PAX immunoreactivity identifies alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma

Pathogenetic and molecular classifications of soft tissue and bone tumors: A 2024 update

Soft tissue and bone tumors comprise a wide category of neoplasms. Their diversity frequently raises diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic options are continuously developing. The therapeutic success rate and long-term prognosis of patients have improved substantially due to new advances in immunohistochemical and molecular biology techniques. A fundamental contribution to these achievements has been the study of the tumor microenvironment and the reclassification of new entities with the updating of the molecular pathogenesis in the revised 5th edition of the Classification of Soft Tissue Tumors, edited by the World Health Organization. The proposed molecular diagnostic techniques include the well-known in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction methods, but new techniques such as copy-number arrays, multiplex probes, single-nucleotide polymorphism, and sequencing are also proposed. This review aims to synthesize the most recent pathogenetic and molecular classifications of soft tissue and bone tumors, considering the major impact of these diagnostic tools, which are becoming indispensable in clinicopathological practice.

Autoantibodies to PAX5, PTCH1, and GNA11 as Serological Biomarkers in the Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hispanic Americans

Studies have demonstrated that autoantibodies to tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) may be used as efficient biomarkers with low-cost and highly sensitive characteristics. In this study, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was conducted to analyze autoantibodies to paired box protein Pax-5 (PAX5), protein patched homolog 1 (PTCH1), and guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit alpha-11 (GNA11) in sera from Hispanic Americans including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, patients with liver cirrhosis (LC), patients with chronic hepatitis (CH), as well as normal controls. Meanwhile, 33 serial sera from eight HCC patients before and after diagnosis were used to explore the potential of these three autoantibodies as early biomarkers. In addition, an independent non-Hispanic cohort was used to evaluate the specificity of these three autoantibodies. In the Hispanic cohort, at the 95.0% specificity for healthy controls, 52.0%, 44.0%, and 44.0% of HCC patients showed significantly elevated levels of autoantibodies to PAX5, PTCH1, and GNA11, respectively. Among patients with LC, the frequencies for autoantibodies to PAX5, PTCH1, and GNA11 were 32.1%, 35.7%, and 25.0%, respectively. The area under the ROC curves (AUCs) of autoantibodies to PAX5, PTCH1, and GNA11 for identifying HCC from healthy controls were 0.908, 0.924, and 0.913, respectively. When these three autoantibodies were combined as a panel, the sensitivity could be improved to 68%. The prevalence of PAX5, PTCH1, and GNA11 autoantibodies has already occurred in 62.5%, 62.5%, or 75.0% of patients before clinical diagnosis, respectively. In the non-Hispanic cohort, autoantibodies to PTCH1 showed no significant difference; however, autoantibodies to PAX5, PTCH1, and GNA11 showed potential value as biomarkers for early detection of HCC in the Hispanic population and they may monitor the transition of patients with high-risk (LC, CH) to HCC. Using a panel of the three anti-TAA autoantibodies may enhance the detection of HCC.

FOXO1 and PAX5 Rearrangement in Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma in Saudi Pediatric Patients

Objective: In this study, we investigate the molecular rearrangement of FOXO1 in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARHS) in Saudi pediatric patients. Method: We performed a molecular detection of molecular translocation in 30 pediatric cases of ARHS using FOXO1 dual color break-apart FISH probe (ZytoLight®, 13q14.11) and PAX5 dual color break-apart FISH probe (ZytoLight®, 9p13.2). Results: All analyzable cases of ARHS demonstrated FOXO1 translocation whereas PAX5 translocation was not detected in any case. Conclusion: Although the testing for PAX5 rearrangement was based on protein-protein network analysis, our study showed that PAX5 translocation is not conspicuous in ARHS. PAX7/3::FOXO1 fusion genes feature ARMS, rendering crossreactivity between PAX7 and PAX3 a possible explanation. Nevertheless, PAX5 immunoreactivity and molecular translocation could be an adjunctive pathway that is confined to aggressive ARMS.

Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumors: An Update on Biomarkers That Correlate with Molecular Alterations

The diagnosis of benign and malignant soft tissue and bone neoplasms is a challenging area of surgical pathology, due to the large number, rarity, and histologic diversity of tumor types. In recent years, diagnosis and classification has been aided substantially by our growing understanding of recurrent molecular alterations in these neoplasms. Concurrently, the role of diagnostic immunohistochemistry has also expanded, with the development of numerous biomarkers based on underlying molecular events. Such biomarkers allow us to infer the presence of these events and can therefore substitute for other ancillary molecular genetic techniques (e.g., fluorescence in situ hybridization, polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing). In this review, we discuss a range of biomarkers currently available for these neoplasms, highlighting the accuracy, staining characteristics, and interpretation pitfalls of each antibody. These include immunohistochemical antibodies that represent reliable surrogates for the detection of gene fusions (e.g., STAT6, CAMTA1, FOSB, DDIT3) and more recently described breakpoint-specific antibodies (e.g., SS18-SSX, PAX3/7-FOXO1). Additionally, discussed are markers that correlate with the presence of gene amplifications (e.g., MDM2, CDK4), deletions (e.g., SMARCB1, SMARCA4), single nucleotide variants (e.g., G34W, K36M), aberrant methylation (H3K27me3), and increased expression as discovered through gene expression profiling (e.g., MUC4, DOG1, ETV4, NKX2.2, NKX3.1).

[Rhabdomyosarcomas: structural distribution and analysis of an immunohistochemical profile]

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a malignant soft tissue tumor originating from primitive mesenchymal cells, which is most common in children.

OBJECTIVE

To qualitatively and quantitatively assess the expression of myogenic transcription factors on a large sample, to identify potential phenotypic differences, and to estimate the distribution and frequency of aberrant markers, such as ALK, PAX5, WT1, PCK, CAM5.2, SIX1, and Synaptophysin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The investigation included 202 tumor tissue samples. Five tissue microarrays were assembled from the obtained material for subsequent histological and immunohistochemical studies.

RESULTS

Embryonal RMS (ERMS) was diagnosed in 103 cases; alveolar RMS (ARMS) was detected in 80; spindle-cell/sclerosing RMS (SRMS) was found in 16 cases; epithelioid RMS (EpiRMS) was diagnosed in 2 patients. The expression of Myogenin and MyoD1 was detected in all the examined RMS tissue samples. ARMS was more characterized by staining at 1+ and 2+ intensities; at the same time, more than 50% of ERMS, SRMS, and EpiRMS cases showed staining at 1+ intensity. ALK expression was investigated using the D5F3 and p80 clones. The D5F3 clone displayed a higher staining intensity than the p80 clone (p<0.05). The expression of PAX5 was observed in 13 of 75 ARMS cases. That of WT1 and SIX1 was found in all RMS groups.

CONCLUSION

The morphological diagnosis of RMS requires a careful assessment of all of the above factors, especially taking into account the variability in the expression of myogenic transcription factors and the high level of phenotypic aberration.

Expression of PAX3 Distinguishes Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma From Histologic Mimics

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a distinctive, anatomically restricted, low-grade spindle cell sarcoma that shows considerable histologic overlap with other cellular spindle cell neoplasms. This tumor type shows both myogenic and neural differentiation, which can be demonstrated by immunohistochemistry; however, the available diagnostic markers are relatively nonspecific. BSNS is characterized by PAX3 rearrangements, with MAML3 as the most common fusion partner. Our aim was to determine whether immunohistochemistry using a monoclonal PAX3 antibody could distinguish BSNS from potential histologic mimics, as well as to evaluate a widely available polyclonal PAX8 antibody, which is known to cross-react with other paired box transcription factor family members. Immunohistochemistry for PAX3 and PAX8 was performed on whole sections of 15 BSNS (10 with confirmed PAX3 rearrangement) and 10 cases each of the following histologic mimics: malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, monophasic synovial sarcoma, spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), solitary fibrous tumor, sinonasal hemangiopericytoma, and cellular schwannoma, as well as alveolar RMS (which harbors PAX3 or PAX7 gene rearrangements). BSNS showed consistent expression of PAX3 (15/15), all multifocal-to-diffuse and most with moderate-to-strong intensity of staining. One single case of spindle cell RMS showed PAX3 expression (1/10), and all other histologic mimics were completely PAX3-negative. In contrast, nuclear staining for PAX8 was present in all 15 BSNS, 7/10 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, 3/10 cellular schwannomas, 2/10 sinonasal hemangiopericytomas, 1/10 synovial sarcoma, 1 spindle cell RMS, and 1 solitary fibrous tumor. All cases of alveolar RMS were positive for PAX8, and most were also positive for PAX3 (8/10). Immunohistochemical expression of PAX3 is highly sensitive (100%) and specific (98%) for BSNS. A polyclonal PAX8 antibody also stains BSNS (likely due to cross-reactivity with PAX3) but has much lower specificity (75%), with frequent expression in numerous mimics.

