Genotypic analysis of hydatidiform mole: an accurate and practical method of diagnosis

Evaluation of Combined p57KIP2 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescent in situ Hybridization Analysis for Hydatidiform Moles Compared with Genotyping Diagnosis

Immunostaining with p57KIP2 is a widely used diagnostic technique to differentiate complete hydatidiform moles (CHMs) from partial hydatidiform moles (PHM) and non-molar hydropic abortion. However, distinguishing between PHMs and non-molar hydropic abortions using histopathology alone is often challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the technical validity and additional benefits of using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in combination with p57KIP2 immunostaining to diagnose molar and non-molar conceptuses. The study involved 80 specimens, which underwent genetic diagnosis using short tandem repeat analysis, including 44 androgenetic CHMs, 20 diandric monogynic PHMs, 14 biparental non-molar hydropic abortions, 1 monoandric digynic triploid abortion, and 1 vaginal specimen of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Two pathologists independently diagnosed the cases based on morphology and p57KIP2 immunostaining while the clinical information was masked. FISH analysis was performed using 3 probes (CEP17, CEPX, and CEPY), which revealed that all androgenetic CHM and biparental diploid non-molar hydropic abortion specimens were diploid. Among the 20 diandric monogynic PHM cases examined by analyzing short tandem repeat polymorphisms, 18 were triploid, and the remaining 2 were diploid. These two specimens were possibly androgenetic/biparental mosaics based on FISH analysis, where the three-signal ratios counting 50 cells were clearly within the diploid ranges. Eight of the 20 genetic PHMs and 2 of the 14 genetically confirmed non-molar hydropic abortions that were falsely diagnosed based on morphology and immunohistochemistry by at least 1 pathologist were correctly diagnosed as PHM and non-molar hydropic abortion, respectively, by FISH analysis. However, 1 monoandric digynic villus was classified as triploid by FISH analysis, leading to a false PHM diagnosis. In conclusion, the combination of FISH analysis with p57KIP2 immunostaining helps in diagnosing molar and non-molar conceptuses in numerous cases; nevertheless, exceptional cases should be considered.

Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining Helps Reduce Maternal Contamination in Short Tandem Repeat Genotyping for Hydatidiform Mole Diagnosis

Short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping provides parental origin information about aneuploidy pregnancy loss and has become the current gold standard for hydatidiform mole diagnosis. STR genotyping diagnostic support most commonly relies on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, but maternal contamination is one of the most common issues based on traditional unstained sections. To evaluate the influence of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining on DNA quality and STR genotyping, DNA was isolated from unstained, deparaffinized hydrated, and H&E-stained tissue sections (i.e. 3 groups) from each of 6 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded placentas. The macrodissected view field, DNA quality, and polymerase chain reaction amplification efficiency were compared among groups. STR genotyping analysis was performed in both the test cohort (n = 6) and the validation cohort (n = 149). H&E staining not only did not interfere with molecular DNA testing of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue but also had a clearer macrodissected field of vision. In the test cohort, H&E-stained sections were the only group that did not exhibit maternal miscellaneous peaks in STR genotyping results. In the validation cohort, 138 (92.62%) cases yielded satisfactory amplification results without maternal contamination. Thus, H&E staining helped to reduce maternal contamination in STR genotyping for hydatidiform mole diagnosis, suggesting that H&E-stained sections can be incorporated into the hydatidiform mole molecular diagnostic workflow.

Molar pregnancy unveiled by DNA profiling: a rare forensic case study

Background

Forensic DNA analysis is one of the most advanced tools in the criminal investigation. It is used successfully in solving offenses involving rape, paternity disputes, murder or attempt to murder, and dacoity as well as identification of mutilated body remains. DNA profiling is used to determine paternity in sexual offense cases where abortion takes place and the product of conception can be anywhere from 6 to 10 weeks of gestation to 8 months. In the present case, a tissue sample stated as a vesicular mole and blood samples of the mother and suspected father were submitted to the DNA division of our laboratory for paternity analysis.

Results

Genotyping results revealed a single allele at all the tested short tandem repeat (STR) loci. The allele obtained at each locus was common with the suspected father. Such type of genotype was very rare and not observed earlier; therefore, repeated analysis was done and the same genotype was obtained every time. DNA profiling revealed all the alleles in the vesicular mole to be of paternal origin only, devoid of any maternal alleles. After referring to books on gynecology, it was confirmed that the genotype obtained was of hydatidiform mole.

Conclusions

In this POCSO Act case, the product of conception (about 1.5 months old) was termed a vesicular mole, and blood samples of the mother and suspected father were sent for the DNA paternity test. STR profiling of the product of conception sample displayed no maternal tissue contamination and non-inheritance of maternal alleles, showing the case to be of molar pregnancy also called hydatidiform mole, a very rare phenomenon in the forensic scenario. After thorough analysis, the case was reported and it was the first of its kind to be reported in a forensic laboratory in Maharashtra, India.

Twin pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and co-existing fetus: A report of 15 cases with a clinicopathological analysis and DNA genotyping

Complete hydatidiform mole (CHM) with co-existing fetus (CHMCF) is very uncommon. In this study, we investigated the clinicopathological features and DNA genotype in 15 CHMCF. Seven patients (46.7%) developed post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), 5 of which had lung metastasis. CHMCF was histologically characterized by a mixed pattern of CHM and the non-molar placenta, mimicking partial hydatidiform mole and placental mesenchymal dysplasia. p57 immunostaining showed a divergent staining pattern, positive in the normal placenta and negative in the CHM component. DNA genotyping of the CHM villi demonstrated exclusively paternal alleles consisting of homozygous/monospermic (n = 9) and heterozygous/dispermic patterns (n = 5) at multiple informative loci. We conclude that CHMCF confers a high risk for post-molar GTD. DNA genotyping contributes significantly to the precision diagnosis of CHMCF.

Challenges in diagnosing hydatidiform moles: a review of promising molecular biomarkers

INTRODUCTION

Hydatidiform moles (HMs) are pathologic conceptions with unique genetic bases and abnormal placental villous tissue. Overlapping ultrasonographical and histological manifestations of molar and non-molar (NM) gestations and HMs subtypes makes accurate diagnosis challenging. Currently, immunohistochemical analysis of p57 and molecular genotyping have greatly improved the diagnostic accuracy.

AREAS COVERED

The differential expression of molecular biomarkers may be valuable for distinguishing among the subtypes of HMs and their mimics. Thus, biomarkers may be the key to refining HMs diagnosis. In this review, we summarize the current challenges in diagnosing HMs, and provide a critical overview of the recent literature about potential diagnostic biomarkers and their subclassifications. An online search on PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases was conducted from the inception to 1 April 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

the emerging biomarkers offer new possibilities to refine the diagnosis for HMs and pregnancy loss. Although the additional studies are required to be quantified and investigated in clinical trials to verify their diagnostic utility. It is important to explore, validate, and facilitate the wide adoption of newly developed biomarkers in the coming years.

