Age-specific cerebral perfusion pressure thresholds and survival in children and adolescents with severe traumatic brain injury*

Evaluating the Benefits of Ventriculostomy Compared to Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

In this study, we compared outcomes between intracranial pressure monitoring (ICP) only versus ventriculostomy (VT) using a nationwide database of pediatric trauma patients.

METHODS

Pediatric patients (<18 years) with severe blunt TBI who underwent ICP monitoring with or without VT were identified from the 2017-2021 ACS Trauma Quality Programs. We excluded patients who experienced death or craniotomy/craniectomy within 48 h. The primary outcome was discharge disposition. Secondary outcomes were subsequent intracranial surgery, length of stay (LOS), and infectious complications. Competing risks survival analysis was used to evaluate the multivariable association between ICP vs. VT and outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1719 eligible patients, 65.9% were male and 54.1% had VT. Between the ICP and VT groups, there were no differences in mean age (11.4 vs. 11.0 years, p = 0.145), injury severity score (30.9 vs. 30.9, p = 0.937), or median GCS (3 vs. 3, p = 0.120). Multivariable analysis showed a robust association between VT and discharge home (compared to rehabilitation center; sHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.97, p = 0.017). VT use was not associated with increased mortality compared to ICP (p = 0.342). Finally, VT patients had longer median LOS (20.5 vs. 18.0 days, p < 0.001) but there was no difference in subsequent craniotomy/craniectomy (8.6 vs. 6.5%, p = 0.096) or infectious complications (1.2 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.549).

CONCLUSION

VT was associated with greater discharge to home. Although VT patients had a greater LOS, the risk for other secondary outcomes did not vary, suggesting that VT may have benefits for the treatment of severe TBI with respect to discharge disposition.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Update in Pediatric Neurocritical Care: What a Neurologist Caring for Critically Ill Children Needs to Know

Currently nearly one-quarter of admissions to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) worldwide are for neurocritical care diagnoses that are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Pediatric neurocritical care is a rapidly evolving field with unique challenges due to not only age-related responses to primary neurologic insults and their treatments but also the rarity of pediatric neurocritical care conditions at any given institution. The structure of pediatric neurocritical care services therefore is most commonly a collaborative model where critical care medicine physicians coordinate care and are supported by a multidisciplinary team of pediatric subspecialists, including neurologists. While pediatric neurocritical care lies at the intersection between critical care and the neurosciences, this narrative review focuses on the most common clinical scenarios encountered by pediatric neurologists as consultants in the PICU and synthesizes the recent evidence, best practices, and ongoing research in these cases. We provide an in-depth review of (1) the evaluation and management of abnormal movements (seizures/status epilepticus and status dystonicus); (2) acute weakness and paralysis (focusing on pediatric stroke and select pediatric neuroimmune conditions); (3) neuromonitoring modalities using a pathophysiology-driven approach; (4) neuroprotective strategies for which there is evidence (e.g., pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, post-cardiac arrest care, and ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke); and (5) best practices for neuroprognostication in pediatric traumatic brain injury, cardiac arrest, and disorders of consciousness, with highlights of the 2023 updates on Brain Death/Death by Neurological Criteria. Our review of the current state of pediatric neurocritical care from the viewpoint of what a pediatric neurologist in the PICU needs to know is intended to improve knowledge for providers at the bedside with the goal of better patient care and outcomes.

Is age or cardiovascular comorbidity the main predictor of reduced cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in older patients with traumatic brain injury?

Introduction

The Pressure Reactivity index (PRx) has been proposed as a surrogate measure for cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) and it has been described that older age is associated with worse PRx. The etiology for this reduced capacity remains unknown.

Research question

To investigate the relation between age and PRx in a cohort of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) while correcting for cardiovascular comorbidities.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data in 151 consecutive TBI patients between 2013 and 2023. PRx was averaged over 5 monitoring days and correlated with demographic, patient and injury data. A multiple regression analysis was performed with PRx as dependent variable and cardiovascular comorbidities, age, Glasgow motor score and pupillary reaction as independent variables. A similar model was constructed without age and compared.

Results

Age, sex, thromboembolic history, arterial hypertension, Glasgow motor score and pupillary reaction significantly correlated with PRx in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, age had a significant worsening effect on PRx (p = 0.01), while the cardiovascular risk factors and injury severity had no impact. The comparison of the models with and without age yielded a significant difference (p = 0.01), underpinning the independent effect of age.

Discussion and conclusion

In the present cohort study in TBI patients it was found that older age independently impaired cerebrovascular pressure reactivity regardless of cardiovascular comorbidity. Pathophysiology of TBI and physiology of ageing seem to line up to synergistically produce a negative effect on brain perfusion.

ICP, PRx, CPP, and ∆CPPopt in pediatric traumatic brain injury: the combined effect of insult intensity and duration on outcome

PURPOSE

The aim was to investigate the combined effect of insult intensity and duration, regarding intracranial pressure (ICP), pressure reactivity index (PRx), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and optimal CPP (CPPopt), on clinical outcome in pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHOD

This observational study included 61 pediatric patients with severe TBI, treated at the Uppsala University Hospital, between 2007 and 2018, with at least 12 h of ICP data the first 10 days post-injury. ICP, PRx, CPP, and ∆CPPopt (actual CPP-CPPopt) insults were visualized as 2-dimensional plots to illustrate the combined effect of insult intensity and duration on neurological recovery.

