Cytokeratin 5 and estrogen receptor immunohistochemistry as a useful adjunct in identifying atypical papillary lesions on breast needle core biopsy

Nonneoplastic and neoplastic sclerosing lesions of the breast

Sclerosing lesions of the breast encompass a spectrum of benign and malignant entities and often pose a diagnostic challenge. Awareness of key morphologic features and pitfalls in the assessment of morphology and immunophenotype is essential to avoid over- or underdiagnosis and ensure optimal clinical management. This review summarizes nonneoplastic sclerosing lesions such as radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion, sclerosing adenosis, sclerosing intraductal papilloma, sclerosing variants of ductal adenoma and nipple adenoma, and fibroadenoma with extensive sclerosis, including their clinical presentation, characteristic morphology, differential diagnostic considerations, appropriate immunohistochemical work-up, when needed, and the clinical significance. In addition, atypical or neoplastic entities (such as atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma, and fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma) that can involve these sclerosing lesions are also briefly discussed.

Intraductal papilloma with atypical ductal hyperplasia and neuroendocrine differentiation as a possible precursor lesion of solid papillary carcinoma

Breast papillary neoplasms include a wide range of tumor types, and their pathological diagnosis is sometimes difficult. Furthermore, the etiology of these lesions is still not fully understood. We report the case of a 72-years-old woman referred to our hospital with bloody discharge from the right nipple. An imaging study detected a cystic lesion, including a solid component contiguous with the mammary duct, in the subareolar region. The lesion was then removed by segmental mastectomy. Pathological examination of the resected specimen revealed an intraductal papilloma with atypical ductal hyperplasia. Moreover, the atypical ductal epithelial cells expressed neuroendocrine markers. The presence of an intraductal papillary lesion with neuroendocrine differentiation suggests solid papillary carcinoma. Thus, this case suggests that intraductal papilloma could be a precursor of solid papillary carcinoma.

Management of Intraductal Papilloma of the Breast Diagnosed on Core Needle Biopsy: Latest Controversies

Intraductal papillomas (IDPs), including central papilloma and peripheral papilloma, are common in the female population. Due to the lack of specific clinical manifestations of IDPs, it is easy to misdiagnose or miss diagnose. The difficulty of differential diagnosis using imaging techniques also contributes to these conditions. Histopathology is the gold standard for the diagnosis of IDPs while the possibility of under sample exists in the percutaneous biopsy. There have been some debates about how to treat asymptomatic IDPs without atypia diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB), especially when the upgrade rate to carcinoma is considered. This article concludes that further surgery is recommended for IDPs without atypia diagnosed on CNB who have high-risk factors, while appropriate imaging follow-up may be suitable for those without risk factors.

Papillomatous breast lesions with atypical columnar cell features

AIMS

Columnar cell lesions (CCLs) are recognised breast cancer precursor lesions. Intraductal papillomas are usually lined by benign (polyclonal) cells. Although papillomas with monoclonal lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH)/ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)) have been described, CCLs have not been described in papillomas.

METHODS

We present two papillary breast lesions lined by a single layer of luminal cells resembling atypical CCL/flat epithelial atypia (FEA). We compared these two lesions with 13 benign intraductal papillomas, and 2 papillomas with ADH/DCIS grade 1 features as controls were immunohistochemically stained for the oestrogen receptor alpha (oestrogen receptor) and progesterone receptors (PR), cytokeratin 5 (CK5) and cyclin D1.

RESULTS

Oestrogen receptor/PR expression was variable, with areas with ≥85% hormone receptor positivity in both morphologically normal papillomas and papillomas with ADH. In ADH areas, CK5 expression was seen in ≤5% of cells while cyclin D1 expression was high (>60%). The two papillary lesions with FEA were 100% oestrogen receptor and 90% cyclin D1 positive, and low on PR/CK5. There was only one morphologically normal papilloma with similar areas of low CK5 (5%) and high cyclin D1 expression; in all other morphologically benign papillomas CK5 expression varied between 10% and 50% and cyclin D1 expression was ≤50%. The papillary lesion with FEA that could be tested showed 16q losses, the hallmark genetic change in low nuclear grade breast neoplasias, in contrast to nine morphologically benign papillomas that could be tested.