Twin/Multiple Gestations With a Hydatidiform Mole: Clinicopathologic Analysis of 21 Cases With Emphasis on Molecular Genotyping and Parental Contribution

Complete hydatidiform moles (CHMs) and partial hydatidiform moles (PHMs) are abnormal gestations characterized by vesicular chorionic villi accompanied by variable trophoblastic hyperplasia, with or without embryonic development. CHMs are purely androgenetic (only paternal [P] chromosome complements), mostly homozygous/monospermic (~85%) but occasionally heterozygous/dispermic, whereas PHMs are overwhelmingly diandric triploid (2 paternal [P] and 1 maternal [M] chromosome complements) and heterozygous/dispermic (>95%). The presence of a fetus in a molar pregnancy usually indicates a PHM rather than a CHM; however, CHMs and PHMs rarely can be associated with a viable fetus or a nonmolar abortus in twin pregnancies and rare multiple gestation molar pregnancies have been reported. A "one-oocyte-model," with diploidization of dispermic triploid zygotes, has been proposed for twin CHM with coexisting fetus, and a "two-oocyte-model" has been proposed for twin PHM with coexisting fetus. Among 2447 products of conception specimens, we identified 21 cases of twin/multiple gestations with a molar component, including 20 CHMs (17 twins, 2 triplets, 1 quintuplet) and 1 PHM (twin). P57 immunohistochemistry was performed on all; DNA genotyping of molar and nonmolar components was performed on 9 twin CHMs, 1 triplet CHM, 1 quintuplet CHM, and 1 twin PHM. All CHM components were p57-negative and those genotyped were purely androgenetic. Twin CHMs had genotypes of P1M1+P2P2 in 5, P1M1+P1P1 in 1, and P1M1+P2P3 in 1, consistent with involvement of 1 oocyte and from 1 to 3 sperm-most commonly a homozygous CHM but involving 2 sperm in the whole conception-and compatible with a "one-oocyte-model." The triplet CHM was P1M1+P1P1+P2M2 and the quintuplet CHM was P1M1+P2M2+P2M2+P3M3+P4P4, consistent with involvement of 2 sperm and at least 2 oocytes for the triplet and 4 sperm and at least 3 oocytes for the quintuplet. The twin PHM had a P1M1+P2P3M2 genotype, consistent with involvement of 2 oocytes and 3 sperm. p57 immunohistochemistry is highly reliable for diagnosis of CHMs in twin/multiple gestations. Refined diagnosis of molar twin/multiple gestations is best accomplished by correlating morphology, p57 immunohistochemistry, and molecular genotyping, with the latter clarifying zygosity/parental chromosome complement contributions to these conceptions.

Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Contemporary Diagnostic Approach

Pathologic diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD)-hydatidiform moles and gestational trophoblastic neoplasms-underwent a major shift in the past decade from morphology-based recognition to precise molecular genetic classification of entities, which also allows for prognostic stratification of molar gestations. This article highlights these recent advances and their integration into the routine pathology practice. The traditional gross and histomorphologic features of each entity are also reviewed with special focus on differential diagnoses and their clinical implications.

Loss of p57 Expression in Conceptions Other Than Complete Hydatidiform Mole: A Case Series With Emphasis on the Etiology, Genetics, and Clinical Significance

Combined p57 immunohistochemistry and DNA genotyping refines classification of products of conception specimens into specific types of hydatidiform moles and various nonmolar entities that can simulate them. p57 expression is highly correlated with genotyping and in practice can reliably be used to identify virtually all complete hydatidiform moles (CHM), but aberrant retained or lost p57 expression in rare CHMs and partial hydatidiform moles (PHM), as well as loss in some nonmolar abortuses, has been reported. Among a series of 2329 products of conceptions, we identified 10 cases for which loss of p57 expression was inconsistent with genotyping results (none purely androgenetic). They displayed a spectrum of generally mild abnormal villous morphology but lacked better developed features of CHMs/early CHMs, although some did suggest subtle forms of the latter. For 5 cases, genotyping (4 cases) and/or ancillary testing (1 case) determined a mechanism for the aberrant p57 results. These included 3 PHMs-2 diandric triploid and 1 triandric tetraploid-and 1 nonmolar specimen with loss of p57 expression attributable to partial or complete loss of the maternal copy of chromosome 11 and 1 nonmolar specimen with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. For 5 cases, including 2 diandric triploid PHMs and 3 biparental nonmolar specimens, genotyping did not identify a mechanism, likely due to other genetic alterations which are below the resolution of or not targeted by genotyping. While overdiagnosis of a PHM as a CHM may cause less harm since appropriate follow-up with serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels would take place for both diagnoses, this could cause longer than necessary follow-up due to the expectation of a much greater risk of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease for CHM compared with PHM, which would be unfounded for the correct diagnosis of PHM. Overdiagnosis of a nonmolar abortus with loss of p57 expression as a CHM would lead to unnecessary follow-up and restriction on pregnancy attempts for patients with infertility. Genotyping is valuable for addressing discordance between p57 expression and morphology but cannot elucidate certain mechanisms of lost p57 expression. Future studies are warranted to determine whether chromosomal losses or gains, particularly involving imprinted genes such as p57, might play a role in modifying the risk of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease for PHMs and nonmolar conceptions that are not purely androgenetic but have some abnormal paternal imprinting of the type seen in CHMs.

Complete Hydatidiform Mole and Coexisting Fetus With Gastroschisis: A Case Report Highlighting the Importance of Diagnostic Genotyping

Twin pregnancy with a complete hydatidiform mole and a coexisting fetus (CHMCF) is an extremely rare occurrence, described only by a handful of published series and cases reports. The majority of the literature on CHMCF examines prenatal care and follow-up in relation to the increased risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). At present, few reports elaborate on the diagnostic process and differential diagnosis, especially in the context of recent molecular advances in risk stratification for GTN. Here, we describe the first known case of a CHMCF with gastroschisis with liveborn delivery at 35 weeks gestation. This report aims to review the pre- and postnatal differential diagnosis and discuss recent updates on the importance of ancillary studies in the diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease.

When a vesicular placenta meets a live fetus: case report of twin pregnancy with a partial hydatidiform mole

BACKGROUND

Hydatidiform moles exhibit a distinctive gross appearance of multiple vesicles in the placenta. The advances in cytogenetic technologies have helped uncover novel entities of hydatidiform moles and enabled elaborate diagnoses. However, management of a vesicular placenta with a coexistent live fetus poses a bigger challenge beyond hydatidiform moles.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 33-year-old woman was referred to our department for suspected hydatidiform mole coexistent with a live fetus at 24 weeks' gestation. The patient had conceived through double embryo transplantation, and first-trimester ultrasonography displayed a single sac. Mid-trimester imaging findings of normal placenta parenchyma admixed with multiple vesicles and a single amniotic cavity with a fetus led to suspicion of a singleton partial molar pregnancy. After confirmation of a normal diploid by amniocentesis and close surveillance, the patient delivered a healthy neonate. Preliminary microscopic examination of the placenta failed to clarify the diagnosis until fluorescence in situ hybridization showed a majority of XXY sex chromosomes. The patient developed suspected choriocarcinoma and achieved remission for 5 months after chemotherapy, but relapsed with suspected intermediate trophoblastic tumor.

CONCLUSION

We report a rare case of twin pregnancy comprising a partial mole and a normal fetus that resembled a singleton partial molar pregnancy. Individualized care is important in conditions where a vesicular placenta coexists with a fetus. We strongly recommend ancillary examinations in addition to traditional morphologic assessment in such cases.

