Essentials of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship: Part 3: Clinical Education and Experience

What to know about 2.0: Revisions to the pediatric emergency medicine milestones

Introduction

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) adopted educational milestones for trainee assessment in 2013, as a key component of the Next Accreditation System. Two years later, the ACGME, American Board of Pediatrics (ABP), and American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) collaborated to create specialty-specific subcompetencies in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM). Since that time, emerging data have demonstrated the need to revise specialty milestones. Consequently, the ACGME summoned a working group to revise the original PEM milestones.

Methods

The PEM Milestones 2.0 Working Group convened in April 2021, comprising diverse representation from ACGME staff, PEM and EM attendings, PEM fellowship program directors, PEM fellows, and community members, overseen by the ACGME's vice president for milestones development. The group met virtually six times over 3 months, with concurrent independent and subgroup work, to draft the PEM Milestones 2.0 and supplemental guide.

Results

The working group's revisions generated concise descriptions of behavioral anchors to define skill acquisition more accurately; attention to the transition from residency to fellowship training; incorporation of harmonized milestones for non-patient care and non-medical knowledge domains; and increased emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion. A supplemental guide was also designed to aid programs in designing programmatic assessment related to specialty-specific milestones.

Conclusions

The PEM Milestones 2.0 provide an updated, specialty-specific framework to guide the development and assessment of PEM fellows and training programs. Future work may focus on faculty and learner development, advancing validity evidence, strengthening content expertise, and integrating milestones with specialty-specific entrustable professional activities.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Training: A Survey of Current Status in Latin America

Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) is a relatively new and rapidly evolving subspecialty in many countries. The purposes of this study were to describe the characteristics and to find common/shared practices in current available PEM fellowship programs across Latin America.

METHODS

An electronic, multicenter survey was created and stored on Google forms. The survey was in Spanish language and included 30 questions about the characteristics of the pediatric emergency program, history of the program, and support expected from the Latin American Pediatric Emergency Society.

RESULTS

A total of 11 PEM programs in 6 countries were acknowledged in Latin America. All programs are placed in pediatric tertiary care hospitals. All PEM programs were approved by the local universities and the Ministries of Health in each country. Difficulties to start a PEM program included a lack of physicians properly trained in PEM who could direct the program, physician instructors in specific topics, places to complete rotations of the future fellows, and getting the local health authorities to acknowledge the importance of the program. With regard to the duration of the program, 72.7% (8) have a 2-year curriculum and 27.3% (3) have a 1-year curriculum. Four (36.4%) program directors mentioned an admission examination as a requirement, 4 (36.4%) needed an examination plus an interview, 3 (27.3%) mentioned that it is necessary just like an interview, and 2 (18.2%) mentioned that the physicians are admitted with a scholarship. With regard to the structure of the programs and rotations included, most of the programs have rotations that are compulsory in different pediatric subspecialties. In 80% of the programs, fellows are evaluated based on different technical skill procedures that they need to learn and perform during PEM fellowship training. The PEM fellowship is recognized by different societies in emergency medicine and pediatrics, except in Dominican Republic where it is only recognized by the Ministry of Health and the university. After completion of the program in 90% (10) of the programs, graduates are not guaranteed a job, and in half, there is no mechanism implemented for recertification of the pediatric emergency physicians by the local medical council.

CONCLUSIONS

In Latin America, postgraduate programs in pediatric emergencies are a response to a need for health systems. Being an innovative specialty, it surpassed each country's own challenges, until it was able to reach an internationally standardized level, with a great diversity of pedagogical methodology, which the product has been to offer a high quality of emergency care to children.

A Community Emergency Department Rotation for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows: Development and Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

There have been increasing job opportunities for pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) specialists within community emergency departments (CEDs), where 90% of children receive emergency care. The majority of training for PEM fellows occurs in academic children's hospitals, which may expose fellows to different resources than CEDs. Our goals were to develop and to evaluate a CED rotation aimed at improving exposure to this care environment for PEM fellows.

METHODS

Kern's 6 steps of curriculum development served as our framework to identify the problem, conduct a needs assessment, develop goals and objectives, formulate an educational strategy, and then plan the implementation and evaluation. Discussion and buy-in among trainees and hospital leadership took place during rotation development. Informal and web-based surveys of PEM fellows and CED attendings evaluated the rotation and assessed participants' reactions, changes in knowledge, and changes in behavior.

RESULTS

The CED rotation was piloted at 1 PEM fellowship program over 2 years. Nine PEM fellows participated in the month-long rotation. The majority of participants reported that the rotation goals and objectives were met and that they acquired new skills and rated the CED rotation as good or excellent. Challenges to the CED rotation included lower patient acuity and distance to the CED.

CONCLUSIONS

A new CED rotation was developed, piloted, and well received by participants. Given the potential differences in practice between tertiary care children's emergency departments and CEDs, as well as increasing job opportunities in CEDs, program directors should consider incorporating a CED rotation for their PEM fellows.

