1
|
Al-Mubarak H, Bane O, Gillingham N, Kyriakakos C, Abboud G, Cuevas J, Gonzalez J, Meilika K, Horowitz A, Huang HHV, Daza J, Fauveau V, Badani K, Viswanath SE, Taouli B, Lewis S. Characterization of renal masses with MRI-based radiomics: assessment of inter-package and inter-observer reproducibility in a prospective pilot study. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:3464-3475. [PMID: 38467854 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04212-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate radiomics features' reproducibility using inter-package/inter-observer measurement analysis in renal masses (RMs) based on MRI and to employ machine learning (ML) models for RM characterization. METHODS 32 Patients (23M/9F; age 61.8 ± 10.6 years) with RMs (25 renal cell carcinomas (RCC)/7 benign masses; mean size, 3.43 ± 1.73 cm) undergoing resection were prospectively recruited. All patients underwent 1.5 T MRI with T2-weighted (T2-WI), diffusion-weighted (DWI)/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and pre-/post-contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1-WI). RMs were manually segmented using volume of interest (VOI) on T2-WI, DWI/ADC, and T1-WI pre-/post-contrast imaging (1-min, 3-min post-injection) by two independent observers using two radiomics software packages for inter-package and inter-observer assessments of shape/histogram/texture features common to both packages (104 features; n = 26 patients). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess inter-observer and inter-package reproducibility of radiomics measurements [good (ICC ≥ 0.8)/moderate (ICC = 0.5-0.8)/poor (ICC < 0.5)]. ML models were employed using reproducible features (between observers and packages, ICC > 0.8) to distinguish RCC from benign RM. RESULTS Inter-package comparisons demonstrated that radiomics features from T1-WI-post-contrast had the highest proportion of good/moderate ICCs (54.8-58.6% for T1-WI-1 min), while most features extracted from T2-WI, T1-WI-pre-contrast, and ADC exhibited poor ICCs. Inter-observer comparisons found that radiomics measurements from T1-WI pre/post-contrast and T2-WI had the greatest proportion of features with good/moderate ICCs (95.3-99.1% T1-WI-post-contrast 1-min), while ADC measurements yielded mostly poor ICCs. ML models generated an AUC of 0.71 [95% confidence interval = 0.67-0.75] for diagnosis of RCC vs. benign RM. CONCLUSION Radiomics features extracted from T1-WI-post-contrast demonstrated greater inter-package and inter-observer reproducibility compared to ADC, with fair accuracy for distinguishing RCC from benign RM. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Knowledge of reproducibility of MRI radiomics features obtained on renal masses will aid in future study design and may enhance the diagnostic utility of radiomics models for renal mass characterization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitham Al-Mubarak
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Octavia Bane
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicolas Gillingham
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai West, New York, NY, 10019, USA
| | - Christopher Kyriakakos
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ghadi Abboud
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jordan Cuevas
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Janette Gonzalez
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kirolos Meilika
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amir Horowitz
- Precision Immunology Institute/Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hsin-Hui Vivien Huang
- Department of Population Sciences and Health Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jorge Daza
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Precision Immunology Institute/Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Valentin Fauveau
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ketan Badani
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Satish E Viswanath
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Case School of Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Radiology, Case School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bachir Taouli
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara Lewis
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1234, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen R, Su Q, Li Y, Shen P, Zhang J, Tan Y. Multi-sequence MRI-based radiomics model to preoperatively predict the WHO/ISUP grade of clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: a two-center study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:1176. [PMID: 39333970 PMCID: PMC11438199 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12930-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop radiomics models based on multi-sequence MRI from two centers for the preoperative prediction of the WHO/ISUP grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS This retrospective study included 334 ccRCC patients from two centers. Significant clinical factors were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses. MRI sequences included Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and in-phase/out-of-phase images. Feature selection methods and logistic regression (LR) were used to construct clinical and radiomics models, and a combined model was developed using the Rad-score and significant clinical factors. Additionally, seven classifiers were used to construct the combined model and different folds LR was used to construct the combined model to evaluate its performance. Models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA). The Delong test compared ROC performance, with p < 0.050 considered significant. RESULTS Multivariate analysis identified intra-tumoral vessels as an independent predictor of high-grade ccRCC. In the external validation set, the radiomics model (AUC = 0.834) outperformed the clinical model (AUC = 0.762), with the combined model achieving the highest AUC (0.855) and significantly outperforming the clinical model (p = 0.003). DCA showed that the combined model had a higher net benefit within the 0.04-0.54 risk threshold range than clinical model. Additionally, the combined model constructed using logistic regression has a higher priority compared to other classifiers. Additionally, 10-fold cross-validation with LR for the combined model showed consistent AUC values (0.849-0.856) across different folds. CONCLUSION The radiomics models based on multi-sequence MRI might be a noninvasive and effective tool, demonstrating good efficacy in preoperatively predicting the WHO/ISUP grade of ccRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruihong Chen
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No. 85 Jiefang South Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, 030001, P.R. China
- Department of College of Medical Imaging, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, 030001, P.R. China
| | - Qiaona Su
- Department of Radiology, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/ Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/ Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, No. 3 Workers' New Street, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, 030013, P.R. China
- Department of College of Medical Imaging, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, 030001, P.R. China
| | - Yangyang Li
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No. 85 Jiefang South Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, 030001, P.R. China
- Department of College of Medical Imaging, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, 030001, P.R. China
| | - Pengxin Shen
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No. 85 Jiefang South Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, 030001, P.R. China
- Department of College of Medical Imaging, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, 030001, P.R. China
| | - Jianxin Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/ Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/ Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, No. 3 Workers' New Street, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, 030013, P.R. China.
| | - Yan Tan
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No. 85 Jiefang South Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, 030001, P.R. China.