Androgenetic/Biparental Mosaic/Chimeric Conceptions With a Molar Component: A Diagnostic and Clinical Challenge

Hydatidiform moles (HM) are gestational trophoblastic diseases which arise due to an imbalance in genetic material and which are morphologically characterized by enlarged and irregular chorionic villi and trophoblastic hyperplasia, among other features. The morphologic differential diagnosis for HM encompasses a number of entities including androgenetic/biparental mosaic/chimeric (ABMC) conceptions, an interesting duo of lesions with a nonmolar form (placental mesenchymal dysplasia) and a molar form (typically with a complete HM component). ABMC conceptions contain a mixture of 2 cell populations (1 androgenetic and 1 biparental) and arise as a result of mosaicism (mitotic error in a zygote) or chimerism (fusion of 2 zygotes). Because of their unique molecular underpinnings, these rare lesions show a number of findings including the presence of multiple villous populations, discordant p57 immunostaining, and mixed genotypes. ABMC conceptions are important to accurately diagnose as the molar form in particular carries a risk for persistent gestational trophoblastic diseases and thus requires appropriate treatment and follow-up. In this report, we provide detailed characterizations of 2 such cases of ABMC conceptions with a molar component. Both patients (ages 34 and 31) were in the first trimester of pregnancy and had ultrasound findings concerning for HM. Increased comprehension of the pathogenesis and morphology of ABMC conceptions, combined with ancillary techniques including p57 immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and molar genotyping, has allowed us to accurately and efficiently identify these lesions. However, a number of pitfalls exist which may lead to misdiagnosis.

Genotyping diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease: frontiers in precision medicine

Investigations in recent decades have exploited tissue DNA genotyping as a powerful ancillary tool for the precision diagnosis and subclassification of gestational trophoblastic disease. As lesions of gestational origin, the inherited paternal genome, with or without copy number alterations, is the fundamental molecular basis for the diagnostic applications of DNA genotyping. Genotyping is now considered the gold standard in the confirmation and subtyping of sporadic hydatidiform moles. Although a precise diagnosis of partial mole requires DNA genotyping, prognostic stratification according to distinct genetic zygosity in complete moles has recently gained significant clinical relevance for patient care. Beyond hydatidiform moles, DNA genotyping has fundamental applications in the diagnosis or prognostic assessment of gestational trophoblastic tumors, in particular gestational choriocarcinoma. DNA genotyping provides a decisive tool in the separation of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia from non-gestational counterparts/mimics of either germ cell or somatic origin. The FIGO/WHO prognostic scoring scheme requires ascertaining the precise index gestational event and the time interval between the tumor and index gestation, where DNA genotyping can provide highly relevant information. With rapid acquisition of molecular diagnostic capabilities in the clinical practice, DNA genotyping has become closely integrated into the routine diagnostic workup of various forms of gestational trophoblastic disease.

A high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia derived from a complete hydatidiform mole with coexisting fetus identified by short tandem repeats analysis: A case report

A complete hydatidiform mole coexisting with a fetus (CHMCF) is a rare form of twin pregnancy. High-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) can occur after a CHMCF pregnancy, although the frequency is low. In cases of GTN, the clinical diagnosis and that based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) scoring system can differ. This case report concerns a patient with a choriocarcinoma that was initially diagnosed and treated as a low-risk stage III GTN following a live birth from a CHMCF pregnancy. We used short tandem repeat (STR) analysis to identify the causative pregnancy as the patient's earlier complete hydatidiform mole. Clinicians should anticipate a high-risk GTN when treating persistent trophoblastic disease (PTD) in patients with a non-typical course.

•

A fetus and a complete hydatidiform mole can coexist as a twin pregnancy.

•

A complete hydatidiform mole coexisting with a fetus can rarely cause choriocarcinoma.

•

Short tandem repeat analysis can be used to identify causative pregnancies.

•

Causative pregnancy is a risk factor for persistent trophoblastic disease.

Refined diagnosis of hydatidiform moles with p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping: updated analysis of a prospective series of 2217 cases

Immunohistochemical analysis of p57 expression and molecular genotyping accurately subclassify molar specimens into complete hydatidiform mole (CHM) and partial hydatidiform mole (PHM) and distinguish these from nonmolar specimens. Characteristics of a prospective series of potentially molar specimens analyzed in a large gynecologic pathology practice are summarized. Of 2217 cases (2160 uterine, 57 ectopic), 2080 (94%) were successfully classified: 571 CHMs (570 uterine, 1 ectopic), 498 PHMs (497 uterine, 1 ectopic), 900 nonmolar (including 147 trisomies, 19 digynic triploids, and 4 donor egg conceptions), and 56 androgenetic/biparental mosaics; 137 were complex or unsatisfactory and not definitively classified. CHMs dominated in patients aged < 21 and >45 years and were the only kind of molar conception found in the latter group. Of 564 successfully immunostained CHMs, 563 (99.8%) were p57-negative (1 p57-positive [retained maternal chromosome 11] androgenetic by genotyping). Of 153 genotyped CHMs, 148 (96.7%) were androgenetic (85% monospermic) and 5 were biparental, the latter likely familial biparental hydatidiform moles. Of 486 successfully immunostained PHMs, 481 (99%) were p57-positive (3 p57-negative [loss of maternal chromosome 11], 2 unknown mechanism). Of 497 genotyped PHMs, 484 (97%) were diandric triploid (99% dispermic) and 13 were triandric tetraploid (all at least dispermic). Of 56 androgenetic/biparental mosaics, 37 had a p57-negative complete molar component (16 confirmed as androgenetic by genotyping). p57 expression is highly correlated with genotyping, serving as a reliable marker for CHMs, and identifies molar components and androgenetic cell lines in mosaic conceptions. Correlation of morphology, p57 expression, genotyping data, and history are required to recognize familial biparental hydatidiform moles and donor egg conceptions, as the former can be misclassified as nonmolar and the latter can be misclassified as dispermic CHM on the basis of isolated genotyping results.

First-trimester miscarriage: A histopathological classification proposal

BACKGROUND

Histopathology of first-trimester abortion products may be useful in document an intrauterine pregnancy, identifying an important pathology affecting the mother or the embryo and diagnosing conditions that are likely to recur in future pregnancies or that explain the adverse fetal outcome. Relevant information provided by histology is essential to determine the cause and to guide the patients with early pregnancy failure.

AIMS

Histopathological classification proposal in first-trimester miscarriage.

METHODS

Published pathological criteria in first-trimester abortion specimens were collected, standardized and focused into a comprehensive diagnosis. The idea was to create a comprehensive classification related to major pathophysiological processes. Thus, the histological criteria were grouped into 7 categories: i. Changes suggesting aneuploidy (CSA) or metabolic storage disease; ii. Embryo anomaly (EA); iii. Multifactorial (MF) causes; iv. Maternal causes (MC); v. Gestational trophoblastic disease, such as hydatidiform mole (HM) and non neoplastic lesions and neoplasms; vi. Ectopic pregnancy; vii. Other. So, a 6-years retrospective study of first-trimester spontaneous miscarriage were reviewed. Two groups were created: i. Study group include specimens with pathological diagnosis; ii. Control group incorporate specimens with pathological diagnosis and additional genetic study in order to validate pathological criteria.