CONCLUSION

We present two papillomatous breast lesions with atypical CCL morphology and 16q loss, for which we propose the term papillary FEA.

Nontoxic Fluorescent Nanoprobes for Multiplexed Detection and 3D Imaging of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer

Multiplexed fluorescent immunohistochemical analysis of breast cancer (BC) markers and high-resolution 3D immunofluorescence imaging of the tumor and its microenvironment not only facilitate making the disease prognosis and selecting effective anticancer therapy (including photodynamic therapy), but also provides information on signaling and metabolic mechanisms of carcinogenesis and helps in the search for new therapeutic targets and drugs. The characteristics of imaging nanoprobe efficiency, such as sensitivity, target affinity, depth of tissue penetration, and photostability, are determined by the properties of their components, fluorophores and capture molecules, and by the method of their conjugation. Regarding individual nanoprobe components, fluorescent nanocrystals (NCs) are widely used for optical imaging in vitro and in vivo, and single-domain antibodies (sdAbs) are well established as highly specific capture molecules in diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Moreover, the technologies of obtaining functionally active sdAb–NC conjugates with the highest possible avidity, with all sdAb molecules bound to the NC in a strictly oriented manner, provide 3D-imaging nanoprobes with strong comparative advantages. This review is aimed at highlighting the importance of an integrated approach to BC diagnosis, including the detection of biomarkers of the tumor and its microenvironment, as well as the need for their quantitative profiling and imaging of their mutual location, using advanced approaches to 3D detection in thick tissue sections. The existing approaches to 3D imaging of tumors and their microenvironment using fluorescent NCs are described, and the main comparative advantages and disadvantages of nontoxic fluorescent sdAb–NC conjugates as nanoprobes for multiplexed detection and 3D imaging of BC markers are discussed.

Papillary neoplasms of the breast-reviewing the spectrum

Papillary neoplasms of the breast encompass a wide range of tumor types ranging from the benign intraductal papilloma to in situ and invasive papillary carcinomas. In this review, we considered each tumor entity listed under the Papillary Neoplasms category in the latest WHO Classification of Breast Tumors (5th edition), namely intraductal papilloma, papillary ductal carcinoma in situ, encapsulated papillary carcinoma, solid-papillary carcinoma, and invasive papillary carcinoma. We examined their pathological features, current issues pertaining to diagnosis and prognostication, as well as the latest molecular findings. We also briefly addressed adenomyoepithelioma and the newly included tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity, highlighting areas where they overlap with papillary neoplasms.

Papillary neoplasms of the breast including upgrade rates and management of intraductal papilloma without atypia diagnosed at core needle biopsy

Papillary neoplasms of the breast are a heterogeneous group of epithelial tumors nearly entirely composed of papillae. Their classification rests on the characteristics of the epithelium and the presence and distribution of the myoepithelial cells along the papillae and around the tumor. Papillary neoplasms of the breast can be diagnostically challenging, especially if only core needle biopsy (CNB) material is available. This review summarizes salient morphological and immunohistochemical features, clinical presentation, and differential diagnoses of papillary neoplasms of the breast. We include a contemporary appraisal of the upgrade rate to carcinoma (invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) and atypical hyperplasias in surgical excision specimens obtained following CNB diagnosis of papilloma without atypia, and a review of the available follow-up data in cases without immediate surgical excision.