- Department of Shanxi Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Nanomedicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, 030001, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang H, Yin F, Chen M, Qi A, Yang L, Wen G. CT-based radiomics model using stability selection for predicting the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1169-1179. [PMID: 38688660 PMCID: PMC11135802 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to develop a model to predict World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) low-grade or high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) using 3D multiphase enhanced CT radiomics features (RFs). METHODS CT data of 138 low-grade and 60 high-grade ccRCC cases were included. RFs were extracted from four CT phases: non-contrast phase (NCP), corticomedullary phase, nephrographic phase, and excretory phase (EP). Models were developed using various combinations of RFs and subjected to cross-validation. RESULTS There were 107 RFs extracted from each phase of the CT images. The NCP-EP model had the best overall predictive value (AUC = 0.78), but did not significantly differ from that of the NCP model (AUC = 0.76). By considering the predictive ability of the model, the level of radiation exposure, and model simplicity, the overall best model was the Conventional image and clinical features (CICFs)-NCP model (AUC = 0.77; sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.69, positive predictive value 0.85, negative predictive value 0.54, accuracy 0.73). The second-best model was the NCP model (AUC = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS Combining clinical features with unenhanced CT images of the kidneys seems to be optimal for prediction of WHO/ISUP grade of ccRCC. This noninvasive method may assist in guiding more accurate treatment decisions for ccRCC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This study innovatively employed stability selection for RFs, enhancing model reliability. The CICFs-NCP model's simplicity and efficacy mark a significant advancement, offering a practical tool for clinical decision-making in ccRCC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haijie Zhang
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Center of PET/CT, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518052, China
| | - Fu Yin
- School of Electronic and Communication Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen 518052, China
| | - Menglin Chen
- Medical Imaging Department, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Anqi Qi
- Medical Imaging Department, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Liyang Yang
- Medical Imaging Department, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Ge Wen
- Medical Imaging Department, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yin F, Zhang H, Qi A, Zhu Z, Yang L, Wen G, Xie W. An exploratory study of CT radiomics using differential network feature selection for WHO/ISUP grading and progression-free survival prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:979613. [DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.979613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesTo explore the feasibility of predicting the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grade and progression-free survival (PFS) of clear cell renal cell cancer (ccRCC) using the radiomics features (RFs) based on the differential network feature selection (FS) method using the maximum-entropy probability model (MEPM).Methods175 ccRCC patients were divided into a training set (125) and a test set (50). The non-contrast phase (NCP), cortico-medullary phase, nephrographic phase, excretory phase phases, and all-phase WHO/ISUP grade prediction models were constructed based on a new differential network FS method using the MEPM. The diagnostic performance of the best phase model was compared with the other state-of-the-art machine learning models and the clinical models. The RFs of the best phase model were used for survival analysis and visualized using risk scores and nomograms. The performance of the above models was tested in both cross-validated and independent validation and checked by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.ResultsThe NCP RFs model was the best phase model, with an AUC of 0.89 in the test set, and performed superior to other machine learning models and the clinical models (all p <0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, univariate and multivariate cox regression results, and risk score analyses showed the NCP RFs could predict PFS well (almost all p < 0.05). The nomogram model incorporated the best two RFs and showed good discrimination, a C-index of 0.71 and 0.69 in the training and test set, and good calibration.ConclusionThe NCP CT-based RFs selected by differential network FS could predict the WHO/ISUP grade and PFS of RCC.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ferrari M, Cartolari R, Barizzi J, Pereira Mestre R, D'Antonio E, Renard J. Percutaneous biopsy of small renal mass: can diagnostic accuracy be affected by hospital volume? Cent European J Urol 2021; 74:334-340. [PMID: 34729222 PMCID: PMC8552940 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2021.3.0104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction High diagnostic performance and low morbidity for renal tumor biopsy (RTB) have been described in highly experienced centers. Here we present the five-year experience of our institute in performing RTB. The protocol used, the safety profile and the diagnostic accuracy obtained were analyzed. Material and methods The study is a retrospective single-institution clinical data review of 84 consecutive RTB of small renal masses. Post-biopsy complications were reported using the Clavien-Dindo system. To measure the concordance between biopsy and nephrectomy specimens regarding histological subtype and International Society of Urological Pathology/World Health Organization (ISUP/WHO) renal cell carcinoma grade, the kappa coefficient of Cohen was used. Results Median (IQR) follow-up time was 44 (29–58) months. In total, 94% of RTB procedures were free of complications; when complications did occur, 80% were grade I and 20% were grade II. No cases of tumor seeding were observed. Combining the first and repeated biopsies the overall diagnostic rate was 85.8%. Overall, 79.1% of diagnostic RTB were malignant. In 42 surgically treated patients, the concordance between the histological results of biopsies and surgical specimens was very good for histological subtypes (k = 0.87) and moderate for tumor grade (k = 0.51). Conclusions RTB resulted in a high safety profile. The overall diagnostic rate was 85% and an unnecessary intervention was avoided in 21% of patients. RTB showed a very good accuracy in determining the histological subtype of renal cancer while it was moderate for the tumor grade. These results are similar to those reported in larger series and support feasibility of this procedure in low-volume centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferrari
- Division of Urology, Bellinzona Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Roberto Cartolari
- Division of Radiology, Bellinzona Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | | - Ricardo Pereira Mestre
- Clinic of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Eugenia D'Antonio
- Clinic of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Julien Renard
- Division of Urology, Bellinzona Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.,Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Altay AY, Karatay H, Bakir B, Erdem S, Buyuk M, Ozcan F, Kilicaslan I, Ozluk Y. Diagnostic accuracy of core biopsies of renal masses: Experience in a real-life setting from a tertiary center. Ann Diagn Pathol 2021; 55:151830. [PMID: 34555597 DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2021.151830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To document and analyze diagnostic accuracy of renal core biopsy (RCB), its diagnostic correlation with resection specimens, and to question the need for immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the preoperative diagnosis of renal masses. MATERIAL AND METHOD RCBs performed at a reference center between 2007 and 2017 were included. Pathological, clinical, and radiological data were obtained from medical records. RESULTS Among 302 biopsies included in this study, 274 (90.7%) were diagnostic. Two hundred sixty-six were neoplastic and 179 were of primary renal origin. The most common secondary neoplasms were hematolymphoid (n = 35) and metastatic (n = 17). Sixty-nine tumors were classified as small renal masses (SRMs) (≤4 cm in diameter) and 53 of them were malignant. Nephrectomy was performed in 58 patients. Overall diagnostic accuracy between resections and RCBs was 88.7%. IHC was performed in 160 (53%) cases. In 15 of those, a definite diagnosis could not be rendered. Renal cell origin and subtype were determined by histomorphology alone in 81 and 75 cases, respectively. Sixty primary neoplasms of renal cell origin required IHC for diagnosis. CONCLUSION RCB is a safe and highly accurate method for the diagnosis of both primary and secondary renal neoplasms. IHC is mostly required for the diagnosis of secondary tumors. Histomorphology is still the primary diagnostic tool, highly dependent on the experience of the surgical pathologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Yilmaz Altay
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Huseyin Karatay
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Baris Bakir
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selcuk Erdem
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Melek Buyuk
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Faruk Ozcan
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Isin Kilicaslan
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yasemin Ozluk
- Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Spoendlin M, Bonkat AG. Incidental Small Renal Tumor: More Biopsy, Less Surgery? PRAXIS 2021; 110:1-3. [PMID: 34344194 DOI: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - And Gernot Bonkat
- Merian Iselin Klinik, Basel, Switzerland
- alta uro AG, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Spoendlin M, Bonkat G. [Incidental Small Renal Tumor: More Biopsy, Less Surgery?]. PRAXIS 2021; 110:539-541. [PMID: 34344192 DOI: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
|
9
|
Moldovanu CG, Boca B, Lebovici A, Tamas-Szora A, Feier DS, Crisan N, Andras I, Buruian MM. Preoperative Predicting the WHO/ISUP Nuclear Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Features. J Pers Med 2020; 11:jpm11010008. [PMID: 33374569 PMCID: PMC7822466 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11010008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Nuclear grade is important for treatment selection and prognosis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). This study aimed to determine the ability of preoperative four-phase multiphasic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)-based radiomics features to predict the WHO/ISUP nuclear grade. In all 102 patients with histologically confirmed ccRCC, the training set (n = 62) and validation set (n = 40) were randomly assigned. In both datasets, patients were categorized according to the WHO/ISUP grading system into low-grade ccRCC (grades 1 and 2) and high-grade ccRCC (grades 3 and 4). The feature selection process consisted of three steps, including least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis, and the radiomics scores were developed using 48 radiomics features (10 in the unenhanced phase, 17 in the corticomedullary (CM) phase, 14 in the nephrographic (NP) phase, and 7 in the excretory phase). The radiomics score (Rad-Score) derived from the CM phase achieved the best predictive ability, with a sensitivity, specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 90.91%, 95.00%, and 0.97 in the training set. In the validation set, the Rad-Score derived from the NP phase achieved the best predictive ability, with a sensitivity, specificity, and an AUC of 72.73%, 85.30%, and 0.84. We constructed a complex model, adding the radiomics score for each of the phases to the clinicoradiological characteristics, and found significantly better performance in the discrimination of the nuclear grades of ccRCCs in all MDCT phases. The highest AUC of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.92-1.00, p < 0.0001) was demonstrated for the CM phase. Our results showed that the MDCT radiomics features may play a role as potential imaging biomarkers to preoperatively predict the WHO/ISUP grade of ccRCCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia-Gabriela Moldovanu
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540139 Târgu Mureș, Romania; (C.-G.M.); (M.M.B.)