RESULTS

Pathological criteria concordance between inter-observers was generally good, with an excellent correlation in EA and HM categories. Despite greater inter-observer disagreement in the CSA and MC categories the correlation with the genetic results was very positive.

CONCLUSION

A standardized, reproducible and biologically comprehensive histopathological classification may improve fetal follow-up and couple's management.

Distinct genomic profiles of gestational choriocarcinoma, a unique cancer of pregnant tissues

Little is known about genomic alterations of gestational choriocarcinoma (GC), unique cancer that originates in pregnant tissues, and the progression mechanisms from the nonmalignant complete hydatidiform mole (CHM) to GC. Whole-exome sequencing (20 GCs) and/or single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray (29 GCs) were performed. We analyzed copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity (CN-LOH) in 29 GCs that exhibited androgenetic CN-LOHs (20 monospermic, 8 dispermic) and no CN-LOH (one with NLRP7 mutation). Most GCs (25/29) harboring recurrent copy number alterations (CNAs) and gains on 1q21.1-q44 were significantly associated with poor prognosis. We detected five driver mutations in the GCs, most of which were chromatin remodeling gene (ARID1A, SMARCD1, and EP300) mutations but not in common cancer genes such as TP53 and KRAS. One patient’s serial CHM/invasive mole/GC showed consistent CN-LOHs, but only the GC harbored CNAs, indicating that CN-LOH is an early pivotal event in HM-IM-GC development, and CNAs may be a late event that promotes CHM progression to GC. Our data indicate that GCs have unique profiles of CN-LOHs, mutations and CNAs that together differentiate GCs from non-GCs. Practically, CN-LOH and CNA profiles are useful for the molecular diagnosis of GC and the selection of GC patients with poor prognosis for more intensive treatments, respectively.

Genomic analysis reveals chromosomal alterations that drive disease progression in a poorly understood class of tumors that form in placental tissue. Gestational choriocarcinoma (GC) arises during pregnancy and can quickly develop into lethal metastatic disease if not treated promptly. To identify the origins of such malignancies, researchers led by Sug Hyung Lee and Yeun-Jun Chung at The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, profiled genetic aberrations in 29 GC specimens. The researchers did not observe any consistent link between these malignancies and a particular set of ‘driver mutations’ underlying tumor progression as has been seen in other solid tumors. However, these GC samples exhibited striking levels of rearrangement between chromosomes. The researchers propose that the gain or loss of genes resulting from these chromosomal abnormalities may be an important contributor to rapidly progressing forms of this disease.

Prevalence of Partial Hydatidiform Mole in Products of Conception From Gestations With Fetal Triploidy Merits Reflex Genotype Testing Independent of the Morphologic Appearance of the Chorionic Villi

Diagnosis of first-trimester partial mole is challenging as the key morphologic features may not be well-developed and may overlap with those of a nonmolar gestation harboring a cytogenetic disorder or degenerative changes. Genotype testing has emerged as the reference tool to distinguish partial mole (diandric triploid genotype) from its nonmolar mimics. However, observer variation in defining the minimum threshold of how much morphologic alteration is required to trigger genotype testing may result in a subset of partial moles that go undetected. We hypothesized that the results of fetal aneuploidy testing performed for prenatal screening or evaluation of miscarriage may assist with triggering molecular testing in the evaluation of products of conception, specifically if fetal triploidy is detected. Gestations with fetal triploidy are either a partial mole (diandric triploidy) or are nonmolar (digynic triploidy). The aims of this study were to define the prevalence of partial mole in 20 products of conception specimens with known fetal triploidy by performing genotype testing and then to determine how well established morphologic criteria for partial mole correlate with the genotype results in this setting. Genotype testing demonstrated that 65% (13/20) were a partial mole and the remainder were nonmolar digynic triploid gestations. Most partial moles were under 9 weeks gestational age and, as expected, lacked classic well-developed morphologic features. Nearly a third (4/13) of the partial moles were originally interpreted as normal or nonmolar gestations with minimal abnormalities that did not merit molecular testing to exclude a partial mole. Even with the retrospective systematic morphologic review, only 23% (3/13) exhibited the combination of chorionic villous enlargement of ≥2.5 mm and cisterns, which has been previously established as the morphologic criteria with the highest predictive value for a molecularly defined partial mole. The other 77% exhibited focal, limited, variable degrees and extent of villous morphologic alterations. We conclude that, given the high prevalence of partial mole among products of conception with known fetal triploidy and the low prevalence of diagnostic morphologic findings in such specimens, reflex genotype testing should be performed in all such cases, regardless of whether or not the morphologic features are suspicious for a partial mole. This reflex testing strategy mitigates against the subjectivity of determining whether subtle villous abnormalities are significant enough to merit pursuing genotype testing. The success of this strategy depends on the clinician documenting the fetal triploidy result at the time of submitting the products of conception specimen and therefore clinician education is needed. Finally, it remains to be determined whether the risk for postmolar gestational trophoblastic disease is the same in diandric triploid gestations that exhibit classic morphologic features as in those that exhibit minimal or negligible villous morphologic abnormalities.

Heterozygous/dispermic complete mole confers a significantly higher risk for post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease

Hydatidiform moles are classified at the genetic level as androgenetic complete mole and diandric-monogynic partial mole. Conflicting data exist whether heterozygous complete moles are more aggressive clinically than homozygous complete moles. We investigated clinical outcome in a large cohort of hydatidiform moles in Chinese patients with an emphasis on genotypical correlation with post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease. Consecutive products of conceptions undergoing DNA genotyping and p57 immunohistochemistry to rule out molar gestations were included from a 5-year period at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital. Patient demographics and clinical follow-up information were obtained. Post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease or gestational trophoblastic neoplasia was determined by the 2002 WHO/FIGO criteria. A total of 1245 products of conceptions were classified based on genotyping results into 219 complete moles, 250 partial moles, and 776 non-molar gestations. Among 219 complete moles, 186 were homozygous/monospermic and 33 were heterozygous/dispermic. Among 250 partial moles, 246 were triploid dispermic, 2 were triploid monospermic, and 2 were tetraploid heterozygous partial moles. Among 776 non-molar gestations, 644 were diploid without chromosomal aneuploidies detectable by STR genotyping and 132 had various genetic abnormalities including 122 cases of various trisomies, 2 triploid digynic-monoandric non-molar gestations, 7 cases of possible chromosomal monosomy or uniparental disomy. Successful follow-up was achieved in 165 complete moles: post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease developed in 11.6% (16/138 cases) of homozygous complete moles and 37.0% (10/27 cases) of heterozygous complete moles. The difference between the two groups was highly significant (p = 0.0009, chi-square). None of the 218 partial moles and 367 non-molar gestations developed post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease. In conclusion, heterozygous/dispermic complete moles are clinically more aggressive with a significantly higher risk for development of post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease compared with homozygous/monospermic complete moles. Therefore, precise genotyping classification of complete moles is important for clinical prognosis and patient management.