Pathology of breast papillary neoplasms: Community hospital experience

In this study, 550 breast papillary neoplasms collected in a community hospital over more than ten years were reviewed and analyzed. This included 457 intraductal papillomas, 53 papillary carcinomas, 35 papillary DCIS and five invasive papillary carcinomas. The diagnostic rate of papillary neoplasms increased over time, likely due to better recognition by pathologists. Intraductal papillomas occurred most frequently in the upper outer quadrants and contained ADH/DCIS in 19% of cases. A total of 28% of non-incidental papillomas were associated with ADH/DCIS, and 29% of patients with papillomas had ADH/DCIS in adjacent tissue; nearly half of papillomas that were > 1 cm in size contained ADH/DCIS in the papilloma or adjacent to it. No single feature could predict an upgrade on excision for non-atypical intraductal papillomas diagnosed on core biopsy. There was no significant difference in the association of ADH/DCIS with central or peripheral papillomas. The overall upgrade rate of non-atypical intraductal papillomas to DCIS on excision was 2%, which justifies the conservative management of non-atypical sub-centimeter lesions. Papillary carcinomas occurred in older than intraductal papilloma patients and were most frequent in the upper quadrants. Although classically devoid of a myoepithelial cell layer, papillary carcinomas may contain some residual or even an ample myoepithelial cell layer in the papillae. An association between papillary carcinoma and conventional invasive carcinoma was found in 40% of EPCs and 89% of SPCs. Papillary DCIS was usually low- or intermediate-grade. The presence of a myoepithelial cell layer in the papillae was not inconsistent with this diagnosis. Invasive papillary carcinoma may have two histologic patterns: papillary and cribriform.

Immunohistochemistry for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer: a review

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignant tumor and main oncologic cause of mortality in women. Although most diagnosis of breast pathology is accomplished using hematoxylin and eosin stained sections, some cases require immunohistochemistry for proper evaluation. We investigated the latter cases including distinctions between ductal and lobular carcinoma, in situ and invasive carcinoma, typical ductal hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia/ductal carcinoma in situ, papillary and spindle cell lesion assessment, metastasis evaluation, and assessment of prognostic and therapy markers. E-cadherin is used to differentiate ductal and lobular carcinoma; 34βE12, CK8, p120 catenin and β-catenin also produce consistent results. Myoepithelial cell (MEC) stains are used to evaluate in situ and invasive carcinoma; calponin, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain and p63 are sensitive/specific markers. 34βE12 and CK5/6 are positive in ductal hyperplasia, which enables its differentiation from atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ. CK 5/6, ER and MEC markers are consistent options for evaluating papillary lesions. Spindle cell lesions can be assessed using β-catenin, SMA, CD34, p63, CKs and hormone receptors. It is important to differentiate primary carcinomas from metastases; the most commonly used markers to identify breast origin include mammaglobin, GCDFP-15, GATA3 and ER, although none of these is completely sensitive or specific. Immunohistochemistry can be used to evaluate central prognostic and predictive factors including molecular subtypes, HER2, hormone receptors, proliferation markers (Ki-67) and lymph-vascular invasion markers including ERG, CD31, CD34, factor VIII and podoplanin. Owing to the complexity of mammary lesions, diagnosis also depends on each particular situation, evaluation of cytological characteristics revealed by immunochemistry and correlation with histological findings.

Core Needle Biopsy of the Breast: An Evaluation of Contemporary Data

Benign and atypical lesions associated with breast cancer risk are often encountered in core needle biopsies (CNBs) of the breast. For these lesions, the rate of "upgrade" to carcinoma in excision specimens varies widely in the literature. Many CNB studies are limited by a lack of radiological-pathological correlation, consistent criteria for excision, and clinical follow-up for patients who forego excision. This article highlights contemporary diagnostic criteria and outcome data that would support an evidence-based approach to the management of these nonmalignant lesions of the breast diagnosed on CNB.

Nuclear inverse polarity papillary lesions lacking myoepithelial cells: A report of two cases

Here, cases of a 68- (Case 1) and a 44-year-old (Case 2) female are presented. They had an abnormality in the breast, and came to our hospital for further examination and treatment. Radiologically, malignancy could not completely excluded so breast excision was performed. Histologically, both cases revealed papillary neoplastic lesions lined by fibrovascular core and nuclear inverse polarity without atypia. Loss of myoepithelial cells was observed by HE, p63, and calponin. Previous report indicate CK5/6, ER, p63 and MUC3 are important for distinguishing between papillary lesions according to the differential index (based on Allred score) of ([ER total score] + [MUC3 total score])/([CK5/6 total score] + [p63 total score] + 1). Based on this analysis, our two cases had benign lesions. However, based on immunopositivity for cell-cycle marker Cyclin-D1, Case 1 was negative, and Case 2 was about 70% positive. Additionally, the Ki-67 index was <1% in both cases, and no evidence of disease was observed after a maximum 62 months of follow-up in both cases, despite lack of additional treatment. Thus, we propose that lack of myoepithelial cells in papillary lesions do not necessarily indicate malignancy and are thought to be, at the most, uncertain malignant potential.