- Department of Radiology, Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Cluj-Napoca, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Bianca Boca
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540139 Târgu Mureș, Romania; (C.-G.M.); (M.M.B.)
- Department of Radiology, Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Cluj-Napoca, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
- Correspondence: (B.B.); (A.L.)
| | - Andrei Lebovici
- Department of Radiology, Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Cluj-Napoca, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Correspondence: (B.B.); (A.L.)
| | - Attila Tamas-Szora
- Department of Radiology, Clinical Municipal Hospital, 400139 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Diana Sorina Feier
- Department of Radiology, Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Cluj-Napoca, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Nicolae Crisan
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (N.C.); (I.A.)
| | - Iulia Andras
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (N.C.); (I.A.)
| | - Mircea Marian Buruian
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540139 Târgu Mureș, Romania; (C.-G.M.); (M.M.B.)
- Department of Radiology, Emergency Clinical County Hospital Târgu Mureș, 540136 Târgu Mureș, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xu K, Liu L, Li W, Sun X, Shen T, Pan F, Jiang Y, Guo Y, Ding L, Zhang M. CT-Based Radiomics Signature for Preoperative Prediction of Coagulative Necrosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Korean J Radiol 2020; 21:670-683. [PMID: 32410406 PMCID: PMC7231614 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The presence of coagulative necrosis (CN) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) indicates a poor prognosis, while the absence of CN indicates a good prognosis. The purpose of this study was to build and validate a radiomics signature based on preoperative CT imaging data to estimate CN status in ccRCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Altogether, 105 patients with pathologically confirmed ccRCC were retrospectively enrolled in this study and then divided into training (n = 72) and validation (n = 33) sets. Thereafter, 385 radiomics features were extracted from the three-dimensional volumes of interest of each tumor, and 10 traditional features were assessed by two experienced radiologists using triple-phase CT-enhanced images. A multivariate logistic regression algorithm was used to build the radiomics score and traditional predictors in the training set, and their performance was assessed and then tested in the validation set. The radiomics signature to distinguish CN status was then developed by incorporating the radiomics score and the selected traditional predictors. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the predictive performance. RESULTS The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the radiomics score, which consisted of 7 radiomics features, was 0.855 in the training set and 0.885 in the validation set. The AUC of the traditional predictor, which consisted of 2 traditional features, was 0.843 in the training set and 0.858 in the validation set. The radiomics signature showed the best performance with an AUC of 0.942 in the training set, which was then confirmed with an AUC of 0.969 in the validation set. CONCLUSION The CT-based radiomics signature that incorporated radiomics and traditional features has the potential to be used as a non-invasive tool for preoperative prediction of CN in ccRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Xu
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Lin Liu
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Wenhui Li
- College of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xiaoqing Sun
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Tongxu Shen
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Feng Pan
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yuqing Jiang
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yan Guo
- Life Sciences, GE Healthcare, China, Shenyang, China
| | - Lei Ding
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Mengchao Zhang
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chopra S, Liu J, Alemozaffar M, Nichols PW, Aron M, Weisenberger DJ, Collings CK, Syan S, Hu B, Desai M, Aron M, Duddalwar V, Gill I, Liang G, Siegmund KD. Improving needle biopsy accuracy in small renal mass using tumor-specific DNA methylation markers. Oncotarget 2018; 8:5439-5448. [PMID: 27690297 PMCID: PMC5354921 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The clinical management of small renal masses (SRMs) is challenging since the current methods for distinguishing between benign masses and malignant renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are frequently inaccurate or inconclusive. In addition, renal cancer subtypes also have different treatments and outcomes. High false negative rates increase the risk of cancer progression and indeterminate diagnoses result in unnecessary and potentially morbid surgical procedures. Experimental Design We built a predictive classification model for kidney tumors using 697 DNA methylation profiles from six different subgroups: clear cell, papillary and chromophobe RCC, benign angiomylolipomas, oncocytomas, and normal kidney tissues. Furthermore, the DNA methylation-dependent classifier has been validated in 272 ex vivo needle biopsy samples from 100 renal masses (71% SRMs). Results In general, the results were highly reproducible (89%, n=70) in predicting identical malignant subtypes from biopsies. Overall, 98% of adjacent-normals (n=102) were correctly classified as normal, while 92% of tumors (n=71) were correctly classified malignant and 86% of benign (n=29) were correctly classified benign by this classification model. Conclusions Overall, this study provides molecular-based support for using routine needle biopsies to determine tumor classification of SRMs and support the clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Chopra
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jie Liu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mehrdad Alemozaffar
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peter W Nichols
- Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Manju Aron
- Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel J Weisenberger
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Clayton K Collings
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sumeet Syan
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brian Hu
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Mihir Desai
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Monish Aron
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vinay Duddalwar
- Department of Radiology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Inderbir Gill
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gangning Liang
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kimberly D Siegmund
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cornelis F, Grenier N. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Solid Renal Tumors: A Practical Algorithm. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2017; 38:47-58. [DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2016.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
13
|
[WHO classification 2016 and first S3 guidelines on renal cell cancer: What is important for the practice?]. DER PATHOLOGE 2017; 37:127-33. [PMID: 26942728 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-016-0144-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The first S3 guidelines on renal cell cancer cover the practical aspects of imaging, diagnostics and therapy as well as the clinical relevance of pathology reporting. This review summarizes the changes in renal tumor classification and the new recommendations for reporting renal cell tumors. The S3 guidelines recommend the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal cell tumors. Novel renal cell tumor entities and provisional or emerging renal cell tumor entities of the 2016 WHO classification of renal tumors are discussed. The S3 guidelines for renal cell cancer also recommend the use of the WHO/International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) grading system for clear cell and for papillary renal cell carcinomas, which replaces the previously used Fuhrman grading system.
