Outcome Comparison in Children Undergoing Extracorporeal Life Support Initiated at a Local Hospital by a Mobile Cardiorespiratory Assistance Unit or at a Referral Center

Unité mobile d’assistance circulatoire et respiratoire de l’enfant et du nouveau-né : une revue narrative

Les unités mobiles d’assistance circulatoire et respiratoire de l’enfant et du nouveau-né se sont développées au cours des dix dernières années. En effet, la mise en place d’une suppléance extracorporelle respiratoire ou circulatoire nécessite une équipe expérimentée et n’est pas disponible dans tous les centres hospitaliers pédiatriques. Or, les enfants atteints d’une défaillance circulatoire ou respiratoire réfractaire ne sont, pour la plupart, pas déplaçables vers une unité délivrant ce type de traitement de sauvetage. Les unités mobiles ont donc pour objectif de mettre à disposition ces technologies d’exception sur l’ensemble du territoire afin de garantir une égalité d’accès aux soins. Cependant, la haute technicité de ces thérapeutiques nécessite une équipe entraînée sachant poser et régler une assistance extracorporelle, prendre en charge un patient en défaillance respiratoire et/ou hémodynamique réfractaire et aguerrie à ces transports à haut risque. Le territoire français était jusqu’en 2014 très mal couvert par les unités mobiles pédiatriques et néonatales. Depuis, la création de plusieurs unités a permis une couverture totale du territoire. L’objectif de cette revue narrative sur les unités mobiles pédiatriques et néonatales est de résumer les différentes modalités de suppléance respiratoire et hémodynamique extracorporelle, d’en illustrer leurs différentes missions et leurs modalités de fonctionnement. Nous finirons par une description de leur efficacité en termes de survie et de survenue d’incidents en cours de transport.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes for Neonates, Infants, and Children Referred to a Regional Pediatric Intensive Care Transport Service for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of referrals for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to a regional pediatric intensive care transport service, and identify clinical features at initial referral that predict the eventual need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Specialist pediatric intensive care transport service based at a large U.K. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center.

PATIENTS

All referrals made for potential extracorporeal membrane oxygenation transport between January 2014 and July 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Demographic and clinical data at the time of referral, referral outcome, and 90-day mortality status were extracted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify clinical features at initial referral in neonates that predicted the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Of 253 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation referrals, 203 were included: 64 of 203 received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (31.5%), 18 were accepted for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation but died before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation could be provided (8.8%), and 121 did not receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (59.6%). The transport team mobilized in 136 of 203 referrals (66.9%); conventional transport to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center was successful in 127 of 136 (93.4%), while nine of 136 were too unstable to transport. The 90-day mortality for the cohort was 17.7% (36/203). In logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio of requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for diaphragmatic hernia was 12.0 (95% CI, 2.8-52.1) compared to meconium aspiration syndrome. Oxygenation index and Vasoactive-Inotropic Score were independent predictors of the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation referrals to a pediatric intensive care transport service, a considerable portion of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation referrals (59.6%) continued on conventional management; however, 8.8% of the referrals died before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation could be provided. Earlier referral for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; targeted referral triage using primary diagnosis, oxygenation index, and Vasoactive-Inotropic Score; and access to mobile extracorporeal membrane oxygenation services and faster mobilization of transport teams are important factors that could improve outcomes.

Mobile Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: 5-Year Experience of a French Pediatric and Neonatal Center

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is an established therapy for refractory cardiac and/or pulmonary failure that is not available in all centers. When infants and children require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, they are sometimes placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in peripheral centers where extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is not available and then transferred on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to specialized centers. The objective of this study is to first describe one of the largest cohorts of infants and children transported by a mobile unit while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

DESIGN

We undertook a single-center retrospective study that included patients transported while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between November 1, 2014, and May 31, 2019.

PATIENTS

All patients transported by our mobile extracorporeal membrane oxygenation unit during the study period were included. Computerized data collection was approved by the French Data Protection Authority (Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés n° 2121127V0).

MAIN RESULTS

Over the study period, our extracorporeal membrane oxygenation mobile team transported 80 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation among which 20 were newborns (25%) and 60 were children of 1 month to 17 years old (75%); 57 patients were on venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (71%) and 23 on venovenous-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (29%). The average duration of transport was 8.4 hours with a median of 8 hours; the average distance travelled was 189 ± 140 km. Transport was by air and then ground for 50% of the patients and by ground for 42%. We observed a significant decrease in the Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (125 vs 99; p = 0.005) and PaCO2 levels (67 vs 49 mm Hg; p = 0.0005) after arrival in our unit. Survival rate 6 months after PICU discharge was 46% (37). There was a statistically significant relationship between initial lactate level and mortality (p = 0.02). We observed minor adverse events in 39% of the transports and had no mortality during transport.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe one of the largest cohorts of infants and children transported by a mobile unit while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Our findings confirm that it is safe to start extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a referring center and to transport patients using an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation mobile team. The only risk factor associated with higher mortality was an initially elevated lactate level.

Neonatal and pediatric ECMO organization in France: A national survey

BACKGROUND

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in France has increased since the H1N1 pandemic in 2009. By contrast, neonatal and pediatric ECMO support in France was known to be limited to a few centers offering congenital cardiac surgery. The purpose of this survey conducted in 2017 was to identify the neonatal and pediatric ECMO centers in France as well as networks existing between ECMO and non-ECMO centers.