RESULTS

This cohort was mostly adolescent pediatric TBI patients with a median age at 15 (interquartile range 12-16) years. For ICP, brief episodes (minutes) above 25 mmHg and slightly longer episodes (20 min) of ICP 20-25 mmHg correlated with unfavorable outcome. For PRx, brief episodes above 0.25 as well as slightly lower values (around 0) for longer periods of time (30 min) were associated with unfavorable outcome. For CPP, there was a transition from favorable to unfavorable outcome for CPP below 50 mmHg. There was no association between high CPP and outcome. For ∆CPPopt, there was a transition from favorable to unfavorable outcome when ∆CPPopt went below -10 mmHg. No association was found for positive ∆CPPopt values and outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This visualization method illustrated the combined effect of insult intensity and duration in relation to outcome in severe pediatric TBI, supporting previous notions to avoid high ICP and low CPP for longer episodes of time. In addition, higher PRx for longer episodes of time and CPP below CPPopt more than -10 mmHg were associated with worse outcome, indicating a potential role for autoregulatory-oriented management in pediatric TBI.

Initial neurocritical care of severe traumatic brain injury: New paradigms and old challenges

Background:

Early neurocritical care aims to ameliorate secondary traumatic brain injury (TBI) and improve neural salvage. Increased engagement of neurosurgeons in neurocritical care is warranted as daily briefings between the intensivist and the neurosurgeon are considered a quality indicator for TBI care. Hence, neurosurgeons should be aware of the latest evidence in the neurocritical care of severe TBI (sTBI).

Methods:

We conducted a narrative literature review of bibliographic databases (PubMed and Scopus) to examine recent research of sTBI.

Results:

This review has several take-away messages. The concept of critical neuroworsening and its possible causes is discussed. Static thresholds of intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure may not be optimal for all patients. The use of dynamic cerebrovascular reactivity indices such as the pressure reactivity index can facilitate individualized treatment decisions. The use of ICP monitoring to tailor treatment of intracranial hypertension (IHT) is not routinely feasible. Different guidelines have been formulated for different scenarios. Accordingly, we propose an integrated algorithm for ICP management in sTBI patients in different resource settings. Although hyperosmolar therapy and decompressive craniectomy are standard treatments for IHT, there is a lack high-quality evidence on how to use them. A discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of invasive ICP monitoring is included in the study. Addition of beta-blocker, anti-seizure, and anticoagulant medications to standardized management protocols (SMPs) should be considered with careful patient selection.

Conclusion:

Despite consolidated research efforts in the refinement of SMPs, there are still many unanswered questions and novel research opportunities for sTBI care.

Pediatric Neurocritical Care

Brain injury in children is a major public health problem, causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Cause of pediatric brain injury varies widely and can be from a primary neurologic cause or as a sequela of multisystem illness. This review discusses the emerging field of pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC), including current techniques of imaging, treatment, and monitoring. Future directions of PNCC include further expansion of evidence-based practice guidelines and establishment of multidisciplinary PNCC services within institutions.

Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in French-Speaking Pediatric Intensive Care Units: Study of Practices

Best strategies for managing severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) are not established, with wide variations among professional practices. The main objective of this study was to assess compliance with updated pediatric TBI management guidelines (2019). A survey was distributed among French-speaking pediatric intensive care physicians from April 1 to June 30, 2019. The survey was based on a clinical case with a total of 70 questions that cover the 15 items of the 2019 TBI guidelines. The questions evaluated the assessment and management of TBI during the acute and intensive care phases. Of 487 e-mails sent, 78 surveys were included. Guidelines were adhered to (> 60%) for 10 of 15 items in the guidelines. Strong adherence to recent guideline changes was achieved for seizure prophylaxis with levetiracetam (n = 21/33, 64%) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide threshold (n = 52, 67%). However, management of the sodium and glucose thresholds and the role of transcranial Doppler were not consistent with the guidelines. Assessment of brain tissue oxygenation (n = 12, 16%) and autoregulation (n = 35, 45%) was not a common practice. There was strong agreement among clinicians on the intracranial pressure (> 80%) and cerebral perfusion pressure (> 70%) thresholds used according to age. Overall, stated practices for the management of TBI appear to be relatively standardized among responders. Variations persist in areas with a lack of evidence and pediatric-specific recommendations.

Optimal Out-of-Hospital Blood Pressure in Major Traumatic Brain Injury: A Challenge to the Current Understanding of Hypotension

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the out-of-hospital blood pressure ranges associated with optimal outcomes in traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Our objective was to evaluate the associations between out-of-hospital systolic blood pressure (SBP) and multiple hospital outcomes without assuming any predefined thresholds for hypotension, normotension, or hypertension.

METHODS

This was a preplanned secondary analysis from the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) TBI study. Among patients (age ≥10 years) with major TBIs (Barell Matrix type 1 and/or Abbreviated Injury Scale-head severity ≥3) and lowest out-of-hospital SBPs of 40 to 299 mmHg, we utilized generalized additive models to summarize the distributions of various outcomes as smoothed functions of SBP, adjusting for important and significant confounders. The subjects who were enrolled in the study phase after the out-of-hospital TBI guideline implementation were used to validate the models developed from the preimplementation cohort.

RESULTS

Among 12,169 included cases, the mortality model revealed 3 distinct ranges: (1) a monotonically decreasing relationship between SBP and the adjusted probability of death from 40 to 130 mmHg, (2) lowest adjusted mortality from 130 to 180 mmHg, and (3) rapidly increasing mortality above 180 mmHg. A subanalysis of the cohorts with isolated TBIs and multisystem injuries with TBIs revealed SBP mortality patterns that were similar to each other and to that of the main analysis. While the specific SBP ranges varied somewhat for the nonmortality outcomes (hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, discharge to skilled nursing/inpatient rehabilitation, and hospital charges), the patterns were very similar to that of mortality. In each model, validation was confirmed utilizing the postimplementation cohort.

CONCLUSION

Optimal adjusted mortality was associated with a surprisingly high SBP range (130 to 180 mmHg). Below this level, there was no point or range of inflection that would indicate a physiologically meaningful threshold for defining hypotension. Nonmortality outcomes showed very similar patterns. These findings highlight how sensitive the injured brain is to compromised perfusion at SBP levels that, heretofore, have been considered adequate or even normal. While the study design does did not allow us to conclude that the currently recommended treatment threshold (<90 mmHg) should be increased, the findings imply that the definition of hypotension in the setting of TBI is too low. Randomized trials evaluating treatment levels significantly higher than 90 mmHg are needed.