Breast Tumor Resembling Tall Cell Variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Solid Papillary Neoplasm With Characteristic Immunohistochemical Profile and Few Recurrent Mutations

OBJECTIVES

Breast tumor resembling tall cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (BTRPTC) is a rare breast lesion that is unrelated to thyroid carcinoma. Morphologically, it shows a solid papillary lesion with bland cytology, eosinophilic/amphophilic secretions, nuclear grooves, reversal of nuclear polarity (recently described), and nuclear inclusions. Clinical course is often uneventful with few exceptions reported in the literature. Herein, we report three additional cases.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining and next-generation sequencing was performed on all three cases.

RESULTS

The lesional cells on all cases were positive for cytokeratin 5 and S100, with weak expression/lack of estrogen receptor. No staining was observed for myoepithelial markers (p63 and myosin heavy chain) around the lesion. IDH2 mutations were identified in two cases at nucleotide 172 (cases 1 and 3). ATM gene mutation was identified in cases 2 and 3 and PIK3CA mutation in case 3. All patients are currently without disease.

CONCLUSIONS

BTRPTC is a slow-growing neoplastic lesion that needs to be distinguished from other papillary lesions for optimizing therapy.

Mammographically dense human breast tissue stimulates MCF10DCIS.com progression to invasive lesions and metastasis

Background

High mammographic density (HMD) not only confers a significantly increased risk of breast cancer (BC) but also is associated with BCs of more advanced stages. However, it is unclear whether BC progression and metastasis are stimulated by HMD. We investigated whether patient-derived HMD breast tissue could stimulate the progression of MCF10DCIS.com cells compared with patient-matched low mammographic density (LMD) tissue.

Methods

Sterile breast specimens were obtained immediately after prophylactic mastectomy from high-risk women (n = 10). HMD and LMD regions of each specimen were resected under radiological guidance. Human MCF10DCIS.com cells, a model of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), were implanted into silicone biochambers in the groins of severe combined immunodeficiency mice, either alone or with matched LMD or HMD tissue (1:1), and maintained for 6 weeks. We assessed biochamber weight as a measure of primary tumour growth, histological grade of the biochamber material, circulating tumour cells and metastatic burden by luciferase and histology. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

HMD breast tissue led to increased primary tumour take, increased biochamber weight and increased proportions of high-grade DCIS and grade 3 invasive BCs compared with LMD. This correlated with an increased metastatic burden in the mice co-implanted with HMD tissue.

Conclusions

Our study is the first to explore the direct effect of HMD and LMD human breast tissue on the progression and dissemination of BC cells in vivo. The results suggest that HMD status should be a consideration in decision-making for management of patients with DCIS lesions.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0767-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pathological criteria and practical issues in papillary lesions of the breast - a review

Papillary lesions of the breast include a broad spectrum of lesions, ranging from benign papilloma, papilloma with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to papillary carcinoma. The accurate diagnosis of mammary papillary lesions is a challenge for pathologists, owing to the overlapping features among these lesions. In this review, some of the diagnostic criteria of papillary lesions are discussed, with special emphasis on some key morphological features, namely fibrovascular cores, epithelial proliferation in a solid pattern, intraductal papilloma complicated by ADH or DCIS, and invasion and its mimics. The roles of immunohistochemistry, and the interpretation of myoepithelial cell markers, hormone receptors, and high molecular weight cytokeratin, are addressed. Finally, novel biomarkers and genetic aberrations in papillary lesions are summarized.

Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Bordering on Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

BACKGROUND

The clinical implications of the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are very different. Yet there are "borderline" breast lesions that have characteristics of both ADH and DCIS. We examined interobserver diagnostic variability for such lesions and correlated pathologic features of the lesions with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We identified all cases of borderline ADH/DCIS lesions treated at our center from 1997 to 2010. Five specialized breast pathologists blinded to clinical outcomes independently reviewed all available slides from each case and were instructed to classify each as benign, ADH, or DCIS. A majority diagnosis (MajDx) was defined as a diagnosis agreed upon by ≥3 pathologists.

