Superficially Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: The Assessment of Key Parameters

The prognostic role of horizontal and circumferential tumor extent in cervical cancer: Implications for the 2019 FIGO staging system

OBJECTIVE

The FIGO 2019 update on cervical cancer staging removed horizontal tumor extent (HZTE) as a staging variable. Evidence is needed to substantiate this change. The prognostic significance of HZTE and a related variable, circumferential tumor extent (%CTE), is similarly unknown. We aimed to investigate the association of HZTE and %CTE with survival outcomes in cervical cancer patients.

METHODS

We identified patients treated with primary surgery for stage I cervical cancer in a single institution during a 9-year period. HZTE and, when available, %CTE were obtained from pathology records. Cases were staged using 2019 FIGO staging. Correlations between HZTE, %CTE and FIGO stage with recurrence-free (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were determined using univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

285 patients were included with a median follow-up of 48 (range 7-123) months. HZTE was statistically associated with RFS and DSS on univariate and multivariate analysis. None of the 168 stage IA patients in our series had tumor recurrence or death during follow-up, including 42 with HZTE ≥7 mm. None of the patients with a tumor horizontal extent <7 mm experienced recurrence or death. %CTE correlated only with RFS on univariate analysis. 2019 FIGO stage did not independently correlate with RFS or DSS in our sample.

CONCLUSIONS

HZTE is an independent predictor of survival in cervical carcinoma. In stage IA tumors, however, HZTE does not offer superior prognostic value, supporting the 2019 FIGO recommendations to remove this variable from staging in these cases. HZTE may be useful in larger tumors in which staging depends on maximum tumor size. %CTE is not an independent prognostic variable in cervical cancer, and we advise against its use.

HPV-related squamous neoplasia of the lower anogenital tract: an update and review of recent guidelines

Squamous cell carcinomas of the lower anogenital tract that are related to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection represent a significant disease burden worldwide. The diagnosis and management of their noninvasive precursors has been the subject of extensive study and debate over several decades, accompanied by an evolving understanding of HPV biology. Recent new consensus recommendations for the pathologic diagnosis of these precursor lesions were published in 2012, the result of the Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology project cosponsored by the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. Most salient among the new guidelines are the recommendation to switch to a 2-tiered nomenclature (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) rather than the traditional 3-tiered "intraepithelial neoplasia" terminology, and the recommendation to expand use of the immunohistochemical marker p16 to distinguish between low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/intraepithelial neoplasia 2. The goals of the project were to align diagnostic terminology with our knowledge of HPV biology, increase reproducibility, consolidate diverse systems of nomenclature, and ultimately better determine a patient's true cancer risk. The clinical guidelines for screening and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia have also been recently updated, most notably with a lengthening of screening intervals. In this review, we focus on the new guidelines put forth for pathologic diagnosis of HPV-related anogenital neoplasia, with discussion of the evidence behind them and their potential implications. We also provide an update on relevant biomarkers, clinical recommendations, and the newest developments relating to cervical neoplasia.