Experience with intravenous enoxaparin in critically ill infants and children

Questions around a case of in utero thrombosis in a premature child, concerning the management of anticoagulant treatments

We report the case of a preterm infant presenting a thrombosis, discovered on ultrasound at 22 weeks of gestational age and confirmed at birth following additional examinations. We describe the anticoagulant treatment of this patient by intravenous enoxaparin, tinzaparin and rivaroxaban, from questioning to practice.

Retrospective Evaluation of Intravenous Enoxaparin Administration in Feline Arterial Thromboembolism

Simple Summary

Feline arterial thromboembolism is a painful disease characterized by acute ischemic necrosis of one or more limbs due to cardiac diseases, hyperthyroidism, or neoplasia. Among others, medical treatment consists of preventing new thrombus formation primarily using heparin products, such as enoxaparin. This retrospective study reports clinical data, regain of perfusion, short-term outcome, and complications of 36 affected cats treated with a novel intravenous enoxaparin protocol. Furthermore, we aimed to report monitoring and management of the intravenous enoxaparin treatment for this disease. In our population, visible hemorrhage was rare. The most common causes of death/euthanasia were cardiac instability, acute kidney injury, neurological abnormalities, and limb necrosis. The hospital discharge rate was 47% overall and was significantly different between single limb (83%) and dual limb (29%) thromboembolism. Our study supports the intravenous use of enoxaparin in combination with oral clopidogrel for cats with thromboembolism as an alternative treatment method.

Abstract

Induction of a hypocoagulable state is imperative in the treatment of feline arterial thromboembolism. Publications in human medicine report the use of enoxaparin intravenously in selected cases. The aim of our retrospective study was to report the regain of perfusion, short-term outcome, and complications of cats treated with a novel intravenous enoxaparin protocol (1 mg/kg bolus injection followed by 3 mg/kg/day continuous infusion) combined with oral clopidogrel administration. The secondary aim was to report the monitoring of enoxaparin with anti-Xa activity. There were 36 cats included. The probability of reaching limb reperfusion was significantly (p = 0.0148) higher with anti-Xa activity within or above the target range compared to results below the target range (19/21, 90% versus 11/20, 55%). The complications observed were acute kidney injury (15/36, 42%), hemorrhage (2/36, 6%), and neurological signs (6/36, 17%). The most common causes of death/euthanasia were cardiac instability, acute kidney injury, neurological abnormalities, and limb necrosis. The hospital discharge rate was 83% (10/12) for single limb and 29% (7/24) for dual limb thrombosis; the difference was significant (p = 0.0039). The median hospitalization time for the survivors was 119.5 (95–480) h. Our study supports the use of intravenous continuous rate infusion of enoxaparin in combination with oral clopidogrel for cats with aortic thromboembolism. We report similar discharge rates and lower hemorrhage rates than previously reported with thrombolytic treatment.

Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism: New Therapies on the Horizon

ABSTRACT

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increasing in pediatric patients. Prompt recognition and evaluation of VTE in young patients could prevent significant morbidity or mortality. In contrast to VTE in adults, current treatment guidelines are largely based on expert opinion as limited randomized controlled trial data exist about the appropriate management in pediatric patients with traditional anticoagulants. However, recently approved direct-acting oral anticoagulants in adults are also being investigated in pediatric VTE and these data could inform future evidence-based treatment principles. Thus, healthcare providers must be well informed about the management of pediatric VTE and the data from these trials to date. This continuing medical education article will provide a summary of management of pediatric VTE with particular emphasis on emerging direct-acting oral anticoagulants.

Intravenous Enoxaparin in Pediatric Burn Patients: A Case Series

Patients with acute burns experience a hypercoagulable state that may necessitate the use of anticoagulants to prevent the complications of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Enoxaparin is a low molecular weight heparin that is commonly used for this purpose; however, the traditional SC route of administration poses potential limitations in the pediatric burn population. These include pain upon injection, increased anxiety, erroneous absorption and distribution, and difficulty in finding an administration site when burns encompass a large percentage of body surface area. As a result, the IV route of administration may be preferable in these patients. To date, a limited number of studies in critically ill pediatric patients have been performed. In this report, we present a case series of 3 pediatric burn patients who initially received SC enoxaparin and were transitioned to IV enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis. The patients were 2, 8, and 10 years old. Burn involvement ranged from 8% to 75% total body surface area, and all patients had central line access. Adequate prophylactic low molecular weight heparin anti-Xa peak concentrations (0.1-0.3 international units/mL) were achieved with IV doses ranging from 0.35 to 0.5 mg/kg administered every 12 hours. No adverse effects, major bleeding events, or treatment failures occurred.

IV Versus Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Critically Ill Infants and Children: Comparison of Dosing, Anticoagulation Quality, Efficacy, and Safety Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Subcutaneous enoxaparin is the mainstay anticoagulant in critically ill pediatric patients although it poses several challenges in this patient population. Enoxaparin infused IV over 30 minutes represents an attractive alternative, but there is limited experience with this route of administration in children. In this study, we assess dosing, anticoagulation quality, safety, and clinical efficacy of IV enoxaparin compared to subcutaneous enoxaparin in critically ill infants and children.

