnosed as non-NENs, while the remaining tumors were NEN. The group of mesenchymal/non-epithelial neoplasms with NE-features (MN-NE) included 31/364 (8%) cases. These mostly malignant neoplasms showed an epithelioid morphology. While all but one tumor expressed synaptophysin, mostly patchy, only 10/29 (34%) co-expressed chromograninA. A total of 13/31 (42%) of the MN-NE showed EWSR1-related gene fusions (6 Ewing sarcomas, 5 clear cell sarcomas, and 1 desmoplastic small round cell tumor, 1 neoplasm with FUS-CREM gene fusion) and 7 (23%) were SWI/SNF (SMARCB1 or SMARCA4)-deficient neoplasms. The remaining MN-NE included synovial sarcoma, sclerosing epithelioid mesenchymal neoplasm, melanoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, and chordoma. A total of 27/31 MN-NE were from the last 8 years, and 6 of them were located in the pancreas. Eleven MN-NE were initially diagnosed as neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). MN-NE with epithelioid features play an increasing role as mimickers of NECs. They mostly belong to tumors with gene fusions involving the EWSR1 gene, or with SWI/SNF complex deficiency. Synaptophysin expression is mostly patchy and chromograninA expression is infrequent in MN-NE of this series and data extracted from literature.