Paired Box 5 (PAX5) Expression in Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Gastrointestinal and Pancreatobiliary Tract: Diagnostic and Potentially Therapeutic Implications

Paired Box 5 (PAX5), a well-established B-cell marker, is preferentially expressed in small cell lung carcinoma and regulates the transcription of c-Met, offering a potential for therapeutic target. Its expression in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PDNEC) of the digestive system has not been systemically evaluated. Archived pathology materials from 38 PDNEC in the gastrointestinal (GI) and pancreatobiliary (PB) tract were reviewed. Representative tumor sections were subject to immunohistochemical stain for PAX5, c-Met, and CD20. The extent of the staining [focal (<10%), patchy (10% to 50%), and diffuse (>50%)] and intensity (1+ to 3+) was evaluated. In total, 38 cases of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors from GI/PB tract served as controls. Nuclear PAX5 staining was observed in 16 (42%) cases in total, in 46% (11/24) of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, 67% (4/6) of small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and 13% (1/8) of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma, with diffuse (8), patchy (4), or focal (4) staining. The intensity was 3+ (2), 2+ (6), and 1+ (8). PAX5 expression was common in ampullary (4/5) and gastroesophageal junctional/esophageal (5/9) PDNEC. Two (5%) of 38 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors were positive for PAX5. Three PAX5 positive PDNEC showed weak cytoplasmic c-Met immunolabeling. CD20 was negative in all tumors. Our data show that PAX5 is commonly expressed in PDNEC of the GI/PB tract including small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. This observation warrants a cautious approach when interpreting small biopsy of poorly differentiated neoplasms, especially when lymphoma is considered in the differentials. Further study of PAX5/c-Met signaling pathway and its potential therapeutic value in GI/PB PDNEC is warranted.

PAX7 Expression in Rhabdomyosarcoma, Related Soft Tissue Tumors, and Small Round Blue Cell Neoplasms

Rhabdomyosarcoma, the most common soft tissue malignancy of childhood, is a morphologically variable tumor defined by its phenotype of skeletal muscle differentiation. The diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma often relies in part on the identification of myogenic gene expression using immunohistochemical or molecular techniques. However, these techniques show imperfect sensitivity and specificity, particularly in scant tissue biopsies. Here, we expand the toolkit for rhabdomyosarcoma diagnosis by studying the expression of PAX7, a transcriptional regulator of mammalian muscle progenitor cells implicated in the pathogenesis of rhabdomyosarcoma. Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue microarrays using a monoclonal anti-PAX7 antibody was used to characterize PAX7 expression in 25 non-neoplastic tissues, 109 rhabdomyosarcomas, and 697 small round blue cell or other soft tissue tumors. Among non-neoplastic tissues, PAX7 was specifically expressed in adult muscle progenitor cells (satellite cells). In embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, PAX7 expression was positive in 52 of 63 cases (83%), negative in 9 of 63 cases (14%), and focal in 2 of 63 cases (3%). PAX7-positive embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma cases included several showing focal or negative myogenin expression. PAX7 expression in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma was positive in 6 of 31 cases (19%), negative in 14 of 31 cases (45%), and focal in 11 of 31 cases (36%). In addition, PAX7 was expressed in 5 of 7 pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcomas (71%) and 6 of 8 spindle cell rhabdomyosarcomas (75%). Among histologic mimics, only Ewing sarcoma showed PAX7 expression (7/7 cases, 100%). In contrast, expression of PAX7 was not seen in the large majority (688/690, 99.7%) of examined cases of other soft tissue tumors, small round blue cell neoplasms, and leukemias/lymphomas. In summary, immunohistochemical analysis of PAX7 expression may be a useful diagnostic tool in the assessment of skeletal muscle differentiation in human tumors.

Round Cell Tumors: Classification and Immunohistochemistry

Round cell tumors as the name suggest are comprised round cells with increased nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio. This group of tumor includes entities such as peripheral neuroectodermal tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, neuroblastoma, hepatoblastoma, Wilms' tumor, and desmoplastic small round cell tumor. These round cells tumors are characterized by typical histological pattern, immunohistochemical, and electron microscopic features that can help in differential diagnosis. The present article describes the classification and explains the histopathology and immunohistochemistry of some important round cell tumors.

Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry in Cutaneous Neoplasia: An Update

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an important adjunct in the diagnosis of neoplastic skin diseases. In addition to the many established IHC markers currently in use, new markers continue to emerge, although their general acceptance and routine application requires robust validation. Here, we summarize the most well-established and commonly used biomarkers along with an array of newer ones reported in the past several decades that either demonstrate or hold high clinical promise in the field of cutaneous pathology. We also highlight recent applications of novel IHC markers in melanoma diagnosis including genetic mutation status markers [e.g. BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B) and NRAS (neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog)] and an epigenetic alteration marker (e.g. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine). We specifically focus on the role of IHC in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous lesions that fall under the following categories: melanoma, epidermal tumors with an intraepidermal epitheliomatous pattern, spindle cell lesions of the dermis, small round blue cell tumors of the dermis, and cutaneous adnexal tumors. While IHC is a valuable tool in diagnostic dermatopathology, marker selection and interpretation must be highly informed by clinical context and the histologic differential diagnosis. With rapid progress in our understanding of the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of tumorigenesis, new IHC markers will continue to emerge in the field of diagnostic dermatopathology.

A leukemic presentation of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma in a 52-year-old woman without an identifiable primary tumor

A 52-year-old woman presented with fatigue and thrombocytopenia. Imaging studies were unremarkable with the exception of a positron emission tomography scan, which demonstrated intense F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake fusing to the marrow. A bone marrow aspirate was notable for large discohesive cells with basophilic cytoplasm, and flow cytometric analysis identified a population of phenotypically unusual cells that coexpressed CD56 and CD71. Immunohistochemical findings in the marrow biopsy demonstrated that the neoplasm was alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, further supported by the presence of a t(2;13). This unusual case demonstrates that leukemic presentations of rhabdomyosarcoma can occur in older adults in the absence of an identifiable primary tumor.

PAX immunoreactivity in poorly differentiated small round cell tumors of childhood

Paired box (PAX) gene antibodies have made it into the mainstream of tumor diagnosis in the recent years. We report the immunoreactivity expression patterns of three PAX genes (PAX2, PAX5 and PAX8) in poorly differentiated small round cell tumors of childhood for possible useful diagnostic applications. We collected and analyzed 123 cases of poorly differentiated small round cell tumors of childhood for their PAX immunoexpression patterns. The results indicated that PAX2 was strongly positive in all alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas and in two-thirds of the kidney clear cell sarcomas, and displayed variable expression in one-half of the embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas. PAX8 immunoexpression was noticed in five and three cases of alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas and embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas, respectively. About one-third of malignant rhabdoid tumors were PAX2-positive and PAX8-positive. All of the Ewing sarcoma and neuroblastoma cases stained negative with all three PAX stains.

Immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of soft tissue tumours

Immunohistochemistry in soft tissue tumours, and especially sarcomas, is used to identify differentiation in the neoplastic cells. In some cases, specific antigens are expressed; however, an initial panel of antibodies is often required in order to establish the broad lineage, with a subsequent, more focused, panel to allow classification. Immunohistochemical evaluation must be employed with the clinical picture, the morphology, and, when necessary, other ancillary techniques such as molecular genetics and cytogenetics. Whereas some diagnoses are evident on morphology, many soft tissue neoplasms are seen microscopically as spindle cell, epithelioid cell, small round cell or pleomorphic tumours that need to be further characterized. This article reviews selected applications of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of each of the principal morphological groups, concentrating on areas of most use in daily practice.

PAX-5: a valuable immunohistochemical marker in the differential diagnosis of lymphoid neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

Undifferentiated tumors and hematolymphoid neoplasms can be diagnostically challenging due to potential overlap of morphologic features and variant antigen expression. PAX-5, a transcription factor expressed throughout B-cell maturation, is detected in most B-cell neoplasms including those that lack expression of mature B-cell markers, such as classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), B-lymphoblastic leukemia and B-cell lymphomas following rituximab therapy. The lack of PAX-5 expression in most CD30-positive non-hematopoietic malignancies (embryonal carcinoma and seminoma) and T-cell lymphomas, such as anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), suggests that the absence of PAX-5 may be used to confirm non-B-cell lineage. The goal of this study was to retrospectively assess PAX-5 immunoreactivity in diagnostic samples of hematolymphoid and other non-hematopoietic malignancies.

DESIGN

Diagnostic lymph node, decalcified core bone marrow biopsies and tissue sections from 111 archived paraffin-embedded tissue blocks and a tissue lymphoma microarray were immunostained using a monoclonal antibody to PAX-5. The corresponding hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue sections and additional immunostains were simultaneously evaluated. PAX-5 immunoreactivity in neoplastic cells was scored as positive or negative. This study was exempted by the Institutional Review Board for Human Research.

