β-catenin, Pax2, and Pten Panel Identifies Precancers Among Histologically Subdiagnostic Endometrial Lesions

Lesions sub-diagnostic of endometrioid intra-epithelial neoplasia/atypical hyperplasia: value of morphology and immunohistochemistry in predicting neoplastic outcome

AIMS

Areas of gland crowding that do not fulfil diagnostic criteria of endometrioid intra-epithelial neoplasia (EIN) are often encountered in endometrial biopsies. In this study, we document the prevalence of neoplastic outcome in patients with these subdiagnostic lesions (SL) and assess the utility of morphological features and a three-marker immunohistochemistry panel (PAX2, PTEN, beta-catenin) to predict outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 430 women with SL on endometrial sampling at Brigham and Women's Hospital between 2001 and 2021 with available follow-up biopsy, 72 (17%) had a neoplastic outcome (EIN or endometrioid carcinoma). Multilayered epithelium and mitoses in SL were statistically associated with a neoplastic outcome. Abnormal three-marker staining was observed in 93% (53 of 57) of SL with neoplastic outcome and 60% (37 of 62) of a control group with benign outcome. Among the 72 patients with neoplastic outcome, EIN/carcinoma tissue was available in 33; of these, 30 (91%) showed abnormal staining for one or more markers. Remarkably, in 84% of these cases the EIN/carcinoma had the aberrant expression seen in the preceding SL. Based on a prevalence of 17%, the positive and negative predictive values of abnormal staining in one or more markers were 24 and 97%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of SL warrants clinical surveillance and repeat sampling because it is followed by endometrioid neoplasia in a significant subset of patients. Normal three-marker staining identifies women with a very low risk of neoplastic outcome. Conversely, abnormal staining is frequent in SL with benign outcome leading to poor specificity and positive predictive value.

Predicting Progestin Therapy Response With PTEN, PAX2, and β-Catenin in Patients With Endometrioid Precancer

This study investigates the predictive value of biomarkers PTEN, PAX2, and β-catenin for therapeutic outcomes in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing progestin therapy. In a retrospective study of 128 patients, we analyzed a total of 351 endometrial biopsy samples and categorized outcomes into responders (absence of residual disease) and nonresponders (presence of residual disease). We found aberrant biomarker expression in pretreatment cases: 48% for PTEN, 65% for PAX2, and 36% for β-catenin. Approximately 77.3% of patients responded to progestin treatment, with nonresponders showing significantly higher initial PTEN loss (75.86% vs 39.79%, P < 0.001). Nonresponders also demonstrated significant PTEN loss (53.33% vs 20.55%, P < 0.001), PAX2 loss (57.33% vs 41.22%, P < 0.05), and β-catenin nuclear staining (53.45% vs 27.91%, P < 0.01) in follow-up samples. In addition, nonresponders exhibited lower recovery of intact PTEN and PAX2, along with higher β-catenin aberrancy in cases initially showing normal β-catenin levels. We conclude that persistent aberrant PTEN and PAX2 expression, coupled with emerging aberrant β-catenin in follow-ups, indicates a greater likelihood of treatment failure. Conversely, the absence of these aberrations suggests successful progestin therapy. Our findings highlight the utility of this 3-marker panel in assessing residual disease status and predicting progestin treatment outcomes, thus offering critical insights for patient management.

Utility of a PAX2, PTEN, and β-catenin Panel in the Diagnosis of Atypical Hyperplasia/Endometrioid Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Endometrial Polyps

The diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasm (AH/EIN) within endometrial polyps (EMPs) often poses a diagnostic conundrum. Our previous studies demonstrated that a panel of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers consisting of PAX2, PTEN, and β-catenin can be effectively utilized for the identification of AH/EIN. A total of 105 AH/EIN within EMP were analyzed using the 3-marker panel. We also evaluated these cases for the presence of morules. Benign EMP (n=90) and AH/EIN unassociated with polyp (n=111) served as controls. Aberrant expression of PAX2, PTEN, or β-catenin was observed in AH/EIN in EMP in 64.8%, 39.0%, and 61.9% of cases, respectively. At least 1 IHC marker was abnormal in 92.4% of cases. Overall, 60% of AH/EIN in EMP demonstrated abnormal results for≥2 IHC markers. The prevalence of PAX2 aberrancy was significantly lower in AH/EIN in EMP than in nonpolyp AH/EIN (64.8% vs. 81.1%, P =0.007), but higher than in benign EMP (64.8% vs. 14.4%, P <0.00001). The prevalence of β-catenin aberrancy was significantly higher in AH/EIN in EMP than in nonpolyp AH/EIN (61.9% vs. 47.7%, P =0.037). All control benign EMP demonstrated normal expression of PTEN and β-catenin. Morules were present in 38.1% of AH/EIN in EMP versus 24.3% in nonpolyp AH/EIN, and absent in benign EMP. A strong positive association was found between β-catenin and morules (Φ=0.64). Overall, 90% cases of atypical polypoid adenomyoma (n=6) and mucinous papillary proliferation (n=4) showed IHC marker aberrancy. In conclusion, the 3-marker IHC panel (PAX2, PTEN, and β-catenin) is (1) a useful tool in the diagnosis of AH/EIN in EMP; (2) PAX2 loss should be interpreted with caution and in combination with morphology and other markers.