p57-discordant villi in hydropic products of conception: a clinicopathological study of 70 cases

p57 immunostaining is performed on hydropic products of conception to diagnose hydatidiform moles (HMs), which can progress to gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Partial hydatidiform mole (PHM) and hydropic abortion (HA) display positive staining in stromal and cytotrophoblastic cells, whereas complete hydatidiform mole (CHM) is characterized by loss of p57 expression in both cell types. In some cases, an aberrant pattern is observed, called discordant p57 expression, with positive cytotrophoblast staining and negative stromal staining, or vice versa. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical, biological, and pathological characteristics of p57-discordant villi (p57DV) and other associated populations in cases of divergent p57 expression and to compare the evolutions of p57DV-associated and classic CHMs. Seventy cases of p57DV diagnosed by referent pathologists were divided into two groups, G1: p57DV ± non-CHM component (n = 22) and G2: p57DV + CHM component (n = 48). p57DV morphology was similar in the two groups. Observation of more than two populations and hybrid villi on p57 immunostaining were significantly more frequent in G2. The clinical, ultrasound, and biological presentations of p57DV-associated and classic CHMs were similar. The initial pathological diagnosis was more frequently incorrect, missing the CHM component, for the p57DV-associated CHMs. Molecular genotyping was informative in seven cases and identified as androgenetic/biparental mosaicism in four cases. These results show that p57DV are a diagnostic challenge for pathologists and that most are associated with a CHM component. However, the clinical management of p57DV-associated CHMs should be the same as that of classic CHMs.

Precision genotyping diagnosis of lung tumors with trophoblastic morphology in young women

Trophoblastic differentiation has been previously described in somatic carcinomas at different primary sites, including the lung. Lung carcinomas with trophoblastic morphology presenting in women during the reproductive years pose a unique diagnostic challenge due to their overlapping microscopical and immunophenotypical features with metastatic choriocarcinoma of gestational origin. Distinction between the two entities is paramount as they require different chemotherapeutic regimens and have a markedly different prognostic outlook. Here we report a series of three female patients (ages 37-48 years) presenting with lung masses. Two of the three patients were noted to have elevated serum beta-hCG levels at the time of their presentation, while serum beta-hCG was not evaluated preoperatively in the third patient. None of them had a clinical history of molar pregnancy or gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Core biopsies of the lung masses were performed in two patients and one patient underwent a wedge resection, showing poorly differentiated carcinoma in all cases with scattered multinucleated giant cells, hemorrhage, and necrosis. Beta-hCG immunostain was performed in two cases and showed diffuse immunoreactivity. Clinical history and imaging studies were not conclusive in any of the cases to rule out a gestational origin. Short tandem repeat genotyping analysis was performed to compare the allelic patterns between tumor and normal tissues and revealed identical profiles in one case, consistent with somatic origin, and unique paternal alleles in two cases, confirming metastatic gestational choriocarcinoma. The patient with primary somatic lung carcinoma died of disease within 15 months despite chemotherapy, while both patients with gestational choriocarcinoma responded well to chemotherapy and are alive without evidence of disease. Our cases illustrate the diagnostic pitfalls of lung tumors with trophoblastic differentiation in young women. Genotyping analysis offers precise diagnostic distinction between primary lung carcinoma and gestational choriocarcinoma with major therapeutic and prognostic implications for the patients.

Measurements in First-Trimester Abortion Products: A Pathologic Study

CONTEXT.—

Related to the advances in prenatal diagnosis and the emergence of medically challenging situations, there has been an increased interest in conducting a pathologic study of first-trimester abortion products.

OBJECTIVE.—

To evaluate measurements across a large group of first-trimester spontaneous abortion specimens. Potential goals include a validation of prenatal embryo and gestational-sac measurements as a function of gestational age (GA).

DESIGN.—

A retrospective case study of first-trimester spontaneous abortions between June 2015 and April 2017 in Centro de Genética Clínica Embryo-Fetal Pathology Laboratory, Porto, Portugal. Considering the inclusion criteria, 585 complete gestational sacs, 182 embryos, and 116 umbilical cords were selected. We recorded the weight of the gestational sacs and embryos and measurements of gestational sacs, umbilical cords, and embryo crown-rump length. Models were computed using regression techniques.

RESULTS.—

Gestational-sac diameter percentiles 5, 25, 50, 75 and 95 were calculated according to GA, and at each 1-week interval the diameter increased an average of 3 mm. Umbilical cord length percentiles 5, 25, 50, 75 and 95 were calculated according to GA, and at each 1-week interval, the length increased an average of 1.35 mm. Embryo crown-rump length estimated mean ± SD values were GA 6 weeks, 5.3 ± 2.3 mm; GA 7 weeks, 9.4 ± 4.8 mm; GA 8 weeks, 13.7 ± 8.2 mm; GA 9 weeks, 20.8 ± 9.1 mm; GA 10 weeks, 22.6 ± 13.4 mm; GA 11 weeks, 29.4 ± 12.9 mm; and GA 12 weeks, 52 mm.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Pathologic measurements obtained should be compared to expected measurements and correlated with ultrasound findings, clinical information, and microscopic findings. Deviations from expected values could lead to an understanding of early pregnancy loss.

Hydatidiform Moles: Ancillary Techniques to Refine Diagnosis

Context.—

Distinction of hydatidiform moles from nonmolar specimens and subclassification of hydatidiform moles as complete hydatidiform mole versus partial hydatidiform mole are important for clinical practice and investigational studies. Risk of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease and clinical management differ for these entities. Diagnosis based on morphology is subject to interobserver variability and remains problematic, even for experienced gynecologic pathologists.

Objectives.—

To explain how ancillary techniques target the unique genetic features of hydatidiform moles to establish diagnostic truth, highlight the issue of diagnostic reproducibility and importance of diagnostic accuracy, and illustrate use of p57 immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction–based DNA genotyping for diagnosis.

Data Sources.—

Sources are the author's 10-year experience using ancillary techniques for the evaluation of potentially molar specimens in a large gynecologic pathology practice and the literature.

Conclusions.—

The unique genetics of complete hydatidiform moles (purely androgenetic), partial hydatidiform moles (diandric triploid), and nonmolar specimens (biparental, with allelic balance) allow for certain techniques, including immunohistochemical analysis of p57 expression (a paternally imprinted, maternally expressed gene) and genotyping, to refine diagnoses of hydatidiform moles. Although p57 immunostaining alone can identify complete hydatidiform moles, which lack p57 expression because of a lack of maternal DNA, this analysis does not distinguish partial hydatidiform moles from nonmolar specimens because both express p57 because of the presence of maternal DNA. Genotyping, which compares villous and decidual DNA patterns to determine the parental source and ratios of polymorphic alleles, distinguishes purely androgenetic complete hydatidiform moles from diandric triploid partial hydatidiform moles, and both of these from biparental nonmolar specimens. An algorithmic approach to diagnosis using these techniques is advocated.

Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization in Surgical Pathology Practice

There have been rapid and significant advances in diagnostic and predictive molecular techniques in recent years with profound impact on patient care. In situ hybridization (ISH) studies have become well entrenched in surgical pathology practice and their role in the evaluation of HER2 in breast carcinoma and their diagnostic utility in soft tissue pathology are well known. Fluorescent ISH is being increasingly used in other sites such as the head and neck and the gynecologic tract. Like most tests in surgical pathology, ISH studies require good quality tissue, correlation with clinical and histopathologic findings, and adherence to guidelines for optimal assay performance and interpretation. Although ISH studies are largely performed in tertiary centers, the tissue is often processed by a variety of laboratories and the referring pathologists are required to discuss the need, relevance, and significance of these tests and the results with their clinical colleagues. Here we review the predictive and diagnostic utility of fluorescent ISH studies in a variety of organ systems, the preanalytical factors that may affect the results, and the pitfalls in the interpretation that all practicing surgical pathologists should be aware of.