RESULTS

A total of 105 women with borderline ADH/DCIS and slides available for review were identified. The MajDx was ADH in 84 (80%), and DCIS in 18 (17%). There were split diagnoses in 3 (3%). MajDx of DCIS correlated significantly with lesion size and nuclear grade. There was diagnostic agreement by all 5 pathologists in 30% of cases, 4 pathologists in 42%, and 3 pathologists in 25%. At a median follow-up of 37 months, 4 (3.8%) patients developed subsequent ipsilateral breast carcinoma (2 invasive, 2 DCIS); all 4 cases had MajDx of ADH.

CONCLUSIONS

Borderline ADH/DCIS represents an entity for which reproducible categorization as ADH or DCIS cannot be achieved. Furthermore, histologic features of borderline lesions resulting in MajDx of ADH vs. DCIS are not prognostic for risk of subsequent breast carcinoma.

Practical Considerations in Breast Papillary Lesions: A Review of the Literature

Context.—Diagnosis of papillary breast lesions, especially in core biopsies, is challenging for most pathologists, and these lesions pose problems for patient management. Distinction between benign, premalignant, and malignant components of papillary lesions is challenging, and the diagnosis of invasion is problematic in lesions that have circumscribed margins. Obtaining a balance between overtreatment and undertreatment of these lesions is also challenging.

Objectives.—To provide a classification and a description of the histologic and immunohistochemical features and the differential diagnosis of papillary breast lesions, to provide an update on the molecular pathology of papillary breast lesions, and to discuss the recommendations for further investigation and management of papillary breast lesions. This review provides a concise description of the histologic and immunohistochemical features of the different papillary lesions of the breast.

Data Sources.—The standard pathology text books on breast pathology and literature on papillary breast lesions were reviewed with the assistance of the PubMed database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed).

Conclusions.—Knowledge of the clinical presentation, histology, immunoprofile, and behavior of papillary breast lesions will assist pathologists with the diagnosis and optimal management of patients with papillary breast lesions.

Estrogen Receptor and Cytokeratin 5 Are Reliable Markers to Separate Usual Ductal Hyperplasia From Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Context.—High–molecular weight cytokeratins, such as cytokeratin 5 (CK5), are helpful to distinguish usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH) from atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Few studies have looked at combining CK5 with estrogen receptor (ER) to differentiate UDH from ADH.

Objective.—To evaluate the expression pattern of CK5 and ER as single or combined markers to separate UDH from ADH and low-grade DCIS.

Design.—A total of 23 ADH, 10 low-grade DCIS, and 32 UDH whole-tissue slides were stained for ER, CK5, progesterone receptor (PR), and Bcl-2. Nuclear staining of ER and PR was scored as diffuse (&gt;80%), focal (10%–80%), or negative (&lt;10%). Cytoplasmic staining of CK5 and Bcl-2 was scored as diffuse (&gt;60%), focal (10%–60%), or negative (&lt;10%). Differences in staining patterns were evaluated.

Results.—For ER staining: 94% of ADH/DCIS cases showed a diffuse staining pattern, whereas none of the 32 UDH cases showed diffuse staining. For CK5 staining: 96% of ADH/DCIS cases were negative or focally positive, whereas all 32 UDH cases had diffuse staining. The combination of ER and CK5 increased the sensitivity (94% to 97%). For PR staining: 11 of 23 ADH cases (48%), 6 of 10 DCIS cases (60%), and 4 of 32 UDH cases (13%) showed diffuse staining. Bcl-2 staining showed no statistical significance (P = .73).

Conclusions.—Although morphology remains the gold standard, ER and CK5 are useful makers to differentiate UDH from ADH. Progesterone receptor staining may have limited value, and Bcl-2 staining is not useful.

Application of immunohistochemistry in breast pathology: a review and update

CONTEXT

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool in routine breast pathology, used for both diagnostic and prognostic parameters. The diagnostic immunomarkers are the scope of this review. Most breast lesions can be diagnosed on routine hematoxylin-eosin sections; however, in several scenarios, such as morphologically equivocal cases or metastatic tumors of unknown primary, the appropriate application of immunohistochemistry adds true value in reaching an accurate diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic utility of the most commonly studied immunomarkers in the field of breast pathology by review of the literature, using the database of indexed articles in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) from 1976 to 2013.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review, and author's research data and personal practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriate use of immunohistochemistry by applying a panel of immunomarkers and using a standardized technical and interpretational method will complement the morphologic assessment and aid in the accurate classification of difficult breast lesions and the identification of metastasis from a breast primary.