Management of Cerebral Edema, Brain Compression, and Intracranial Pressure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the pathophysiology and management of cerebral edema, brain compression, and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). It also provides a brief introduction to the concept of the glymphatic system and select cellular contributors to cerebral edema.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cerebral edema and brain compression should be treated in a tiered approach after the patient demonstrates a symptomatic indication to start treatment. All patients with acute brain injury should be treated with standard measures to optimize intracranial compliance and minimize risk of ICP elevation. When ICP monitors are used, therapies should target maintaining ICP at 22 mm Hg or less. Evidence exists that serial clinical examination and neuroimaging may be a reasonable alternative to ICP monitoring; however, clinical trials in progress may demonstrate advantages to advanced monitoring techniques. Early decompressive craniectomy and hypothermia are not neuroprotective in traumatic brain injury and should be reserved for situations refractory to initial medical interventions. Medical therapies that acutely lower plasma osmolality may lead to neurologic deterioration from osmotic cerebral edema, and patients with acute brain injury and renal or liver failure are at elevated risk.

SUMMARY

A tiered approach to the management of cerebral edema and brain compression can reduce secondary brain injury when implemented according to core physiologic principles. However, our knowledge of the pathophysiology of acute brain injury is incomplete, and the conceptual framework underlying decades of clinical management may need to be revised in response to currently evolving discoveries regarding the pathophysiology of acute brain injury.

Monitoring cerebrovascular reactivity in pediatric traumatic brain injury: comparison of three methods

PURPOSE

To study three different methods of monitoring cerebral autoregulation in children with severe traumatic brain injury.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of all children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at a university-affiliated hospital with severe TBI over a 4-year period to study three different methods of monitoring cerebral autoregulation: pressure-reactivity index (PRx), transcranial Doppler derived mean flow velocity index (Mx), and near-infrared spectroscopy derived cerebral oximetry index (COx).

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included in the study, aged 5 months to 17 years old. An empirical regression analyzing dependence of PRx on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) displayed the classic U-shaped distribution, with low PRx values (< 0.3) reflecting intact auto-regulation, within the CPP range of 50-100 mmHg. The optimal CPP was 75-80 mmHg for PRx and COx. The correlation coefficients between the three indices were as follows: PRx vs Mx, r = 0.56; p < 0.0001; PRx vs COx, r = 0.16; p < 0.0001; and COx vs Mx, r = 0.15; p = 0.022. The mean PRx with a cutoff value of 0.3 predicted correctly long-term outcome (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

PRx seems to be the most robust index to access cerebrovascular reactivity in children with TBI and has promising prognostic value. Optimal CPP calculation is feasible with PRx and COx.

Neurocritical Care and Brain Monitoring

The goal of neurocritical care (NCC) is to improve the outcome of patients with neurologic insults. NCC includes the management of the primary brain injury and prevention of secondary brain injury; this is achieved with standardized clinical care for specific disorders along with neuromonitoring. Neuromonitoring uses multiple modalities, with certain modalities better suited to certain disorders. The term "multimodality monitoring" refers to using multiple modalities at the same time. This article reviews pediatric NCC, the various physiologic parameters used, especially continuous electroencephalographic monitoring.

Fifteen-minute consultation: Severe traumatic brain injury in paediatrics

Paediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a non-degenerative, acquired brain insult. Following a blow or penetrating trauma to the head, normal brain function is disrupted. If it occurs during the early stages of development, deficits may not immediately become apparent but unfold and evolve over time. We address the difficulties that arise when treating a child with severe TBI.

Intracranial and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Thresholds Associated With Inhospital Mortality Across Pediatric Neurocritical Care

OBJECTIVES

Targets for treatment of raised intracranial pressure or decreased cerebral perfusion pressure in pediatric neurocritical care are not well defined. Current pediatric guidelines, based on traumatic brain injury, suggest an intracranial pressure target of less than 20 mm Hg and cerebral perfusion pressure minimum of 40-50 mm Hg, with possible age dependence of cerebral perfusion pressure. We sought to define intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure thresholds associated with inhospital mortality across a large single-center pediatric neurocritical care cohort.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

PICU, single quaternary-care center.

PATIENTS

Individuals receiving intracranial pressure monitoring from January 2012 to December 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure measurements from 262 neurocritical care patients (87 traumatic brain injury and 175 nontraumatic brain injury; 63% male; 8.3 ± 5.8 yr; mortality 11.1%). Mean intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure had area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.75 and 0.64, respectively, for association of inhospital mortality. Cerebral perfusion pressure cut points increased with age (< 2 yr = 47, 2 to < 8 yr = 58 mm Hg, ≥ 8 yr = 73 mm Hg). In the traumatic brain injury subset, mean intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure had area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.70 and 0.78, respectively, for association of inhospital mortality. Traumatic brain injury cerebral perfusion pressure cut points increased with age (< 2 yr = 45, 2 to < 8 yr = 57, ≥ 8 yr = 68 mm Hg). Mean intracranial pressure greater than 15 mm Hg, male sex, and traumatic brain injury status were independently associated with inhospital mortality (odds ratio, 14.23 [5.55-36.46], 2.77 [1.04-7.39], and 2.57 [1.03-6.38], respectively; all p < 0.05). Mean cerebral perfusion pressure less than 67 mm Hg and traumatic brain injury status were independently associated with inhospital mortality (odds ratio, 5.16 [2.05-12.98] and 3.71 [1.55-8.91], respectively; both p < 0.01). In the nontraumatic brain injury subset, mean intracranial pressure had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.77 with an intracranial pressure cut point of 15 mm Hg, whereas mean cerebral perfusion pressure was not predictive of inhospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified mean intracranial pressure thresholds, utilizing receiver operating characteristic and regression analyses, associated with inhospital mortality that is below current guidelines-based treatment targets in both traumatic brain injury and nontraumatic brain injury patients, and age-dependent cerebral perfusion pressure thresholds associated with inhospital mortality that were above current guidelines-based targets in traumatic brain injury patients. Further study is warranted to identify data-driven intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure targets in children undergoing intracranial pressure monitoring, whether for traumatic brain injury or other indications.