DESIGN

Retrospective single-center study comparing dosing, anticoagulation quality, safety, and clinical efficacy of two different routes of enoxaparin administration (IV vs subcutaneous) in critically ill infants and children. Key outcome measures included dose needed to achieve target antifactor Xa levels, time required to achieve target antifactor Xa levels, proportion of patients achieving target anticoagulation levels on initial dosing, number of dose adjustments, duration spent in the target antifactor Xa range, anticoagulation-related bleeding complications, anticoagulation failure, and radiologic response to anticoagulation.

SETTING

Tertiary care pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS

All children admitted to the cardiac ICU, PICU, or neonatal ICU who were prescribed enoxaparin between January 2014 and March 2016 were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

One hundred ten patients were identified who had received IV or subcutaneous enoxaparin and had at least one postadministration peak antifactor Xa level documented.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 139 courses of enoxaparin administered, 96 were therapeutic dose courses (40 IV and 56 subcutaneous) and 43 were prophylactic dose courses (20 IV and 23 subcutaneous). Dosing, anticoagulation quality measurements, safety, and clinical efficacy were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that anticoagulation with IV enoxaparin infused over 30 minutes is a safe and an equally effective alternative to subcutaneous enoxaparin in critically ill infants and children.

A practical approach to the use of low molecular weight heparins in VTE treatment and prophylaxis in children and newborns

Low-molecular weight heparins are currently the most commonly used anticoagulants in children and newborns. However, since thrombotic complications rarely occur outside large children's hospitals, physicians often encounter some practical problems in managing these treatments when a pediatric thrombosis specialist is not available. The drug of choice is enoxaparin, due to its favorable FXa/FIIa ratio and the availability of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. The treatment of acute thrombosis should be started with two daily injections but when compliance is an issue, a single daily administration schedule could be chosen for secondary prophylaxis ensuring careful measurement of the post 24-hour anti-FXa activity. Furthermore, a subcutaneous device may be a useful tool and a topical dermal anesthetic could be effective in controlling pain without affecting anti-FXa levels. In neonate and toddlers, where mini doses are frequently needed, the dead space of syringes and needles could represent an issue and therefore the use of insulin syringes without dead space is advisable, while a dilution of the drug is useful with other syringes. This article derives from a nonsystematic review of the available literature, with special attention to recent international guidelines and expert recommendations, combined to authors' clinical practice in large tertiary pediatric hospitals and will provide concise and practical information for the use of low-molecular weight heparin in childhood and infancy in a sort of "answering frequently asked questions."

Successful thrombolysis following enoxaparin therapy in two pediatric patients with congenital heart disease presenting with intracardiac and cerebral thrombosis

Enoxaparin displays fibrinolytic activity through stimulation of endothelial release of tissue plasminogen activator. Moreover, enoxaparin increases the release of tissue factor pathway inhibitor, which inhibits coagulation activity. However, there are only few reports regarding the use of enoxaparin for the treatment of children with thrombosis complicating congenital heart disease. We report the clinical findings from two patients, one child with an A. cerebri media infarction and another with a left ventricular thrombus. In both cases successful thrombolysis was obtained by intravenous administration of enoxaparin. The first patient was a 12-year-old girl with an atrioventricular septal defect, who underwent biventricular repair at the age of 8 months. She presented with right-sided middle cerebral artery infarction. Thrombolysis was contraindicated, because she was beyond the therapeutic window recommended by accepted guidelines. Enoxaparin 2.5 mg/kg/d was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion (CII). The MRI 10 days later revealed a reopened middle cerebral artery and she experienced complete remission of the neurological signs. The second patient was a 16-year-old boy who had tetralogy of Fallot corrected in late infancy. He presented with severe heart failure and a mural thrombus in the left ventricular apex. Enoxaparin was administered and resulted in complete disappearance of the thrombus within a week. According to our experience, CII of enoxaparin was safe and well tolerated without secondary bleeding and resulted in complete dissolution of the thrombi without secondary embolization. Therefore, CII of enoxaparin may be a possible alternative for the treatment of thrombotic complications in children with contraindications against conventional thrombolytic therapy.

IV enoxaparin in pediatric and cardiac ICU patients

OBJECTIVES

To report our experience with the use of IV enoxaparin in neonatal and pediatric patients in the ICU.

DESIGN

We performed a case control from January 1, 2009, to June 30, 2012, comparing patients that received IV enoxaparin to controls that received subcutaneous enoxaparin. Cases were matched to controls in a 1:2 manner. IV enoxaparin doses were infused over 30 minutes and anti-Factor Xa levels were drawn 4 hours after the start of the IV infusion or 4 hours after a subcutaneous dose.