Triploidy--Observations in 154 Diandric Cases

Hydatidiform moles (HMs) are abnormal human pregnancies with vesicular chorionic villi, imposing two clinical challenges; miscarriage and a risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). The parental type of most HMs are either diandric diploid (PP) or diandric triploid (PPM). We consecutively collected 154 triploid or near-triploid samples from conceptuses with vesicular chorionic villi. We used analysis of DNA markers and/or methylation sensitive-MLPA and collected data from registries and patients records. We performed whole genome SNP analysis of one case of twinning (PP+PM).In all 154 triploids or near-triploids we found two different paternal contributions to the genome (P1P2M). The ratios between the sex chromosomal constitutions XXX, XXY, and XYY were 5.7: 6.9: 1.0. No cases of GTN were observed. Our results corroborate that all triploid human conceptuses with vesicular chorionic villi have the parental type P1P2M. The sex chromosomal ratios suggest approximately equal frequencies of meiosis I and meiosis II errors with selection against the XYY conceptuses or a combination of dispermy, non-disjunction in meiosis I and meiosis II and selection against XYY conceptuses. Although single cases of GTN after a triploid HM have been reported, the results of this study combined with data from previous prospective studies estimate the risk of GTN after a triploid mole to 0% (95% CI: 0–1,4%).

First-trimester molecular diagnosis of complete hydatidiform mole associated with dizygotic twin pregnancy conceived by intrauterine insemination

OBJECTIVE

To present first-trimester molecular diagnosis of complete hydatidiform mole (CHM) associated with dizygotic twin pregnancy conceived by intrauterine insemination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 32-year-old woman presented to the hospital with a huge complex cystic mass measuring about 8.5 cm × 4.1 cm in the uterine cavity and a living co-existing fetus with fetal biometry equivalent to 9 weeks. She underwent chorionic villus sampling at 13 weeks of gestation, and microsatellite genotyping for molar pregnancy test was applied. A molar pregnancy test was performed by a short tandem repeat (STR) identifier polymerase chain reaction (PCR) polymorphic marker analysis. The pregnancy was terminated at 14 weeks of gestation. Postnatal polymorphic DNA marker analysis of the placenta by quantitative fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR) was performed. Analysis of maternal blood total β-human chorionic gonadotropin revealed a high level of 551,600 mIU/mL at 10 weeks of gestation and a level of 1.0 mIU/mL at 15 weeks postpartum. The woman was doing well at 4 months after delivery.

RESULTS

The results of STR identifier PCR polymorphic marker analysis showed androgenic conception in the complex cystic mass and biparental conception in the living fetus. Pathological analysis of the cystic mass confirmed the diagnosis of CHM. The results of QF-PCR showed biparental inheritance in the normal fetus and complete paternal homozygosity in the CHM of the abnormal fetus in all STRs, indicating dizygotic twinning and CHM of monospermy.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of placentomegaly with many grape-like vesicles should include a differential diagnosis of CHM, partial hydatidiform mole (PHM), placental mesenchymal dysplasia (PMD), and recurrent hydatidiform mole. Microsatellite genotyping for molar pregnancy testing and zygosity testing is useful in cases of prenatal diagnosis of placentomegaly associated with many grape-like vesicles and a twin pregnancy with a living fetus in the first trimester.

Characteristics of hydatidiform moles: analysis of a prospective series with p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping

Immunohistochemical analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C (CDKN1C, p57, Kip2) expression and molecular genotyping accurately classify hydatidiform moles into complete and partial types and distinguish these from non-molar specimens. Characteristics of a prospective series of all potentially molar specimens encountered in a large gynecologic pathology practice are summarized. Initially, all specimens were subjected to both analyses; this was later modified to triage cases for genotyping based on p57 results: p57-negative cases diagnosed as complete hydatidiform moles without genotyping; all p57-positive cases genotyped. Of the 678 cases, 645 were definitively classified as complete hydatidiform mole (201), partial hydatidiform mole (158), non-molar (272), and androgenetic/biparental mosaic (14); 33 were unsatisfactory, complex, or problematic. Of the 201 complete hydatidiform moles, 104 were p57-negative androgenetic and an additional 95 were p57-negative (no genotyping), 1 was p57-positive (retained maternal chromosome 11) androgenetic, and 1 was p57-non-reactive androgenetic; 90 (85%) of the 106 genotyped complete hydatidiform moles were monospermic and 16 were dispermic. Of the 158 partial hydatidiform moles, 155 were diandric triploid, with 154 p57-positive, 1 p57-negative (loss of maternal chromosome 11), and 1 p57-non-reactive; 3 were triandric tetraploid, with 2 p57-positive and 1 p57-negative (loss of maternal chromosome 11). Of 155 diandric triploid partial hydatidiform moles, 153 (99%) were dispermic and 2 were monospermic. Of the 272 non-molar specimens, 259 were p57-positive biparental diploid, 5 were p57-positive digynic triploid, 2 were p57-negative biparental diploid (no morphological features of biparental hydatidiform mole), and 6 were p57-non-reactive biparental diploid. Of the 14 androgenetic/biparental mosaics with discordant p57 expression, 6 were uniformly mosaic and 8 had a p57-negative androgenetic molar component. p57 expression is highly correlated with genotyping, serves as a reliable marker for diagnosis of complete hydatidiform moles, and identifies androgenetic cell lines in mosaic conceptions. Cases with aberrant and discordant p57 expression can be correctly classified by genotyping.

Development of a silver in situ hybridisation based assay for the determination of ploidy status in molar pregnancy diagnosis

The aim of this study was to establish a scoring method for ploidy analysis using silver in situ hybridisation (SISH) with a chromosome 17 centromere probe. SISH was performed using the Ventana chromosome 17 centromere probe on sections from formalin fixed, paraffin embedded archival cases of complete hydatidiform moles, partial hydatidiform moles and hydropic products of conception with previously established ploidy status (determined by flow cytometry or karyotyping). In order to determine ploidy status, a scoring method was developed based on both the average number of signals per nucleus (ASN) and the percentage of nuclei with three signals (N3S), enumerated in 50 villous cytotrophoblastic and/or stromal cells. The results of four independent observers were compared individually and collectively with previously established ploidy status. There was a highly statistically significant difference between diploid and triploid gestations for ASN (1.86 ± 0.13 and 2.70 ± 0.16 respectively, Student t-test, p < 0.0001) and for N3S (1.14 ± 1.65 and 71.59 ± 14.25 respectively, Student t-test, p < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of the SISH-based assay was 99.1% and 100% respectively for ASN, and 100% and 100% respectively for N3S. A chromosome 17 centromere probe SISH-based assay can reliably distinguish between diploid and triploid gestations. This test has diagnostic utility in distinguishing partial hydatidiform moles from histological mimics.