Collapse
|
14
|
Crestani A, Rossanese M, Calandriello M, Sioletic S, Giannarini G, Ficarra V. Introduction to small renal tumours and prognostic indicators. Int J Surg 2016; 36:495-503. [PMID: 27004420 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2015] [Revised: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Over the past years, the widespread use of radiological imaging for evaluating abdominal symptoms unrelated to kidney cancer has been linked to a significant increase in the percentage of renal tumours incidentally detected at an asymptomatic stage. The definition of 'small' renal tumours has changed over the years. Presently, according to dimensional criteria, surgical indications and prognostic impact, small renal tumours are defined as masses ≤4 cm in size. Classical preoperative variables that influence the decision-making process in the management of T1a renal tumours can be classified as patient-related and tumour-related factors. Age is an independent predictor of cancer-specific survival (CSS), with older patients exhibiting significantly worse survival. An accurate classification of the anatomical and topographical characteristics of small renal masses based on available nephrometry systems is necessary for standard preoperative evaluation of patients eligible for partial nephrectomy (PN). Renal tumour biopsies (RTBs) can be indicated in patients eligible for active surveillance or ablative treatments, those with other primary tumours, those with prior renal lesions and/or those with multiple synchronous tumours, showing a median diagnostic rate of 92%. Small renal tumours typically have a good prognosis. Patient age, mode of presentation, nuclear grading, coagulative necrosis and histologic subtype can influence the prognosis of this subgroup of RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Crestani
- Academic Medical Centre Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Urology Unit, Udine, Italy
| | - Marta Rossanese
- Academic Medical Centre Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Urology Unit, Udine, Italy
| | - Mattia Calandriello
- Academic Medical Centre Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Urology Unit, Udine, Italy
| | - Stefano Sioletic
- Academic Medical Centre Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Pathology Unit, Udine, Italy
| | - Gianluca Giannarini
- Academic Medical Centre Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Urology Unit, Udine, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ficarra
- Academic Medical Centre Hospital "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Urology Unit, Udine, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinic Medical Sciences, Urology Unit, University of Udine, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Moch H. [Kidney tumours]. DER PATHOLOGE 2016; 37:125-6. [PMID: 26886133 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-016-0146-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H Moch
- Institut für Pathologie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Schmelzbergstr.12, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gellert LL, Mehra R, Chen YB, Gopalan A, Fine SW, Al-Ahmadie H, Reuter VE, Tickoo SK. The diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous renal needle core biopsy and its potential impact on the clinical management of renal cortical neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015; 138:1673-9. [PMID: 25427045 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0574-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT While biopsies are now increasingly being performed for the diagnosis of renal cortical neoplasms, the influence of the rendered pathological diagnoses on the clinical management is only rarely documented. OBJECTIVES To report our experience with consecutively performed renal biopsies and the potential impact of the diagnosis on subsequent clinical management. DESIGN Material from needle biopsies performed consecutively at our institution between 2006 and 2011 was reviewed. The influence of the reported pathology results on the clinical management was determined from patient follow-up medical record review. RESULTS In total, 218 percutaneous biopsies for renal masses were performed during this period. Among them, 181 (83%) yielded neoplastic tissue, including 81 clear cell renal cell carcinomas, 29 low-grade oncocytic neoplasms, 7 papillary renal cell carcinomas, 5 clear cell papillary renal cell carcinomas, 5 angiomyolipomas, and 14 urothelial carcinomas. Fourteen additional cases (6%) contained lesional material from clinically known nonneoplastic processes, for a total diagnostic yield of 89%. Twenty-three (11%) were nonrepresentative of lesional tissue. In 10 of these, repeat biopsies or resections established the diagnosis of renal tumors. Biopsy diagnosis was confirmed in 29 of 30 cases (97%) on subsequent nephrectomy. Following the biopsy diagnosis, there were significant differences in the clinical management; overall, 79% of clear cell renal cell carcinomas received therapeutic interventions, and 17% were put on active surveillance. In contrast, 77% of the benign or low-grade lesions were put on active surveillance. CONCLUSIONS Accurate and specific diagnosis can be rendered on renal core biopsy in most renal tumors, and the biopsy diagnosis can have a definitive role in their clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan L Gellert