RESULTS

Nuclear PAX-5 immunoreactivity was detected in 88% (36/41) of Hodgkin lymphoma, all cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=72), small B-cell lymphomas (n=5), B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma and mixed phenotype acute leukemia with B-cell lineage (n=5). PAX-5 was not detected in ALCL (n=22), T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, mixed phenotype acute leukemia with T-cell lineage (n=5), acute myeloid leukemia (n=4), carcinoid tumors with typical morphology (n=5), melanoma (n=3), and undifferentiated/metastatic tumors (n=8). Non-neoplastic bone marrow sections showed scattered nuclear staining in small B-cell lymphocytes/hematogones. The detection of PAX-5 immunoreactivity resulted in the reclassification of two cases of ALCL to cHL.

CONCLUSION

Overall, our results demonstrate that including PAX-5 in a panel with other immunomarkers helps establish B-cell lineage and increases diagnostic yield.

PAX5 expression in nonhematopoietic tissues. Reappraisal of previous studies

The Pax gene family encodes transcription factors with similar structures but distinctive roles in development and with limited expression in adult tissues. Reexpression of PAX proteins is frequently observed in human cancers, reflecting recapitulation of embryologic or developmental function. Defining expression of PAX family members is important in the immunohistochemical differential diagnosis of cancer, understanding oncogenesis, and defining targets for therapy. Immunostaining for PAX5 has become a commonly used technique in differential diagnosis of B-lineage hematologic malignancies. In seeking to define the range and degree of expression of PAX5 in nonhematologic pediatric cancers by immunohistochemical analysis with the anti-PAX5 monoclonal antibody routinely used in research and diagnosis, we observed strong immunostaining in a number of malignant tissues, including Wilms tumor. The pattern of expression of PAX5 in Wilms tumor was found to be identical to that of PAX2, raising the possibility of antibody cross-reactivity. This was subsequently confirmed by Western blotting and immunostaining of transfected cells and quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Since the same PAX5 monoclonal antibody has been used consistently in the literature, these findings indicate a need for reappraisal of published PAX5 immunostaining results.

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma: another entity in the differential diagnosis of small round blue cell tumors

We saw in consultation a biopsy specimen from a 6-year old girl with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). The tumor arose in soft tissue of the neck, and diagnostic tissue was obtained by core needle biopsy. Histologically, the neoplasm was cellular without pattern. Immunohistochemical workup with a large panel of antibodies at another institution showed immunoreactivity for NB84 and neuron specific enolase (dim). Antibodies specific for CD3, CD20, and CD45/LCA were negative; CD30 or ALK were not assessed. Electron microscopy showed cytoplasmic structures thought to be neurosecretory granules. The neoplasm was interpreted initially as a neuroblastoma. At the time of our review, we considered the possibility of ALCL. Immunohistochemical analysis for CD30 showed bright, uniform expression and ALK was positive in a nuclear and cytoplasmic pattern, confirming the diagnosis of ALK+ ALCL. The purpose of this review is to discuss ALK+ ALCL and many of the other entities included under the rubric of small round blue cell tumor, with a focus on tumors that occur in children.

Expression profiling of transcription factors in B- or T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma and burkitt lymphoma: usefulness of PAX5 immunostaining as pan-Pre-B-cell marker

The optimal use of transcription factors to determine B-lineage specificity in B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL) has not been fully investigated. We undertook an extensive immunohistochemical study of a panel of B-cell transcription factors in B- and T-ALL and Burkitt lymphoma to evaluate those with the best specificity and sensitivity. Tissue microarrays were constructed from 34 B-ALL, 19 T-ALL, and 30 Burkitt lymphoma samples. All 34 (100%) cases of B-ALL expressed PAX5; 32 (94%), BOB.1; 33 (97%), PU.1; 29 (85%), CD79a; 27 (79%), CD22; 2 (6%), CD20; 9 (26%), OCT-2; and 3 (9%), MUM1. Burkitt lymphoma cases were positive for PAX5 (30/30 [100%]), BOB.1 (27/30 [90%]), PU.1 (23/30 [77%]), CD79a (29/30 [97%]), CD22 (14/30 [47%]), CD20 (30/30 [100%]), OCT-2 (23/30 [77%]), and MUM1 (5/30 [17%]). T-ALLs were only positive for PU.1 (15/19 [79%]) and BOB.1 (12/19 [63%]). PAX5 demonstrated better specificity for B-lineage determination than BOB.1 and PU.1 and better sensitivity than CD79a, CD22, and CD20. These findings suggest that PAX5 has the greatest diagnostic usefulness and lineage determination in B-ALL, especially in cases with an inadequate specimen for flow cytometric analysis.