RESULTS

Seventy-two neonatal or pediatric intensive care unit medical directors answered the survey (84% of the centers surveyed). Twenty were identified as ECMO centers, defined as a unit able to start ECMO with its own resources. ECMO centers ranged from 470,000 to 1,180,000 inhabitants (neonates or children under 18). Thirteen of them (65%) reported that they were affiliated with a congenital cardiac surgery department. A total of 187 patients were supported with ECMO in these centers in 2016. Only six of these centers estimated an activity greater than 15 cases per year over the last 5 years. Nearly 30% of ECMO runs were indicated before or after congenital heart surgery. Four of the ECMO centers offered off-site facilities (mobile team). Non-ECMO centers are likely to be neonatal intensive care units. Nine of them (18.7%) declared knowing an ECMO center that provided mobile care with predefined organization, 11 (22.9%) reported knowing an ECMO center providing a mobile activity without predefined organization, nine (18.%), and 18 (37.5%) ICUs declared they knew of the existence of an ECMO program but did not report any possibility of mobile care or any procedure for transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the centers reporting the highest case volumes, four offered mobile ECMO abilities. Well-organized networks for the most severe neonates and children were not identified in France.

Mobile extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for children: single-center 10 years’ experience

Objectives:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has become a gold standard in treatment of severe refractory circulatory and/or pulmonary failure. Those procedures require gathering of competences and material. Therefore, they are conducted in a limited number of reference centers. Emergent need for such treatments induces either hazardous transfers or a mobile pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation team able to remote implantation and transportation. The aim of this work is not to focus on pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outcomes or indications, which have been extensively discussed in the literature. This study would like to detail the implementation, safety, and feasibility, even in a middle-size pediatric cardiac surgery reference center.

Patients:

This is a retrospective analysis of a series of patients initiated on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a peripheral center and transferred to a reference center. The data were collected from 10 consecutive years: from 2006 to 2016.

Results:

A total of 57 pediatric patients with a median weight of 6.00 (3.2-14.5) kg and median age of 2.89 (0.11-37.63) months were cannulated in peripheral center and transported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We did not experience any adverse event during transport. The outcomes were comparable to our literature-reported on-site extracorporeal membrane oxygenation series with 42 patients (74%) weaned from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and a 30-day survival of 60%. Neither patient’s age nor weight, indication for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or length of transport, was statistically significant in terms of outcomes.

Conclusion:

Offsite extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implantation and ground or air transport for pediatric patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation appeared to be safe when performed by a dedicated and experienced team, even within a mid-size center.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for neonatal and pediatric refractory septic shock: more than 15 years of learning

The objective of the study was to report our institutional experience in the management of children and newborns with refractory septic shock who required venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) treatment, and to identify patient-and infection-related factors associated with mortality. This is a retrospective case series in an intensive care unit of a tertiary pediatric center. Inclusion criteria were patients ≤ 18 years old who underwent a VA ECMO due to a refractory septic shock due to circulatory collapse. Patient conditions and support immediately before ECMO, analytical and hemodynamic parameter evolution during ECMO, and post-canulation outcome data were collected. Twenty-one patients were included, 13 of them (65%) male. Nine were pediatric and 12 were newborns. Median septic shock duration prior to ECMO was 29.5 h (IQR, 20-46). Eleven patients (52.4%) suffered cardiac arrest (CA). Neonatal patients had worse Sepsis Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Oxygenation Index and PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, blood gas analysis, lactate levels, and left ventricular ejection fraction compared to pediatric patients. Survival was 33.3% among pediatric patients (60% if we exclude pneumococcal cases) and 50% among newborns. Hours of sepsis evolution and mean airway pressure (MAP) prior to ECMO were significantly higher in the non-survivor group. CA was not a predictor of mortality. Streptococcus pneumoniae infection was a mortality risk factor. There was an improvement in survival during the second period, from 14.3 to 57.2%, related to shorter sepsis evolution before ECMO placement, better candidate selection, and greater ECMO support once the patient was placed.

CONCLUSION

Patients with refractory septic shock should be transferred precociously to a referral ECMO center. However, therapy should be used with caution in patients with vasoplegic pattern shock or S. pneumoniae sepsis. What is Known: • Children with refractory septic shock have significant mortality rates, and although ECMO is recommended, overall survival is low. • There are no studies regarding characteristics of infections as predictors of pediatric survival in ECMO. What is New: • Septic children should be transferred precociously to referral ECMO centers during the first hours if patients do not respond to conventional therapy. • Treatment should be used with caution in patients with vasoplegic pattern shock or S. pneumoniae sepsis.

Interhospital Transport of Children Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Practical and Ethical Dilemma

OBJECTIVES

To discuss risks and benefits of interhospital transport of children in cardiac arrest undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

DESIGN

Narrative review.

RESULTS

Not applicable.

CONCLUSIONS

Transporting children in cardiac arrest with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation between hospitals is potentially lifesaving if it enables access to resources such as extracorporeal support, but may risk transport personnel safety. Research is needed to optimize outcomes of patients transported with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and reduce risks to the staff caring for them.