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Domínguez-Esteban M, Villacampa-Aubá F, Garcia-Muñóz H, Tejido Sánchez A, Romero Otero J, de la Rosa Kehrmann F. Lessons learned from the comparative study between renal mass biopsy and the analysis of the surgical specimen. Actas Urol Esp 2014; 38:655-61. [PMID: 24704129 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2014] [Accepted: 02/02/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of renal mass (RM) biopsy is currently under discussion. As a result of the progressive increase in the incidental diagnosis of RMs (which have a higher percentage of benignity and well-differentiated cancers), new approaches have emerged such as observation, especially with elderly patients or those with significant comorbidity. RM biopsy (RMB) should provide sufficient information for making this decision, but so far this has not been the case. We examine our prospective series of in-bench RMBs after surgery and compare them with the anatomy of the removed specimen. MATERIAL AND METHODS We obtained (prospectively, in-bench and with a 16-gauge needle) 4 biopsies of RMs operated on in our department from October 2008 to December 2009. These RMs were analyzed by 2 uropathologists and compared with the results of the specimen. RESULTS We analyzed 188 biopsies (47 RMs); 12.75% were "not valid". The ability of biopsy to diagnose malignancy or benignity was 100%, and the coincidence in the histological type was 95%. The success in determining the tumor grade was 100% when the cancer was low-grade and 62% when high-grade. None of the analyzed data (necrosis, size, etc.) influenced the results in a statistically significant manner. CONCLUSION RMB with a 16-G needle enables the differentiation between malignancy and benignity in 100% of cases, with a very similar diagnostic accuracy in the tumor type. Tumor grade is still the pending issue with renal mass biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Domínguez-Esteban
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, España.
| | - F Villacampa-Aubá
- Unidad de Uro-Oncología, Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - H Garcia-Muñóz
- Sección de Uro-Patología, Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - A Tejido Sánchez
- Unidad de Uro-Oncología, Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - J Romero Otero
- Unidad de Uro-Oncología, Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - F de la Rosa Kehrmann
- Unidad de Uro-Oncología, Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tomaszewski JJ, Uzzo RG, Smaldone MC. Heterogeneity and renal mass biopsy: a review of its role and reliability. Cancer Biol Med 2014; 11:162-72. [PMID: 25364577 PMCID: PMC4197425 DOI: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2014] [Accepted: 06/25/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Increased abdominal imaging has led to an increase in the detection of the incidental small renal mass (SRM). With increasing recognition that the malignant potential of SRMs is heterogeneous, ranging from benign (15%-20%) to aggressive (20%), enthusiasm for more conservative management strategies in the elderly and infirmed, such as active surveillance (AS), have grown considerably. As the management of the SRM evolves to incorporate ablative techniques and AS for low risk disease, the role of renal mass biopsy (RMB) to help guide individualized therapy is evolving. Historically, the role of RMB was limited to the evaluation of suspected metastatic disease, renal abscess, or lymphoma. However, in the contemporary era, the role of biopsy has grown, most notably to identify patients who harbor benign lesions and for whom treatment, particularly the elderly or frail, may be avoided. When performing a RMB to guide initial clinical decision making for small, localized tumors, the most relevant questions are often relegated to proof of malignancy and documentation (if possible) of grade. However, significant intratumoral heterogeneity has been identified in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) that may lead to an underestimation of the genetic complexity of a tumor when single-biopsy procedures are used. Heterogeneous genomic landscapes and branched parallel evolution of ccRCCs with spatially separated subclones creates an illusion of clonal dominance when assessed by single biopsies and raises important questions regarding how tumors can be optimally sampled and whether future evolutionary tumor branches might be predictable and ultimately targetable. This work raises profound questions concerning the genetic landscape of cancer and how tumor heterogeneity may affect, and possibly confound, targeted diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. In this review, we discuss the current role of RMB, the implications of tumor heterogeneity on diagnostic accuracy, and highlight promising future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Tomaszewski
- 1 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Rowan University School of Medicine, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA ; 2 Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Robert G Uzzo
- 1 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Rowan University School of Medicine, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA ; 2 Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Marc C Smaldone