The significance of combined CK5/6 and p63 immunohistochemistry in predicting the risks of subsequent carcinoma development in intraductal papilloma of the breast

Prediction of subsequent risks of breast carcinoma (BC) development in intraductal papilloma (IDP) has remained controversial with the exception of atypical papilloma (AP). The potential value of immunohistochemistry (IHC) of cytokeratin 5/6 [CK5/6] and p63 have been proposed but its standardization has also remained controversial. We studied 17 patients initially diagnosed as IDP or AP who subsequently developed BC with 34 age-matched controls. We compared histological features, results of IHC (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2], p63, CK5/6, Ki67), and ultrasound findings. Univariate conditional logistic regression analysis revealed that the status of both CK5/6 and p63/CK5/6 were significantly associated with subsequent BC development (P < 0.05). BC development in CK5/6 positive patients was 17.9% and p63/CK5/6 double positive patients 8.6%, respectively. Ultrasound evaluation was not significantly associated with any of the parameters examined and subsequent carcinoma development. Despite CK5/6 positivity, the subsequent incidence of BC development was nearly 20%. However p63/CK5/6 double positive status could predict a significantly lower subsequent carcinoma incidence, indicating a more accurate prognostic utility. Combining p63/CK5/6 with histological findings could be easily applied and could predict the subsequent BC development of the patients diagnosed as IDP at biopsy.

The clinical use of a P63/cytokeratin7/18/cytokeratin5/14 antibody cocktail in diagnostic breast pathology

An antibody cocktail directed against p63, cytokeratin (CK)5/14, and CK7/18 is reported to be useful in distinguishing noninvasive from invasive breast lesions and for the characterization of intraductal epithelial proliferations. However, limited studies evaluate its use in clinical practice. A retrospective review of breast material at a university medical center identified cases that were immunostained with the above antibody cocktail. Additional p63 immunostaining alone was performed to further determine the utility of the antibody cocktail in the evaluation of invasion. Of 50 breast cases identified, the antibody cocktail was used to confirm or exclude invasion in 44 (88%). Twenty-two (50%) of these had easily identifiable p63/CK5/14-positive myoepithelial cells, whereas the remainder lacked such staining, confirming the diagnosis of invasive carcinoma. In 27 cases with available diagnostic material for additional p63 immunostaining, the cocktail better highlighted myoepithelial cells by staining nuclei and cytoplasm. Easier identification of invasion was also facilitated by CK7/18 expression in invasive foci, especially those composed of single cells. Ten cases were immunostained to help determine the nature of an intraductal proliferation. The cocktail demonstrated a mosaic staining pattern of both CK7/18- and CK5/14-positive epithelial cells in 3 (30%) cases consistent with usual hyperplasia; homogenous CK7/18 expression in the remaining cases supported the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia or carcinoma in situ. In summary, the p63/CK7/18/CK5/14 cocktail stain appears to be a useful tool in diagnostic breast pathology, in the evaluation of possible invasion, particularly in the setting of minute foci of invasion as well as in epithelial proliferations.

Follow-up of breast papillary lesion on core needle biopsy: experience in African-American population

Background

The optimal course of clinical follow-up after a diagnosis of breast papillary lesion on a core needle biopsy (CNB) remains elusive. In particular, no reports in literature have addressed this question in African-American population. We describe our experience with breast papillary lesions in a primarily African-American population.

Methods

A search of our database for breast papillary lesions diagnosed on CNB between September 2002 and September 2012 was conducted. Cases were categorized into benign, atypical, and malignant. CK5/6 and CK903 stains were performed when necessary.