The management of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury: Italian Guidelines

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the work was to update the "Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury" published in 2012, to reflect the new available evidence, and develop the Italian national guideline for the management of severe pediatric head injuries to reduce variation in practice and ensure optimal care to patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from January 2009 to October 2017. Inclusion criteria were English language, pediatric populations (0-18 years) or mixed populations (pediatric/adult) with available age subgroup analyses. The guideline development process was started by the Promoting Group that composed a multidisciplinary panel of experts, with the representatives of the Scientific Societies, the independent expert specialists and a representative of the Patient Associations. The panel selected the clinical questions, discussed the evidence and formulated the text of the recommendations. The documentarists of the University of Florence oversaw the bibliographic research strategy. A group of literature reviewers evaluated the selected literature and compiled the table of evidence for each clinical question.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The search strategies identified 4254 articles. We selected 3227 abstract (first screening) and, finally included 67 articles (second screening) to update the guideline. This Italian update includes 25 evidence-based recommendations and 5 research recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

In recent years, progress has been made on the understanding of severe pediatric brain injury, as well as on that concerning all major traumatic pathology. This has led to a progressive improvement in the clinical outcome, although the quantity and quality of evidence remains particularly low.

In adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury, does the use of norepinephrine for augmenting cerebral perfusion pressure improve neurological outcome? A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Despite multiple interventions, mortality due to severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) within mature Trauma Systems has remained unchanged over the last decade. During this time, the use of vasoactive infusions (commonly norepinephrine) to achieve a target blood pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) has been a mainstay of sTBI management. However, evidence suggests that norepinephrine, whilst raising blood pressure, may reduce cerebral oxygenation. This study aimed to review the available evidence that links norepinephrine augmented CPP to clinical outcomes for these patients.

METHODS

A systematic review examining the evidence for norepinephrine augmented CPP in TBI patients was undertaken. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed for a dedicated literature search of multiple scientific databases. Two dedicated reviewers screened articles, whilst a third dedicated reviewer resolved conflicts.

RESULTS

The systematic review yielded 4,809 articles, of which 1,197 duplicate articles were removed. After abstract/title screening, 45 articles underwent full text review, resulting in the identification of two articles that investigated the effect of norepinephrine administration on clinical outcomes in patients following TBI when compared to other vasopressors. Neither study found a difference in neurological outcome between the vasopressor groups. No articles measured the effect of norepinephrine compared to no vasopressor use on the clinical outcome of patients with sTBI.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being a mainstay of pharmacological management for hypotension in patients following sTBI, there is minimal clinical evidence supporting the use of norepinephrine in targeting a CPP for either improving neurological outcomes or reducing mortality. Outcomes-based clinical trials exploring the role of brain tissue perfusion and oxygenation monitoring are required to validate any benefit.

Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, Executive Summary

The purpose of this work is to identify and synthesize research produced since the second edition of these Guidelines was published and incorporate new results into revised evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury in pediatric patients. This document provides an overview of our process, lists the new research added, and includes the revised recommendations. Recommendations are only provided when there is supporting evidence. This update includes 22 recommendations, 9 are new or revised from previous editions. New recommendations on neuroimaging, hyperosmolar therapy, analgesics and sedatives, seizure prophylaxis, temperature control/hypothermia, and nutrition are provided. None are level I, 3 are level II, and 19 are level III. The Clinical Investigators responsible for these Guidelines also created a companion algorithm that supplements the recommendations with expert consensus where evidence is not available and organizes possible interventions into first and second tier utilization. The complete guideline document and supplemental appendices are available electronically (https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001735). The online documents contain summaries and evaluations of all the studies considered, including those from prior editions, and more detailed information on our methodology. New level II and level III evidence-based recommendations and an algorithm provide additional guidance for the development of local protocols to treat pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Our intention is to identify and institute a sustainable process to update these Guidelines as new evidence becomes available.

Transcranial Doppler as a non-invasive method to estimate cerebral perfusion pressure in children with severe traumatic brain injury

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is one of the most important parameters in preventing ischemic brain insults. Guidelines have used CPP values to guide treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) for many years. We tested the feasibility of a novel non-invasive method for CPP estimation (nCPP) in children with severe TBI.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively monitored pediatric TBI patients with invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, arterial blood pressure, and Transcranial Doppler (TCD) studies was performed daily. A novel estimator of CPP (nCPP) was calculated using TCD-spectral accounting method. We analyzed the correlation coefficient and correlation in time domain between CPP and nCPP, prediction ability of nCPP to detect low CPP, and the confidence intervals for CPP prediction (95% CI).

RESULTS

We retrospectively analyzed 69 TCD recordings from 19 children (median age 15 years, range 3-16 years). There was a good correlation between CPP and nCPP (Spearman correlation coefficient, R = 0.67 (p < 0.0001), and a good mean correlation in time domain (R = 0.55 ± 0.42). The ability of nCPP to predict values of CPP below 70 mmHg was excellent as demonstrated by an area under the curve of 0.908 (95% CI = 0.83-0.98) using a receiver operating curve analysis. Bland-Altman analysis revealed that nCPP overestimated CPP by 19.61 mmHg with a wide 95% CI of ± 40.4 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

nCPP monitoring with TCD appears to be a feasible method for CPP assessment in pediatric TBI. The novel spectral CPP tested in this study has a decent correlation with invasive CPP and can predict low CPP with excellent accuracy at the 70-mmHg threshold.