- 1 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Rowan University School of Medicine, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA ; 2 Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cornelis F, Tricaud E, Lasserre AS, Petitpierre F, Bernhard JC, Le Bras Y, Yacoub M, Bouzgarrou M, Ravaud A, Grenier N. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the differentiation of low and high grade clear cell renal carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2014; 25:24-31. [PMID: 25117747 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3380-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2014] [Revised: 07/10/2014] [Accepted: 07/29/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively evaluate the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to differentiate low from high Fuhrman grade renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS MR images from 80 consecutive pathologically proven RCC (57 clear cell, 16 papillary and 7 chromophobe) were evaluated. Double-echo chemical shift, dynamic contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were reviewed independently. Signal intensity index (SII), tumour-to-spleen SI ratio (TSR), ADC ratio, wash-in (WiI) and wash-out indices (WoI) between different phases were calculated and compared to pathological grade and size. The Fuhrman scoring system was used. Low grade (score ≤ 2) and high grade (score ≥ 3) tumours were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS No associations between grade and imaging factors were found for papillary and chromophobe RCCs. For clear cell RCCs, there was a significant association between the grade and parenchymal WiI (WiI2) (P = 0.02) or ADCr (P = 0.03). A significant association between tumour grade and size (P = 0.01), WiI2 (P = 0.02) and ADCr (P = 0.05) remained in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Multiparametric MRI can be used to accurately differentiate low Fuhrman grade clear cell RCC from high grade. High Fuhrman grade (≥ 3) RCCs were larger, had lower parenchymal wash-in indices and lower ADC ratios than low grade. KEY POINTS • Fuhrman grade of clear cell RCC can be differentiated with multiparametric MR imaging. • Fuhrman grade significantly differed for size, parenchymal wash-in index and ADC ratio. • No significant associations were found for papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Cornelis
- Department of Radiology, Pellegrin Hospital, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Patard JJ, Baumert H, Bensalah K, Bernhard JC, Bigot P, Escudier B, Grenier N, Hétet JF, Long JA, Méjean A, Paparel P, Richard S, Rioux-Leclercq N, Coloby P, Soulié M. Recommandations en onco-urologie 2013 du CCAFU: Cancer du rein. Prog Urol 2013; 23 Suppl 2:S177-204. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(13)70055-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
21
|
Kapur P, Christie A, Raman JD, Then MT, Nuhn P, Buchner A, Bastian P, Seitz C, Shariat SF, Bensalah K, Rioux-Leclercq N, Xie XJ, Lotan Y, Margulis V, Brugarolas J. BAP1 immunohistochemistry predicts outcomes in a multi-institutional cohort with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2013; 191:603-10. [PMID: 24076305 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mutations in the tumor suppressor gene BAP1 occur in approximately 15% of clear cell renal cell carcinoma cases. Sequencing efforts demonstrated worse outcomes in patients with BAP1 mutated clear cell renal cell carcinoma. We investigated the clinicopathological significance and oncologic outcomes of BAP1 loss using a previously validated immunohistochemical assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS Immunohistochemistry for BAP1 was performed on tissue microarray sections from 559 nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma cases treated with nephrectomy at multiple institutions. The association of BAP1 expression with clinicopathological parameters was analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests. Survival was assessed by Cox regression analysis, which also identified independent predictors of time dependent outcomes. RESULTS At a median followup of 50 months (range 0 to 183) 86 of 483 patients (17.8%) experienced recurrence and 121 of 559 (21.6%) had died. BAP1 was negative in 82 of 559 tumors (14.7%). BAP1 loss was associated with adverse clinicopathological variables, including high Fuhrman grade (p <0.0001), advanced pT stage (p = 0.0021), sarcomatoid dedifferentiation (p = 0.0001) and necrosis (p <0.0001). Cox regression revealed that patients with BAP1 negative tumors had significantly worse disease-free survival (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8-4.7, p <0.0001) and overall survival (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.1, p = 0.0010) than patients with BAP1 positive tumors. CONCLUSIONS Immunohistochemistry for BAP1 serves as a powerful marker to predict poor oncologic outcomes and adverse clinicopathological features in patients with nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. BAP1 assessment using immunohistochemistry on needle biopsy may benefit preoperative risk stratification and guide treatment planning in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Payal Kapur
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France.