Results

A total of 64 breast papillary lesions were diagnosed on CNB, including 55 (86%) benign papillary lesions, 6 (9%) atypical lesions, and 3 (5%) intraductal papillary carcinomas. Of these 64 patients, 29 patients (25 African-Americans, 3 Hispanics, 1 Asian American) underwent lumpectomy within 6 months after CNB. Pathology of the lumpectomy showed: five of the 25 (20%) benign papillary lesions on needle biopsy were upgraded to intraductal or invasive papillary carcinoma; 2 of the 3 atypical papillary lesion cases on core biopsy were upgraded (67%), one into intraductal papillary carcinoma, the other invasive papillary carcinoma; the only case of malignant papillary lesion on CNB remained as intraductal papillary carcinoma on lumpectomy. The rate of upgrade in lumpectomy/mastectomy was 25%. CK5/6 and CK903 immunostains were performed on all seven core needle biopsies that were later upgraded.

Conclusions

In our predominantly African-American urban population, 25% of benign or atypical papillary lesions diagnosed on CNB was upgraded in the final excisional examination. Early excision of all papillary lesions diagnosed on CNB may be justified in this patient population.

Virtual Slides

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/7950117821177201

Ductal carcinoma in situ: what the pathologist needs to know and why

Ductal carcinoma in situ is a proliferation of malignant epithelial cells confined to the ductolobular system of the breast. It is considered a pre-cursor lesion for invasive breast cancer and when identified patients are treated with some combination of surgery, +/− radiation therapy, and +/adjuvant tamoxifen. However, no good biomarkers exist that can predict with accuracy those cases of DCIS destined to progress to invasive disease or once treated those patients that are likely to suffer a recurrence; thus, in the era of screening mammography it seems likely that many patients with DCIS are overtreated. This paper details the parameters that should be included in a pathology report for a case of DClS with some explanations as to their importance for good clinical decision making.

Histological analysis of benign breast imaging reporting and data system categories 4c and 5 breast lesions in imaging study

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to analyze the histology of breast lesions categorized as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4c or 5 breast lesions during the imaging evaluation, but diagnosed as benign during the histological evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 71 breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4c or 5 during imaging study, but diagnosed as benign upon histological evaluation.

RESULTS

Breast lesions were classified into six groups upon histological analysis: intraductal papilloma (18 cases), inflammatory group (15 cases), fibroepithelial tumor (14 cases), clustered microcalcification (10 cases), minimal histological alteration (10 cases), and adenosis (4 cases). Sclerosis and architectural complexity were associated with most of the biopsies that were morphologically similar to malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Among 71 cases categorized as 4c or 5 during the imaging study, but diagnosed as benign upon histological examination, intraductal papilloma was the most frequently identified histological lesion. These 71 cases exhibited histological characteristics of sclerosis and/or complex/complicated features that should be histologically differentiated from malignancy during evaluation.

Combined evaluation of CK5/6, ER, p63, and MUC3 for distinguishing breast intraductal papilloma from ductal carcinoma in situ

The differentiation of intraductal papilloma (IDP) in the breast from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is sometimes difficult. Fifty papillary lesions (25 DCIS and 25 IDP) were immunohistochemically examined using a panel of antibodies, including CK5/6, ER, p63, Ki-67, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, neuron specific enolase, CD56, MUC1, MUC3, CD44, p21, p27, and p53. The immunohistochemical staining pattern of each antibody was evaluated using the Allred scoring system. Then, the area under curve (AUC) for each antibody was computed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. DCIS typically showed high scores for ER and MUC3 reactivity compared with IDP, and the AUC for ER and MUC3 were 0.941 and 0.908, respectively. In contrast, IDP showed high scores for CK5/6 and p63 reactivity compared with DCIS, and the AUC for CK5/6 and p63 were 1.00 and 0.954, respectively. We devised a 'Differential Index' (DI) using the following formula: [S(ER) + S(MUC3)]/[S(CK5/6) + S(p63) + 1]. The distributions of the DI for IDP and DCIS did not overlap when the cutoff value was placed arbitrarily at DI = 1.0. From these results, it is concluded that a panel of four CK5/6, ER, p63, and MUC3 antibodies provide valuable information for differentiating IDP from DCIS.