Non-invasive estimation of cerebral perfusion pressure using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in children with severe traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

To identify if cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) can be non-invasively estimated by either of two methods calculated using transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) parameters.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of previously prospectively gathered data.

SETTING

Pediatric intensive care unit in a tertiary care referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-three children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in place.

INTERVENTIONS

TCD evaluation of the middle cerebral arteries was performed daily. CPP at the time of the TCD examination was recorded. For method 1, estimated cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPe) was calculated as: CPPe = MAP × (diastolic flow (Vd)/mean flow (Vm)) + 14. For method 2, critical closing pressure (CrCP) was identified as the intercept point on the x-axis of the linear regression line of blood pressure and flow velocity parameters. CrCP/CPPe was then calculated as MAP-CrCP.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

One hundred eight paired measurements were available. Using patient averaged data, correlation between CPP and CPPe was significant (r = 0.78, p = < 0.001). However, on Bland-Altman plots, bias was 3.7 mmHg with 95% limits of agreement of - 17 to + 25 for CPPe. Using patient averaged data, correlation between CPP and CrCP/CPPe was significant (r = 0.59, p = < 0.001), but again bias was high at 11 mmHg with wide 95% limits of agreement of - 15 to + 38 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

CPPe and CrCP/CPPe do not have clinical value to estimate the absolute CPP in pediatric patients with TBI.

Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Intracranial Pressure, Cerebral Perfusion Pressure, What Does it Mean? A Review of the Literature

Severe traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children. In 2003 the Brain Trauma Foundation released guidelines that have since been updated (2010) and have helped standardize and improve care. One area of care that remains controversial is whether the placement of an intracranial pressure monitor is advantageous in the management of traumatic brain injury. Another aspect of care that is widely debated is whether management after traumatic brain injury should be based on intracranial pressure-directed therapy, cerebral perfusion pressure-directed therapy, or a combination of the two. The aim of this article was to provide an overview and review the current evidence regarding these questions.

Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, Executive Summary

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this work is to identify and synthesize research produced since the second edition of these Guidelines was published and incorporate new results into revised evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury in pediatric patients.

METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS

This document provides an overview of our process, lists the new research added, and includes the revised recommendations. Recommendations are only provided when there is supporting evidence. This update includes 22 recommendations, nine are new or revised from previous editions. New recommendations on neuroimaging, hyperosmolar therapy, analgesics and sedatives, seizure prophylaxis, temperature control/hypothermia, and nutrition are provided. None are level I, three are level II, and 19 are level III. The Clinical Investigators responsible for these Guidelines also created a companion algorithm that supplements the recommendations with expert consensus where evidence is not available and organizes possible interventions into first and second tier utilization. The purpose of publishing the algorithm as a separate document is to provide guidance for clinicians while maintaining a clear distinction between what is evidence based and what is consensus based. This approach allows, and is intended to encourage, continued creativity in treatment and research where evidence is lacking. Additionally, it allows for the use of the evidence-based recommendations as the foundation for other pathways, protocols, or algorithms specific to different organizations or environments. The complete guideline document and supplemental appendices are available electronically from this journal. These documents contain summaries and evaluations of all the studies considered, including those from prior editions, and more detailed information on our methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

New level II and level III evidence-based recommendations and an algorithm provide additional guidance for the development of local protocols to treat pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Our intention is to identify and institute a sustainable process to update these Guidelines as new evidence becomes available.

Critical Care in the Pediatric Emergency Department

In caring for critically ill children, recognition and management often begins in the pediatric emergency department. A seamless transition in care is needed to ensure appropriate care to the sickest of children. This review covers the management of critically ill children in the pediatric emergency department beyond the initial stabilization for conditions such as acute respiratory failure and pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome, traumatic brain injury, status epilepticus, congenital heart disease, and metabolic emergencies.

Is There a Relationship Between Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure-Guided Management and PaO2/FiO2 Ratio After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury?

OBJECTIVE

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) management has been associated with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in previous literature. We aimed to investigate the relationships between optimal CPP-guided management, ventilation parameters over time and outcome after severe TBI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed retrospective analysis of recorded data from 38 patients admitted to the NCCU after severe TBI, managed with optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt)-guided therapy, calculated using pressure reactivity index (PRx). All patients were sedated and ventilated with lung protective criteria (Peep > 5, tidal volume 6-8 ml/kg and airway pressure < 30 cmH₂O).

RESULTS

Daily mean CPPopt varied between a minimum of 84 mmHg and a maximum of 91 mmHg with an all period mean value of 88 mmHg. The mean value for the difference between CPP and CPPopt was -1.9 mmHg. Daily mean P/F ratio decreased and varied between 253 and 387 with an all-period mean of 294 mmHg. During the 10 days of recording data, five patients (13%) developed criteria of severe ARDS, but only two patients died due to severe ARDS (5%). PaO₂/FiO₂ (P/F) ratio did not correlate with CPPopt, but showed a strong correlation with tidal volume (p = 0.000) and driving pressure (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Although CPPopt-guided therapy may induce a decrease in P/F ratio over time during the first 10 days, we could not find an association with worst outcome, which may be influenced by lung protective ventilation strategies and preservation of cerebral autoregulation.

Mean Square Deviation of ICP in Prognosis of Severe TBI Outcomes in Children

OBJECTIVES

Prognostic value of intracranial pressure (ICP) is discussed in the recent literature. The aim of our study was to find the parameter that could be representative of ICP variations and might become a good predictor of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 81 patients with severe TBI (2004-2014).

INCLUSION CRITERIA

GCS ≤ 8, age > 3 years old, admission time to our clinic <24 h from the time of injury. Mean daily values of ICP were used as a predictor, Glasgow outcome scale value was used as a grouping variable. Outcomes were assessed 6 months after injury.