Partial hydatidiform mole: histologic parameters in correlation with DNA genotyping

Histologic diagnosis of partial hydatidiform mole (PHM) continues to be problematic, and DNA genotyping has recently become cost-effective for precise separation of PHM from its mimics. We performed a comprehensive reevaluation of histologic parameters of PHM in correlation with DNA genotyping. A total of 143 early abortion specimens were subjected to genotyping as part of the routine workup, resulting in 60 cases of PHM, 52 cases of various chromosomal trisomies, and 31 cases of nonmolar diploid gestations. All available hematoxylin and eosin slides were reviewed retrospectively by 2 gynecologic pathologists blinded to the genotyping results. Significant histologic overlaps were present among genetically confirmed PHM, hydropic abortions, and chromosomal trisomy syndromes. The following morphologic parameters emerged with diagnostic significance for PHM: villus size, presence of 2 villous populations, round or oval pseudoinclusions, at least moderate villous hydrops, cistern formation, and trophoblastic hyperplasia. The most sensitive morphologic features for PHM included villous hydrops (86% sensitivity) or the presence of at least 1 of the following 3 parameters: 2 villous populations, round or oval pseudoinclusions, and cisterns (84% sensitivity). The presence of cisterns and villous size ≥2.5 mm had the highest positive predictive value (90%) for PHM. In conclusion, no single or combined morphologic features are sufficient for definitive diagnosis of PHM. The presence of any one of the following histologic findings should prompt DNA genotyping workup to rule out PHM: round or oval pseudoincludions, cistern formation, 2 populations of villi, and a villous size of ≥2.5 mm.

Characterization of androgenetic/biparental mosaic/chimeric conceptions, including those with a molar component: morphology, p57 immnohistochemistry, molecular genotyping, and risk of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease

Recent studies have demonstrated the value of ancillary techniques, including p57 immunohistochemistry and short tandem repeat genotyping, for distinguishing hydatidiform moles (HM) from nonmolar specimens and for subtyping HMs as complete hydatidiform moles (CHM) and partial hydatidiform moles (PHM). With rare exceptions, CHMs are p57-negative and androgenetic diploid; partial hydatidiform moles are p57-positive and diandric triploid; and nonmolar specimens are p57-positive and biparental diploid. Androgenetic/biparental mosaic/chimeric conceptions can have morphologic features that overlap with HMs but are genetically distinct. This study characterizes 11 androgenetic/biparental mosaic/chimeric conceptions identified in a series of 473 products of conception specimens subjected to p57 immunohistochemistry and short tandem repeat genotyping. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on 10 to assess ploidy. All cases were characterized by hydropically enlarged, variably sized and shaped villi. In 5 cases, the villi lacked trophoblastic hyperplasia, whereas in 6 there was a focal to extensive villous component with trophoblastic hyperplasia and features of CHM. The villi lacking trophoblastic hyperplasia were characterized by discordant p57 expression within individual villi (p57-positive cytotrophoblast and p57-negative stromal cells), whereas the villous components having trophoblastic hyperplasia were uniformly p57-negative in both cell types. Short tandem repeat genotyping of at least 2 villous areas in each case demonstrated an excess of paternal alleles in all regions, with variable paternal:maternal allele ratios (usually >2:1); pure androgenetic diploidy was identified in those cases with a sufficiently sized villous component having trophoblastic hyperplasia and features of CHM. Fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrated uniform diploidy in 7 cases, including 4 of 5 tested cases with trophoblastic hyperplasia and 3 of 5 cases without trophoblastic hyperplasia. Two cases without trophoblastic hyperplasia had uniformly diploid villous stromal cells but 1 had triploid and 1 had tetraploid cytotrophoblast; 1 case with trophoblastic hyperplasia had uniformly diploid villous stromal cells but a mixture of diploid, triploid, and tetraploid cytotrophoblast. In 3 cases with a CHM component, persistent gestational trophoblastic disease developed. These results indicate that androgenetic/biparental mosaic/chimeric conceptions are most often an admixture of androgenetic diploid (p57-negative) and biparental diploid (p57-positive) cell lines but some have localized hyperdiploid components. Recognition of their distinctive p57 expression patterns and genotyping results can prevent misclassification as typical CHMs, PHMs, or nonmolar specimens. The presence of androgenetic cell lines, particularly in those with a purely androgenetic CHM component, warrants follow-up because of some risk of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease.

Diagnostic utility of microsatellite genotyping for molar pregnancy testing

CONTEXT

Molecular genotyping by analysis of DNA microsatellites, also known as short tandem repeats (STRs), is an established method for diagnosing and classifying hydatidiform mole. Distinction of both complete hydatidiform mole and partial hydatidiform mole from nonmolar specimens is relevant for clinical management owing to differences in risk for persistent gestational trophoblastic disease.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the technical performance of microsatellite genotyping by using a commercially available multiplex assay, and to describe the application of additional methods to confirm other genetic abnormalities detected by the genotyping assay.

DESIGN

Microsatellite genotyping data on 102 cases referred for molar pregnancy testing are presented. A separate panel of mini STR markers, flow cytometry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and p57 immunohistochemistry were used to characterize cases with other incidental genetic abnormalities.

RESULTS

Forty-eight cases were classified as hydatidiform mole (31, complete hydatidiform mole; 17, partial hydatidiform mole). Genotyping also revealed 11 cases of suspected trisomy and 1 case of androgenetic/biparental mosaicism. Trisomy for selected chromosomes (13, 16, 18, and 21) was confirmed in all cases by using a panel of mini STR markers.

CONCLUSIONS

This series illustrates the utility of microsatellite genotyping as a stand-alone method for accurate classification of hydatidiform mole. Other genetic abnormalities may be detected by genotyping; confirmation of the suspected abnormality requires additional testing.

Diagnostic reproducibility of hydatidiform moles: ancillary techniques (p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping) improve morphologic diagnosis for both recently trained and experienced gynecologic pathologists

Distinction of hydatidiform moles from nonmolar specimens (NMs) and subclassification of hydatidiform moles as complete hydatidiform mole (CHM) and partial hydatidiform mole (PHM) are important for clinical practice and investigational studies; however, diagnosis based solely on morphology is affected by interobserver variability. Molecular genotyping can distinguish these entities by discerning androgenetic diploidy, diandric triploidy, and biparental diploidy to diagnose CHMs, PHMs, and NMs, respectively. Eighty genotyped cases (27 CHMs, 27 PHMs, 26 NMs) were selected from a series of 200 potentially molar specimens previously diagnosed using p57 immunohistochemistry and genotyping. Cases were classified by 6 pathologists (3 faculty level gynecologic pathologists and 3 fellows) on the basis of morphology, masked to p57 immunostaining and genotyping results, into 1 of 3 categories (CHM, PHM, or NM) during 2 diagnostic rounds; a third round incorporating p57 immunostaining results was also conducted. Consensus diagnoses (those rendered by 2 of 3 pathologists in each group) were also determined. Performance of experienced gynecologic pathologists versus fellow pathologists was compared, using genotyping results as the gold standard. Correct classification of CHMs ranged from 59% to 100%; there were no statistically significant differences in performance of faculty versus fellows in any round (P-values of 0.13, 0.67, and 0.54 for rounds 1 to 3, respectively). Correct classification of PHMs ranged from 26% to 93%, with statistically significantly better performance of faculty versus fellows in each round (P-values of 0.04, <0.01, and <0.01 for rounds 1 to 3, respectively). Correct classification of NMs ranged from 31% to 92%, with statistically significantly better performance of faculty only in round 2 (P-values of 1.0, <0.01, and 0.61 for rounds 1 to 3, respectively). Correct classification of all cases combined ranged from 51% to 75% by morphology and 70% to 80% with p57, with statistically significantly better performance of faculty only in round 2 (P-values of 0.69, <0.01, and 0.15 for rounds 1 to 3, respectively). p57 immunostaining significantly improved recognition of CHMs (P<0.01) and had high reproducibility (κ=0.93 to 0.96) but had no impact on distinction of PHMs and NMs. Genotyping provides a definitive diagnosis for the ∼25% to 50% of cases that are misclassified by morphology, especially those that are also unresolved by p57 immunostaining.