Luminal cytokeratin expression profiles of breast papillomas and papillary carcinomas and the utility of a cytokeratin 5/p63/cytokeratin 8/18 antibody cocktail in their distinction

Luminal cytokeratin (CK) expression in breast papillary lesions, and its potential diagnostic utility among other markers in distinguishing between papillomas and papillary carcinomas, has not been previously evaluated. Such expression was determined in 42 papillary lesions (18 papillary carcinomas and 24 papillomas) by immunostaining with a CK5/p63/CK8/18 antibody cocktail. The mean CK8/18 intensity score and percentage of positive cells were significantly higher in papillary carcinomas (227 and 95%, respectively, vs 86 and 42% in papillomas; both P-values <0.0001), whereas the mean CK5 intensity score and percentage of positive cells were significantly lower (7 and 5%, respectively, vs 107 and 58% in papillomas; both P-values <0.0001). Half (9/18) of the papillary carcinomas expressed p63 vs all (24/24) of the papillomas (P = 0.0001). P63 expression in papillary carcinoma was always (9/9; 100%) focal/limited in nature (expression in <10% of cells), whereas focal expression was seen in only four (17%) papillomas (P<0.0001). Both differential CK (CK8/18 and CK5) expression and p63 were equally sensitive (100%) for the diagnosis of papillary carcinoma, but differential CK expression was more specific (96 vs 83%), resulting in a greater accuracy. However, the best discriminatory power in the distinction from papilloma was achieved when all three markers were used in combination, resulting in 100% sensitivity and specificity values. It is concluded that breast papillary lesions have differential CK expression profiles that, especially in combination with p63, can be useful for their stratification, potentially also in needle biopsy material, in which more accurate and reproducible characterization is needed.

Diagnostic evaluation of papillary lesions of the breast on core biopsy

The management of asymptomatic intraductal papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed on core biopsy poses a challenge for patients and clinicians, as the distinction between common benign lesions and atypical or malignant varieties may be difficult without formal excision. The aim of this study was to determine whether a combination of histopathologic and biomarker features could be used to accurately identify benign papillary lesions on core biopsy. An inclusive group of 127 excised papillary lesions was characterized by detailed histopathologic review and immunohistochemical staining for the basal markers cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6) and P63 and the proliferation marker Ki67. Comparison of benign, atypical, and malignant lesions revealed that the combination of broad, sclerotic fibrovascular cores, and epithelial CK5/6 staining was most commonly seen in benign papillomas. Ki67 staining revealed striking intralesional heterogeneity, but there was no difference between the high scores of benign, atypical, or malignant lesions (P=0.173). In a non-overlapping set of 42 cases, a binary classifier specifying benign lesions on the basis of thick fibrovascular cores and epithelial CK5/6 staining on core biopsy gave an overall misclassification rate of 4/42 (10%) when compared with the final excision diagnosis. Misclassified cases included 2/27 lesions ultimately diagnosed as benign and 2/2 atypical papillomas. All malignant lesions (n=13) were correctly assigned. The combined assessment of fibrovascular core thickness and CK5/6 staining on core biopsy distinguished benign from malignant papillary lesions, but did not separate benign from atypical cases. This approach may form a useful addition to the clinicopathologic evaluation of papillary lesions of the breast.

Papillary carcinoma of the breast: an overview

Papillary carcinoma of the breast represents approximately 0.5% of all newly diagnosed cases of breast cancer. The prevalence of both invasive and in situ papillary carcinoma seems to be greater in older postmenopausal women and, in relative terms, in males. Histologic features of the tumor include cellular proliferations surrounding fibrovascular cores, with or without invasion. In this review, characteristics of both in situ and invasive disease are outlined. Immunohistochemical analyses of papillary carcinoma suggest the utility of markers such as smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, calponin, p63, and high molecular weight keratins, which can characterize the myoepithelial cell layer. With respect to radiographic evaluation of papillary carcinoma, ultrasonography is the most extensively studied imaging modality, though magnetic resonance mammography has potential utility. Available data suggest improved outcome for papillary carcinoma as compared to invasive ductal carcinoma. Treatment-related information for patients with papillary carcinoma is limited, and patterns noted in available series suggest a variable approach to this disease. The scarcity of information underscores the need for further treatment- and outcome-related studies in papillary carcinoma of the breast.