RESULTS

Total mortality was 27%. We have entered the indicator "energy ICP" (E ²), which describes the dynamics of the process and energy. E ² value in the group of survivors was <500 mmHg²; the probability of accurate forecasting was 91%. Sensitivity, 0.9; specificity; 0.94.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method is accessible and easy to perform. This method has high specificity in the prediction of severe traumatic brain injury outcome and can be a reliable tool for ICP control.

Emergency Neurological Life Support: Intracranial Hypertension and Herniation

Sustained intracranial hypertension and acute brain herniation are "brain codes," signifying catastrophic neurological events that require immediate recognition and treatment to prevent irreversible injury and death. As in cardiac arrest, a brain code mandates the organized implementation of a stepwise management algorithm. The goal of this Emergency Neurological Life Support protocol is to implement an evidence-based, standardized approach to the evaluation and management of patients with intracranial hypertension and/or herniation.

Critical thresholds for intracranial pressure vary over time in non-craniectomised traumatic brain injury patients

Background

Intracranial pressure (ICP)- and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP)-guided therapy is central to neurocritical care for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. We sought to identify time-dependent critical thresholds for mortality and unfavourable outcome for ICP and CPP in non-craniectomised TBI patients.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of 355 patients with moderate-to-severe TBI who received ICP monitoring and were managed without decompressive craniectomy in a tertiary hospital neurocritical care unit. Patients were grouped in 2 × 2 tables according to survival/death or favourable/unfavourable outcomes at 6 months and serial thresholds of mean ICP and CPP, using increments of 0.1 and 0.5 mmHg respectively. Sequential chi-square analysis was performed, and the thresholds yielding the highest chi-square test statistic were taken as having the best discriminative value for outcome. This process was repeated over monitoring periods of 1, 3, 5 and 7 days and for each day of recording to establish time-dependent thresholds. The same analysis was performed for age and sex subgroups.

Results

Global ICP thresholds were 21.3 and 20.5 mmHg for mortality and unfavourable outcome respectively (p < 0.001). After the first day of ICP monitoring, ICP thresholds fell to between 15 and 20 mmHg and remained significant (p < 0.05). Significant time-dependent CPP thresholds for mortality or unfavourable outcome were often not identified, and no identifiable trends were produced.

Conclusion

Critical ICP thresholds in non-craniectomised TBI patients vary with time and fall below established ICP targets after the first day of monitoring.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-018-3555-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Relationships between cerebral flow velocities and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine relationships between cerebral blood flow and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

Children with TBI, a Glasgow Coma Score of 8-12, and abnormal brain imaging were enrolled prospectively. Cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) was assessed within 24 h of trauma and daily thereafter through death, discharge, or hospital day 8, whichever came first. Twelve months from injury, participants completed neurodevelopmental testing.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were enrolled. Low flow velocities (< 2 SD below age/gender normal) were found in 6% (n = 4). No patient with a single low CBFV measurement had a good neurologic outcome (Pediatric Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E Peds) ≤ 4)). Normal flow velocities (± 2 SD around age/gender normal) were seen in 43% of participants (n = 30). High flow velocities (> 2 SD above age and gender normal with a Lindegaard ratio (LR) < 3) were identified in 23% of children (n = 16), and vasospasm (> 2 SD above age/gender normal with LR ≥ 3) was identified in 28% (n = 19). Children with good outcomes based on GOS-E Peds scoring were more likely to have had normal flow velocity than other flow patterns. No other differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual patient responses to TBI in terms of CBFV alterations were heterogeneous. Low flow was uniformly associated with a poor outcome. Patients with good outcomes were more likely to have normal flow. This suggests CBFV may serve as a prognostic indicator in children with TBI. Future studies are needed to determine if aberrant CBFVs are also a therapeutic target.

Cushing's sign and severe traumatic brain injury in children after blunt trauma: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan

OBJECTIVE

We tested whether Cushing's sign could predict severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring immediate neurosurgical intervention (BI-NSI) in children after blunt trauma.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using Japan Trauma Data Bank.

SETTING

Emergency and critical care centres in secondary and tertiary hospitals in Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

Children between the ages of 2 and 15 years with Glasgow Coma Scale motor scores of 5 or less at presentation after blunt trauma from 2004 to 2015 were included. A total of 1480 paediatric patients were analysed.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients requiring neurosurgical intervention within 24 hours of hospital arrival and patients who died due to isolated severe TBI were defined as BI-NSI. The combination of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) on arrival, which were respectively divided into tertiles, and its correlation with BI-NSI were investigated using a multiple logistic regression model.

RESULTS

In the study cohort, 297 (20.1%) exhibited BI-NSI. After adjusting for sex, age category and with or without haemorrhage shock, groups with higher SBP and lower HR (SBP ≥135 mm Hg; HR ≤92 bpm) were significantly associated with BI-NSI (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.68 to 4.80, P<0.001) compared with the patients with normal vital signs. In age-specific analysis, hypertension and bradycardia were significantly associated with BI-NSI in a group of 7-10 and 11-15 years of age; however, no significant association was observed in a group of 2-6 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Cushing's sign after blunt trauma was significantly associated with BI-NSI in school-age children and young adolescents.

Management of severe traumatic brain injury (first 24hours)

The latest French Guidelines for the management in the first 24hours of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) were published in 1998. Due to recent changes (intracerebral monitoring, cerebral perfusion pressure management, treatment of raised intracranial pressure), an update was required. Our objective has been to specify the significant developments since 1998. These guidelines were conducted by a group of experts for the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société francaise d'anesthésie et de réanimation [SFAR]) in partnership with the Association de neuro-anesthésie-réanimation de langue française (ANARLF), The French Society of Emergency Medicine (Société française de médecine d'urgence (SFMU), the Société française de neurochirurgie (SFN), the Groupe francophone de réanimation et d'urgences pédiatriques (GFRUP) and the Association des anesthésistes-réanimateurs pédiatriques d'expression française (ADARPEF). The method used to elaborate these guidelines was the Grade^® method. After two Delphi rounds, 32 recommendations were formally developed by the experts focusing on the evaluation the initial severity of traumatic brain injury, the modalities of prehospital management, imaging strategies, indications for neurosurgical interventions, sedation and analgesia, indications and modalities of cerebral monitoring, medical management of raised intracranial pressure, management of multiple trauma with severe traumatic brain injury, detection and prevention of post-traumatic epilepsia, biological homeostasis (osmolarity, glycaemia, adrenal axis) and paediatric specificities.