Diagnostic reproducibility of hydatidiform moles: ancillary techniques (p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping) improve morphologic diagnosis

Distinction of hydatidiform moles (HMs) from nonmolar specimens (NMs) and subclassification of HMs as complete hydatidiform moles (CHMs) and partial hydatidiform moles (PHMs) are important for clinical practice and investigational studies; yet, diagnosis based solely on morphology is affected by interobserver variability. Molecular genotyping can distinguish these entities by discerning androgenetic diploidy, diandric triploidy, and biparental diploidy to diagnose CHMs, PHMs, and NMs, respectively. Eighty genotyped cases (27 CHMs, 27 PHMs, and 26 NMs) were selected from a series of 200 potentially molar specimens previously diagnosed using p57 immunostaining and genotyping. Cases were classified by 3 gynecologic pathologists on the basis of H&E slides (masked to p57 immunostaining and genotyping results) into 1 of 3 categories (CHM, PHM, or NM) during 2 diagnostic rounds; a third round incorporating p57 immunostaining results was also conducted. Consensus diagnoses (those rendered by 2 of 3 pathologists) were determined. Genotyping results were used as the gold standard for assessing diagnostic performance. Sensitivity of a diagnosis of CHM ranged from 59% to 100% for individual pathologists and from 70% to 81% by consensus; specificity ranged from 91% to 96% for individuals and from 94% to 98% by consensus. Sensitivity of a diagnosis of PHM ranged from 56% to 93% for individual pathologists and from 70% to 78% by consensus; specificity ranged from 58% to 92% for individuals and from 74% to 85% by consensus. The percentage of correct classification of all cases by morphology ranged from 55% to 75% for individual pathologists and from 70% to 75% by consensus. The κ values for interobserver agreement ranged from 0.59 to 0.73 (moderate to good) for a diagnosis of CHM, from 0.15 to 0.43 (poor to moderate) for PHM, and from 0.13 to 0.42 (poor to moderate) for NM. The κ values for intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.44 to 0.67 (moderate to good). Addition of the p57 immunostain improved sensitivity of a diagnosis of CHM to a range of 93% to 96% for individual pathologists and 96% by consensus; specificity was improved from a range of 96% to 98% for individual pathologists and 96% by consensus; there was no substantial impact on diagnosis of PHMs and NMs. Interobserver agreement for interpretation of the p57 immunostain was 0.96 (almost perfect). Even with morphologic assessment by gynecologic pathologists and p57 immunohistochemistry, 20% to 30% of cases will be misclassified, and, in particular, distinction of PHMs and NMs will remain problematic.

Diandric triploid hydatidiform mole with loss of maternal chromosome 11

Distinction of hydatidiform moles (HM) from nonmolar specimens and their subclassification as complete (CHM) versus partial hydatidiform mole (PHM) are important for clinical practice and investigational studies to refine ascertainment of risk of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), which differs among these entities. Immunohistochemical analysis of p57 expression, a paternally imprinted maternally expressed gene on 11p15.5, and molecular genotyping are useful for improving diagnosis. CHMs are characterized by androgenetic diploidy, with loss of p57 expression due to lack of maternal DNA. Loss of p57 expression distinguishes CHMs from both PHMs (diandric triploidy) and nonmolar specimens (biparental diploidy), which retain expression. We report a unique HM characterized by morphologic features suggesting an early CHM, including lack of p57 expression by immunohistochemistry, but with genetic features more in keeping with a PHM. Specifically, molecular genotyping by short tandem repeat markers provided evidence to support interpretation as a PHM by demonstrating allele patterns and ratios most consistent with diandric triploidy, with evidence of loss of the maternal copy of chromosome 11 to explain the lack of p57 expression. This case illustrates the value of combined traditional pathologic and ancillary molecular techniques for refined diagnosis of molar specimens. It also raises questions regarding which modalities should be used to ultimately define the subtypes of HMs and whether chromosomal losses or gains, particularly involving imprinted genes such as p57, might play a role in modifying risk of persistent GTD.

Molecular diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease

Gestational trophoblastic disease consists of well-defined diagnostic entities of proliferative disorder of the placenta, of which hydatidiform moles are common lesions. Even with available ancillary studies, including ploidy and immunohistochemistry analyses, histological diagnosis of molar pregnancies can be challenging in a significant percentage of the cases. Reliable diagnostic approaches with improved sensitivity and specificity are highly desirable. Recently, PCR-based short tandem repeat DNA genotyping has emerged as a powerful diagnostic measure in the workup of gestational trophoblastic disorders, particularly hydatidiform moles.

Diagnosis of hydatidiform moles by polymorphic deletion probe fluorescence in situ hybridization

Because products of conception often contain maternal and villous tissues, the determination of maternal and villous genotypes based on genetic polymorphisms can help discern maternal and paternal chromosomal contribution and aid in the diagnosis of hydatidiform moles. Polymorphic deletion probe (PDP) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes based on copy number variants are highly polymorphic and allow in situ determination of genetic identity. By using three informative PDPs on chromosomes 2p, 4q, and 8p, we compared maternal with villous genotypes and determined the ploidy of villous tissue. PDP FISH was performed on 13 complete moles, 13 partial moles, 13 nonmolar abortions, and an equivocal hydropic abortion. PDP FISH permitted definitive diagnosis of complete moles in five of 13 cases for which maternal and villous genotypes were mutually exclusive. A complete mole was highly suspected when all three PDP loci showed homozygous villous genotypes. The diagnosis of a complete mole by PDP FISH yielded a theoretical test sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 91.8%, an observed test sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 92.3%. Triploidy was observed in all partial moles, in which diandric triploidy was confirmed in six cases. In the equivocal hydropic abortion, PDP FISH combined with p57 immunofluorescence revealed placental androgenetic/biparental mosaicism. PDP FISH can be used in clinical practice and research studies to subclassify hydatidiform moles and evaluate unusual products of conception.

Molecular distinction of consecutive molar pregnancies

BACKGROUND

It may be difficult to differentiate the consecutive occurrence of two independent molar pregnancies from gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after the initial molar pregnancy, especially when the interval between them is short.

CASE

A 25-year-woman who had had a complete hydatidiform mole 6 months earlier presented with a 6-week history of secondary amenorrhea. Serum human chorionic gonadotropin had increased to 19,857 micro-international units/mL, with no gestational sac demonstrated. Dilation and curettage was performed. Pathologic examination identified a tiny amount of hydropic villi compatible with complete hydatidiform mole. Analysis of short tandem repeat polymorphisms revealed that the molar tissues of the first and second complete hydatidiform moles were of different genetic origin. The patient went into remission spontaneously without chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Genetic profiling was useful to discriminate a recurrent mole from suspected gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.