A Descriptive Analysis of the Cumulative Experiences of Emergency Medicine Residents in the Pediatric Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES

Most children seeking emergency care are evaluated in general emergency departments (EDs). The cumulative pediatric clinical experiences of emergency medicine (EM) residents are largely unknown. This study examined EM resident pediatric clinical experience through the lens of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements and the Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study of the cumulative clinical experience of two classes of EM residents from a 4-year training program at two pediatric EDs of a quaternary care pediatric center. A database of resident patient encounters was generated from the electronic medical record. Experiences classified included: diagnosis categories per the Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine, procedures, and resuscitations. Results were stratified by age, acuity, and disposition.

RESULTS

Twenty-five EM residents evaluated 17,642 patients (median = 723). Most patients (73.5%) were emergent acuity (Emergency Severity Index triage level 2 or 3 or non-intensive care admission); 2% were critical. Residents participated in 598 (median = 22) medical resuscitations and 483 (median = 19) trauma resuscitations. Minor procedures (e.g., laceration repair) were commonly performed; critical procedures (e.g., intubation) were rare. Exposure to neonates was infrequent and pediatric deaths were rare. Abdominal pain (5.7%), asthma exacerbation (4.6%), and fever (3.8%) were the most common diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency medicine residents encountered a wide array of pediatric diagnoses throughout training and performed a substantial number of common pediatric procedures. Exposure to critical acuity and procedures, neonatal pathology, and certain pediatric-specific diagnoses, such as congenital heart disease, was limited despite training in a large, quaternary care children's hospital. Curriculum development and collaboration should focus on these areas.

Current Practices in Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Trauma Training

OBJECTIVE

The management of injured children is a required element of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship training. Given the relatively infrequent exposure of trainees to major trauma, it is important to understand how programs train fellows and assess their competency in pediatric trauma.

METHODS

An online survey was sent to 84 PEM fellowship program directors (PDs). Program directors were asked to describe their program's characteristics, the degree of fellow independence, educational techniques used to train fellows in trauma, and their expectation of fellows' competency in 14 core trauma-related skills upon graduation. Program directors were classified as having high expectations if they anticipated that graduating fellows could perform 12 trauma skills or more independently.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine programs (70%) responded. Although most programs (55, 93%) identified as pediatric trauma centers, fellows at the majority of programs (41, 69%) spent some or all of their trauma experience at an outside hospital. Only a minority of programs (17, 29%) allowed fellows to lead pediatric trauma resuscitations as independent attendings without precepting. Programs used over a dozen different educational methods to varying degrees. Less than half of programs (28, 47%) used a formal trauma curriculum. Whereas 33 PDs (56%) had high expectations, only 9 (15%) expected fellows to be able to perform all 14 skills.

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable variability in how PEM fellows are trained to care for injured children. Most PDs do not realistically expect fellows to be able to perform all recommended trauma skills after graduation. Our findings highlight the need for further research and efforts to standardize the training of PEM fellows in pediatric trauma.

A Call to Restore Your Calling: Self-care of the Emergency Physician in the Face of Life-Changing Stress: Part 6 of 6: Trainee Burnout

Whereas our last article focused on burnout in practicing pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians, this article centers on burnout in PEM fellows. Our discussion is based solely on trainee burnout literature. As graduates of pediatrics or emergency medicine residencies, PEM fellows are charged with achieving attending-level clinical expertise while continuing to cope with trainee challenges, such as limited practice autonomy, low pay, financial debt, and uncertain future employment. In this article, we discuss PEM fellow burnout and review risk and protective factors, presentation, and evidence-based interventions to mitigate it. In the absence of PEM fellow-specific literature, we share pediatrics and emergency medicine residency data.This article is dedicated to the trainees we have lost to suicide. We miss you.

Development of a Quality Improvement Curriculum in a Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship

Quality improvement (QI) is a science of systematic analysis and improvement of health care delivery systems. Working knowledge of QI models is imperative to professional development of future pediatric emergency medicine practitioners. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has established a list of QI and patient safety expectations for trainees. In order to address educational needs in this area, we have created a novel QI curriculum for pediatric emergency medicine fellows that include didactic sessions, active participation in QI projects, and mentorship by QI faculty. As a part of the curriculum, fellows are required to participate in variety of QI and patient safety activities, such as Morbidity and Mortality conferences, QI and Patient Case Review committees, and Clinical Care Guideline work groups. As a measure of success, fellows who have participated in this curriculum have shared their successful QI work at the local and national levels. This goal of this report is to share our experience in order to provide other institutions a framework for their own curriculum development.

Essentials of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Part 7: Careers in PEM

This article is the last in a 7-part series that aims to comprehensively describe the current state and future directions of pediatric emergency medicine fellowship training from the essential requirements to considerations for successfully administering and managing a program to the careers that may be anticipated on program completion. This article focuses on the many career paths as educators, researchers, advocates, innovators, consultants, administrators, and leaders available to pediatric emergency medicine physicians, in both clinical and nonclinical realms, and how fellows and junior faculty can enrich and prolong their careers through diversification.