Brain metabolism and severe pediatric traumatic brain injury

Age-dependent changes in brain metabolism may influence the response to and tolerance of secondary insults, potentially affecting outcomes. More complete characterization of brain metabolism across the clinical trajectory of severe pediatric TBI is needed to improve our ability to measure and better mitigate the impact of secondary insults. Better management of secondary insults will impact clinical care and the probability of success of future neuroprotective clinical trials. Improved bedside monitoring and imaging technologies will be required to achieve these goals. Effective and sustained integration of brain metabolism information into the pediatric critical care setting will be equally challenging and important.

Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition

The scope and purpose of this work is 2-fold: to synthesize the available evidence and to translate it into recommendations. This document provides recommendations only when there is evidence to support them. As such, they do not constitute a complete protocol for clinical use. Our intention is that these recommendations be used by others to develop treatment protocols, which necessarily need to incorporate consensus and clinical judgment in areas where current evidence is lacking or insufficient. We think it is important to have evidence-based recommendations to clarify what aspects of practice currently can and cannot be supported by evidence, to encourage use of evidence-based treatments that exist, and to encourage creativity in treatment and research in areas where evidence does not exist. The communities of neurosurgery and neuro-intensive care have been early pioneers and supporters of evidence-based medicine and plan to continue in this endeavor. The complete guideline document, which summarizes and evaluates the literature for each topic, and supplemental appendices (A-I) are available online at https://www.braintrauma.org/coma/guidelines.

Pediatric neurocritical care in the 21st century: from empiricism to evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Approximately one in five children admitted to a pediatric ICU have a new central nervous system injury or a neurological complication of their critical illness. The spectrum of neurologic insults in children is diverse and clinical practice is largely empirical, as few randomized, controlled trials have been reported. This lack of data poses a substantial challenge to the practice of pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC). PNCC has emerged as a novel subspecialty, and its presence is expanding within tertiary care centers. This review highlights the recent advances in the field, with a focus on traumatic brain injury (TBI), cardiac arrest, and stroke as disease models.

RECENT FINDINGS

Variable approaches to the structure of a PNCC service have been reported, comprising multidisciplinary teams from neurology, critical care, neurosurgery, neuroradiology, and anesthesia. Neurologic morbidity is substantial in critically ill children and the increased use of continuous electroencephalography monitoring has highlighted this burden. Therapeutic hypothermia has not proven effective for treatment of children with severe TBI or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, results of studies of severe TBI suggest that multidisciplinary care in the ICU and adherence to guidelines for care can reduce mortality and improve outcome.

SUMMARY

There is an unmet need for clinicians with expertise in the practice of brain-directed critical care for children. Although much of the practice of PNCC may remain empiric, a focus on the regionalization of care, creating defined training paths, practice within multidisciplinary teams, protocol-directed care, and improved measures of long-term outcome to quantify the impact of such care can provide evidence to direct the maturation of this field.

Emergency Neurological Life Support: Intracranial Hypertension and Herniation

Sustained intracranial hypertension and acute brain herniation are "brain codes," signifying catastrophic neurological events that require immediate recognition and treatment to prevent irreversible injury and death. As in cardiac arrest, a brain code mandates the organized implementation of a stepwise management algorithm. The goal of this emergency neurological life support protocol is to implement an evidence-based, standardized approach to the evaluation and management of patients with intracranial hypertension and/or herniation.

Intracranial Hypertension and Cerebral Hypoperfusion in Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Thresholds and Burden in Accidental and Abusive Insults

OBJECTIVES

The evidence to guide therapy in pediatric traumatic brain injury is lacking, including insight into the intracranial pressure/cerebral perfusion pressure thresholds in abusive head trauma. We examined intracranial pressure/cerebral perfusion pressure thresholds and indices of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure burden in relationship with outcome in severe traumatic brain injury and in accidental and abusive head trauma cohorts.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study.

SETTING

PICU in a tertiary children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Children less than18 years old admitted to a PICU with severe traumatic brain injury and who had intracranial pressure monitoring.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A pediatric traumatic brain injury database was interrogated with 85 patients (18 abusive head trauma) enrolled. Hourly intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure (in mm Hg) were collated and compared with various thresholds. C-statistics for intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure data in the entire population were determined. Intracranial hypertension and cerebral hypoperfusion indices were formulated based on the number of hours with intracranial pressure more than 20 mm Hg and cerebral perfusion pressure less than 50 mm Hg, respectively. A secondary analysis was performed on accidental and abusive head trauma cohorts. All of these were compared with dichotomized 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale scores. The models with the number of hours with intracranial pressure more than 20 mm Hg (C = 0.641; 95% CI, 0.523-0.762) and cerebral perfusion pressure less than 45 mm Hg (C = 0.702; 95% CI, 0.586-0.805) had the best fits to discriminate outcome. Two factors were independently associated with a poor outcome, the number of hours with intracranial pressure more than 20 mm Hg and abusive head trauma (odds ratio = 5.101; 95% CI, 1.571-16.563). As the number of hours with intracranial pressure more than 20 mm Hg increases by 1, the odds of a poor outcome increased by 4.6% (odds ratio = 1.046; 95% CI, 1.012-1.082). Thresholds did not differ between accidental versus abusive head trauma. The intracranial hypertension and cerebral hypoperfusion indices were both associated with outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of hours of intracranial pressure more than 20 mm Hg and cerebral perfusion pressure less than 45 mm Hg best discriminated poor outcome. As the number of hours with intracranial pressure more than 20 mm Hg increases by 1, the odds of a poor outcome increased by 4.6%. Although abusive head trauma was strongly associated with unfavorable outcome, intracranial pressure/cerebral perfusion pressure thresholds did not differ between accidental and abusive head trauma.