SETTING

The pediatric and cardiac ICUs of a tertiary/quaternary, free-standing, academic children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty-five neonatal and pediatric patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic enoxaparin.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen cases and 30 controls were included. Of 15 patients, 13 received IV enoxaparin for treatment and two received IV enoxaparin for prophylaxis as compared with 25 of 30 controls receiving subcutaneous enoxaparin for treatment and five receiving subcutaneous enoxaparin for prophylaxis. The ages for the cases ranged from 21 days to 16 years with a median weight of 5 kg, and the ages for controls ranged from 10 days to 23 years with a median weight of 31 kg. The median duration of IV therapy was 11 days (range, 1-120 d) and the median duration for subcutaneous therapy was 15 days (range, 3-85 d). The mean initial IV dose was 1.14 ± 0.38 mg/kg/dose q12h, and the mean initial subcutaneous dose was 0.85 ± 0.2 mg/kg/dose subcutaneous q12h (p = 0.003). The mean therapeutic IV dose was 1.31 ± 0.52 mg/kg/dose q12h, and the mean therapeutic subcutaneous dose was 0.9 ± 0.3 mg/kg/dose q12h (p = 0.016). There were no adverse events reported related to bleeding, thrombosis, or hypersensitivity in any of the cases or controls evaluated.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacodynamics of a 30-minute IV enoxaparin infusion was found to produce therapeutic 4 hour anti-Factor Xa levels similar to subcutaneous doses. Although this was a small study, there were no adverse events, suggesting the safety profile of IV enoxaparin may be similar to subcutaneous dosing with the added benefit of less pain associated with IV dosing. These findings suggest that IV enoxaparin may be a viable option for anticoagulating critically ill children and its use warrants further study.

Dosing and monitoring of enoxaparin therapy in children: experience in a tertiary care hospital

Pediatric deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an emerging problem in tertiary care hospitals, recent reviews shows a rate of 40.2/10,000 admissions. Experts affirm that enoxaparin has become in the drug of choice for DVT therapy. Despite this, there is a little information regarding the optimal dose schedule for enoxaparin therapy in children and the therapeutic guidelines for enoxaparin use in children are extrapolated from adult guidelines. Monitoring by antifactor Xa (anti-Xa) measurement and target concentrations between 0.5-1 U/ml at 4-6 h postdose are recommended. This study was designed to analyse our experience in paediatric-specific dosage requirements for enoxaparin therapy. A retrospective study was performed with patients less than 16 years old, who were treated with enoxaparin for DVT and monitored by anti-Xa concentration, between January 2005 and March 2012. Demographic and clinical characteristics and outcomes were obtained. Fourteen patients were analyzed: boy/girl ratio, 8/4; median age, 3.5 months. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis was the most common indication for therapy. All patients presented thrombosis risks factors. Dose increases were necessary only in patients less than 6 years old. Target anti-Xa concentrations were achieved in 12 (85%) patients. Children younger than 1 year required a higher dose of enoxaparin/kg (1.5-2.7 mg/kg per 12 h). Complete resolutions of DVT were registered in all cases. The mean number of dose increases was three and a median of 11 days to achieve target anti-Xa concentration. This study indicates that an initial higher enoxaparin dose may be necessary in neonates and infants, but other factors must be considered to improve management.

Population pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin in infants, children and adolescents during secondary thromboembolic prophylaxis: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Enoxaparin has been extensively studied in adults on its safety and efficacy during prevention of symptomatic thromboembolism when acute anticoagulation or secondary prevention is required as a result of venous thrombosis or stroke. In children, it is still used off-label and little is known about the pharmacokinetics in children.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a once- or twice-daily dosing regimen would be feasible in children to achieve appropriate plasma levels of enoxaparin.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using anti-factor (F)Xa activity data from 126 children (median age: 5.9 years) receiving enoxaparin either as a once- or twice-daily dosing regimen.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model was adequate for describing the enoxaparin kinetics. Body weight proved to be the most predictive covariate for clearance and central volume of distribution: clearance 15 mL h⁻¹ kg⁻¹, central volume of distribution 169 mL kg⁻¹, intercompartmental clearance 58 mL h⁻¹, peripheral volume of distribution 10 L and absorption rate 0.414 h⁻¹. Interindividual variability was found to be 54% for clearance and 42% for volume of distribution.

CONCLUSION

The model is capable of describing all age groups and dosing levels of our population and predicts 12 h and 24 h enoxaparin activities sufficiently. According to our results, a once-daily enoxaparin dosing regimen with frequent monitoring is feasible. In 53.2% of the patients the median 24 h trough level was above the desired range of 0.1 IU mL⁻¹ anti-FXa activity for prophylaxis therapy.

Thrombosis in the pediatric population

Whereas thrombotic events in critically ill children do not occur as commonly as in adults, they are being recognized with increasing frequency in the pediatric intensive care unit. The reasons for this are not clear but likely include an increased awareness of the problem and the ability to make a diagnosis using relatively noninvasive tests. In this section, I attempt to define the extent of the problem, summarize and discuss the relevant literature (pointing out where published experience in the pediatric population differs from that in adult patients), and suggest some guidelines regarding thrombophilia treatment and the management of thrombotic events.