Epidemiology of Admissions From the Emergency Department Among Febrile Infants Younger Than 90 Days in the United States, 2002 to 2012

Comparison of facilitated tucking and oral dextrose in reducing the pain of heel stick in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

With the increase in hospitalization of premature infants in emergency departments and the painful procedure in these sectors, appropriate methods of pain relief are required. This study aimed to compare the effect of oral dextrose and facilitated tucking in the reduction of pain during heel sticks in premature infants and assess their effectiveness and feasibility for use in emergency settings.

METHODS

This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial with cross-over design. Sixty infants were recruited from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at Valiasr hospital in Tehran, Iran from March 2015 to September 2016. They were randomly allocated into three groups (no pain relief method, oral dextrose and facilitated tucking). Six blood samples were collected by heel stick for each infant. Oral dextrose and facilitated tucking were compared with the routine method of blood sampling and pain was measured two times for each method. The pain scores was measured by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Repeated Measure ANOVA, ANOVA and Scheffe post-hoc test were used with SPSS 16.

RESULTS

The pain score's increase during heel stick was significantly lower after using oral dextrose (3.58 ± 0.34) and facilitated tucking (5.58 ± 0.53) in comparison to the routine method (8.91 ± 0.18) of blood sampling (P < 0.001, η² = 0.971). Oral dextrose was more effective than facilitated tucking (P < 0.001, Cohen's d = 4.49). The emergency nurses rated oral dextrose as easier (t = 2.20, df = 118, p = 0.02, Cohen's d = 0.39) and more applicable method (t = 2.99, df = 118, p = 0.003, Cohen's d = 0.54) for the emergency department.

CONCLUSIONS

Facilitated tucking is an effective method of pain reduction which can be used in the absence of oral dextrose, in a situation in which it is contraindicated or in combination with oral dextrose. Based on the increase of infant's admission in emergency department future studies are needed to identify the best method of pain reduction for procedures in this setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials IRCT201408029568N9, 2014-09-08.

Management of febrile infants aged 1 month and less than 3 months in a French university hospital: Clinical practice evaluation

BACKGROUND

Management of febrile infants is challenging due to the increased risk of serious bacterial infections and it varies among physicians and hospitals. The goals of this study were to describe and compare the management of febrile infants aged 1-2 months in a hospital in 2011 and 2016.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in the Bordeaux Pellegrin University Hospital, France, in 2011 and 2016. All infants aged 1-2 months with diagnosis codes referring to fever were included. Data on infant characteristics, fever episodes, clinical symptoms, and management were collected from medical charts. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic models were used.

RESULTS

A total of 530 infants were included; 89.2% had blood testing and 81.1% urine testing; 79.6% of the infants were hospitalized, three of them in the pediatric intensive care unit. The median hospitalization duration was 3 days. In the sample investigated, 59.8% of the infants received antibiotic therapy and 128 (24.1%) had bacterial infections with no difference between 2011 and 2016. The main bacterial infection was pyelonephritis (86.7%). Urethral catheterization was implemented in 2016, whereas a urine bag was utilized for 174 out of 177 infants in 2011. The percentage of contaminated urine cultures was higher in 2011 (35.9%) than in 2016 (19.6%, P<0.001). The hospitalization rate was higher in 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of febrile infants changed between 2011 and 2016. The hospitalization rate and antibiotic therapy use remained high regarding the rate of bacterial infection. Use of urethral catheterization decreased the level of contamination.