| | - Alana Christie
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - Jay D Raman
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - Matthew T Then
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - Philipp Nuhn
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - Patrick Bastian
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - Xian-Jin Xie
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| | - James Brugarolas
- Department of Pathology (PK), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology (PK, YL, VM), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Developmental Biology (JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Simmons Cancer Center (XJX, JB), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (JDR), Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MTT), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Urology, University of Munich (PN, AB), Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, Paracelsus-Klinik Golzheim, Dusseldorf, Germany (PB); Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano (CS), Bolzano, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital (CS, SFS), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Pathology, University of Rennes (KB, NR-L), Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vargas HA, Delaney HG, Delappe EM, Wang Y, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS, Tan Y, Zhao B, Schwartz LH, Hricak H, Russo P, Akin O. Multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI: single-slice versus volumetric quantification of tumor enhancement for the assessment of renal clear-cell carcinoma fuhrman grade. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 37:1160-7. [PMID: 23152173 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2011] [Accepted: 09/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the association between clear-cell carcinoma pathology grade at nephrectomy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tumor enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived the informed consent requirement. In all, 32 patients underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI prior to nephrectomy. MRI tumor enhancement was measured using two approaches: 1) the most enhancing portion of the tumor on a single slice and 2) volumetric analysis of enhancement in the entire tumor. Associations between pathological grade, tumor size, and enhancement were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test and generalized logistic regression models. RESULTS No significant association between pathology grade and enhancement was found when measurements were made on a single slice. When measured in the entire tumor, significant associations were found between higher pathology grades and lower mean, median, top 10%, top 25%, and top 50% tumor enhancement (P < 0.001-0.002). On multivariate analysis the association between grade and enhancement remained significant (P = 0.041-0.043), but tumor size did not make an additional contribution beyond tumor enhancement alone in differentiating between tumor grades. CONCLUSION There is significant association between tumor grade and enhancement, but only when measured in the entire tumor and not on the most enhancing portion on a single slice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hebert Alberto Vargas
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Can Renal Biopsy Accurately Predict Histological Subtype and Fuhrman Grade of Renal Cell Carcinoma? J Urol 2012; 188:1690-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2012] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
24
|
Volpe A, Finelli A, Gill IS, Jewett MA, Martignoni G, Polascik TJ, Remzi M, Uzzo RG. Rationale for Percutaneous Biopsy and Histologic Characterisation of Renal Tumours. Eur Urol 2012; 62:491-504. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 187] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2012] [Accepted: 05/03/2012] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
25
|
Lhermitte B, de Leval L. Interpretation of needle biopsies of the kidney for investigation of renal masses. Virchows Arch 2012; 461:13-26. [PMID: 22678078 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-012-1255-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2012] [Revised: 04/17/2012] [Accepted: 05/18/2012] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The development of new therapeutic options for renal tumors has lead to the need of a pretherapeutic diagnosis for an increasing proportion of patients presenting with a renal mass. This need is particularly important for a small, incidentally discovered renal mass (less than 4 cm) as it can be a benign lesion in a significant percentage of cases. Recent studies have shown that needle biopsy is an accurate and safe method allowing for a precise histopathological diagnosis of the mass in most cases. The aims of the biopsy are (1) to assess the benign or malignant nature of the lesion, (2) to assess the primary or secondary nature of the lesion, and (3), in case of a primary malignancy, to determine histological prognostic factors, such as the tumor type. This review, based on the most recent literature and our own experience, is intended to provide a practical approach to the diagnosis, relying on appropriate morphologic assessment and the use of immunohistochemistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoît Lhermitte
- University Institute of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 25 rue du Bugnon, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang HK, Zhu Y, Yao XD, Zhang SL, Dai B, Zhang HL, Shen YJ, Wang CF, Ye DW. External Validation of a Nomogram Using RENAL Nephrometry Score to Predict High Grade Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Urol 2012; 187:1555-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2011] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Kai Wang
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yao Zhu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Xu-Dong Yao
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Shi-Lin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Dai
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Hai-Liang Zhang
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi-Jun Shen
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao-Fu Wang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Ding-Wei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chi A, Shirodkar SP, Escudero DO, Ekwenna OO, Yates TJ, Ayyathurai R, Garcia-Roig M, Gahan JC, Manoharan M, Bird VG, Lokeshwar VB. Molecular characterization of kidney cancer: association of hyaluronic acid family with histological subtypes and metastasis. Cancer 2011; 118:2394-402. [PMID: 21887686 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2011] [Revised: 07/12/2011] [Accepted: 07/15/2011] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Molecular profiling of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) may improve the distinction between oncocytoma and malignant RCC subtypes and aid in early detection of metastasis. The hyaluronic acid (HA) family includes HA synthases (HAS1, HAS2, HAS3), hyaluronidases (HYAL-1, HYAL-2, HYAL-3, HYAL-4, PH20, HYAL-P1), and HA receptors (CD44s, CD44v, RHAMM). HA family members promote tumor growth and metastasis. The authors evaluated the expression of HA family members in kidney specimens. METHODS By using quantitative polymerase chain reaction, mRNA levels of 12 HA family members were measured in tumor specimens obtained from 86 consecutive patients undergoing nephrectomy; 80 of them also provided normal specimens. Mean and median follow-up were 15.2 ± 8.8 and 13.8 months. RCC specimens included clear cell RCC: 65; papillary: 10; chromophobe: 5; oncocytoma: 6; metastasis positive: 17. RESULTS Median HAS1, CD44s, and RHAMM transcript levels were elevated 3- to 25-fold in clear cell RCC and papillary and chromophobe tumors when compared with normal tissues. HYAL-4, CD44s, and RHAMM levels were elevated 4- to 12-fold in clear cell RCC and papillary tumors when compared with oncocytomas; only HYAL-4 levels distinguished between chromophobe and oncocytoma (P = .009). CD44s and RHAMM levels were significantly higher in tumors <4 cm (510 ± 611 and 19.6 ± 20.8, respectively) when compared with oncocytoma (46.4 ± 20 and 3.8 ± 2.5; P ≤ .006). In univariate and multivariate analyses, CD44s (P < .0001), RHAMM (P < .0001), stage, tumor size, and/or renal vein involvement were significantly associated with metastasis. The combined CD44s + RHAMM marker had 82% sensitivity and 86% specificity to predict metastasis. CONCLUSIONS CD44s and RHAMM levels distinguish between oncocytoma and RCC subtypes regardless of tumor size and are potential predictors of RCC metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Chi
- Department of Urology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33101, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|