Pathophysiology and Management of Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children

Traumatic brain injury remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children. Key pathophysiologic processes of traumatic brain injury are initiated by mechanical forces at the time of trauma, followed by complex excitotoxic cascades associated with compromised cerebral autoregulation and progressive edema. Acute care focuses on avoiding secondary insults, including hypoxia, hypotension, and hyperthermia. Children with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury often require intensive monitoring and treatment of multiple parameters, including intracranial pressure, blood pressure, metabolism, and seizures, to minimize secondary brain injury. Child neurologists can play an important role in acute and long-term care. Acutely, as members of a multidisciplinary team in the intensive care unit, child neurologists monitor for early signs of neurological change, guide neuroprotective therapies, and transition patients to long-term recovery. In the longer term, neurologists are uniquely positioned to treat complications of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury, including epilepsy and cognitive and behavioral issues.

Variations of the blood gas levels and thermodilutional parameters during ICP monitoring after severe head trauma in children

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to define, in children following head trauma and GSC ≤ 8, at which level of intracranial pressure (ICP), the thermodilutional, and gas analytic parameters implicated in secondary cerebral insults shows initial changes.

METHODS

We enrolled in the study 56 patients: 30 males and 26 females, mean age 71 ± 52 months. In all children, volumetric hemodynamic and blood gas parameters were monitored following initial resuscitation and every 4 h thereafter or whenever a hemodynamic deterioration was suspected. During the cumulative hospital stay, a total of 1050 sets of measurements were done. All parameters were stratified in seven groups according to ICP (group A1 = 0-5 mmHg, group A2 = 6-10 mmHg, group A3 = 11-15 mmHg, group A4 16-20 mmHg, group A5 21-25 mmHg, group A6 26-30 mmHg, group A7 >31 mmHg).

RESULTS

Mean values of jugular oxygen saturation (SJO2), jugular oxygen partial pressure (PJO2), extravascular lung water (EVLWi), pulmonary vascular permeability (PVPi), fluid overload (FO), and cerebral extraction of oxygen (CEO2) vary significantly from A3 (11-15 mmHg) to A4 (16-20 mmHg). They relate to ICP in a four-parameter sigmoidal function (4PS function with: r(2) = 0.90), inflection point of 15 mmHg of ICP, and a maximum curvature point on the left horizontal asymptote at 13 mmHg of ICP.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean values of SJO2, PJO2, EVLWi, PVPi, FO, and CEO2 become pathologic at 15 mmHg of ICP; however, the curve turns steeper at 13 mmHg, possibly a warning level in children for the development of post head trauma secondary insult.

Management of pediatric traumatic brain injury

OPINION STATEMENT

Pediatric severe traumatic brain injury continues to be a major cause of disability and death. Rapid initial airway and hemodynamic stabilization is critical, followed by the need for immediate recognition of intracranial pathology that requires neurosurgical intervention. Intracranial hypertension and cerebral hypoperfusion have been recognized as major insults after trauma and management should be directed at preventing both. Sedation with opioids, moderate hyperventilation to arterial carbon dioxide level of 35-40 mmHg, hyperosmolar therapy with 3 % saline or mannitol, normothermia, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage continue to be the cornerstones of initial management of intracranial hypertension (intracranial pressure >20 mmHg). Refractory intracranial hypertension is treated with high-dose barbiturate therapy to achieve medical burst suppression on electroencephalography and decompressive craniectomy. In addition, those children require antiepileptic medications for seizure prophylaxis, adequate nutritional management, and early physical therapy and rehabilitation referrals. Most of the evidence for care of children with brain injury comes from center-specific practice and experience rather than objective data. This lack of evidence provides the ground for ongoing research; nevertheless, outcomes after traumatic brain injury continue to show improvement.

Intracranial pressure and cerebrovascular autoregulation in pediatric critical illness

Protecting the brain in vulnerable infants and children with critical illness involving the brain is a central aspect of pediatric intensive care and neurocritical care. Collectively, illness-induced derangements in intracranial pressure, circulatory homeostasis, and pressure autoregulation are all fundamental in informing bedside management. Therefore, this review provides an understanding of these entities and a physiological approach to bedside care and monitoring.

Multimodal monitoring in the pediatric intensive care unit: new modalities and informatics challenges

We review several newer modalities to monitor the brain in children with acute neurologic disease in the pediatric intensive care unit, such as partial brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2), jugular venous oxygen saturation (SjvO2), near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), thermal diffusion measurement of cerebral blood flow, cerebral microdialysis, and EEG. We then discuss the informatics challenges to acquire, consolidate, analyze, and display the data. Acquisition includes multiple data types: discrete, waveform, and continuous. Consolidation requires device interoperability and time synchronization. Analysis could include pressure reactivity index and quantitative EEG. Displays should communicate the patient's current status, longitudinal and trend information, and critical alarms.

Update on the 2012 guidelines for the management of pediatric traumatic brain injury - information for the anesthesiologist

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant contributor to death and disability in children. Considering the prevalence of pediatric TBI, it is important for the clinician to be aware of evidence-based recommendations for the care of these patients. The first edition of the Guidelines for the Acute Medical Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Infants, Children, and Adolescents was published in 2003. The Guidelines were updated in 2012, with significant changes in the recommendations for hyperosmolar therapy, temperature control, hyperventilation, corticosteroids, glucose therapy, and seizure prophylaxis. Many of these interventions have implications in the perioperative period, and it is the responsibility of the anesthesiologist to be familiar with these guidelines.